吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (1): 68-82.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220206

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

塔里木盆地塔河地区中下奥陶统沉积特征及其演化模式#br#

郭春涛1, 2,史江涛1, 2,刘亮1, 2,荆雪婷1, 2,刘杨晋3   

  1. 1.山西工程技术学院矿区生态修复与固废资源化厅市共建山西省重点实验室培育基地,山西 阳泉 045000
    2.山西工程技术学院地球科学与工程系,山西 阳泉 045000
    3.山西国辰建设工程勘察设计有限公司,山西 阳泉 045000
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-12 出版日期:2024-01-26 发布日期:2024-03-11
  • 作者简介:郭春涛(1981—),男,副教授,博士,主要从事沉积学方面的研究,E-mail:xinylx521@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41802171);山西省高等学校科技创新项目(2021L590);山西省基础研究计划(202203021211287)

Sedimentary Characteristics and Evolution Model of Middle and Lower Ordovician in Tahe Area, Tarim Basin#br#

Guo Chuntao1, 2, Shi Jiangtao1, 2, Liu Liang1, 2, Jing Xueting1, 2, Liu Yangjin3   

  1. 1. The Cultivation Base of Shanxi Key Laboratory of Mining Area Ecological Restoration and Solid Wastes Utilization, Shanxi 
    Institute    of Technology, Yangquan 045000, Shanxi, China
    2. Department of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Shanxi Institute of Technology, Yangquan 045000, Shanxi, China
    3. Shanxi Guochen Construction Engineering Survey and Design Co., Ltd., Yangquan 045000, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2022-07-12 Online:2024-01-26 Published:2024-03-11
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41802171), the Science and Technology Innovation Project of Colleges and Universities in Shanxi Province (2021L590) and the Fundamental Research Program of Shanxi Province (202203021211287)

摘要: 沉积环境对岩溶型储层的发育起着基础性作用,影响着岩溶体的规模和强度,加强沉积环境研究有助于优质岩溶储层的勘探与预测。为深入认识塔河地区中下奥陶统沉积特征,在野外调查基础上,结合岩石颜色、类型、组合、结构、构造、古生物、地球化学特征等岩石学和岩相学标志,利用岩心、测录井、地震和区域宏观沉积资料,对中下奥陶统沉积环境进行了精细识别和划分。结果显示,研究区岩石类型主要为颗粒灰岩、泥晶灰岩、生物灰岩和过渡岩类;共发育5种沉积环境,蓬莱坝组以局限—半局限台地为主,鹰山组以半局限台地、开阔台地为主,一间房组以开阔台地、台地边缘、淹没台地为主;共发育11种地震相,与各类沉积相带具有较明显的对应关系。总的来说,研究区以台地相为主,时空演化差异明显。纵向上,自蓬莱坝组至一间房组沉积水体逐渐加深,沉积环境由局限逐渐变为开阔;横向上,研究区主体以开阔台地、台地边缘为主,向东、向南至研究区外部逐渐过渡为斜坡、盆地相。综合前人资料,建立了研究区自下奥陶统蓬莱坝组局限台地→半局限台地→中下奥陶统鹰山组开阔台地→中奥陶统一间房组台地边缘→一间房组晚期、吐木休克组淹没台地的演化模式。
关键词:塔河地区;中下奥陶统;沉积环境;地震相;演化模式

关键词: 塔河地区, 中下奥陶统, 沉积环境, 地震相, 演化模式

Abstract: The environment plays a fundamental role in the development of karst reservoirs and affects the scale and strength of karst bodies. Strengthening the study of sedimentary environments can be beneficial to the exploration and prediction of high-quality karst reservoirs. In order to deeply understand the sedimentary characteristics of the Middle and Lower Ordovician in Tahe area, the sedimentary environment is finely identified and divided by using core, logging, seismic and regional macro-sedimentary data on the basis of field survey. At the same time, the petrological and petrographic indicators, such as rock color, type and combination, structure, paleontology, geochemical characteristics, and so on, are also used to identify sedimentary environments. The results show that the rock types in the study area are mainly granular limestone, micritic limestone, biological limestone and transitional rocks. There are five types of sedimentary environments developed in total. The Penglaiba Formation is dominated by restricted and semi-restricted platform, and the Yingshan Formation is dominated by semi-restricted platform and open platform, while the Yijianfang Formation is dominated by open platform, platform margin and submerged platform. A total of 11 seismic facies are developed, which have an obvious corresponding relationship with various sedimentary facies. In general, the study area is dominated by platform facies, with obvious differences in space-time evolution. Vertically, the sea waterbody gradually deepens from the Penglaiba Formation to the Yijianfang Formation, and the sedimentary environment gradually changes from restricted to open platform. Laterally, the main body of the study area is dominated by open platform and platform margin, and gradually transits to slope and basin facies from east and south to the outside of the study area. Based on previous data, the evolution model of the study area is established. This model shows that the sedimentary environment has evolved gradually from restricted platform of the Lower Ordovician Penglaiba Formation →semi-restricted platform → open platform of the Middle and Lower Ordovician Yingshan Formation → platform margin of the Middle Ordovician Yijianfang Formation → submerged platform of the late Yijianfang Formation and the Tumuxiuke Formation.

Key words: Tahe area, Middle and Lower Ordovician, sedimentary environment, seismic facies, evolution model

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 高家俊, 孟庆涛, 曾文人, 李金国, 李丽, 康嘉楠, . 依兰盆地始新统达连河组油页岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 60-72.
[2] 史江涛, 郝君明, 王小雷. 塔河地区奥陶系鹰山组储层特征及其主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 348-362.
[3] 梁天意, 刘敬党, 李猛猛, 王刚, 李琛, 王利. 大兴安岭中段林西组砂岩LA-ICP-MS碎屑锆石U-Pb年代学及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 442-462.
[4] 李天军, 黄志龙, 王瑞, 苟红光, 张品, 殷越. 银根—额济纳旗盆地天草凹陷下白垩统巴音戈壁组有效烃源岩地球化学特征及其形成环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 957-972.
[5] 海连富, 王磊, 马治军, 徐清海, 宋扬, 白金鹤. 宁夏固原炭山地区中侏罗统延安组油页岩特征及其沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 747-756.
[6] 易海永, 崔宝琛, 王瑶琳, 邱玉超, 徐胜林, 李乾. 四川盆地广安地区中二叠统栖霞组岩石特征与沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 454-464.
[7] 孟庆涛, 李金国, 刘招君, 胡菲, 徐川. 茂名盆地羊角含矿区始新统油柑窝组油页岩有机地球化学特征及沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 356-367.
[8] 王嗣敏, 臧东升, 王熙琼, 李杰, 韩嵩, 李建中. 辽西建昌盆地油页岩发育特征及沉积环境[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 326-340.
[9] 张健, 张海华, 陈树旺, 郑月娟, 张德军, 苏飞, 黄欣. 松辽盆地北部上二叠统林西组地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 518-530.
[10] 董清水, 何春生, 楼仁兴, 任锡钢, 张超, 张渝金, 许圣传. 大兴安岭南段阿鲁科尔沁旗地区林西组沉积环境特征及其时限的地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 425-441.
[11] 曾文人, 孟庆涛, 刘招君, 徐银波, 孙平昌, 王克兵. 柴北缘团鱼山地区中侏罗统石门沟组油页岩有机地球化学特征及古湖泊条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1270-1284.
[12] 陈庆松, 杨润柏, 刘德民, 陶兰初. 滇东北会泽灯影组硅质岩成因及沉积环境——来自岩石学和地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1327-1337.
[13] 曾忠诚, 边小卫, 张若愚, 孔文年, 陈宁, 赵端昌, 赵江林. 西昆仑塔什库尔干下-中侏罗统龙山组沉积构造背景分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 1039-1052.
[14] 王昱翔, 顾忆, 傅强, 王斌, 万旸璐, 李映涛. 顺北地区中下奥陶统埋深碳酸盐岩储集体特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(4): 932-946.
[15] 高小惠, 张训华, 蔡来星, 郭兴伟, 李文强. 南黄海盆地中部隆起CSDP-2井志留系-石炭系岩石学特征及其沉积相[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(1): 53-64.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .