种混合泥质砂岩有效介质通用电阻率模型比较

种混合泥质砂岩有效介质通用电阻率模型比较

宋延杰¹，唐晓敏¹，张传英²

1．大庆石油学院地球科学学院，黑龙江大庆 163318;2．石油工业出版社，北京 100011

收稿日期:2007-10-18 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2008-09-26 发布日期:2008-09-26
通讯作者: 宋延杰

Comparison of Three Generalized Effective Medium Resistivity Models in Laminated and Dispersed Shaly Sands

SONG Yan-jie¹，TANG Xiao-min¹，ZHANG Chuan-ying²

1.College of Earth Sciences, Daqing Petroleum Institute, Daqing,Heilongjiang 163318, China;2.Petroleum Industry Press, Beijing 100011, China

Received:2007-10-18 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2008-09-26 Published:2008-09-26
Contact: SONG Yan-jie

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 复杂泥质砂岩油气层的识别与评价一直是测井解释领域亟待解决的难点和热点问题，因此，针对复杂泥质砂岩油气层的特点，有必要研究能够描述这类储层导电规律的新导电理论。针对用于复杂泥质砂岩油气层解释的3种混合泥质砂岩有效介质电阻率模型，从理论和实验角度，进行了全面系统的比较。通过对3种有效介质通用电阻率模型建模理论基础的分析，可知混合泥质砂岩有效介质非对称模型基于HB方程和并联导电理论，对称模型基于对称导电理论和并联导电理论，而孔隙结合模型基于混合介质电导率积分方程；对称电阻率模型可用于多连续项存在的地层，而非对称电阻率模型和孔隙结合电阻率模型只允许水为连续项。对骨架不导电的纯砂岩进行模型化简，可知非对称电阻率模型和孔隙结合电阻率模型可以简化成阿尔奇公式，而对称电阻率模型能化简成类似阿尔奇公式。通过1组混合泥质砂岩人造岩样和2组分散泥质砂岩岩样以及1组骨架导电人造岩样的实验数据，验证3种有效介质通用电阻率模型均适用于混合泥质砂岩地层解释，且精度相近。

关键词: 混合泥质砂岩, HB方程, 对称导电理论, 电导率积分方程, 电阻率模型

Abstract: Evaluation on complex hydrocarbon-bearing shaly sand reservoirs is a difficult problem in logging technology. Since conductance mechanism in complex hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs is different from that in common hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs, a new conducting theory should be proposed to describe the conducting mechanism for complex hydrocarbon-bearing reservoirs. The theoretical and experimental comparison of three effective medium resistivity models in laminated and dispersed shaly sands is addressed in detail. Theoretical analysis shows that asymmetrical effective medium resistivity model comes from HB equation and parallel conductance theory, and symmetrical effective medium resistivity model is established from symmetrical theory of resistivity interpretation and parallel conductance theory, while effective medium pore combination resistivity model is derived from conductivity integration equation of mixed medium. Also symmetrical effective medium resistivity model can be applied to the multi-continuous formation with more than two continuous components; asymmetrical resistivity model and pore combination resistivity model can be used only in the formation of a continuous component of water. The asymmetrical effective medium resistivity model and effective medium pore combination resistivity model can be simplified to Archie equation, and symmetrical effective medium resistivity model can be simplified to an equation similar to Archie equation in clean sand with non-conducting matrix grains. One set data from synthetic core sample of dispersed and laminated shaly sands, two set data of the rock sample of dispersed shaly sands, and one set data of artificial sample with conducting matrix grains show that the three models can be applied to dispersed and laminated shaly sands, and their application accuracy is about the same.

Key words: laminated and dispersed shaly sand, HB equation, symmetrical conductance theory, conductivity integration equation, resistivity model

中图分类号:

P631.8

宋延杰，唐晓敏，张传英. 种混合泥质砂岩有效介质通用电阻率模型比较[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 879-0886.

SONG Yan-jie，TANG Xiao-min，ZHANG Chuan-ying. Comparison of Three Generalized Effective Medium Resistivity Models in Laminated and Dispersed Shaly Sands[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 879-0886.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张波, 曹洪恺, 孙建孟, 张鹏云, 闫伟超. 稠油热采地层阵列感应测井响应特性数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1277-1286.
[2]	廖东良, 曾义金. 利用测井资料建立地层剪破裂模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1268-1276.
[3]	潘保芝, 刘文斌, 张丽华, 郭宇航, 阿茹罕. 一种提高储层裂缝识别准确度的方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 298-306.
[4]	李振苓, 沈金松, 李曦宁, 王磊, 淡伟宁, 郭森, 朱忠民, 于仁江. 用形态学滤波从电导率图像中提取缝洞孔隙度谱[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1295-1307.
[5]	肖凡, 陈建国. 基于RCGA的PPC模型在化探异常识别与提取中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1319-1330.
[6]	张恒荣, 何胜林, 吴进波, 吴一雄, 梁玉楠. 一种基于Kozeny-Carmen方程改进的渗透率预测新方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 899-906.
[7]	姜艳娇, 孙建孟, 高建申, 邵维志, 迟秀荣, 柴细元. 低孔渗储层井周油藏侵入模拟及阵列感应电阻率校正方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 265-278.
[8]	高建申, 孙建孟, 姜艳娇, 崔利凯. 侧向测井电极系结构影响分析及阵列化测量新方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1874-1883.
[9]	潘保芝, 蒋必辞, 刘文斌, 房春慧, 张瑞. 致密砂岩储层含气测井特征及定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 930-937.
[10]	张新培, 于雪峰. 利用地球物理信息描述太古宇潜山有效储集体[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 270-278.
[11]	赵军, 代新雲, 古莉, 祁新忠, 陈伟中. 基于粒度控制的复杂储层渗透性建模方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 279-285.
[12]	郑香伟, 吴健, 何胜林, 胡向阳, 梁玉楠. 基于流动单元的砂砾岩储层渗透率测井精细评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 286-294.
[13]	金博, 黄先雄, 常广发，张胜斌,付海波,李铁柱. 滨里海盆地Д南石炭系碳酸盐岩储层类型及分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(6): 2042-2050.
[14]	张中庆, 庞兵强. 随钻电磁波测井数据处理新方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1720-1726.
[15]	宋延杰，姜艳娇,宋杨，张依妮. 古龙南地区低阻油层胶结指数和饱和度指数影响因素实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(2): 704-714.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed