吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 755-761.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180192

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

超声波振动下不同应力条件对岩石强度影响的试验

尹崧宇1, 赵大军2   

  1. 1. 中交天津航道局有限公司天津市疏浚工程技术企业重点实验室, 天津 300450;
    2. 吉林大学建设工程学院, 长春 130026
  • 收稿日期:2018-07-18 出版日期:2019-05-26 发布日期:2019-06-03
  • 通讯作者: 赵大军(1964-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下钻采技术方面的研究,E-mail:1729333689@qq.com E-mail:1729333689@qq.com
  • 作者简介:尹崧宇(1989-),男,博士,主要从事地下钻采技术方面的研究,E-mail:15421072@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41572356)

Experiment on Effect of Different Stress Conditions on Rock Strength Under Ultrasonic Vibration

Yin Songyu1, Zhao Dajun2   

  1. 1. Tianjin Key Laboratory for Dredging Engineering Enterprises, CCCC Tianjin Dredging Co. Ltd., Tianjin 300450, China;
    2. Construction Engineering College, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2018-07-18 Online:2019-05-26 Published:2019-06-03
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(41572356)

摘要: 振动有助于碎岩,以往关于振动碎岩机理的研究大多在低频率段展开。为填补超高频率段下振动碎岩机理的空白,采用单轴动静组合加载模式,开展了超声波振动下不同应力条件对岩石强度影响的试验研究,其中超声波振动频率为20 kHz,预压范围为100~500 N。研究结果表明:当预压小于200 N时,岩石内部应力状态无法满足强度准则,岩石强度下降不明显;当预压大于等于200 N时,岩石强度随振动时间的增加而逐渐降低且存在最优预压力值(400 N)使得岩石强度最低。缩短振动频率与岩石固有频率的差值有利于提高超声波振动碎岩效率。

关键词: 超声波振动, 预压力, 数值模拟, 抗压强度

Abstract: Vibration contributes to crushing of rocks. Research on the mechanism of vibrating rock is usually carried out in the low frequency range. In order to fill in the gap of the mechanism of rock crushing by vibration of ultra-high frequency section, an experimental study on the effect of ultrasonic vibration on rock strength under different stress conditions was conducted based on static and dynamic loading models, under the condition that the ultrasonic vibration frequency was 20 kHz, and the preloading range was 100-500 N. It is demonstrated that the rock strength remained unchanged basically when the preloading was less than 200 N. The reason is that the internal stress state of rock did not meet the strength criterion. When the preloading was more than 200 N, the rock strength increased with vibration duration, and there is an optimal preloading value (400 N) to minimize the rock strength. The efficiency of ultrasonic vibration rock crushing can be improved by narrowing the difference between the vibration frequency and the natural frequency of the rock.

Key words: ultrasonic vibration, preloading, numerical simulation, compressive strength

中图分类号: 

  • P634.1
[1] Atalah A. Effect of Rock Trenching Vibrations on Nearby Structures[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management,2008, 134:234-241.
[2] Xu G Y, Yan C B. Numerical Simulation for Influence of Excavation and Blasting Vibration on Stability of Mined-out Area[J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2006,13:577-583.
[3] Roussy R. The Development of Sonic Drilling Technology[J].Geo-Drilling International,2002,10:12-14
[4] Oothoudt T. Sonic Drilling:An Environmental Imperative[J]. Geo-Drilling International,1998,2:14-16
[5] Davison L, Stevens A L. Continuum Measures of Spall Damage[J].Journal of Applied Physics, 1972,43:988-994.
[6] Whittles D N, Kingman S, Lowndes I, et al. Laboratory and Numerical Investigation into the Characteristics of Rock Fragmentation[J]. Minerals Engineering,2006,19:1418-1429.
[7] Li X B, Zhou Z L, Lok Tat-Seng,et al. Innovative Testing Technique of Rock Subjected to Coupled Static and Dynamic Loads[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,2008,45(5):739-748.
[8] 李夕兵, 周子龙,叶州元,等. 岩石动静组合加载力学特性研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(7):1387-1395. Li Xibing, Zhou Zilong, Ye Zhouyuan, et al. Study of Rock Mechanical Characteristics Under Coupled Static and Dynamic Loads[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008,27(7):1387-1395.
[9] 李夕兵, 宫凤强, 高科,等. 一维动静组合加载下岩石冲击破坏试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2010,29(2):251-260. Li Xibing, Gong Fengqiang, Gao Ke,et al.Test Study of Impact Failure of Rock Subjected to One Dimensional Coupled Static and Dynamic Loads[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2010,29(2):251-260.
[10] 尹土兵, 李夕兵, 叶洲元,等. 温-压耦合及动力扰动下岩石破碎的能量耗散[J].岩石力学与工程报, 2013,32(6):1197-1202. Yin Tubing, Li Xibing, Ye Zhouyuan,et al. Energy Dissipation of Rock Fracture Under Thermo-Mechanical Coupling and Dynamic Disturbances[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013,32(6):1197-1202.
[11] Nikolic M, Ibrahimbegovic A. Rock Mechanics Model Capable of Representing Initial Heterogeneities and Full Set of 3D Failure Mechanisms[J].Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2015,290:209-227.
[12] Zhong J H, Liu S X, Ma Y S,et al. Macro-Fracture Mode and Micro-Fracture Mechanism of Shale[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42:269-276.
[13] Rabczuk T, Bordas S, Zi G. On Three-Dimensional Modelling of Crack Growth Using Partition of Unity Methods[J]. Computers & Structures,2010, 88(23):1391-1411
[14] Bazant Z P, Caner F C, Carol Ignacio, et al. Microplane Model M4 for Concrete:I:Formulation with Work-Conjugate Deviatoric Stress[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,2000,126(9):944-953.
[15] 张德海,朱浮声, 邢纪,等,岩石类非均质脆性材料破坏过程的数值模拟[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(4):570-574. Zhang Dehai, Zhu Fusheng, Xing Ji,et al. Numerical Simulation of Fracture Propagation of Anisotropic Rock-Like Materials[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005,24(4):570-574.
[16] Volkov C Д.The Intensity Statistical Theory[M].Beijing:Science Press,1965
[17] 尹崧宇,赵大军,周宇,等,超声波振动下非均匀岩石损伤过程数值模拟与试验[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(2):526-533. Yin Songyu, Zhao Dajun, Zhou Yu, et al. Numerical Smulation and Experiment of the Damage Process of Heterogeneous Rock Under Ultrasonic Vibration[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017,47(2):526-533.
[18] Chang C S, Wang T K, Sluys L J, et al. Fracture Modeling Using a Micro-Structural Mechanics Approach:I:Theory and Formulation[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics,2002,69:1941-1958.
[1] 朱杰, 曹军, 唐文铖, 肖建勋. 冻结条件下偏高岭土基地聚合物改良土的力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 951-962.
[2] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[3] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[4] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[5] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[6] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[7] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[8] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[9] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[10] 刁国君, 何昕.

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.

[11] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[12] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[13] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[14] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[15] 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443 -1456 .
[2] 马荣,石建省,刘继朝. 人工内分泌网络模型在水文地质参数研究中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 914 -921 .
[3] 李宁, 王成文. 东北及邻区晚古生代地层接触关系与佳-蒙地块的形成和演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1331 -1340 .
[4] 胡大千,初凤友,姚 杰. 中太平洋YJA海山富钴结壳矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 32 -0037 .
[5] 姜 雪, 程日辉,于民凤. 裂谷地层的气候和构造控制:Zscape模型分析与在松辽盆地北安断陷的应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 54 -0059 .
[6] 李春柏,张新涛,刘 立,任延广,孟 鹏. 布达特群热流体活动及其对火山碎屑岩的改造作用--以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 221 -0226 .
[7] 孟宪纲,薄万举,刘志广,刘勇,畅柳,李朝柱,王子平. 芦山7.0级地震与巴颜喀拉块体中东段的活动性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1705 -1711 .
[8] 陈欢庆, 梁淑贤, 舒治睿, 邓晓娟, 彭寿昌. 冲积扇砾岩储层构型特征及其对储层开发的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 13 -24 .
[9] 贾大成,邢立新, 潘 军, M. J. van Bergen, H. van Roermund. 伊通上地幔剪切带捕虏体中富铝尖晶石的地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 497 -502 .
[10] 谢忠雷,杨佰玲,包国章,董德明. 茶园土壤不同形态镍的含量及其影响因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 599 -604 .