吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 863-871.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160320

• 地球探测与信息技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

云南楚雄盆地西部高精度重磁电特征及基底特征

张聪1,2, 石砥石1,2, 张子亚1,2, 陈科1,2, 苑坤2, 乔计花3, 彭芳苹4   

  1. 1. 中国地质调查局非常规油气地质重点实验室, 北京 100029;
    2. 中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国地质调查局发展研究中心, 北京 100037;
    4. 北京勘察技术工程有限公司, 北京 100192
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-07 出版日期:2018-05-26 发布日期:2018-05-26
  • 作者简介:张聪(1986-),女,工程师,博士研究生,主要从事页岩气地质调查和相关研究,E-mail:zh_cong520@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国土资源部全国油气资源战略选区调查与评价项目(XQ2014-04-02);中国地质调查局项目(121201021000150011)

Basement Structure of Western Chuxiong Basin in Yunnan Province: Using High-Precision Gravity-Magnetic-Electrical Survey

Zhang Cong1,2, Shi Dishi1,2, Zhang Ziya1,2, Chen Ke1,2, Yuan Kun2, Qiao Jihua3, Peng Fangping4   

  1. 1. The Key Laboratory of Unconventional Oil & Gas Geology, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100029, China;
    2. Oil & Gas Survey, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Development of Geological and Research Center, China Geological Surveys, Beijing 100037, China;
    4. Beijing Technology and Engineering Co., Ltd, Beijing 100192, China
  • Received:2017-09-07 Online:2018-05-26 Published:2018-05-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by Project of Investigation and Evaluation of the National Oil and Gas Resources Strategic Selection of Ministry of Land and Resources (XQ2014-04-02) and Project of China Geological Survey (121201021000150011)

摘要: 楚雄盆地是滇黔桂地区面积最大的含油气盆地,油气勘探进展缓慢,关键问题是基底和沉积盖层展布不清。重磁电是认识和了解盆地基底展布的重要手段。本研究在楚雄盆地西部实施2条区域重磁电测线,并对其进行基底结构的综合解译。结果表明:楚雄盆地西部上三叠统底界的最大埋藏深度为7 km,盆地总体走向北西,结晶基底在平川、云南驿、红河断裂以东,猛虎、舍资一线以西地区深度最大为9 km;在大姚县和南华县之间形成楚雄盆地最大的磁基底凹陷区,面积达到1 200 km2

关键词: 基底结构, 重力, 磁力, 大地电磁, 楚雄盆地

Abstract: Chuxiong basin is the largest petroleum-bearing basin in the Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi area, but its progress of oil and gas exploration is slow. The key issue is the unclear structure of the basement and sedimentary caprock. Two parallel exploration profiles were obtained based on the high precision gravity, magnetic and electrical data,and the basement characteristics and stratigraphic structure were figured out hereupon. The comprehensive exploration results show that the maximum burial depth of bottom boundary is 7 km in the Upper Triassic in the western Chuxiong basin. The overall trend of Chuxiong basin is north-west, and the maximum depth of the crystallization basement is 9 km between the Pingchuan-Yunnanyi-Honghe and the Menghu-Shezi faults. The largest magnetic basement sag in Chuxiong basin exists between Dayao County and Nanhua County, with an area of 1 200 km2.

Key words: basement structure, gravity, magnetic, magnetotelluric, Chuxiong basin

中图分类号: 

  • P59
[1] 滇黔桂石油地质志组.中国石油地质志之卷11:滇黔桂石油地质志[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1992:240-241. Group of DianQianGui Petroleum Geology. Petroleum Geology of China:Vol 11:Petroleum Geology of the DianQianGui Area[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 1992:240-241.
[2] 周明辉,梁秋原. 楚雄盆地油气保存单元划分与评价[J]. 云南地质,2005,24(3):303-308. Zhou Minghui, Liang Qiuyuan. The Division and Evaluation of Oil-Gas Preservation Unit in Chuxiong Basin[J]. Yunnan Geology, 2005, 24(3):303-308.
[3] 中国石油天然气总公司滇黔桂石油勘探局. 楚参1井完井地质总结报告[R]. 成都:中国石油化工股份有限公司勘探分公司, 1993. DianQianGui Petroleum Exploration Bureau,China Petroleum and Natural Gas Corporation. Summary Geology Report of Well Completion of Chucan NO.1 Well[R]. Chengdu:China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation Exploration Company, 1993.
[4] 刘光鼎,郝天珧,刘伊克. 重磁研究对认识盆地的意义[J].地球物理学进展,1996, 11(2):1-15. Liu Guangding, Hao Tianyao, Liu Yike. The Significance of Gravity and Magnetic Research for Knowing Sedimentary Basins[J]. Progress in Geophysics,1996,11(2):1-15.
[5] 马宗晋,高祥林,宋正范.中国布格重力异常水平梯度图判读和构造解释[J].地球物理学报,2006,49(1):106-114. Ma Zongjin, Gao Xianglin, Song Zhengfan. Analysis and Tectonic Interpretation to the Horizontal Gradient Map Calculated from Bouguer Gravity Data in the China Mainland[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,2006, 49(1):106-114.
[6] 翁爱华,李斯睿,杨悦,等.磁电法基本原理、发展现状及前景展望[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2017,47(6):1838-1854. Weng Aihua, Li Sirui, Yang Yue, et al.Basic Principle, Current Advance and Prospect of Magnetometric Resistivity[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition),2017,47(6):1838-1854.
[7] 王朝栋.用重力成果探讨云南楚雄盆地基底构造[J].石油与天然气地质,1986,7(4):419-426. Wang Chaodong. Application of Gravity Exploration Results to Disscuss the Basal Structure of the Chuxiong Basin, Yunnan Province[J]. Oil and Gas Geology,1986,7(4):419-426.
[8] 汪士昭.从遥感图象看楚雄盆地的断裂构造格局及油气勘探远景[J]. 石油勘探与开发,1991(3):25-33. Wang Shizhao. A Study of the Faulted Structure Framework and Prospect of Oil and Gas in Chuxiong basin by Remote Sensing Technique[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1991(3):25-33.
[9] 云南省地质矿产局.云南省区域地质志[M]. 北京:地质出版社,1990:611-634. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Yunnan Province. Regional Geology of Yunnan Province[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1990:611-634.
[10] 杨庆道,王伟锋,吴思卫,等. 楚雄盆地构造演化及其对油气聚集的控制[J].中国石油勘探,2011,16(4):29-36 Yang Qingdao, Wang Weifeng, Wu Siwei, et al. Tectonic Evaluation of Chuxiong Basin and Its Control on Hydrocarbon Accumulation[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2011,16(4):29-36.
[11] 彭金宁,刘光祥,方成名,等. 楚雄盆地与四川盆地中西部地质条件对比分析[J].地质学刊,2009, 33(3), 235-238. Peng Jinning, Liu Guangxiang, Fang Chengming, et al. Contrast Analysis of Geological Conditions Between Central and West Chuxiong Basin and Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Geology, 2009, 33(3), 235-238.
[12] 刘俊来,唐渊,宋志杰, 等. 滇西哀牢山构造带:结构与演化[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2011,41(5):1285-1303. Liu Junlai, Tang Yuan, Song Zhijie, et al. The Ailaoshan Belt in Western Yunnan:Tectonic Framework and Tectonic Evolution[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2011, 41(5):1285-1303.
[13] 梁兴. 楚雄盆地含油气系统分析及勘探目标选择[J]. 海相油气地质,1998,3(2):35-48. Liang Xing. Petroleum System and Exploration Targets in Chuxiong Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 1998, 3(2):35-48.
[14] 张福东, 戚厚发. 从新的勘探理念寻求楚雄盆地油气勘探的突破:试论楚雄盆地的深盆气勘探前景[J]. 天然气地球科学,2004,15(1):28-32. Zhang Fudong, Qi Houfa. Looking for the Breakthrough of the Exploration for Oil and Gas in Chuxiong Basin in Term of the New Exploration Concept:On the Exploration Prospects of Deep Basin Gas in Chuxiong Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2004, 15(1):28-32.
[15] 缪卫东,史晓颖,张志琳,等. 楚雄盆地烃源岩特征及资源潜力分析[J]. 石油天然气学报,2010, 32(1):6-12. Miao Weidong, Shi Xiaoying, Zhang Zhilin, et al. Characteristcs of Source Rock and Analysis on Resource Potentialities of Chuxiong Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2010, 32(1):6-12.
[16] 李秀梅.楚雄盆地烃源岩有机地化特征及综合评价[J].云南地质,2000,19(4):416-422. Li Xiumei. Geochemistry and Assessment of Hydrocarbon Source Rock in Chuxiong Basin[J]. Yunnan Geology, 2000, 19(4):416-422.
[17] 万汉平.大地电磁测深的TE和TM极化模式对比研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2010:5-9. Wan Hanping. Comparison of Magnetotelluric TE and TM Polarizationmodes[D]. Chengdu:Chengdu University of Technology, 2010:5-9.
[18] 蔡军涛,陈小斌,赵国泽.大地电磁资料精细处理和二维反演解释技术研究:阻抗张量分解与构造维性分析[J].地球物理学报,2010,53(10):2516-2526. Cai Juntao, Chen Xiaobin, Zhao Guoze. Refined Techniques for Data Processing and Two-Dimensional Inversion in Magnetotelluric:Ⅰ:Tensor Decomposition and Dimensionality Analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(10):2516-2526.
[19] 许德树,曾华霖,万天丰.中国视密度图与大地构造单元[J].地学前缘,2001,8(2):407-414. Xu Deshu, Zeng Hualin, Wan Tianfeng. Apparent Density Mapping and Tectonic of China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2001, 8(2):407-414.
[20] 曾辉,王朝林.利用航磁资料研究楚雄盆地地温并预测油气远景区[J].石油与天然气地质,1986,7(3):268-272. Zeng Hui, Wang Chaolin. Application of Aeromagnetic Data in Studying Geothermics of Chuxiong Basin and Forecasting Its Petroleum Prospects[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1986, 7(3):268-272.
[1] 郑国磊, 徐新学, 李世斌, 袁航, 马为, 叶青. 天津市重力数据反演解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1221-1230.
[2] 王泰涵, 黄大年, 马国庆, 李野, 林松. 基于并行预处理算法的三维重力快速反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 384-393.
[3] 马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[4] 陈辉, 尹敏, 殷长春, 邓居智. 大地电磁三维正演聚集多重网格算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 261-270.
[5] 夏景生, 王志坤, 王海荣, 薛林, 王恺, 刘成权. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷西斜坡中深层“混合型河口坝”成因及沉积学意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1642-1653.
[6] 张冲, 黄大年, 秦朋波, 吴国超, 方刚. 重力场向下延拓的三阶Adams-Bashforth公式法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1533-1542.
[7] 王明常, 李彦妮, 刘财, 马国庆, 牛雪峰, 王民水. 斜轴高斯投影在跨带物探长剖面测量中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1582-1588.
[8] 蔡剑华, 肖晓. 基于组合滤波的矿集区大地电磁信号去噪[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 874-883.
[9] 高秀鹤, 黄大年, 孙思源, 于平. 重力梯度数据协克里金三维反演确定岩脉倾向[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 589-596.
[10] 罗天涯, 熊彬, 蔡红柱, 陈欣, 刘云龙, 兰怀慷, 李祖强, 梁卓. 复杂电性结构大地电磁二维响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 215-223.
[11] 韩松, 刘国兴, 韩江涛. 华南地区进贤-柘荣剖面深部电性结构[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1837-1846.
[12] 严家斌, 皇祥宇. 大地电磁三维矢量有限元正演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1538-1549.
[13] 吴海枝, 韩润生, 吴鹏. 楚雄盆地六苴砂岩型铜矿床成矿流体性质及演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 398-411.
[14] 王丹丹, 李世臻, 周新桂, 李爱勇, 温泉波, 林燕华. 大兴安岭地区突泉盆地高精度重磁电特征及其构造格架[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 240-253.
[15] 蒋甫玉, 谢磊磊, 常文凯, 黄岩, 张作宏. 三度体重力矢量的有限单元法正演计算[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(4): 1217-1226.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!