›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (06): 1470-1474.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

高速公路施工区车辆汇入的可接受间隙

孙智勇, 孙小端   

  1. 北京工业大学 交通工程北京市重点实验室, 北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2011-08-20 出版日期:2012-11-01
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划项目(2009BAG13A03).

Gap acceptance of merging in expressway work zone

SUN Zhi-yong, SUN Xiao-duan   

  1. Beijing Key Lab of Traffic Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2011-08-20 Online:2012-11-01

摘要: 在分析高速公路施工区上游过渡区驾驶员选择间隙行为的基础上,采用Logistic模型描述驾驶员接受和拒绝间隙的行为分析高速公路施工区车辆汇入的可接受间隙,并建立了可接受间隙模型。研究驾驶员接受间隙时车辆汇入的概率,从汇入过程选择6个自变量,结合实测数据采用混合逐步选择法得到:后相对车头时距和被超车车辆速度2个自变量与汇入概率显著相关。检验结果表明:模型具有较好的拟合度和预测精度。利用可接受间隙模型,提出了临界可接受间隙的计算公式。研究结论可对施工区上游过渡区长度设计和施工区交通组织和管理提供技术支持。

关键词: 交通运输安全工程, 可接受间隙, Logistic模型, 驾驶行为, 施工区

Abstract: A model was built for the gap acceptance using the analysis method of logistic model to describe the driver behavior of gap acceptance and rejection in the upstream transition area to study the gap acceptance of merging in the expressway work zone.Merge probability of driver accepted gap was studied in gap acceptance model and 6 independent variables were selected from merging. It was found that 2 independent variables, the back relative headway, vehicle speed of being overtaken were significantly related to merge probability based on actual data and mixed step-by-step selection method. The proposed logistic regression model was tested on the fittness and predictive accuracy and the encouraging result was achieved. A critical gap calculation formula was derived from the gap acceptance model. The conclusion provided technical support for the design of upstream transition length, traffic organization and management of the work zone.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation safety, gap acceptance, logistic model, driving behavior, work zone

中图分类号: 

  • U491
[1] Skabardonis A. Modeling the traffic behaviour at grade-separated interchanges[J]. Traffic Engineering and Contro1, 1985, 26(9): 410-415.
[2] Jodie L E, Lily E, Natarajan G. Probability of breakdown at freeway merges using Markov chains[J]. Transport Research Part B, 2001, 35(3): 237-254.
[3] 吴晓层, 范炳全. 城市高架道路下匝道车流插入机制的Markov链模型[J]. 土木工程学报, 2006, 36(1): 117-121. Wu Xiao-ceng, Fan Bing-quan. A Markov chain model for traffic flow on off-ramp of city freeway[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2006, 36(1): 117-121.
[4] 杨小宝. 考虑实施过程的车辆换道模型及其应用[J]. 物理学报, 2009, 58(2): 836-842. Yang Xiao-bao. Lane-changing model considering the maneuver process and its applications[J]. Acta Physica Sinic, 2009, 58(2): 836-842.
[5] 杨小宝,张宁,黄留兵. 通行能力仿真中的换道模型研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2007, 122(2): 82-85. Yang Xiao-bao, Zhang Ning, Huang Liu-bing. Lane changing model in road capacity simulation[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2007, 122(2): 82-85.
[6] Vivek G, Ghulam H. Gap acceptance behavior in mandatory lane changes under congested and uncongested traffic on a multi-lane freeway[C]//Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2007, Washington D C, 2007:2919-2935.
[7] 孙剑, 李克平, 杨晓光. 拥挤交通流交织区车道变换行为仿真[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2009, 21(13): 4174-4179. Sun Jian, Li Ke-ping, Yang Xiao-guang. Simulation on lane-changing behavior under congested weaving sections[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2009, 21(13): 4174-4179.
[8] 冯雨芹, 裴玉龙, 张亚平. 基于近景摄影测量的选择性车道变换模型标定[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报, 2007, 39(8): 1292-1295. Feng Yu-qin, Pei Yu-long, Zhang Ya-ping. Calibration of discretionary lane changing model based on close-range photogrammetry[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2007, 39(8): 1292-1295.
[9] Ahmed K I, Ben-akivam E, Koutsopoulosh N, et al. Models of freeway lane changing and gap acceptance behavior[J]. Transportation and Traffic Theory, 1996, 13(2): 501-515.
[10] 邵长桥, 刘江, 荣建, 等. 双车道公路上驾驶员超车行为研究[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2007, 33(3): 302-305. Shao Chang-qiao, Liu Jiang, Rong Jian,et al. The study of drivers' overtaking behavior on the two·lane highway[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2007, 33(3): 302-305.
[11] Kita H. Effects of merging lane length on the merging behavior at expressway on-ramps[C]//Transportation and Traffic Theory, Amsterdam, 1993: 37-51.
[12] 王济川,郭志刚. Logistic 回归模型方法与应用[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2001.
[1] 代存杰,李引珍,马昌喜,柴获,牟海波. 不确定条件下危险品配送路线多准则优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1694-1702.
[2] 王芳荣, 郭柏苍, 金立生, 高琳琳, 岳欣羽. 次任务驾驶安全评价指标筛选及其权值计算[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1710-1715.
[3] 谭立东, 刘丹, 李文军. 基于蝇复眼的交通事故现场全景图像阵列仿生设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(6): 1738-1744.
[4] 万平, 吴超仲, 林英姿, 马晓凤. 基于驾驶行为多元时间序列特征的愤怒驾驶状态检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1426-1435.
[5] 李显生, 孟祥雨, 郑雪莲, 程竹青, 任圆圆. 非满载罐体内液体冲击动力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(3): 737-743.
[6] 王占中, 赵利英, 曹宁博. 基于多层编码遗传算法的危险品运输调度模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(3): 751-755.
[7] 王海玮, 温惠英, 刘敏. 夜间环境驾驶员精神负荷的生理特性评估与实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 420-428.
[8] 徐进, 陈薇, 周佳, 罗骁, 邵毅明. 汽车转向盘操作与驾驶负荷的相关性[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 438-445.
[9] 郭应时, 付锐, 赵凯, 马勇, 袁伟. 驾驶人换道意图实时识别模型评价及测试[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(6): 1836-1844.
[10] 孙璐, 徐建, 崔相民. 面板数据模型分析及交通事故预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(6): 1771-1778.
[11] 王喆, 杨柏婷, 刘昕, 刘群, 宋现敏. 基于模糊聚类的驾驶决策判别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5): 1414-1419.
[12] 张波,王文军,魏民国,成波. 基于机器视觉的驾驶人使用手持电话行为检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5): 1688-1695.
[13] 马勇, 石涌泉, 付锐, 郭应时. 驾驶人分心时长对车道偏离影响的实车试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(4): 1095-1101.
[14] 徐建, 孙璐. 解决交通事故数据分析中零值问题的模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(3): 769-775.
[15] 金立生, 王岩, 刘景华, 王亚丽, 郑义. 基于Adaboost算法的日间前方车辆检测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(6): 1604-1608.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!