J4 ›› 2010, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1020-1026.

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地松科1井晚白垩世沉积时期古湖泊生产力

宁维坤1|付丽2|霍秋立2   

  1. 1.吉林大学 |材料科学与工程学院|长春 130026;2.大庆油田有限责任公司 |勘探开发研究院|黑龙江 大庆 163712
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-10 出版日期:2010-09-26 发布日期:2010-09-26
  • 作者简介:宁维坤(1966-)|男|安徽青阳人|讲师|主要从事地球化学勘察研究|E-mail:ningweikun@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家“973”计划项目(2006CB701404)

Productivity of Paleo-Songliao Lake During the Late Cretaceous in Well Songke-1, Songliao Basin

NING Wei-kun1, FU Li2, HUO Qiu-li2   

  1. 1.College of Material Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China;
    2.Exploration and Development Research Institute,Daqing Oilfield Company,Ltd.,PetroChina,Daqing,Heilongjiang 163712,China
  • Received:2010-01-10 Online:2010-09-26 Published:2010-09-26

摘要:

通过对松科1井不同层位泥岩样品的地球化学分析,利用有机碳法计算古海洋生产力公式定量恢复了白垩纪时期松辽古湖泊生产力,探讨了湖泊演化过程中生物发育、水体环境的变化及生产力与优质烃源岩关系。结果显示:青山口组一段和嫩江组一段时期生产力最高,最大值达到3 000 g/(m2·a),生物标志化合物指标反映了该时期以藻类为主要贡献,水体具有盐度分层,湖底为厌氧环境,可能与海侵作用有关,此时湖泊为超富营养或富营养湖,反映出高生产力与湖泊中藻类勃发、水体分层、湖底厌氧等条件有关;青二、三段早期继承了青一段时期湖泊特点,具有相对较高的生产力,为中至富养湖;之后生产力逐渐下降,到晚期时生产力又有增大,为中养湖。姚家组一段沉积时期湖泊生产力平均为365 g/(m2·a),为中养湖;姚家组二、三段沉积早期和晚期时生产力均较低,一般低于100 g/(m2·a),属贫养湖;而在沉积中期生产力有明显增大,为中养湖。生产力、泥岩中生物标志物的变化反映了湖泊在白垩纪沉积时期生物发育、水体环境出现振荡变化。超养湖和富养湖的高生产力是形成优质源岩的基础。

关键词: 松辽盆地, 松科1井, 白垩纪, 湖泊生产力, 油气

Abstract:

The geochemical study on well Songke-1 in Songliao basin indicates the biological development, varied water environments and paleoproductivity of paleo-Songliao Lake during the Late Cretaceous. A formula used to quantify the paleoproductivity of ocean was applied to restore paleoproductivity during the Late Cretaceous in Songliao basin. The results show that the highest paleoproductivity achieved at 3 000 g/(m2·a)during the deposition of the 1st Member of Qingshankou Formation (K2qn1) and the 1st Member of Nenjiang Formation (K2n1). Biomarker indicators show that the paleoproductivity was mainly contributed by algae and the paleolake was in hypereutrophic or eutrophic state with stratified water column and anoxic water-sediment interface. It is believed that the eutrophic lake was the result of transgression during the Late Cretaceous and formed high paleoproductivity. During the early age of Qingshankou 2nd-3rd Members’ deposit, the nutrients of the lake decreased to mesotrophic-eutrophic and the bioproductivity was decreasing. In the late age of Qingshankou 2nd-3rd Members’ deposit, the bioproductivity bloomed again and the lake became mesotrophic. The lake was in mesotrophic state with bioproductivity average at 365 g/(m2·a) during the deposit of Yaojia 1st Member. Both in the early and late deposit of Yaojia 2nd[CD*2]3rd  Members, the lake was in oligotrophic state with the bioproductivity lower than 100 g/(m2·a)and in the mid stage of deposit the lake became mesotrophic with increasing bioproductivity. It is concluded that the paleolake was characterized with blooming biomass and vibrating water environment. Further study shows that hypereutrophication and eutrophication are essential for depositing high-quality source rock.

Key words: Songliao basin, well Songke-1, Cretaceous, lake paleoproductivity, petroleum gas

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 牟敦山, 付广, 陈雪晴. 南堡1号构造馆三段断盖配置油气渗漏部位及其控藏作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1008-1017.
[2] 陈爱民. 澳大利亚Bonaparte盆地WA-406-P区块油气成藏条件及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 965-980.
[3] 李文强, 郭巍, 孙守亮, 杨绪海, 刘帅, 侯筱煜. 塔里木盆地巴楚—麦盖提地区古生界油气藏成藏期次[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 640-651.
[4] 舒晴, 朱晓颖, 高维, 李瑞, 尹航. 三塘湖盆地航磁异常特征及油气远景预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 451-460.
[5] 姚刚, 董向欣, 李丽丽, 马国庆, 孟令顺. 东海陆架盆地构造划分的高精度重磁解释技术[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 517-524.
[6] 李昂, 鞠林波, 张丽艳. 塔里木盆地古城低凸起古-中生界构造演化特征与油气成藏关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 545-555.
[7] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[8] 蔡来星, 卢双舫, 肖国林, 王蛟, 吴志强, 郭兴伟, 侯方辉. 论优质源储耦合关系的控藏作用:对比松南致密油与松北致密气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 15-28.
[9] 杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[10] 马德龙, 何登发, 魏东涛, 王彦君, 魏彩茹. 准噶尔盆地南缘古牧地背斜多期构造变形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1695-1704.
[11] 张焕旭, 陈世加, 路俊刚, 刘超威, 陈娟, 李勇, 徐坤. “膨胀力”作用下致密砂岩储层石油运聚特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1341-1351.
[12] 张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[13] 鲍新华, 张宇, 李野, 吴永东, 马丹, 周广慧. 松辽盆地增强型地热系统开发选区评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 564-572.
[14] 高翔, 刘志宏, 聂志阳, 姚勇, 贾卧, 王超, 宋健. 松辽盆地大庆长垣形成时间的厘定及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 74-83.
[15] 李博南, 刘财, 郭智奇. 基于等效介质模型和频变AVO反演的裂缝储层参数估算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 234-244.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!