吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (6): 1700-1708.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200241

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

源外斜坡区断裂附近油气聚集有利部位预测方法及其应用

付广1, 王宏伟1, 韩国猛2, 浦秀刚2   

  1. 1. 东北石油大学地球科学学院, 黑龙江 大庆 163318;
    2. 中国石油大港油田公司研究院, 天津 300280
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-26 出版日期:2021-11-26 发布日期:2021-11-24
  • 作者简介:付广(1962-),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气藏形成和保存方面的研究,E-mail:fuguang2008@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41872157,42072157)

Prediction Method and Application of Oil and Gas Accumulation Favorable Position Near Fault in Slope Area Outside Source

Fu Guang1, Wang Hongwei1, Han Guomeng2, Pu Xiugang2   

  1. 1. College of Earth Science, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318, Heilongjiang, China;
    2. Research Institute, PetroChina Dagang Oilfield Company, Tianjin 300280, China
  • Received:2020-10-26 Online:2021-11-26 Published:2021-11-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41872157,42072157)

摘要: 为了明确含油气盆地源外斜坡区断裂附近油气分布规律,先统计研究区已知井点砂体地层砂地比值,将最小比值作为能储集油气砂体的所需最小值,圈闭出能储油砂体分布区;再通过计算得到砂体地层顶面古构造脊分布,将二者叠合部位确定为沿砂体侧向运移向断裂输送油气路径;然后计算圈出断裂侧向封闭部位,将其与能储集油气砂体分布区叠合,该叠合部位即可判定为断砂配置圈闭油气部位。笔者建立了预测源外斜坡区断裂附近油气聚集有利部位的方法,既将输送油气路径和断砂配置圈闭油气耦合部位预测为油气聚集有利部位。将该方法应用于渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷源外歧南斜坡区赵北断裂附近沙一段下部油气聚集有利部位预测中。预测结果显示,源外歧南斜坡区赵北断裂附近沙一段下部油源聚集有利部位主要有2处,均分布在赵北断裂西部,与目前赵北断裂附近沙一段下部已发现油气主要分布在西部相吻合,表明该方法用于预测源外斜坡区赵北断裂附近油气聚集是可行的。

关键词: 源外斜坡区, 断裂, 油气聚集, 有利部位, 预测方法, 歧口凹陷

Abstract: In order to clarify the distribution law of oil and gas near the fault in the slope area outside the source of the petroliferous basin, first, the sand ground ratio of well point sand body formation is known in the statistical study area, and the minimum ratio is taken as the minimum value required for oil and gas reservoir sand body, and the distribution area of oil and gas reservoir sand body is trapped, second, the distribution of paleotectonic ridge on the top of sand body formation is obtained through calculation, the overlapping position of the two is determined as the oil and gas transportation path along the lateral migration of the sand body to the fault, third, by calculating the lateral sealing part of the fault and superimposing it with the distribution area of oil and gas reservoir sand body, the superimposed part can be determined as the oil and gas part of fault sand configuration trap. The authors establish a method to predict the favorable parts of oil and gas accumulation near the faults in the slope area outside the source, which predicts the oil and gas coupling parts of oil and gas transmission path and fault sand configuration trap as the favorable parts of oil and gas accumulation. The method is applied to predict the favorable parts of oil and gas accumulation in the Es1x near Zhaobei fault in Qinan slope area outside the source of Qikou sag, Bohai Bay basin. The prediction results show that there are mainly two favorable parts for oil source accumulation in the Es1x near Zhaobei fault in Qinan slope area outside the source, which are distributed in the west of Zhaobei fault, which is consistent with the fact that oil and gas in the Es1x near Zhaobei fault are mainly distributed in the west, indicating that this method is feasible to predict oil and gas accumulation near Zhaobei fault in the slope area outside the source.

Key words: external source slope area, fault, hydrocarbon accumulation, favorable position, prediction method, Qikou sag

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 付广,王浩然.不同时期油源断裂输导油气有利部位确定方法及其应用[J].石油学报,2018,39(2):180-188. Fu Guang, Wang Haoran. Determination Method and Its Application of Favorable Positions for Hydrocarbon Transport in Oil-Source Fault During Different Periods[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(2):180-188.
[2] 李建民,牟敦山,李乔乔,等.断裂输导油气有利部位的综合预测方法及其应用[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2019,34(6):14-19,25. Li Jianmin, Mu Dunshan, Li Qiaoqiao,et al. Comprehensive Prediction Method of Favorable Parts for Oil and Gas Transmission in Oil Source Faults and Its Application[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University(Natural Science), 2019,34(6):14-19,25.
[3] 付广,梁木桂,李乔乔.源断砂空间匹配输导油气有效性研究[J].中国矿业大学学报,2019,48(3):584-591. Fu Guang, Liang Mugui, Li Qiaoqiao. Effectiveness of Transporting Oil and Gas of Source-Fault-Sandstone Space Matching[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2019,48(3):584-591.
[4] 付广,孙同文,吕延防.南堡凹陷断-砂配置侧向输导油气能力评价方法[J].中国矿业大学学报,2014,43(1):79-87. Fu Guang,Sun Tongwen,Lü Yanfang. An Evaluation Method of Oil-Gas Lateral Transporting Ability of Fault-Sandstone Configuration in Nanpu Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2014,43(1):79-87.
[5] 周立宏,韩国猛,董越崎,等.渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷滨海断鼻断-砂组合模式与油气成藏[J].石油勘探与开发,2019,46(5):869-882. Zhou Lihong, Han Guomeng, Dong Yueqi, et al. Fault-Sand Combination Modes and Hydrocarbon Accumulation in Binhai Fault Nose of Qikou Sag, Bohai Bay Basin, East China[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2019,46(5):869-882.
[6] 丁文龙,漆立新,云露,等.塔里木盆地巴楚-麦盖提地区古构造演化及其对奥陶系储层发育的控制作用[J].岩石学报,2012,28(8):2542-2556. Ding Wenlong, Qi Lixin, Yun Lu, et al. The Tectonic Evolution and Its Controlling Effects on the Development of Ordovician Reservoir in Bachu-Markit Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica,2012,28(8):2542-2556.
[7] 吕延防,王伟,胡欣蕾,等.断层侧向封闭性定量评价方法[J].石油勘探与开发,2016,43(2):310-316. Lü Yanfang, Wang Wei, Hu Xinlei, et al. Quantitative Evaluation Method of Fault Lateral Sealing[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2016,43(2):310-316.
[8] 史集建,李丽丽,付广,等.盖层内断层垂向封闭性定量评价方法及应用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2012,42(增刊2):162-170. Shi Jijian, Li Lili, Fu Guang, et al. Quantitative Evaluation Method and Application of Vertical Sealing Property of Faults in Caprock[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2012, 42(Sup.2):162-170.
[9] 付广,史集建,吕延防.断层侧向封闭性定量研究方法的改进[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):414-418. Fu Guang,Shi Jijian,Lü Yanfang. An Improvement in Quantitatively Studying Lateral Seal of Faults[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3):414-418.
[10] 付广,王浩然.利用地震资料预测油源断裂有利输导油气部位[J].石油地球物理勘探,2018,53(1):161-168,9-10. Fu Guang, Wang Haoran. Prediction of Favorable Oil-Gas Transportation Parts of Oil-Source Faults on Seismic Data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2018, 53(1):161-168, 9-10.
[11] 姜贵璞,付广,孙同文.利用地震资料确定油源断裂输导油气能力及油气富集的差异性[J].地球物理学进展,2017,32(1):160-166. Jiang Guipu, Fu Guang, Sun Tongwen. Seismic Data is Used to Determine the Transportation Oil-Gas Ability of Oil Source Faults and the Difference of Oil-Gas Accumulation[J]. Progress in Geophysics,2017,32(1):160-166.
[12] 吕延防,黄劲松,付广,等. 砂泥岩薄互层段中断层封闭性的定量研究[J].石油学报, 2009,30(6):824-829. Lü Yanfang, Huang Jinsong, Fu Guang, et al. Quantitative Study on Fault Sealing Ability in Sandstone and Mudstone Thin Interbed[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2009,30(6):824-829.
[13] 刘树根,邓宾,钟勇,等.四川盆地及周缘下古生界页岩气深埋藏-强改造独特地质作用[J].地学前缘,2016,23(1):11-28. Liu Shugen, Deng Bin, Zhong Yong, et al. Unique Geological Features of Burial and Superimposition of the Lower Paleozoic Shale Gas Across the Sichuan Basin and Its Periphery[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2016,23(1):11-28.
[14] 胡欣蕾,吕延防,孙永河,等.泥岩盖层内断层垂向封闭能力综合定量评价:以南堡凹陷5号构造东二段泥岩盖层为例[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2018,48(3):705-718. Hu Xinlei, Lü Yanfang, Sun Yonghe, et al. Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Vertical Sealing Ability of Faults in Caprock:An Example of Ed2 Mudstone Caprock in Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2018,48(3):705-718.
[15] 韦丹宁,付广.反向断裂下盘较顺向断裂上盘更易富集油气机理的定量解释[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(3):702-710. Wei Danning, Fu Guang. Quantitative Explanation of Mechanism About Lower Wall of Antithetic Faults Accumulating More Oil-Gas Than Upper Wall of Consequent Faults[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2016,46(3):702-710.
[16] 吕延防,韦丹宁,孙永河,等.南堡凹陷断层对中、上部含油组合油气成藏的控制作用[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):971-982. Lü Yanfang, Wei Danning, Sun Yonghe, et al. Control Action of Faults on Hydrocarbon Migration and Accumulation in the Middle and Upper Oil-Bearing Group in Nanpu Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015,45(4):971-982.
[17] 孙同文,吕延防,刘哲,等.断裂控藏作用定量评价及有利区预测:以辽河坳陷齐家-鸳鸯沟地区古近系沙河街组三段上亚段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2013,34(6):790-796. Sun Tongwen, Lü Yanfang, Liu Zhe, et al. Quantitative Evaluation of Control of Faults on Hydrocarbon Accumulation and Play Fairway Prediction:A Case from Es3(1) in Qijia-Yuanyanggou Area, the Liaohe Depression[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2013, 34(6):790-796.
[18] 赵贤正,王权,金凤鸣,等.冀中坳陷隐蔽型潜山油气藏主控因素与勘探实践[J].石油学报,2012,33(增刊1):71-79. Zhao Xianzheng, Wang Quan, Jin Fengming, et al. Main Controlling Factors and Exploration Practice of Subtle Buried-Hill Hydrocarbon Reservoir in Jizhong Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(Sup.1):71-79.
[1] 韩国猛, 陈冬霞, 马建英, 王梓颐, 董晓伟, 高思航, 邹磊落, 王娜. 黄骅坳陷歧北斜坡油气成藏机制与成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1636-1653.
[2] 樊文鑫, 李光明, 梁生贤. 西藏扎西康铅锌多金属矿床控矿构造的电性特征及找矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1709-1719.
[3] 席海银, 范月野, 王广婷, 张杨. 松辽盆地北部构造演化对砂岩型铀矿床成矿的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1030-1041.
[4] 袁红旗, 魏鸣禄, 于英华. 油源断裂油气成藏期优势通道输导能力综合评判方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 694-703.
[5] 廖文毫, 陈冬霞, 曾溅辉, 姜文亚, 刘子驿, 朱传真, 王艺帆. 歧口凹陷埕北断阶区断砂组合样式及其对油气富集的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 336-354.
[6] 王孔伟, 路永强, 聂进, 滕明明, 王宵亮. 三峡库区仙女山和九畹溪断裂带水库地震变化规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 624-637.
[7] 曹凤娟, 贾丽华, 李梦莹, 王松阳. 辽宁地区主要断裂活动性和地震危险性评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(1): 286-295.
[8] 包苏新, 董丙元, 裴易峰, 荣亮亮, 邱隆清, 杜尚宇. 低温超导瞬变电磁法在内蒙古四子王旗地质勘探中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 1211-1218.
[9] 姜文亚, 宋泽章, 周立宏, 蒲秀刚, 王娜, 代昆, 万伟超, 刘祥柏. 渤海湾盆地歧口凹陷地层压力结构特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 52-69.
[10] 张鹏辉, 张小博, 方慧, 王小江, 刘建勋. 地球物理资料揭示的嫩江—八里罕断裂中段深浅构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 261-272.
[11] 樊文鑫, 李光明, 焦彦杰, 梁生贤. 重磁场特征对西藏扎西康矿集区构造格架与成矿的启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1741-1754.
[12] 刘洪波, 吴治国, 郑孝诚, 王恩强, 王玉敏, 张宁. 沂沭断裂带莱州湾海域重力场特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1438-1447.
[13] 雷东宁, 乔岳强, 胡庆, 王秋良, 林松, 李雪. 丹江断裂东段第四纪活动性及地震地质涵义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1362-1375.
[14] 姜大朋, 何敏, 张向涛, 彭光荣, 牛胜利, 李振升. 箕状断陷控洼断裂上下盘油气成藏差异性及勘探实践——以南海北部珠江口盆地惠州凹陷X洼为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(2): 346-355.
[15] 祁江豪, 吴志强, 张训华, 侯方辉. 胶莱盆地在南黄海的延伸:来自OBS深地震探测的新证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 106-114.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .