Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1268-1277.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201704302

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Precision Analysis of 3D Electromagnetic Field Numerical Modeling Based on Quasi-Linear Integral Equation Method

Liu Yongliang, Li Tonglin, Zhu Cheng, Guan Zhenwei, Su Xiaobo   

  1. College of GeoExploration Sciences and Technology, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Received:2016-11-03 Online:2017-07-26 Published:2017-07-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Deep State Detection Technology and the Experimental Research on Special(SinoProbe-03-05) and National Major Scientific Instruments and Equipment Development Projects(2011YQ05006009)

Abstract: The accuracy and the application scope of quasi-linear approximation methods, including scalar quasi-linear approximation, diagonal quasi-linear approximation, quasi-analytic approximation and localized quasi-linear approximation, are still a relatively misty concept in large-scale three-dimensional data inversion. In the paper, we implemented three-dimensional numerical simulation based on these approximation methods. By forward modeling,we systematically compared the accuracy of simulation results, and constrained the range of applications of these methods. Theoretical results show that: The diagonal quasi-linear approximation method has the highest accuracy and the widest range of applications among these methods and can give accurate results when electrical resistivity changes within 3-4 orders of magnitude; The accuracy of the quasi-analytical approximation method is a bit lower than that of the diagonal quasi-linear approximation method, and is suitable for calculating the geoelectrical model whose conductivity contrast between abnormal and background is roughly a few times to a hundred times; The accuracy of scalar quasi-linear approximation method and localized quasi-linear approximation method is the lowest, and they are only able to be used to calculate the geoelectric model of anomalous conductivity and background conductivity ratio of roughly tens of times.

Key words: quasi-linear approximation, quasi-analytic approximation, localized quasi-linear approximation, accuracy comparison

CLC Number: 

  • P631.3
[1] Born M. Optic[M]. New York: Springer,1933.
[2] Berdichevsky M N, Zhdanov M S. Advanced Theory of Deep Geomagnetic Sounding[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1984.
[3] Torres-Verdin C, Habashy T M. Rapid 2.5-Dimen-sional Forward Modeling and Inversion via a New Nonlinear Scattering Approximation[J]. Radio Science, 1994, 29(4): 1051-1079.
[4] Torres-Verdin C, Habashy T M. A Two-Step Linear Inversion of Two-Dimensional Electrical Conductivity[J]. IEEE Transactions on Antennas & Propagation,1995: 43(4):405-415.
[5] Zhdanov M S, Fang S. Quasi-Linear Approximation in 3-D Electromagnetic Modeling[J]. Geophysics,1996, 61(3): 646-665.
[6] Zhdanov M S, Fang S. Three-Dimensional Quasi-Linear Electromagnetic Inversion[J]. Radio Sci, 1996, 31(4): 741-754.
[7] Zhdanov M S, Hursán G. 3D Electromagnetic Inversion Based on Quasi-Analytical Approximation[J]. Inverse Problems, 2000, 16(5): 1297–1322.
[8] Zhdanov M S, Tartaras E. Three-Dimensional Inversion of Multitransmitter Electromagnetic Data Based on the Localized Quasi-Linear Approximation[J]. Geophys J Int, 2002, 148(3): 506-519.
[9] Ueda T, Zhdanov M S. Fast Numerical Modeling of Multitransmitter Electromagnetic Data Using Multigrid Quasi-Linear Approximation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2006, 44(6): 1428-1434.
[10] 孙建国. 高频渐近散射理论及其在地球物理场数值模拟与反演成像中的应用:研究历史与研究现状概述以及若干新进展[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(4):1231-1259. Sun Jianguo. High-Frequency Asymptotic Scattering Thoeries and Their Application in Numerical Modeling and Imaging of Geophysical Fields: An Overview of the Research History and the State-of-the-Art, and Some New Developments[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4): 1231-1259.
[11] 王伯年, 李过房, 曹伟武. 爱因斯坦求和约定的推广[J]. 上海理工大学学报, 2003, 25(1): 5-7. Wang Bonian, Li Guofang, Cao Weiwu. On the Extension of Einstein's Summation Convention[J]. Journal of University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, 2003, 25(1): 5-7.
[12] 李建平. 带地形的三维复电阻率电磁场正反演研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2008. Li Jianping. Research on Electromagnetic Modeling of 3D Complex Resistivity with Topography [D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2008.
[1] Yin Changchun, Yang Zhilong, Liu Yunhe, Zhang Bo, Qi Yanfu, Cao Xiaoyue, Qiu Changkai, Cai Jing. Characteristics of 3D DC Resistivity Response for Arbitrary Anisotropic Models Using Circular Scanning Measurement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3): 872-880.
[2] Liu Xintong, Liu Sixin, Meng Xu, Fu Lei. Envelope Waveform Inversion of Cross-Hole Radar Without Low Frequency Data [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 474-482.
[3] Wang Yan, Lu Qi, Liu Cai, She Songsheng, Liu Sixin. Using GPR Antenna-Target Polarization Instantaneous Attribute Analysis Method to Detect LNAPL Contaminated Soil [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(2): 491-500.
[4] Yin Changchun, Lu Yongchao, Liu Yunhe, Zhang Bo, Qi Yanfu, Cai Jing. Multigrid Quasi-Linear Approximation for Three-Dimensional Airborne EM Forward Modeling [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 252-260.
[5] Chen Hui, Yin Min, Yin Changchun, Deng Juzhi. Three-Dimensional Magnetotelluric Modelling Using Aggregation-Based Algebraic Multigrid Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(1): 261-270.
[6] Li Dajun, Weng Aihua, Yang Yue, Li Sirui, Li Jianping, Li Shiwen. Three-Dimension Forward Modeling and Characteristics for Surface-Borehole Transient Electromagnetic by Using Staggered-Grid Finite Difference Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(5): 1552-1561.
[7] Li Guang, Qu Xiaodong, Huang Ling, Fang Guangyou. Geometric Error Analysis of Frequency-Domain Magnetic Dipole-Dipole System [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1255-1267.
[8] Chen Shuai, Li Tonglin, Zhang Rongzhe. 1-D Occam Inversion of Transient Electromagnetic in Consideration of Induced Polarization Effect [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1278-1285.
[9] Zeng Zhaofa, Li Wenben, Xi Jianjun, Huang Ling, Wang Zhejiang. Inverse Direction Imaging Method of Array Type GPR Based on DOA Estimation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(4): 1308-1318.
[10] Cai Jianhua, Xiao Xiao. De-Noising of Magnetotelluric Signal in the Ore Concentration Area Based on Combination Filter [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(3): 874-883.
[11] Weng Aihua, Liu Jiayin, Jia Dingyu, Yang Yue, Li Jianping, Li Yabin, Zhao Xiangyang. 1-D Inversion for Controlled Source Electromagnetic Sounding Using Limited Memory Quasi-Newton Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 597-605.
[12] Xi Jianjun, Zeng Zhaofa, Huang Ling, Cui Dandan, Wang Zhejiang. Characteristics of the Signal Polarization Field in Array Type Ground Penetrating Radar [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 633-644.
[13] Luo Tianya, Xiong Bin, Cai Hongzhu, Chen Xin, Liu Yunlong, Lan Huaikang, Li Zuqiang, Liang Zhuo. Magnetotelluric Responses of Two-Dimensional Complex Conductivity Structures [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(1): 215-223.
[14] Li Shiwen, Yin Changchun, Weng Aihua. Full-Time Inversion of Time-Domain AEM Data for Resistivity and Magnetic Permeability [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6): 1830-1836.
[15] Han Song, Liu Guoxing, Han Jiangtao. Deep Electrical Structure of Jinxian-Zherong Magnetotelluric Profile in South China [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(6): 1837-1846.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!