Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (2): 644-653.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20210151

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Prediction of Carbonate Porosity and Permeability Based on Machine Learning and Logging Data

Hou Xianmu1, 2, Wang Fuyong1, 2, Zai Yun1, 2, Lian Peiqing3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Exploration,Beijing 102249, China
    2. Unconventional Petroleum Research Institute,China University of Petroleum,Beijing 102249,China
    3. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083,China
  • Received:2021-05-25 Online:2022-03-27 Published:2022-11-22
  • Supported by:
    the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51874320)

Abstract: Accurate prediction of porosity and permeability of carbonate reservoirs is of great significance to the evaluation of carbonate reservoirs. Fractures and dissolved pores are widely developed in carbonate reservoirs, and the prediction of reservoir porosity and permeability from logging curves based on the empirical formulas has large errors. Taking a carbonate reservoir in the Middle East as the research object, we selected 914 core wells to determine porosity and permeability. By using random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector machine (SVM), and long short-term memory  (LSTM) machine learning methods and logging data, we predicted porosity and permeability, optimized machine learning parameters, and screened out logging porosity and permeability prediction methods suitable for carbonate reservoirs. The research results show that there is little difference between the four machine learning methods in predicting reservoir porosity. By adjusting the types of input parameters, the porosity and permeability prediction results can be further improved. When using neutron (NPHI), lithological density (RHOB) ) , and acoustic time difference (DT) logging parameter data as input, the prediction accuracy based on LSTM is the highest, the root mean square error (RMSE) of the porosity prediction result is 4.536 2, and the permeability prediction is poor due to the strong heterogeneity of carbonate reservoirs when using only NPHI as the machine learning input parameter, the RF-based reservoir permeability prediction has the highest accuracy, and its RMSE  is 45.882 3.

Key words: carbonate, logging, porosity, permeability, machine learning, prediction

CLC Number: 

  • TE357
[1] Zhang Yongzhe, Cheng Shanlin, Li Yuedong, Yang Zhaoke. Research and Application of Multi-Source Information for Ore Prospecting and Prediction: Taking Jilin Shajingou Gold Deposit as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1855-1866.
[2] Ding Lei, Chen Dianyuan, Hu Xiangyang, Zhang Hengrong, Wang Yi. Optimization and Application of Fast Dynamic Time Wrapping Algorithm in Logging Curve Similarity Measurement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(6): 2042-2050.
[3] Yang Guohua, Li Wanlu, Meng Bo. Spatiotemporal Distribution of Groundwater Ammonia Nitrogen Based on Machine Learning Methods#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(6): 1982-1995.
[4] Yu Xiaofei, Gong Fanying, Li Yongsheng, Zhang Jiarui. Geological Characteristics of Typical Cobalt Deposits in China and Prediction of Mineral Resources in the Key Areas#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(5): 1377-1418.
[5] Zhang Lihua, Wang Min, Shan Gangyi, Pan Baozhi, Cao Yue. Analysis on Porosity Stress Sensitivity of Volcanic Rocks with Different Lithology and Its Influencing Factors:#br# Taking Volcanic Rocks in Changling Fault Depression as an Example [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 382-389.
[6] Shi Jiangtao, Hao Junming, Wang Xiaolei. Reservoir Characteristics and Controlling Factors of Lower-Middle Ordovician Yingshan Formation in Tahe Area#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 348-362.
[7] Li Zhongtan, Xue Linfu, Ran Xiangjin, Li Yongsheng, Dong Guoqiang, Li Yubo, Dai Junhao. Intelligent Prospect Prediction Method Based on Convolutional Neural Network: A Case Study of Copper Deposits in Longshoushan Area, Gansu Province [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 418-433.
[8] Cui Yitong, Wang Zhuwen, Xu Fanghui, Han Ruiyi, Qi Xinghua. Analysis of Fracture Formation Characteristics of Igneous Rock Based  on Stoneley Wave and Electrical Imaging Logging [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 624-632.
[9] Fu Chendong, Wang Aiyun. Improvement of New Three-Water Model and Determination of Its Parameters [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 654-661.
[10] Chen Wei, Yang Zhouyu, Liao Zhiquan, Yang Bin, Ding Ming. Metallogenic Geological Characteristics and Prospecting Prediction of Jiulongnao Ore Field in Southern Jiangxi#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 403-417.
[11] Wu Meng, Qin Yunhu, Wang Xiaoqing, Yang Liu, Zhu Shifei, Zhang Zhen, Mao Lixin, Zhang Jing, Li Guozhang. Log Response of Coal Quality and Its Prediction Model in Renjiazhuang Coal Mine#br# [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(2): 633-643.
[12] Qin Xiwen, Wang Qiangjin, Wang Xinmin, Guo Jiajing, Chu Xiao. Short-Term Prediction of PM2.5 in Beijing Based on VMDLSTM Method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(1): 214-.
[13] Zhang Tao, Guo Zhiqi, Liu Cai, Liu Xiwu, Liu Yuwei, . Seismic Responses Simulation of InterSalt Shale Oil Rhythm Formation and Prediction of Layer Thickness of Thin Shale Reservoirs [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(1): 281-.
[14] Zhang Bingqiang, Zhao Fuyuan, Yang Qinghao, Huang Yi, Li Junhai, Liu Song. Metallogenic Geological Conditions and Prospecting Direction of Jiadi Gold Deposit in Panxian County, Guizhou Province [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2022, 52(1): 94-.
[15] Fan Wenxin, Li Guangming, Liang Shengxian. Electrical Characteristics of Ore-Controlling Structures and Prospecting Prediction of Zhaxikang Mining Area, Tibet [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1709-1719.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] CHENG Li-ren, ZHANG Yu-jie, ZHANG Yi-chun. Ordovician Nautiloid Fossils of Xainza Region,Tibet[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] LI Bing-cheng. Preliminary Studies on Holocene Climatic In Fuping,Shaanxi Province[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] HE Zhong-hua,YANG De-ming,WANG Tian-wu,ZHENG Chang-qing. SHRIMP U[CD*2]Pb Dating of Zircons from Two-Mica Granite in Baga Area in Gangdise Belt[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] CHEN Li, NIE Lei, WANG Xiu-fan, LI Jin. Seismic Risk Analysis of Some Electric Power Equipment Station in Suizhong[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] JI Hong-jin,SUN Feng-yue2,CHEN Man,HU Da-qian,SHI Yan-xiang,PAN Xiang-qing. Geochemical Evaluation for Uncovered GoldBearing Structures in Jiaodong Area[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] CHU Feng-you, SUN Guo-sheng,LI Xiao-min,MA Wei-lin, ZHAO Hong-qiao. The Growth Habit and Controlling Factors of the CobaltRich Crusts in Seamount of the Central Pacific[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] LI Bin, MENG Zi-fang, LI Xiang-bo, LU Hong-xuan, ZHENG Min. The Structural Features and Depositional Systems of the Early Tertiary in the Biyang Depression[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] LI Tao, WU Sheng-jun, CAI Shu-ming, XUE Huai-ping, YASUNORI Nakayama. Simulation Analysis of the Storage Capacity Based on DEM Before and After Connecting to Yangtze River in Zhangdu Lake[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] KUANG Li-xiong,GUO Jian-hua, MEI Lian-fu, TONG Xiao-lan, YANG Li. Study on the Upheaval of the Bogeda Mountain Block from Angle of Oil and Gas Exploration[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] ZHANG Guang-xin, DENG Wei, HE Yan, RAMSIS Salama. An Application of Hydrological Response Units in Assessment of Soil Salinization Risks[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .