Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (1): 259-267.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20190940

Previous Articles    

Shear strength of reinforced concrete beams based on elastoplastic stress field theory

Er-gang XIONG(),Han XU,Ci TAN,Jing WANG,Ruo-yu DING   

  1. School of Civil Engineering,Chang′an University,Xi′an 710061,China
  • Received:2019-10-11 Online:2021-01-01 Published:2021-01-20

Abstract:

In order to study the shear behavior of reinforced concrete beams based on the elastoplastic stress field theory (EPSF), ICONC, a finite element program based on the EPSF theory, was used to model the concrete members. The influences of finite element mesh size, shape and iterative step number on the simulation results were investigated. Twelve test beams were selected. The simulation results based on EPSF theory, experimental results and ABAQUS simulation results were compared to verify the accuracy of the results based on EPSF theory. The shear capacities of 70 beams subject to shear failure were calculated by the formulas in the Chinese and American code, and also calculated by EPSF theory, then those calculated values were compared with the experimental values. The results show that the mesh size, shape and iteration steps have little influence on the simulation results. ICONC, an applicable program based on EPSF theory, can accurately simulate the failure phenomena of reinforced concrete beams, the yield of reinforcement and the crack distributions of concrete. Compared to ABAQUS, EPSF theory can permit an accurate, convenient and rapid prediction of the ultimate shear capacity for reinforced concrete beams. The changes in concrete strength, shear span ratio and stirrup ratio have little impact on ICONC program simulation results. So the proposed method has certain accuracy and stability.

Key words: structural engineering, reinforced concrete beams, elastoplastic stress field theory, ICONC program, shear capacity

CLC Number: 

  • TU375.1

Fig.1

Actual and adopted material constitutive relationship"

Fig.2

Steel and concrete slab models of four finite element size"

Table 1

Ultimate bearing capacity of different models"

极限承载力/(kN·m-1M1M2M3M4
对称配筋均布压应力3564356435643564
对称配筋均布拉应力182182182182
对称配筋均布剪应力179179179179
非对称配筋均布剪应力129129129129

Table 2

Ultimate bearing capacity of beams with different widths and meshes"

极限承载力/kNρw=0.20%(bw=150)ρw=0.31%(bw=100)ρw=0.61%(bw=50)ρw=1.02%(bw=30)
M126622414597
M226222114194
M326221813690
M426121513489

Fig.3

Finite element mesh of different shapes"

Table 3

Ultimate bearing capacity of beams with different mesh shapes"

网格类型极限承载力网格类型极限承载力
MDR266MD3261
MD1270MD4255
MD2264

Table 4

Experimental beam simulation and measured ultimate bearing capacity"

试件编号PTEST/kNPEPSF/kN

PF

/kN

PEPSFPTESTPFPTEST破坏形式
E?1.5360354374.630.981.04剪压破坏
F?1.0491480561.940.981.14斜压破坏
A?2?24023944110.981.02弯曲破坏
A'?2?14064003950.990.97弯曲破坏
C?2?26026106281.011.04弯曲破坏
A?2?13403444111.011.19剪切破坏
B?2?14564585480.991.20剪切破坏
B?2?23604505481.251.52剪切破坏
C?2?15706006281.051.10剪切破坏

Fig.4

Comparison of calculated and experimental values"

Fig. 5

Crack patterns by DIC and relative stresses of finite element model"

Table 5

Simulation and measured ultimate bearing capacity of experimental beams"

试件编号PTEST/kNPEPSF/kNPEPSFPTEST破坏形式
A24394521.03剪切破坏
B23653310.91剪切破坏
C22902901剪切破坏

Fig.6

Failure phenomena of test beams and relative stresses under the single point loading"

Table 6

Comparison of ultimate bearing capacity obtained by each method"

梁编号PTEST/kNPEPSF/kNPABS/kNPEPSFPTESTPABSPTEST
E?1.5360354382.00.981.06
F?1.0491480554.40.981.13
A?2?2402394403.90.981.00
A′?2?1406400430.40.991.06
C?2?2602600621.21.011.03
A?2?1340344357.81.011.05
B?2?1456458531.30.991.16
B?2?2360450514.41.251.43
C?2?1570600638.41.051.12

Fig. 7

Comparison of theoretical calculations and experimental values"

Table 7

Comparison of values from Chinese, American codes, EPSF theory and experimental results"

参 数EPSF理论中国规范美国规范
均值0.960.800.48
变异系数0.090.230.25
标准差0.090.180.12

Fig. 8

Ratio of three calculated values to experimental values changes with concrete strength"

Fig. 9

Ratio of three calculated values to experimental values changes with shear span ratio"

Fig. 10

Ratio of three calculated values to experimental values changes with hoop rate"

1 Niketić F. Development of a consistent approach for design and assessment of structural concrete members using stress fields and strut-and-tie models[D]. Lausanne: EPFL, Switzerland, 2017.
2 Ruiz M F, Muttoni A. On development of suitable stress fields for structural concrete[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2007, 104(4): 495-502.
3 Vecchio F J, Collins M P. The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1986, 83(2): 219-231.
4 Muttoni A, Schwartz J, Thürlimann B. Design of Concrete Structures with Stress Fields[M]. Basel:Birkhäuser Verlag, 1997.
5 Muttoni A. Die Anwendbarkeit der Plastizitätstheorie in der Bemessung von Stahlbeton[M]. Basel:Birkhäuser Verlag, 1990.
6 CEB-FIB. Model code 2010 First final draft –Volumes 1 fib Bulletin 65[Z].
7 Vecchio F J, Shim W. Experimental and analytical investigation of classic concrete beam tests[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2004, 130(3): 460-469.
8 Frey F, Jirousek J. Méthode des éléments finis Analyse des structures et milieux continues[M]. Lausanne, Suisse: Presses Polytechnique et Universitaires Romandes, 2001.
9 赵娜娜. 基于压力路径法钢筋混凝土梁的抗剪试验研究[D]. 西安:长安大学建筑工程学院, 2017.
Zhao Na-na. Behaviour of reinforced concrete beams for shear in compliance with compressive force path method[D]. Xi'an: School of Architectural Engineering, Chang'an University, 2017.
10 ―2010. 混凝土结构设计规范[S].
11 阎昭琦. 基于压力路径法的大尺寸钢筋混凝土梁斜截面抗剪性能研究[D]. 西安:长安大学建筑工程学院, 2018.
Yan Zhao-qi. Behaviour of big size reinforced concrete beams for shear in compliance with compressive force path method[D]. Xi'an: School of Architectural Engineering, Chang'an University, 2018.
12 易伟建, 吕艳梅. 高强箍筋高强混凝土梁受剪试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2009, 30(4): 94-101.
Yi Wei-jian, Lv Yan-mei. Experimental study on shear behavior of high-strength concrete beams with high-strength stirrups[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2009, 30(4): 94-101.
13 中国建筑科学研究院. 钢筋混凝土构件试验数据集——85年设计规范背景资料续编[M]. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1985.
14 Cladera Bohigas A. Shear design of reinforcement high-strength concrete beams[D]. Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2002.
15 Yoon Y S, Cooc W D, Mitchell D. Minimum shear reinforcement in normal, medium and high-strength concrete beams[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1996, 93(5): 576-584.
16 Hong S G, Kim D J, Kim S Y. Shear strength of reinforced concrete deep beams with end anchorage failure[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2002, 99(1): 12-22.
17 李娟. HRB500级箍筋混凝土梁斜截面受力性能试验研究[D]. 长沙:湖南大学土木工程学院,2007.
Li Juan. Experimental Study on mechanical behavior of diagonal section of reinforced concrete beams with HRB500 stirrups[D]. Changsha: School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, 2007.
18 ACI 318M―14. Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary[S].
[1] Xue-ping FAN,Guang QU,Yue-fei LIU. Bridge extreme stress prediction based on new data assimilation algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 572-580.
[2] De-lei YANG,Le-wei TONG. Calculation formula of SCF for CHS⁃CFSHS welded T⁃joints with brace under axial tension [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1891-1899.
[3] SU Ying-she, YANG Yuan-yuan. Seismic compression performance of the concrete under high temperature [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5): 1436-1442.
[4] SU Xiao-ping,WANG Qing. Corrosion damage of concrete under multi-salt soaking, freezing-thawing and dry-wet cycles [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 112-120.
[5] GUO Jun-ping, DENG Zong-cai, LU Hai-bo, LIN Jin-song. Experiment on shear behavior of reinforced concrete beams strengthened with prestressed high strength steel wire mesh [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(4): 968-977.
[6] ZHANG Li-ye, GUO Xue-dong, DONG Li-juan. Bridge system mean time to failure with load-sharing process [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(05): 1247-1252.
[7] GUO Xue-dong, ZHANG Li-ye, DONG Li-juan, WU Yun-tao, ZHANG Qiang. Bridge system reliability assessment method [J]. , 2012, (03): 634-638.
[8] JIANG Hao, GUO Xue-Dong, ZHANG Li-Ye. Damage diagnosis of concrete structure based on modal strain energy theory [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(增刊): 209-0213.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!