吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1723-1731.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20180321

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

缝网间距对高温岩体储留层温度影响规律模拟

孙可明1,2, 张宇1   

  1. 1. 辽宁工程技术大学力学与工程学院, 辽宁 阜新 123000;
    2. 青岛理工大学理学院, 山东 青岛 266520
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-06 发布日期:2019-11-30
  • 作者简介:孙可明(1968-),男,教授,主要从事渗流理论及工程应用等方面的教学与研究工作,E-mail:sskkmm11@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(51574137);科技部重大专项(2017ZX05037-001);辽宁省教育厅一般项目(LJYL047)

Simulation of Influence of Fracture-Network Spacing on Temperature of HDR Geothermal Reservoirs

Sun Keming1,2, Zhang Yu1   

  1. 1. College of Mechanics and Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin 123000, Liaoning, China;
    2. School of Science, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266520, Shandong, China
  • Received:2018-12-06 Published:2019-11-30
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (51574137); Major Project of Ministry of Science and Technology (2017ZX05037-001) and General Project of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education (LJYL047)

摘要: 为研究高温岩体储留层注水过程中缝网间距对储留层岩体温度的影响规律,建立了考虑热对流和热传导效应的热流固耦合力学模型。以水平井多簇缝网地热开发为例,将缝网及其周围岩体简化为等效的多孔介质,利用ABAQUS二次开发功能实现了流固耦合和热对流耦合。模拟结果表明:储留层岩体温度的变化按注水持续时间分为3个阶段:初温保持阶段,该阶段储留层岩体温度保持原始温度,缝网间距的不同对储留层岩体整体温度无影响;快速降温阶段,该阶段储留层岩体温度下降随注水时间呈现负指数变化规律,缝网间距与储留层岩体温度呈正相关关系;温度缓慢下降平稳阶段,该阶段初期缝网间距与储留层岩体温度的关系和快速降温阶段一致,但后期缝网间距与储留层岩体温度呈负相关关系。空间上,在岩体温度高的区域,缝网间距越小,岩体温度变化梯度越大;在岩体温度较低的区域,缝网间距越小,岩体温度变化梯度越小。

关键词: 高温岩体储留层, 热流固耦合力学模型, 数值模拟, 缝网间距

Abstract: A T-H-M (thermal-hydraulic-mechanical) coupling mechanical model considering the effect of thermal convection and thermal conduction is built to study the influence of fracture-network spacing on temperature of reservoir rock mass during water injection for HDR geothermal reservoirs. Taking the horizontal well with multiple-fracture-network geothermal development as an example, the fracture-network and its surrounding rocks are regarded as an equivalent porous medium, the coupling of H-M coupling and thermal convection is achieved by the secondary development of ABAQUS. The simulation results show that the temperature change of the reservoir rock mass falls into three stages during water injection:in the initial temperature maintaining stage, the rock mass temperature remains initial, and there is no effect of different fracture-networks spacings on the temperature of overall reservoir rock mass; in the temperature rapid declining stage, the temperature decline of the reservoir rock mass shows a negative exponential with the water injection time, and the fracture-network spacings are positively correlated with the temperature of reservoir rock mass; the third stage is the temperature slow and steady declining stage, at the beginning of this stage, the relationship between the fracture-network spacings and the temperature of reservoir rock mass are consistent with that in the temperature rapid declining stage, however, at the end of this stage, the fracture-network spacings are negatively correlated with the temperature of reservoir rock mass. In space, the smaller the fracture-network spacing, the greater the gradient temperature changes of reservoir rock mass in the area where rock mass temperature is high; while the smaller the fracture-network spacing, the smaller the gradient temperature changes of reservoir rock mass in the area where rock mass temperature is low.

Key words: hot dry rock geothermal reservoirs, thermal-hydraulic-mechanical coupling mechanical model, numerical simulation, fracture-network spacing

中图分类号: 

  • P341
[1] 许天福,袁益龙,姜振蛟,等. 干热岩资源和增强型地热工程:国际经验和我国展望[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(4):1139-1152. Xu Tianfu, Yuan Yilong, Jiang Zhenjiao, et al. Hot Dry Rock and Enhanced Geothermal Engineering:International Experience and China Prospect[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4):1139-1152.
[2] 黄顺平. 地热能开采过程多场耦合数值模拟与分析[D].北京:北京交通大学,2018. Huang Shunping. Numerical Simulation of Multi-Field Coupling Process and Analysis in Geothermal Energy Mining[D]. Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University, 2018.
[3] 赵延林,王卫军,赵阳升,等. 双重介质热-水-力三维耦合模型及应用[J].中国矿业大学学报,2010,39(5):709-715. Zhao Yanlin, Wang Weijun, Zhao Yangsheng, et al. 3D Dual Medium Model of Thermal-Hydro-Mechanical Coupling and Its Application[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2010, 39(5):709-715.
[4] 陈必光. 地热对井裂隙岩体中渗流传热过程数值模拟方法研究[D]. 北京:清华大学,2014. Chen Biguang. Study on Numerical Methods for Coupled Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Fractured Rocks of Doublet System[D]. Beijing:Tsinghua University, 2014.
[5] 蔺文静,刘志明,马峰,等. 我国陆区干热岩资源潜力估算[J]. 地球学报,2012,33(5):807-811. Lin Wenjing, Liu Zhiming, Ma Feng, et al. An Estimation of HDR Resources in China's Mainland[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2012, 33(5):807-811.
[6] 国家发展和改革委员会,国家能源局. 能源发展"十三五"规划[J]. 中国电力企业管理,2017(1):7. National Development and Reform Commission, National Energy Administration of the People's Republic of China. The 13th Five-Year Plan for Energy Development[J]. China Power Enterprise Management, 2017(1):7.
[7] 国务院办公厅. 能源发展战略行动计划(2014-2020年)(摘录)[J].上海节能,2014(12):1-2. General Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China.Energy Development Strategic Action Plan (2014-2020) (Excerpt)[J]. Shanghai Energy Conservation, 2014(12):1-2.
[8] 陆川,王贵玲. 干热岩研究现状与展望[J].科技导报,2015,33(19):13-21. Lu Chuan, Wang Guiling. Current Status and Prospect of Hot Dry Rock Research[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2015, 33(19):13-21.
[9] 廖志杰,万天丰,张振国. 增强型地热系统:潜力大、开发难[J].地学前缘,2015,22(1):335-344. Liao Zhijie, Wan Tianfeng, Zhang Zhenguo. The Enhanced Geothermal System(EGS):Huge Capacity and Difficult Exploitation[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2015, 22(1):335-344.
[10] 赵阳升,王瑞凤,胡耀青,等. 高温岩体地热开发的块裂介质固流热耦合三维数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2002,21(12):1751-1755. Zhao Yangsheng, Wang Ruifeng, Hu Yaoqing, et al. 3D Numerical Simulation for Coupled THM of Rock Matrix-Fractured Media in Heat Extraction in HDR[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2002, 21(12):1751-1755.
[11] 段云星. 干热岩地热资源开采井网优化数值模拟研究[D].北京:中国地质大学(北京),2017. Duan Yunxing. Numerical Simulation of Well Pattern Optimization for Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Resources Exploitation[D] Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2017.
[12] 康健,赵明鹏,赵阳升,等. 随机介质固热耦合模型与高温岩体地热开发人工储留层二次破裂数值模拟[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(6):969-974. Kang Jian, Zhao Mingpeng, Zhao Yangsheng, et al. Random Non-Homogeneous Solid-Heat Coupled Model and Numerical Simulations of Second Fracturing for Man-Made-Reserve Stratum in HDR[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(6):969-974.
[13] Vik H S, Salimzadeh S, Nick N M. Heat Recovery from Multiple-Fracture Enhanced Geothermal Systems:The Effect of Thermoelastic Fracture Interactions[J]. Elsevier Ltd, 2018, 121:606-622.
[14] Sun Z X, Xin Y, Yao J, et al. Numerical Investigation on the Heat Extraction Capacity of Dual Horizontal Wells in Enhanced Geothermal Systems Based on the 3-D THM Model[J]. MDPI, 2018, 11(2):280.
[15] 王曌龙. 裂隙岩体热流固耦合模型研究及应用[D].徐州:中国矿业大学,2015. Wang Zhaolong. Study on the Coupled Thermal-Hydrologic-Mechanical Model in Fractured Rock Mass and Its Application[D]. Xuzhou:China University of Mining and Technology, 2015.
[16] 王瑞凤. 高温岩体地热开发的固流热多场耦合与数值仿真[D].太原:太原理工大学,2002. Wang Ruifeng. 3D Solid-Fluid-Heat Coupled Numerical Simulation in Exploitation of HDR[D]. Taiyuan:Taiyuan University of Technology, 2002.
[17] 白冰. 饱和多孔介质热-水-力控制方程耦合项的意义及耦合影响分析[J].岩土力学,2006,27(4):519-524,536. Bai Bing. Effects of Coupling Schemes of Thermo Hydro-Mechanical Governing Equations for saturated Porous Medium[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(4):519-524, 536.
[1] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[2] 涂君汕, 陈辉, 邓居智, 陈康, 李焱, 余辉. 水库堤坝对高密度电法的影响及校正技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1013-1025.
[3] 束龙仓, 位书静, 澈丽木格, 温中琦, 刘波. 西辽河平原生态输水的地下水响应及不确定性量化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 647-660.
[4] 黄兴国, 翁央央, 韩丽. 基于广义递归卷积的孔隙黏弹地震波正演模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(1): 377-385.
[5] 周柳湘, 余思琴, 陈俊华, 刘城, 陈义, 张鑫鑫, . 潜孔锤与冲击钻机联合钻进工艺成孔碎岩过程数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(5): 1608-1618.
[6] 苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[7] 于子望, 卢帅屹, 白林, 郑天琪. CO2地质封存岩石力学问题研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 930-942.
[8] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[9] 刁国君, 何昕.

地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.

[10] 蔺学旻, 肖红琳. 缝洞型储层声波远探测测井响应模拟及应用——以塔河油田碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 312-327.
[11] 魏虹羽, 李世超, 王伟安. 地球动力学数值模拟算法的应用现状与展望[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 98-124.
[12] 吴泽坤, 何来胜, 白晓宇, 麻栋栋, 牛永昌, 赵广, 桑松魁, 闫楠, 张明义. 层状土中静压桩连续贯入现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1291-1304.
[13] 庞志超, 肖华, 毛晨飞, 陈国军, 梁琬坤, 高明, 张啸. 准噶尔盆地南缘地区含膏质地层岩性特征及测井识别方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1419-1431.
[14] 刘怀湜, 赵雪娇, 刘雨新, 房庭瑞, 张静, 嵇艳鞠. 基于改进粒子群优化的超顺磁效应多参数提取[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 993-1002.
[15] 韩长玉, 赵浩汀.

路基填筑短期内热棒高导热性影响 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 570-580.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443 -1456 .
[2] 马荣,石建省,刘继朝. 人工内分泌网络模型在水文地质参数研究中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 914 -921 .
[3] 李宁, 王成文. 东北及邻区晚古生代地层接触关系与佳-蒙地块的形成和演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1331 -1340 .
[4] 胡大千,初凤友,姚 杰. 中太平洋YJA海山富钴结壳矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 32 -0037 .
[5] 姜 雪, 程日辉,于民凤. 裂谷地层的气候和构造控制:Zscape模型分析与在松辽盆地北安断陷的应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 54 -0059 .
[6] 李春柏,张新涛,刘 立,任延广,孟 鹏. 布达特群热流体活动及其对火山碎屑岩的改造作用--以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 221 -0226 .
[7] 孟宪纲,薄万举,刘志广,刘勇,畅柳,李朝柱,王子平. 芦山7.0级地震与巴颜喀拉块体中东段的活动性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1705 -1711 .
[8] 陈欢庆, 梁淑贤, 舒治睿, 邓晓娟, 彭寿昌. 冲积扇砾岩储层构型特征及其对储层开发的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 13 -24 .
[9] 贾大成,邢立新, 潘 军, M. J. van Bergen, H. van Roermund. 伊通上地幔剪切带捕虏体中富铝尖晶石的地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 497 -502 .
[10] 谢忠雷,杨佰玲,包国章,董德明. 茶园土壤不同形态镍的含量及其影响因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 599 -604 .