Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1255-1267.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201704301

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Geometric Error Analysis of Frequency-Domain Magnetic Dipole-Dipole System

Li Guang1,2,3, Qu Xiaodong1,2,3, Huang Ling1,2, Fang Guangyou1,2   

  1. 1. Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Radiation and Sensing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
    3. Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2017-01-23 Online:2017-07-26 Published:2017-07-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Major Scientific Research Equipments Development Project (ZDYZ2012-1-03-05)

PDF (PC)

435

Abstract: During the underground exploratio with frequency domain electromagnetic instruments based on magnetic dipole model, systematic errors are caused by the position and attitude changes of transmitting and receiving coils due to installation errors, the sway of instruments, as well as the geometric distortion of materials and other factors. The quantitative analysis of geometric errors for frequency-domain electromagnetic instruments has a great guiding significance in instrument production, field operation and system correction. According to the sources of the errors, the geometric errors were divided into two categories, one is the primary field error, the other is the secondary field error. By introducing the tensor matrixes of the primary field and the secondary field, we forwarded the primary field and the secondary fields from nine configurations based on homogeneous earth model, and quantitatively analyzed the features and changes of the geometric errors of the nine configurations in a differential way. Numerical results show that, in the primary field errors introduced by the geometric distortion, only PERyz and PERzy coil configurations do not contain linear term of the position change; only VCA, VCP and HCP configurations do not contain linear term of attitude change. In the secondary field errors introduced by the geometric distortion, PERzx and PERxz coil configurations have the maximum relative error; VCA, VCP and HCP coil configurations are greatly influenced by the change of height and coil separation, which needs real-time measurement for correction; and the VCP coil configuration is least influenced by the change of coil separation and attitude.

Key words: frequency domain electromagnetic, geometric distortion, tensor matrix, primary filed error, secondary field error

CLC Number: 

  • P631.3
[1] Fraser D C. The Multicoil: Ⅱ: Airborne Electro-magnetic System[J]. Geophysics, 1979, 44(8): 1367-1394.
[2] Fraser D C. Dighem Resistivity Techniques in Airborne Electromagnetic Mapping[J]. Geological Survey of Canada, 1986, 22: 49-54.
[3] Cain M J. ResolveSurvey for US Geological Survey East Poplar Oil Fields[R]. Montana: Fugro Airborne Surveys, 2004.
[4] Won I J, Oren A, Funak F. GEM-2A: A Programmable Broadband Helicopter-Towed Electromagnetic Sensor[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(6): 1888-1895.
[5] McNeill J D. EM34-3 Measurements at Two Inter-Coil Spacings to Reduce Sensitivity to Near-Surface Material[R]. Mississauga: Geonics, 1985.
[6] McNeill J D. Why Doesn't Geonics Limited Build a Multi-Frequency EM31 or EM38?[R]. Mississauga: Geonics, 1996.
[7] McNeill J D. Electromagnetic Terrain Conductivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers[R]. Mississauga: Geonics, 1980.
[8] Won I J, Keiswetter D A, Fields G R A, et al. GEM-2: A New Multifrequency Electromagnetic Sensor[J]. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1996, 1(2): 129-137.
[9] Won I J, Keiswetter D A, Hanson D R, et al. GEM-3: AMonostatic Broadband Electromagnetic Induction Sensor[J]. Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1997, 2(1): 53-64.
[10] Huang H, San Filipo B, Oren A, et al. Coaxial Coil Towed EMI Sensor Array for UXO Detection and Characterization[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2007, 61(3): 217-226.
[11] Manstein Y, Manstein A. EM-ISensor NEMFIS: Method, Equipment and Case Stories of Archaeological Prospection[J]. ArcheoSciences, 2009, 33: 321-324.
[12] Tølbøll R J, Christensen N B. Sensitivity Functions of Frequency-Domain Magnetic Dipole-Dipole Systems[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2): F45-F56.
[13] Ward S H, Hohmann G W. Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications[M]. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1988: 131-311.
[14] 王卫平, 曾昭发, 李静, 等. 频率域航空电磁法地形影响和校正方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 941-951. Wang Weiping, Zeng Zhaofa, Li Jing,et al. Topographic Effects and Correction for Frequency Airborne Electromagnetic Method[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(3): 941-951.
[15] Son K H. Interpretation of Electromagnetic Dipole-Dipole Frequency Sounding Data over a Vertically Stratified Earth[D]. North Carolina: North Carolina State University, 1985.
[16] Won I J, Smits K. Airborne Electromagnetic Bathymetry[J]. Geoexploration, 1991, 27(3): 297-319.
[17] Holladay J S, Lo B, Prinsenberg S K. Bird Orientation Effects in Quantitative Airborne Electromagnetic Interpretation of Pack Ice Thickness Sounding[C]//Oceans'97 MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings. Halifax: [s. n.], 1997: 1114-1119.
[18] Balkov E V, Epov M I, Manstein A K, et al. Elements of Calibration and Data Interpretation of EMI Sounding Device EMS[C]//The 10th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics. Utrecht: Near Surface, 2004.
[19] Yin C, Fraser D C. Attitude Corrections of Helicopter EM Data Using a Superposed Dipole Model[J]. Geophysics, 2004, 69(2): 431-439.
[20] 王琦, 林君, 于生宝,等. 固定翼航空电磁系统的线圈姿态及吊舱摆动影响研究与校正[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013, 56(11): 3741-3750. Wang Qi, Lin Jun, Yu Shengbao, et al. Study on Influence and Correction of Coil Attitude and Bird Swing for the Fixed-Wing Time-Domain Electromagnetic System[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(11): 3741-3750.
[21] 曲昕馨, 李桐林, 王飞. 直升机吊舱姿态变化对电磁场测量的影响规律及其校正方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(4): 1310-1321. Qu Xinxin, Li Tonglin, Wang Fei. A Study on the Effect of Bird's Attitude on Helicopter EM Data and the Correction Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(4): 1310-1321.
[22] Lin J. Sensitivity Analysis and Comparison of Frequency-Domain Electromagnetic System Configurations[C]//International Symposium on Antennas, Propagation and EM Theory, 2000 Proceedings. Isape: IEEE Xplore, 2000: 630-633.
[23] Guillemoteau J, Sailhac P, Behaegel M. Modelling an Arbitrarily Oriented Magnetic Dipole over a Homogeneous Half-Space for a Rapid Topographic Correction of Airborne EM Data[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2015, 46(1): 85-96.
[24] West G F, Macnae J C. Physics of the Electroma-gnetic Induction Exploration Method: Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics: Applications: Part A and Part B[M]. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1991: 5-45.
[25] Frischknecht F C, Labson V F, Spies B R, et al. Profiling Methods Using Small Sources[M]. Tulsa: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1991: 105-270.
[26] Bracken R E, Smith D V, Brown P J, et al. Calibrating a Tensor Magnetic Gradiometer Using Spin Data[R]. Reston: US Geological Survey, 2005.
[27] Pang H, Li J, Chen D, et al. Calibration of Three-Axis Fluxgate Magnetometers with Nonlinear Least Square Method[J]. Measurement, 2013, 46(4):1600-1606.
[1] Yin Changchun, Yang Zhilong, Liu Yunhe, Zhang Bo, Qi Yanfu, Cao Xiaoyue, Qiu Changkai, Cai Jing. Characteristics of 3D DC Resistivity Response for Arbitrary Anisotropic Models Using Circular Scanning Measurement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3): 872-880.
[2] Liu Xintong, Liu Sixin, Meng Xu, Fu Lei. Envelope Waveform Inversion of Cross-Hole Radar Without Low Frequency Data [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 474-482.
[3] Wang Yan, Lu Qi, Liu Cai, She Songsheng, Liu Sixin. Using GPR Antenna-Target Polarization Instantaneous Attribute Analysis Method to Detect LNAPL Contaminated Soil [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 491-500.
[4] Yin Changchun, Lu Yongchao, Liu Yunhe, Zhang Bo, Qi Yanfu, Cai Jing. Multigrid Quasi-Linear Approximation for Three-Dimensional Airborne EM Forward Modeling [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 252-260.
[5] Chen Hui, Yin Min, Yin Changchun, Deng Juzhi. Three-Dimensional Magnetotelluric Modelling Using Aggregation-Based Algebraic Multigrid Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 261-270.
[6] Li Dajun, Weng Aihua, Yang Yue, Li Sirui, Li Jianping, Li Shiwen. Three-Dimension Forward Modeling and Characteristics for Surface-Borehole Transient Electromagnetic by Using Staggered-Grid Finite Difference Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(5): 1552-1561.
[7] Liu Yongliang, Li Tonglin, Zhu Cheng, Guan Zhenwei, Su Xiaobo. Precision Analysis of 3D Electromagnetic Field Numerical Modeling Based on Quasi-Linear Integral Equation Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1268-1277.
[8] Chen Shuai, Li Tonglin, Zhang Rongzhe. 1-D Occam Inversion of Transient Electromagnetic in Consideration of Induced Polarization Effect [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1278-1285.
[9] Zeng Zhaofa, Li Wenben, Xi Jianjun, Huang Ling, Wang Zhejiang. Inverse Direction Imaging Method of Array Type GPR Based on DOA Estimation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1308-1318.
[10] Cai Jianhua, Xiao Xiao. De-Noising of Magnetotelluric Signal in the Ore Concentration Area Based on Combination Filter [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(3): 874-883.
[11] Weng Aihua, Liu Jiayin, Jia Dingyu, Yang Yue, Li Jianping, Li Yabin, Zhao Xiangyang. 1-D Inversion for Controlled Source Electromagnetic Sounding Using Limited Memory Quasi-Newton Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 597-605.
[12] Xi Jianjun, Zeng Zhaofa, Huang Ling, Cui Dandan, Wang Zhejiang. Characteristics of the Signal Polarization Field in Array Type Ground Penetrating Radar [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 633-644.
[13] Luo Tianya, Xiong Bin, Cai Hongzhu, Chen Xin, Liu Yunlong, Lan Huaikang, Li Zuqiang, Liang Zhuo. Magnetotelluric Responses of Two-Dimensional Complex Conductivity Structures [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 215-223.
[14] Li Shiwen, Yin Changchun, Weng Aihua. Full-Time Inversion of Time-Domain AEM Data for Resistivity and Magnetic Permeability [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6): 1830-1836.
[15] Han Song, Liu Guoxing, Han Jiangtao. Deep Electrical Structure of Jinxian-Zherong Magnetotelluric Profile in South China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6): 1837-1846.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
Copyright © Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: +86-431-88502374；13756165364　E-mail: xuebao1956@jlu.edu.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd