J4

• 松辽盆地火山岩储层专刊 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地白垩系营城组埋藏火山机构岩相定量模型及储层流动单元特征

唐华风1,徐正顺2,王璞珺1,舒 萍2,黄玉龙1,边伟华1,丁日新2   

  1. 1.吉林大学 地球科学学院,长春 130061;2.大庆油田 勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2007-06-20 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-11-26 发布日期:2007-11-26
  • 通讯作者: 唐华风

Facies Quantitive Model and Characteristics of Reservoirs Flow Unit of Buried Volcanic Edifice of Yingcheng Formation in Songliao Basin, Cretaceous, NE China

TANG Hua-feng1, XU Zheng-shun2, WANG Pu-jun1, SHU Ping2, HUANG Yulong1, BIAN Weihua1, DING Rixing2   

  1. 1.College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061,China;2.Daqing Exploration &Development Institute, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163712, China
  • Received:2007-06-20 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-11-26 Published:2007-11-26
  • Contact: TANG Hua-feng

摘要: 松辽盆地营城组火山机构类型划分为碎屑岩火山机构、熔岩火山机构和复合火山机构3种。碎屑岩火山机构中火山通道相占9.3%,爆发相占55.3%,喷溢相占29.2%,侵出相占1.4%,火山沉积相占4.8%;火山机构半径为0.5~1.5 km,高度为50~220 m。熔岩火山机构中火山通道相占8.1%,爆发相占23.4%,喷溢相占62.6%,侵出相占5.1%,火山沉积相占0.8%;火山机构半径为1~2 km,高度为200~300 m。复合火山机构中火山通道相占4.9%,爆发相占34.4%,喷溢相占56.8%,侵出相占2.6%,火山沉积相占1.3%;火山机构半径为2~4 km,厚度为300~450 m。亚相控制储层流动单元的规模,碎屑岩火山机构的储层流动单元范围为0.3~1.5 km,厚度小于60 m。熔岩火山机构的储层流动单元范围为1~2 km,厚度小于80 m。复合火山机构的储层流动单元范围为1.5~3.0 km,厚度小于100 m。各类火山机构气藏开发时的井距和压裂方案均存在差异。

关键词: 松辽盆地, 营城组, 火山机构类型, 岩相模型, 储层流动单元

Abstract: According to eruptive scale illustrated by drilling lithology, facies characteristics and seismic data, early Cretaceous volcanic edifices of Yingcheng Formation in Xujiaweizi faulted depression, Songliao Basin were classified into pyroclastic volcanic edifice, lava volcanic edifice and compound volcanic edifice. The facies composition of pyroclastic volcanic edifice was listed as fellows: 9.3% for volcanic vent facies, 55.3% for explosive facies, 29.2% for effusive facies, 1.4% for extrusive facies and 4.8% for volcanic sedimentary facies. The pyroclastic volcanic edifices is 0.5-1.5 km wide and 50-220 m thick. The facies composition of lava volcanic edifice was 8.1% for volcanic vent facies, 23.4% for explosive facies, 62.6% for effusive facies, 5.1% for extrusive facies, and 0.8% for volcanic sedimentary facies. The lava volcanic edifices is 1-2 km wide and 200-300 m thick. The facies composition of compound volcanic edifice was 4.9% for volcanic vent facies, 34.4% for explosive facies, 56.8% for effusive facies, 2.6% for extrusive facies and 1.3% for volcanic sedimentary facies. The compound volcanic edifices is 2-4 km wide and 300-450 m thick. The scale of reservoir flow unit is controlled by subfacies of volcanic edifices. So the scale of reservoir flowing unit is various for each volcanic edifice, pyroclastic volcanic edifice is 0.3-1.5 km in width and less than 60 m in thickness, lava volcanic edifice is 1-2 km in width and less than 80 m in thickness, compound volcanic edifice is 1.5-3.0 km in width and less than 100 m in thickness. So the distance of wells and hydraulic fracturing plan are different in each kind volcanic edifice during the development.

Key words: Songliao Basin, Yingcheng Formation, volcanic edifices type, facies model, reservoir flow unit

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[2] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[3] 鲍新华, 张宇, 李野, 吴永东, 马丹, 周广慧. 松辽盆地增强型地热系统开发选区评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 564-572.
[4] 高翔, 刘志宏, 聂志阳, 姚勇, 贾卧, 王超, 宋健. 松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 74-83.
[5] 林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[6] 刘财, 杨宝俊, 冯晅, 单玄龙, 田有, 刘洋, 鹿琪, 刘才华, 杨冬, 王世煜. 论油气资源的多元勘探[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1208-1220.
[7] 温志良, 姜福平, 钟长林, 姜雪飞, 王果谦, 齐岩. 松辽盆地东南隆起超大型油页岩矿床特征及成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 681-691.
[8] 康健, 韦庆海, 周琳, 高研, 张永刚, 高峰. 利用地震台阵观测资料研究大庆地区深部构造[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 900-910.
[9] 修立君, 邵明礼, 唐华风, 董常春, 高有峰. 松辽盆地白垩系营城组火山岩孔缝单元类型和特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 11-22.
[10] 那金, 许天福, 魏铭聪, 冯波, 鲍新华, 姜雪. 增强地热系统热储层-盐水-CO2相互作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1493-1501.
[11] 陈彬滔, 潘树新, 梁苏娟, 张庆石, 刘彩燕, 王革. 陆相湖盆深水块体搬运体优质储层的主控因素以松辽盆地英台地区青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1002-1010.
[12] 李正伟, 张延军, 郭亮亮, 金显鹏. 松辽盆地北部干热岩开发水热产出预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1189-1197.
[13] 刘志宏, 孙理难, 王超, 高翔, 宋健, 黄超义, 梅梅. 松辽盆地伏龙泉断陷构造特征及演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 663-673.
[14] 郑玉龙, 陈春瑞, 王佰长, 王占国, 刘胜英, 吴相梅. 松辽盆地北部油页岩资源潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 683-690.
[15] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 李昂, 石蕾, 刘爽. 松辽盆地肇州区块沙河子组层序格架特征及其对沉积和烃源岩的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 724-735.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!