吉林大学学报(地球科学版)

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

渭河中游宝鸡-扶风北岸斜坡结构及其对大型滑坡形成机理的指示意义

辛鹏1,2,  吴树仁1,2, 石菊松1,2, 王涛1,2, 石玲1,2,  韩金良1,2   

  1. 1.国土资源部新构造运动与地质灾害重点实验室, 北京100081;
    2.中国地质科学院地质力学研究所,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-21 出版日期:2013-03-26 发布日期:2013-03-26
  • 作者简介:辛鹏(1984-),男,博士研究生,主要从事工程地质与地质灾害研究,E-mail:xxiinnpp@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    科技部“十二·五”科技支撑计划项目(2012BAK10B02);国家自然科学基金项目(41102165,40802085);中国地质科学院基本科研业务费项目(DALXJK201111)

Slope Structure on the North Bank of Baoji-Fufeng Section in the Middle Reaches of Weihe River and Its Indicative Significance on the Formation Mechanism of Large Landslide

Xin Peng1,2,Wu Shuren1,2,Shi Jusong1,2,Wang Tao1,2,Shi  Ling1,2,Han Jinliang1,2   

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Neotectonic Movement and Geohazard ,Ministry of Land and Resources ,Beijing100081,China;
    2.Institute of Geomechanics ,Chinese Academy of Geological Science,Beijing100081,China
  • Received:2012-06-21 Online:2013-03-26 Published:2013-03-26

摘要:

渭河中游宝鸡-扶风段北岸塬边集中发育大型黄土滑坡,体积超过1 000×104 m3的滑坡达58处。在区域活动断裂调查、地球物理勘察、典型斜坡结构与构造调查基础上,研究了大型滑坡结构及其形成机理。研究表明:渭河北缘活动断裂以地堑式结构控制北坡塬边斜坡的地貌,主断裂面倾向南,倾角平均为68°,而次级断面结构组合控制斜坡结构,影响塬边大型黄土滑坡结构;塬边主断裂面与多个大型黄土滑坡后缘滑壁一致,断裂最大下挫距离7.1 m,影响大型滑坡的形态及发生过程;活动断裂呈地堑式结构,局部次级断面控制塬边多级滑动面的结构及其演化过程,如杨家村滑坡,局部滑坡剪出受断裂结构控制,剪出口角度可达72°,大部分剪出口未受到断裂面影响,角度平均为23°;三门组黏土岩黏粒体积分数超过35%,塑限平均值为23,是滑坡的层间剪切带;降雨诱发老滑坡复活是目前新滑坡发育的主要形式,大量的老滑坡形成于0.009 Ma BP二级阶地侵蚀期,而古滑坡形成于0.13 Ma BP三级阶地侵蚀期。

关键词: 斜坡, 结构, 断裂, 滑坡, 机理

Abstract:

The plateau edge on the north bank of Baoji-Fufeng section in the middle reach of Weihe River is the concentrated development zone with large loess landslide, which consists of 58 places each with the area above 10 million cubic meters. Based on the detailed survey on the regional active fractures, geophysical survey, and detailed survey on typical slide structures, the authors studied the slope structure and mechanisms of landslides along the plateau edge. The study shows that: 1)Active faults in northern margin of the Weihe River, as graben-like structure, control the terrain and physiognomy of slope zone of the plateau edge on the northern bank. The details are that principal fracture surface is S-dipping and the dipping angle is 68° on average controls the angle of plateau edge in bank slope; and the assemblage of secondary faulted structure controls the slope structure and affects the structure of large loess landslide on the plateau edge. 2)The principal fracture surface of the plateau edge is consistent with smooth wall of back scarp of many large loess landslide, and it has influence on the configuration and occurrence of large landslide. The maximum distance of fault offset is 7.1 m. 3)Active faults have graben-like structure and local secondary fracture surface controls the structure of multi-order sliding surface of plateau edge and its formation and evolution. For instance, in the Yangjiacun landslide, local landslide is controlled and sheared by faulted structure and the shearing angle reaches 72°. The toe of surface of rupture of most landslides are not affected by fracture surface and their angles are 23° on average. 4)The clay content of clayey layer in the Sanmen Formation overpasses 35% and the average plastic index is 23. It is an interlayer shear zone of landslide. 5)The major pattern of new landslide development is reactivation of old ones induced by the precipitation. Many old landslides on northern bank were formed in the denudation period of second-order terrace in 0.009 Ma BP, while ancient landslides in the period of third-order terrace in 0.13 Ma BP.

Key words: slope, structure, fracture, landslides, mechanisms

中图分类号: 

  • P642.22
[1] 赵金童, 牛瑞卿, 姚琦, 武雪玲. 雷达数据辅助下的滑坡易发性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1182-1191.
[2] 林敉若, 操应长, 葸克来, 王健, 陈洪, 吴俊军. 阜康凹陷东部斜坡带二叠系储层特征及控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 991-1007.
[3] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[4] 郑国磊, 徐新学, 李世斌, 袁航, 马为, 叶青. 天津市重力数据反演解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1221-1230.
[5] 孙超, 邵艳红, 王寒冬. 支挡式结构物水平冻胀力研究进展与思考[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 784-798.
[6] 贾艳聪, 操应长, 林畅松, 王健. 东营凹陷博兴洼陷沙四上亚段滩坝优质储层形成机理与分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 652-664.
[7] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[8] 张聪, 石砥石, 张子亚, 陈科, 苑坤, 乔计花, 彭芳苹. 云南楚雄盆地西部高精度重磁电特征及基底特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 863-871.
[9] 殷长春, 杨志龙, 刘云鹤, 张博, 齐彦福, 曹晓月, 邱长凯, 蔡晶. 基于环形扫面测量的三维直流电阻率法任意各向异性模型响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 872-880.
[10] 朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[11] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[12] 李志明, 张隽, 鲍云杰, 曹婷婷, 徐二社, 芮晓庆, 陈红宇, 杨琦, 张庆珍. 沾化凹陷渤南洼陷沙一段湖相富有机质烃源岩岩石学与孔隙结构特征:以罗63井和义21井取心段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 39-52.
[13] 谭福林, 胡新丽, 张玉明, 何春灿, 章涵. 考虑渐进破坏过程的滑坡推力计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 193-202.
[14] 付建康, 罗刚, 胡卸文. 滑坡堰塞坝越顶溢流破坏的物理模型实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 203-212.
[15] 林承焰, 王杨, 杨山, 任丽华, 由春梅, 吴松涛, 吴玉其, 张依旻. 基于CT的数字岩心三维建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 307-317.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!