吉林大学学报(地球科学版)

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

区域滑坡灾害风险评估--以长江三峡库区秭归县为例

彭令1,牛瑞卿1,赵艳南1,邓清禄2   

  1. 1.中国地质大学地球物理与空间信息学院,武汉430074;
    2.中国地质大学工程学院,武汉430074
  • 收稿日期:2012-09-12 出版日期:2013-05-26 发布日期:2013-05-26
  • 作者简介:彭令(1984-),男,博士研究生,主要从事地质灾害预测预报方面的研究工作,E-mail:wuhanpl@gmail.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家“973”计划项目(2011CB710601);国家“863”计划项目(2012AA121303)

Risk Assessment of a Regional Landslide:A Case of Zigui County Territory in Three Gorges Reservoir

Peng Ling1, Niu Ruiqing1, Zhao Yannan1, Deng Qinglu2   

  1. 1.Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan430074, China;
    2.Faculty of Engineering , China University of Geosciences, Wuhan430074, China
  • Received:2012-09-12 Online:2013-05-26 Published:2013-05-26

摘要:

以滑坡灾害突出的三峡库区秭归县为研究区。在深入分析滑坡孕灾环境、诱发因素、滑坡编录和承灾体信息的基础上,利用Logistic回归模型和统计分析方法相结合进行了滑坡危险性评价。通过滑坡灾害致灾强度与承灾体抗灾能力分析了人口、建筑物、生命线工程和土地资源的易损性。采用成本价值核算法对各类承灾体进行了价值核算,最后通过风险模型预测了研究区内未来10年滑坡灾害的生命与经济风险。生命和经济高风险区分别占整个研究区面积的1.11%和2.71%,主要分布在集镇和学校、企事业单位等人口密集区以及交通建设用地等经济价值大的地区;中风险区分别占13.21%和20.66%,主要分布于农村居民生活居住和耕地活动区;低风险区分别占85.68%和76.63%,则分布在经过地质灾害治理和人类活动较为稀少的未利用地及林地等区域。通过实地调查分析与对比验证,发现预测结果与实际灾情较吻合。研究表明,集镇和学校、企事业单位等人口集中区和交通建设用地区是今后减灾防灾部署工作的重中之重。

关键词: 滑坡, 危险性, 易损性, 风险评估, 三峡库区

Abstract:

Zigui County with prominent landslide hazard in Three Gorges Reservoir was taken as study area to conduct systematic research on landslide risk assessment. Based on the detailed analysis on landslide environmental factors, triggering factors, landslide inventory and the information of disaster bearing elements, landslide hazard was quantitatively assessed by using logistic regression model combined with statistical analysis method. The vulnerability of the population, buildings, lifeline engineering and land resources were calculated according to the landslide hazard intensity and the resistance ability of disaster bearing elements. Values attributed to disaster bearing elements were obtained by cost-value method for each element. Finally, landslide risk analysis considering life and economic costs were carried out through quantitative risk models in the studied area for next ten years. Highly risk areas of life and economic account for 1.11% and 2.71% respectively of the total studied area, and mainly distributed in the market town, school and enterprise residential quarters, transportation and construction land where there were dense population and prosperous economic value. Areas with moderate risk account for 13.21% and 20.66% separately, which were primary distributed in the rural residents and cultivated land. Low risk areas account for 85.68% and 76.63% individually mainly distributed in the area of treated geological hazard zone and little human activity of unutilized land and forest land. Combining with the field survey data, the risk analysis results were basically consistent with the status of local landslide disasters. It can be concluded that the critical areas, such as town, schools, enterprises, transport lines and so on, where damages are likely to be great require priority for mitigation actions.

Key words: landslides, hazards, vulnerability, risk assessment, Three Gorges Reservoir

中图分类号: 

  • P642.22
[1] 赵金童, 牛瑞卿, 姚琦, 武雪玲. 雷达数据辅助下的滑坡易发性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1182-1191.
[2] 郑确, 刘财, 田有. 辽宁海城及其邻区地震b值空间分布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 922-933.
[3] 谭福林, 胡新丽, 张玉明, 何春灿, 章涵. 考虑渐进破坏过程的滑坡推力计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 193-202.
[4] 付建康, 罗刚, 胡卸文. 滑坡堰塞坝越顶溢流破坏的物理模型实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 203-212.
[5] 李鹏, 苏生瑞, 马驰, 黄璜, 徐继维. 堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的形成机理——以祖师庙滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1471-1479.
[6] 王孔伟, 常德龙, 李春波, 胡安龙, 魏东. 再论“滑坡群”——以三峡库区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1491-1501.
[7] 秦胜伍, 马中骏, 刘绪, 李广杰, 彭帅英, 陈骏骏, 翟健健. 基于简化Newmark模型的长白山天池火山诱发崩塌滑坡危险性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 826-838.
[8] 徐则民, 梅雪峰, 王礼荣, 张有为, 曾强, 郭丽丽. 滑坡预警中的降水时空变异性——以云南头寨沟为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 154-162.
[9] 安玉科, 吴玮江, 张文, 姚青青, 宋建, 张宏宏. 抗滑桩裂纹控制荷载结构设计法及工程应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 171-178.
[10] 王常明, 田书文, 王翊虹, 阮云凯, 丁桂伶. 泥石流危险性评价:模糊c均值聚类-支持向量机法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1168-1175.
[11] 钱文见, 尚岳全, 杜丽丽, 朱森俊. 充气位置及压力对边坡截排水效果的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 536-542.
[12] 彭令, 徐素宁, 彭军还. 多源遥感数据支持下区域滑坡灾害风险评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 175-186.
[13] 王萌, 姜元俊, 黄栋, 李倩倩. 基于小流域的地震扰动区降雨型滑坡泥石流危险性评价方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1781-1788.
[14] 郭小花, 卢玉东, 李小林, 孙政, 李重阳, 张蓉. 黄河上游德恒隆-锁子滑坡堵塞黄河事件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1789-1797.
[15] 蒋秀姿, 文宝萍, 蒋树, 冯传煌, 赵成, 李瑞冬. 甘肃舟曲锁儿头滑坡活动的主控因素分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1798-1807.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!