吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5): 1515-1522.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201505206

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

有机氯代烃在壤土中的吸附和解吸特性

张凤君1, 贾晗1, 刘佳露1, 董佳新1,2, 卢伟1, 吕聪1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学地下水资源与环境教育部重点实验室, 长春 130021;
    2. 北京晓清环保工程有限公司, 北京 100000
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-10 发布日期:2015-09-26
  • 通讯作者: 吕聪(1984),女,副教授,博士,主要从事土壤污染修复技术研究,E-mail:lvcong@jlu.edu.cn。 E-mail:lvcong@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张凤君(1957),男,教授,博士,主要从事水处理技术研究,E-mail:zhangfengjun@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(41302182,41472214)

Sorption and Desorption of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons onto Loam Soil

Zhang Fengjun1, Jia Han1, Liu Jialu1, Dong Jiaxin1,2, Lu Wei1, Lü Cong1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Groundwater Resources and Environment, Ministry of Education, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China;
    2. Beijing Xiaoqing Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100000, China
  • Received:2014-11-10 Published:2015-09-26

摘要:

选取三氯乙烯(TCE)、顺-1,2-二氯乙烯(cis-1,2-DCE)、1,1,1-三氯乙烷(1,1,1-TCA)、1,2-二氯乙烷(1,2-DCA)4种常见的有机氯代烃,通过批次实验研究其在壤土中的吸附和解吸特性。结果表明:4种有机氯代烃在壤土中的吸附平衡时间约为3 d;在本文研究的整个浓度范围内,4种有机氯代烃的吸附等温线基本呈线性趋势,但更符合Freundlich模型。对于有机氯乙烯而言,TCE在壤土中的吸附特性较为显著,线性分配系数Kd为0.624 L/kg,其次是cis-DCE,Kd为0.238 L/kg;对于有机氯乙烷而言,1,1,1-TCA在壤土中的吸附特性较为显著,Kd为0.520 L/kg,其次是1,2-DCA,Kd为0.353 L/kg。这进一步表明4种有机氯代烃化合物在壤土中的吸附特性与化合物本身的疏水性有关。通过Abdul、Dobbs、Rao和Cong经验公式估算lgKoc值发现,Abdul估算所得lgKoc比实测值偏小,Cong估算lgKoc比实测值偏大,Dobbs和Rao与实测值更为接近;说明 Dobbs和Rao经验公式更适用于预测有机氯代烃化合物在壤土的吸附特性。另外,研究发现有机氯代烃的解吸过程具有明显的滞后性,吸附特性较强的物质,其解吸较为缓慢。

关键词: 有机氯代烃, 壤土, 1, 2-二氯乙烷, 顺-1, 2-二氯乙烯, 吸附, 解吸

Abstract:

The sorption and desorption characteristics of the four organic chlorinated hydrocarbons (trichloroethylene (TCE), cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (cis-1,2-DCE), 1,1,1-trichloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA)) onto loam soil are investigated by a batch of experiments in this study. The results indicate that the sorption equilibrium time of the four chlorinated hydrocarbons onto the loam soil is about three days. The sorption isotherm for all compounds is nearly linear, and fits to Freundlich isotherm slightly over the entire concentration range. As for chloroethylenes, TCE is strongly sorbed to the loam samples (Kd = 0.624 L/kg), and followed by cis-DCE (Kd = 0.238 L/kg). For chloroethanes, 1,1,1-TCA is strongly sorbed (Kd=0.520 L/kg), and followed by 1,2-DCA (Kd=0.353 L/kg). This is consistent with the order of hydrophobicity of the compounds. In addition, the lgKoc value is estimated by Abdul, Dobbs, Rao and Cong empirical regression formula respectively in this study, and the results show that the estimated lgKoc value determined by Abdul regression is significantly lower than the calculated value, and the estimated lgKoc value determined by Cong regression is significantly higher than the calculated value, while the estimated lgKoc values determined by Dobbs and Rao regression are much closer to the calculated values. This demonstrates that the Dobbs and Rao regression is more suitable for lgKoc estimation for chlorinated hydrocarbons. Besides, it is found that there is a certain lag in desorption of chlorinated hydrocarbons from the loam soil; and the higher the sorption capacity of chlorinated hydrocarbon, the lower the desorption capacity of chlorinated hydrocarbon.

Key words: chlorinated hydrocarbons, loam soil, 1, 2-DCA, cis-1, 2-DCE, sorption, desorption

中图分类号: 

  • X523

[1] Doherty R E. A History of the Production and Use of Carbon Tetrachloride, Tetrachloroethylene, Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in the United States: Part 1:Historical Background; Carbon Tetrachloride and Tetrachloroethylene[J]. Environmental Forensics, 2000, 1(2): 69-81.

[2] 丁培杰, 王秀娟. 三氯乙烯、四氯乙烯生产技术及市场分析[J]. 氯碱工业, 2012, 48(12): 1-5. Ding Peijie, Wang Xiujuan. Production Technologies and Market Analysis of Trichloroethylene,Tetrachloroethylene[J]. Chlor-Alkali Industry, 2012, 48(12): 1-5.

[3] 康春莉, 何冲, 熊鹰, 等. 典型石油烃组分在地下水中的自然衰减规律[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2012, 42(1):206-211. Kang Chunli, He Chong, Xiong Ying, et al. Natural Attenuation of the Typical Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Aquifer[J]. Journal of Jilin University :Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42(1):206-211.

[4] 杨悦锁, 雷玉德, 杜新强, 等. 当地下水邂逅DNA:石油类有机污染及其生物降解[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2012, 42(5):1434-1445. Yang Yuesuo, Lei Yude, Du Xinqiang, et al. When Groundwater Meets DNA: Petroleum Hydrocarbon Stress vs Biodegradation[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2012, 42(5):1434-1445.

[5] Mattes T E, Alexander A K, Coleman N V. Aerobic Biodegradation of the Chloroethenes: Pathways, Enzymes, Ecology, and Evolution[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2010, 34(4): 445-475.

[6] EPA. 126 Priority Pollutants[J/OL].(2010-10-01)[2014-02-03].http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/methods/pollutants.cfm.

[7] 高存荣, 王俊桃. 我国69个城市地下水有机污染特征研究[J]. 地球学报, 2011, 32(5): 581-591. Gao Cunrong, Wang Juntao. Research on Groundwater Organic Contamination Characteristics in 69 Cities of China[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2011, 32(5): 581-591.

[8] 胡林, 邱兆富, 何龙, 等. 土壤组分对四氯乙烯吸附解吸行为的影响[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(12): 4635-4641. Hu Lin, Qiu Zhaofu, He Long, et al. Effects of Soil Compositions on Sorption and Desorption Behavior of Tetrachloroethylene in Soil[J]. Environmental Science, 2013, 34(12): 4635-4641.

[9] 孟凡勇. 挥发性氯代烃在我国典型土壤中的吸附-解吸特性研究[D].上海:上海师范大学, 2011. Meng Fanyong. Study on the Adsorption-Desorption Characteristics of Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Typical Soil of China[D]. Shanghai:Shanghai Normal University, 2011.

[10] 刘明亮. 土壤/沉积物对三氯乙烯的吸附行为研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2007. Liu Mingliang. Study on Sortion Behavior of TCE by Natural Soils and Sediments[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2007.

[11] 张坤峰, 何江涛, 刘明亮, 等. 土壤有机质形态对有机污染物三氯乙烯(TCE)的吸附影响研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(1): 286-288. Zhang Kunfeng, He Jiangtao, Liu Mingliang, et al. Effect of the Organic Matter in Soil on the Adsorption of the Organic Pollutant-Trichloroethene[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(1): 286-288.

[12] 刘玉龙, 缪德仁, 刘菲, 等. 1,2-二氯乙烷和1,2-二氯丙烷在某污染场地包气带的吸附-解吸特性[J]. 地学前缘, 2008, 15(6): 185-191. Liu Yulong, Miao Deren, Liu Fei, et al. Adsorption and Desorption of 1, 2-Dichloroethane and 1, 2-Dichloropropane by Soils in an Unsaturated Zone[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2008, 15(6): 185-191.

[13] Lu C, Bjerg P L, Zhang F J, et al. Sorption of Chlorinated Solvents and Degradation Products on Natural Clayey Tills[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 83(11): 1467-1474.

[14] Allen R M, Groenevelt H, Mackay D M. Analytical Method for the Sorption of Hydrophobic Organic Pollutants in Clay-Rich Materials[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1995, 29(1): 148-153.

[15] Mazari-Hiriart M,Hernandez-Eugenio C,Rojo-Callejas F, et al. Vertical Variability of PCE Sorption in the Lacustrine Clays of Mexico City[J]. Environmental Geology, 2000, 39(6): 595-602.

[16] Binger C A,Martin J P,Allen-King R M,et al.Variability of Chlorinated-Solvent Sorption Associated with Oxidative Weathering of Kerogen[J]. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 1999, 40(2): 137-158.

[17] 刘锐, 孟凡勇, 文晓刚, 等. 挥发性氯代烃在土壤中的吸附行为研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(1): 165-172. Liu Rui, Meng Fanyong, Wen Xiaogang, et al. The Research Progress of Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons Adsorption Behavior in the Soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(1): 165-172.

[18] Allen-King R M, McKay L D, Trudell M R. Organic Carbon Dominated Trichloroethylene Sorption in a Dlay-Rich Glacial Deposit[J]. Ground Water, 1997, 35: 124-130.

[19] Abdul A, Gibson T L, Rai D N. Statistical Correlations for Predicting the Partition Coefficient for Nonpolar Organic Contaminants Between Aquifer Organic Carbon and Water[J]. Hazardous Waste and Hazardous Materials, 1987, 4(3):211-222.

[20] Dobbs R A, Wang L, Govind R. Sorption of Toxic Organic Compounds on Wastewater Solids: Correlation with Fundamental Properties[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 1989, 23(9): 1092-1097.

[21] Rao P S C, Davidson J M. Estimation of Pesticide Retention and Transformation Parameters Required in Nonpoint Source Pollution Models[C]//Overocash M R,Davidson I M.Environmental Impact of Nonpoint Source Pollution.New York:Arbor,1980:23-67.

[22] Ukrainczyk L, Rashid N. Irreversible Sorption of Nicosulfuron on Clay Minerals[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 1995, 43(4): 855-857.

[1] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2] 杨立红, 刘莹, 罗弋卜, 曾皓, 苏建政, 李迎超. 油页岩原位开采中高温腐蚀下的选材[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1091-1102.
[3] 邢昌柱, 韩四红, 陈久灿, 刘娜.

粉状黑云母活化过硫酸盐降解染料活性绿19的活化机制 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1298-1308.

[4] 李学杰, 田成静, 钟和贤, 张江勇, 廖志良. 南海晚更新世以来火山玻璃分布特征与物源分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 1-14.
[5] 郭春涛, 刘亮, 倪玲梅, 史江涛, 田朋飞, 荆雪婷. 塔里木盆地米兰低凸起寒武系白云岩成因——来自米兰1井的指示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 57-69.
[6] 李洋, 欧丽, 黄琨, 刘鹏, 刘燕红, 李曼曼, 唐金平. 基于同步辐射技术研究锌在废弃稀土矿区土壤中的吸附及垂向迁移特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 233-244.
[7] 龚凤鸣, 侯大力, 强贤宇, 向雪妮, 黄思婧, 韩鑫, 余洋阳, 顾康福.

钠基蒙脱石狭缝中CH4-CO2竞争吸附与CO2埋存 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 470-478.

[8] 余光展, 王健, 吴楠, 徐清海, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区延长组7段致密砂岩微观孔隙结构评价#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 83-95.
[9] 吴秋莹, 胡斌, 刘财, 高锐. 基于L1/2正则化的抛物线Radon变换多次波压制方法#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 323-336.
[10] 张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[11] 郭威, 张鹏宇, 钟秀平, 王晓初, 贾瑞, 陈晨, 王元. 回顾、探索与开创:第十届天然气水合物国际会议评述[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1760-1772.
[12] 张少杰, 刘适搏, 杨武, 陈思齐. 粉末活性炭增强臭氧氧化去除铁锰[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1228-1237.
[13] 柴乃杰, 周文梁. 基于优化组合权-模糊可变集的坝基岩体质量分级[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 514-.
[14] 杜涛, 曲希玉, 王清斌, 张洋晨, 高山. 渤中19-6凝析气田孔店组砂砾岩储层压实成岩裂缝垂向演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 17-29.
[15] 雷海艳, 王剑, 陈锐兵, 等. 准噶尔盆地盆1井西凹陷东斜坡下侏罗统三工河组二段油气成藏有利地质因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1052-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443 -1456 .
[2] 马荣,石建省,刘继朝. 人工内分泌网络模型在水文地质参数研究中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 914 -921 .
[3] 李宁, 王成文. 东北及邻区晚古生代地层接触关系与佳-蒙地块的形成和演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1331 -1340 .
[4] 胡大千,初凤友,姚 杰. 中太平洋YJA海山富钴结壳矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 32 -0037 .
[5] 姜 雪, 程日辉,于民凤. 裂谷地层的气候和构造控制:Zscape模型分析与在松辽盆地北安断陷的应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 54 -0059 .
[6] 李春柏,张新涛,刘 立,任延广,孟 鹏. 布达特群热流体活动及其对火山碎屑岩的改造作用--以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 221 -0226 .
[7] 孟宪纲,薄万举,刘志广,刘勇,畅柳,李朝柱,王子平. 芦山7.0级地震与巴颜喀拉块体中东段的活动性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1705 -1711 .
[8] 陈欢庆, 梁淑贤, 舒治睿, 邓晓娟, 彭寿昌. 冲积扇砾岩储层构型特征及其对储层开发的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 13 -24 .
[9] 贾大成,邢立新, 潘 军, M. J. van Bergen, H. van Roermund. 伊通上地幔剪切带捕虏体中富铝尖晶石的地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 497 -502 .
[10] 谢忠雷,杨佰玲,包国章,董德明. 茶园土壤不同形态镍的含量及其影响因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 599 -604 .