油页岩原位开采温度-时间-转化率判识方法及应用

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170199

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 394-399.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20170199

油页岩原位开采温度-时间-转化率判识方法及应用

马中良^1,2,3,4, 王强^1,2,3,4, 郑伦举^1,2,3,4, 张彩明^1,2,3,4

1. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126;
2. 国家能源页岩油研发中心, 江苏无锡 214126;
3. 中国石油化工集团公司油气成藏重点实验室, 江苏无锡 214126;
4. 中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所, 江苏无锡 214126

收稿日期:2017-07-30 出版日期:2019-03-26 发布日期:2019-03-28
作者简介:马中良(1984-),男,高级工程师,主要从事油气地球化学、石油实验地质学和油页岩原位开采技术研究,E-mail:mazl.syky@sinopec.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2017ZX05036002-004，2017ZX05005001-003）；国家能源页岩油研发中心自主研发基金项目（2017）

Identification Method & Application of Temperature and Heating Time and Hydrocarbon Conversion Rate of Oil Shale In-Situ Mining

Ma Zhongliang^1,2,3,4, Wang Qiang^1,2,3,4, Zheng Lunju^1,2,3,4, Zhang Caiming^1,2,3,4

1. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
2. State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
3. Sinopec Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China;
4. Wuxi Research Institute of Petroleum Geology, Exploration and Production Research Institute, Sinopec, Wuxi 214126, Jiangsu, China

Received:2017-07-30 Online:2019-03-26 Published:2019-03-28
Supported by:
Supported by National Science and Technology Major Projiect (2017ZX05036002-004, 2017ZX05005001-003) and Independent Research and Development Fund of State Energy Center for Shale Oil Research and Development (2017)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 油页岩原位转化开采加热的最终温度、加热时间和最终油气转化率与原位开采的经济成本息息相关。利用Rock-Eval 6型岩石热解分析仪分别获取不同升温速率下的油页岩烃产率-转化率和烃产率-活化能之间的关系，以烃产率为桥梁，建立活化能与转化率的对应关系；在此基础上，依据化学动力学反应原理，将油页岩有机质（干酪根）演化生成油气的过程近似为具一级反应特征的热裂解反应，获取不同转化率条件下温度倒数（1/T）与时间对数（ln t）的关系式，建立油页岩原位转化温度-时间-转化率关系图。以广东茂名盆地油柑窝组油页岩为例，通过上述方法建立了油页岩原位转化开采温度-时间-转化率关系图。由判识关系图可知：加热至350℃开采该区油页岩，转化率达90%需要98 a；加热至200℃开采该区油页岩，在不采取其他措施的情况下即使转化10%也需要147 a。实际情况下，地下油页岩原位受热具有非均质性，加热开采能耗大，通过添加催化剂降低油页岩原位油气转化所需的温度、改善油气产物品质可能是油页岩原位开采技术的一种发展方向。

关键词: 油页岩, 原位开采, 转化率, 页岩油, 茂名盆地

Abstract: The final temperature, heating time and the final oil and gas conversion rate of in-situ transformation of oil shale are closely related to the economic cost of in-situ mining. The relationship between hydrocarbon yield-conversion rate and hydrocarbon yield-activation energy of oil shale under different heating rates was obtained by using Rock-Eval 6 rock pyrolysis analyzer. The relationship between activation energy and conversion rate was established based on hydrocarbon yield. Further, based on the principle of chemical kinetics, the process of oil shale organic matter (kerogen) evolution was approximated to the thermal cracking reaction with the first-order reaction characteristics, and the relationship between reciprocal of temperature (1/T) and logarithm of heating time (ln t) under different conversion rates was obtained, and the temperature-time-conversion diagram of in-situ conversion of oil shale was established. Taking the oil shale of E_2-3 y Formation in Maoming Basin of Guangdong Province as an example, the temperature-time-conversion diagram of oil shale was drawn by the above method. It is shown that it would take 98 years to extract oil shale in this area by heating to 350℃ with 90% conversion rate, and 147 years to heat to 200℃ with 10% conversion rate without other measures. In fact, the in-situ heating of underground oil shale is heterogeneous,and the energy consumption of heating is large. It is possible to reduce the temperature and improve the quality of oil shale by adding catalyst to oil shale in-situ production.

Key words: oil shale, in-situ mining, conversion rate, shale oil, Maoming basin

中图分类号:

P618.12

马中良, 王强, 郑伦举, 张彩明. 油页岩原位开采温度-时间-转化率判识方法及应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(2): 394-399.

Ma Zhongliang, Wang Qiang, Zheng Lunju, Zhang Caiming. Identification Method & Application of Temperature and Heating Time and Hydrocarbon Conversion Rate of Oil Shale In-Situ Mining[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(2): 394-399.

参考文献

[1] 刘招君,杨虎林,董清水,等.中国油页岩[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009. Liu Zhaojun,Yang Hulin,Dong Qingshui,et al.Oil Shale in China[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,2009.
[2] 李隽,汤达祯,薛华庆,等.中国油页岩原位开采可行性初探[J].西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2014,36(1):58-64. Li Jun,Tang Dazhen,Xue Huaqing,et al.Discission of Oil Shale In-Situ Conversion Process in China[J].Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition),2014,36(1):58-64.
[3] 马中良,郑伦举,赵中熙.不同边界条件对油页岩原位转化开采的影响及启示[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(2):431-441. Ma Zhongliang,Zheng Lunju,Zhao Zhongxi.Influence and Its Revelation of Oil Shale In-Situ Mining Simulation in Different Boundary Conditions[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2017,47(2):431-441.
[4] 李广友,马中良,郑家锡,等.油页岩不同温度原位热解物性变化核磁共振分析[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(3):402-406. Li Guangyou,Ma Zhongliang,Zheng Jiaxi,et al.NMR Analysis of the Physical Change of Oil Shales During in Situ Pyrolysis at Different Temperatures[J].Petroleum Geology & Experiment,2016,38(3):402-406.
[5] 汪友平,王益维,孟祥龙,等.美国油页岩原位开采技术与启示[J].石油钻采工艺,2013,35(6):55-59. Wang Youping,Wang Yiwei,Meng Xianglong,et al.Enlightenment of American's Oil Shale In-Situ Retorting Technology[J].Oli Drilling & Production Technology,2013,35(6):55-59.
[6] 孙友宏,邓孙华,王洪艳.国际油页岩开发技术与研究进展:记第33届国际油页岩会议[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):1052-1059. Sun Youhong,Deng Sunhua,Wang Hongyan.Advances in the Exploitation Technologies and Researches of Oil Shale in the World:Report on 33rd Oil Shale Symposium in US[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2015,45(4):1052-1059.
[7] 何生,叶加仁,徐思煌,等.石油及天然气地质学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,2010. He Sheng,Ye Jiaren,Xu Sihuang,et al.Geology of Oil and Gas[M].Wuhan:China University of Geosciences Press,2010.
[8] Al-Harahsheh A,Al-Ayed O,Moh'd Al-Harahsheh,et al.Heating Rate Effect on Fractional Yield and Composition of Oil Retorted from El-Lajjun Oil Shale[J].Journal of Analytical & Applied Pyrolysis,2010,89(2):239-243.
[9] Goldfarb J L,Anthony D'Amico,Culin C,et al.Oxidation Kinetics of Oil Shale Semicokes:Reactivity as a Function of Pyrolysis Temperature and Shale Origin[J].Energy & Fuels,2013,27(2):666-672.
[10] Sun Y H,Bai F T,Lü X S,et al.A Novel Energy-Efficient Pyrolysis Process:Self-Pyrolysis of Oil Shale Triggered by Topochemical Heat in a Horizontal Fixed Bed[J].Scientific Reports,2015,5:8290.
[11] 王擎,王平,柏静儒,等.油页岩化学结构CPD模型的改进[J].中国电机工程学报,2017,37(2):621-627. Wang Qing,Wang Ping,Bai Jingru,et al.Improvement of the Chemical Percolation for Devolatilization Model Based on Chemical Structure of Oil Shale[J].Proceedings of the CSEE,2017,37(2):621-627.
[12] 雷怀玉,王红岩,刘德勋,等.柳树河油页岩的热解特征及动力学[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(1):25-29. Lei Huaiyu,Wang Hongyan,Liu Dexun,et al.Pyrolysis Characteristics and Kinetics of Liushuhe Oil Shale[J].Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2012,42(1):25-29.
[13] 岩石热解分析:GB/T18602-2012[S].北京:中国国家标准化管理委员会,2012. Rock Pyrolysis Analysis:GB/T18602-2012[S].Beijing:Standardization Administration of the People's Republic of China,2012.

相关文章 15

[1]	李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2]	陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法：以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[3]	王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[4]	肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[5]	杨立红, 刘莹, 罗弋卜, 曾皓, 苏建政, 李迎超. 油页岩原位开采中高温腐蚀下的选材[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1091-1102.
[6]	张可佳, 廖明月, 刘涛, 赵玉武, 刘宗堡, 田枫, 张岩, 贺友志. 基于改进BlendMask的页岩扫描电镜图像矿物鉴定方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1387-1400.
[7]	程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞. 微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.
[8]	王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[9]	蔡潇, 夏威, 马晓东, 臧素华, 丁安徐, 刘玉霞, 花彩霞, 朱一川, 李辉. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组页岩油储集空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1482-1493.
[10]	于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
[11]	孟庆涛, 胡菲, 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉. 陆相坳陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因：以松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 20-37.
[12]	张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[13]	高家俊, 孟庆涛, 曾文人, 李金国, 李丽, 康嘉楠, . 依兰盆地始新统达连河组油页岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 60-72.
[14]	孟颖, 王剑, 马万云, 雷海艳, 孙平昌, 方石, 丁聪, 王灼, 陶连馨. 基于细粒岩石类型对玛湖凹陷下二叠统风城组烃源岩分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1735-1746.
[15]	罗卫锋, 胡志方, 王胜建, 杨云见, 张林, 张云枭. 基于可控源电磁技术的页岩压裂监测试验——以宜昌地区鄂阳页2HF井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1338-.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

油页岩原位开采温度-时间-转化率判识方法及应用

Identification Method & Application of Temperature and Heating Time and Hydrocarbon Conversion Rate of Oil Shale In-Situ Mining

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10