J4 ›› 2010, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 432-438.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Attenuation Anisotropy and AVO Analysis

GUO Zhi-qi1, LIU Cai1, FENG Xuan1, HAN Yan-yan1, WANG Xiao-huan2   

  1. 1.College of GeoExploration Science and Technology, Jilin University| Changchun 130026, China;
    2.Exploration and Development Research Institute,Daqing Oilfield Co.Ltd, Daqing, Heilongjiang 163712,China
  • Received:2009-03-23 Online:2010-03-26 Published:2010-03-26

Abstract:

At present, the research on attenuation anisotropy in media mainly focuses on the case of homogeneous media and pays little attention to the effects of attenuation anisotropy on reflection seismic data. For the viscoelastic anisotropic cap rock/reservoir reflection model, the AVO responses of P-P、P-S waves were investigated for the variation of the Thomsen anisotropy parameters δε of cap rock based on the viscoelastic anisotropic reflection and transmission theory. The anisotropy of phase velocity, quality factor and attenuation were studied, and then, the effect of attenuation anisotropy of the cap rock on AVO analysis was investigated. The study showed that not only phase velocity anisotropy but also attenuation anisotropy exists in viscoelastic anisotropic media. Moreover, the anisotropy degree of the attenuation is much stronger than the phase velocity, and the attenuation anisotropy of S wave is much stronger than that of P wave. When considered only interface reflection, with different anisotropy parameters δ and the variation of critical angles of P-P reflection wave, the reflection coefficients for the pre-and post-critical region would be varied. With the variation of different anisotropy parameters ε, both of the critical angles of P-P reflection wave and the reflection coefficients for pre-critical region nearly do not changed. Because of the attenuation anisotropy of cap rock varied significantly for different Thomsen anisotropy parameters δε, this effect will mislead AVO analysis, and should be compensated before AVO analysis.

Key words: viscoelasticity, anisotropy, AVO response, velocity, attenuation

CLC Number: 

  • P631.4
[1] Ye Yunfei, Sun Jianguo, Zhang Yiming, Xiong Kai. Construction of Low-Frequency Model with Three-Dimensional Tomographic Velocity Inversion and Application in Deep-Water Bock W of South China Sea [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 1253-1259.
[2] Deng Xinhui, Liu Cai, Guo Zhiqi, Liu Xiwu, Liu Yuwei. Full Wave Field Seismic Response Simulation and Analysis of Anisotropic Shale Reservoir in Luojia Area of Jiyang Depression [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 1231-1243.
[3] Zhang Bing, Guo Zhiqi, Xu Cong, Liu Cai, Liu Xiwu, Liu Yuwei. Fracture Properties and Anisotropic Parameters Inversion of Shales Based on Rock Physics Model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 1244-1252.
[4] Hu Xinlei, Lü Yanfang, Sun Yonghe, Sun Tongwen. Comprehensive Quantitative Evaluation of Vertical Sealing Ability of Faults in Caprock: An Example of Ed2 Mudstone Caprock in Nanpu Sag [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3): 705-718.
[5] Hu Ning, Liu Cai. Fractional Temporal Derivative Computation Method for Numerical Simulation of Wavefield in Viscous Fluid-Saturated Viscous Two-Phase VTI Medium [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3): 900-908.
[6] Yin Changchun, Yang Zhilong, Liu Yunhe, Zhang Bo, Qi Yanfu, Cao Xiaoyue, Qiu Changkai, Cai Jing. Characteristics of 3D DC Resistivity Response for Arbitrary Anisotropic Models Using Circular Scanning Measurement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2018, 48(3): 872-880.
[7] Lu Yanhong, Wu Zhaoying, Ding Guang, Fu Qi, Zhang Fan. Upper Crustal Velocity Structure in Qianguo M5.8 Earthquake Region [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(6): 1894-1903.
[8] Cui Xin, Li Bo, Zhu Yuanqing, Li Yajun, Mu Juan, Wang Feng. One-Dimension Seismic Velocity Model of Shandong Province Based on Hyposat and HypoDD [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(5): 1572-1581.
[9] Pang Shuo, Liu Cai, Guo Zhiqi, Liu Xiwu, Huo Zhizhou, Liu Yuwei. Estimation of Pore-Shape and Shear Wave Velocity Based on Rock-Physics Modelling in Shale [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(2): 606-615.
[10] Qin Linjiang, Yang Changfu. Analytic Solution to the MT Responses of a Two-Segment Model with Axially Anisotropic Conductivity Structures Overlying a Perfect Insulator [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(4): 1260-1267.
[11] Kang Jian, Wei Qinghai, Zhou Lin, Gao Yan, Zhang Yonggang, Gao Feng. Deep Structure Based on Seismic Array Observations in Daqing Area [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3): 900-910.
[12] Ben Fang, Liu Yunhe, Huang Wei, Xu Chi. MCSEM Responses for Anisotropic Media in Shallow Water [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 581-593.
[13] Liu Yang, Li Bingxiu, Liu Cai, Chen Changle, Yang Xueting. Attenuation Compensation Method of Seismic Wave in the Local Time-Frequency Transform Domain [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 594-602.
[14] Wu Juan, Chen Xiaohong, Bai Min. Viscoacoustic Gaussian Beam Prestack Depth Migration [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(5): 1530-1538.
[15] Dai Ronghuo,Zhang Fanchang,Liu Hanqing,Li Cancan. Non-Linear Pre-Stack Seismic AVA Inversion Based on Bayesian Theory Using Successive Iteration Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2014, 44(6): 2026-2033.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!