Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 52 ›› Issue (4): 847-855.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20200899

Previous Articles    

Pseudo-static analysis method of pile group earthquake response in liquefying mild inclined sloping ground

Liang TANG1,2(),Pan SI1,2,Jie CUI1,2,Xian-zhang LING1,3,Xiao-feng MAN1,2   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China
    2.Heilongjiang Research Center for Rail Transit Engineering in Cold Regions,Harbin Institute of Technology,Harbin 150090,China
    3.School of Civil Engineering,Qingdao University of Technology,Qingdao 266033,China
  • Received:2020-11-25 Online:2022-04-01 Published:2022-04-20

Abstract:

First, using quadUP element with water-soil dynamic coupling and a multi-yield plastic constitutive model that can accurately describe the liquefaction characteristics of sand and the accumulation of shear deformation, a two-dimensional finite element numerical model of pile-soil dynamic interaction in liquefying mild inclined sloping ground is established. Then, this model is used to obtain the dynamic p-y curve under sinusoidal load. The slope angles and the depth are selected as the control indexes to establish the formula of dynamic p-y curve of saturated sand. Third, combined with the nonlinear Winkler foundation beam model, the pseudo-static analysis model of pile-soil interaction in liquefiable mild inclined ground was established. Based on the finite element analysis results, the validation of the pseudo-static analysis method was achieved before presentation of a detailed parametric study on the pile dynamic response. The results show that the displacement of pile decreases with the increase of the modulus of pile foundation and the rigidity of pile bottom connection. When the bending stiffness of pile foundation is constant, the bending moment and displacement of pile increase significantly with the increase of pile diameter.

Key words: geotechnical engineering, liquefying inclined ground, dynamic p-y curve, pseudo-static analysis, parameter analysis

CLC Number: 

  • TU473

Fig.1

Finite element model of dynamic soil-pile interaction?[18]"

Table 1

Numerical model parameters for sand[19]"

参 数松 砂参 数松 砂
密度ρ/(kg·m-31900剪缩系数c10.2
参考剪切模量Gr /kPa64000剪胀系数d10.4
参考体积模量Br /kPa200000剪胀系数d20.2
摩擦角?/(o)32液化系数l110
峰值剪应变γmax0.1液化系数l20.2
参考围压Pr /kPa100液化系数l31.0
围压系数np0.5屈服面数量n11
相位转换角?PT /(o)27

Fig.2

Base input motion"

Fig.3

Relation between reduction coefficient and pore pressure ratio"

Fig.4

Peak of hysteresis loop of dynamic p-y curve (downslope pile in group at 2° sloping ground)"

Fig.5

Comparison among dynamic p?y curve,p?y curves from API and p?multiplier method (downslope pile in group at 2° sloping ground)"

Fig.6

Comparison of calculated and modified values of dynamic p?y curve (downslope pile in group at 2° sloping ground)"

Fig.7

Relation between proportional coefficient and depth"

Fig.8

Relation between proportion coefficient and inclination factor"

Fig.9

Relationship between depth with slope and intercept"

Fig.10

Simplified numerical model"

Fig.11

Peak displacement of free field soil layer"

Fig.12

Comparison of pseudo-static method and numerical results(downslope pile in group)"

Fig.13

Influence of pile modulus on pile response (at 2° sloping ground)"

Fig.14

Influence of pile bottom connection stiffness on pile response (at 2° sloping ground)"

Fig.15

Influence of pile diameter on pile response (at 2° sloping ground)"

1 Fiegel G L, Kutter B L. Liquefaction-induced lateral spreading of mildly sloping ground[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(12): 2236-2243.
2 Brandenberg S-J, Boulanger R-W, Kutter B-L, et al. Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 1378-1391.
3 Knappett J-A, S-P-G Madabhushi. Liquefaction-induced settlement of pile groups in liquefiable and laterally spreading soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2008, 134(11): 1609-1618.
4 汪明武, Tobita T, Iai S. 倾斜液化场地桩基地震响应离心机试验研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(10): 2012–2017.
Wang Min-gwu, Tobita T, Iai S. Dynamic centrifuge tests of seismic responses of pile foundations ininclined liquefiable soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 8(10): 2012–2017.
5 Ebeido A, Elgamal A, Tokimatsu K, et al. Pile and pile-group response to liquefaction-inducedlateral spreading in four large-scale shake-table experiments[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(10): No. 04019080.
6 Ashford S A, Juirnarongrit T, Sugano T, et al. Soil–pile response to blast-induced lateral spreading. I: field test[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(2): 152-162.
7 Wang Rui, Fu Peng-cheng, Zhang Jian-min. Finite element model for piles in liquefiable ground[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2016, 72: 1-14.
8 Chang Dong-dong, Boulanger R, Brandenberg S, et al. FEM analysis of dynamic soil-pile-structure interaction in liquefied and laterally spreading ground[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2013, 29(3): 733-755.
9 唐亮, 凌贤长, 艾哈迈德·艾格玛. 液化侧向流动场地桩基动力反应振动台试验三维有限元数值模拟方法[J]. 土木工程学报, 2013, 46(): 180-184.
Tang Liang, Ling Xian-zhang, Agma Ahmed. Liquefaction lateral flow site pile foundation dynamic reaction shaker test three-dimensional finite element numerical simulation method[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2013, 46(S1): 180-184.
10 Tabesh A. Lateral seismic analysis of piles[D]. Sydney: University of Sydney, 1997.
11 Miura F. Nonlinear analyses of piles subjected to liquefaction-induced large ground deformation[C]∥Proc of the Third Japan-US Workshopon Earthquake Resistant Design of Lifeline Facilities and Countermeasures For Soil Lique,Tokyo,Japan, 1990: 497-512.
12 Liu L, Dobry R. Effect of liquefaction on lateral response of piles by centrifuge model tests[C]∥Workshop on New Approaches to Liquefaction Analysis, 1999.
13 Japanese Road Association. Specification for Highway Bridges, part V: seismic design[C]∥The International Workshop on Limit State Design in Geotechnical Engineering Practice, Tokyo, Japan, 1996.
14 Choobbasti A J, Zahmatkesh A. Computation of degradation factors of p-y curves in liquefiable soils for analysis of piles using three-dmensional finite element model[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 89: 61-74.
15 Wang X W, Luo F Y, Su Z Y, et al. Efficient finite-element model for seismic response estimation of piles and soils in liquefied and laterally spreading ground considering shear localization[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(6): No. 6016039.
16 Choobbasti A J, Zahmatkesh A. Computation of degradation factors of p-y curves in liquefiable soils for analysis of piles using three-dmensional finite element model[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 89: 61-74.
17 苏雷. 液化侧向扩展场地桩-土体系地震模拟反应分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院, 2016.
Su Lei. Earthquake simulation response of soil-pile system in liquefaction-induced lateral spreading ground[D]. Harbin: School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2016.
18 Yang Z H, Elgamal A, Parra E. Computational model for cyclic mobility and associated shear deformation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(12): 1119-1127.
19 American Petroleum Institute (API). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms(RP2A-WSD)[M].Washington: Springer, 1987.
20 凌贤长, 唐亮. 液化场地桩基侧向响应分析中p-y曲线模型研究进展[J]. 力学进展, 2010, 40(3):250-262.
Ling Xian-zhang, Tang Liang. Research progress of p-y curves model in lateral response analysis of pile foundation in liquefaction site[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2010, 40(3): 250-262.
21 Brandenberg S J, Boulanger R W, Kutter B L, et al. Behavior of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2005, 131(11): 1378-1391.
22 Liu L, Dobry R. Efiect of liquefaction on lateral response of piles by centrifuge model tests[J]. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER) Bulletin, 1995, 9(1): 7-11.
23 唐亮. 液化场地桩⁃土动力相互作用p-y曲线模型研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学土木工程学院, 2010.
Tang Liang. p-y model of dynamic pile-soil interaction in liquefying ground[D]. Harbin: School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2010.
24 Boulanger R W, Curras C J, Kutter B L, et al. Seismic soil-pile-structure interaction experiments and analyses[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(9): 750-759.
[1] Chang-jun ZHONG,Zhong-bin WANG,Chen-yang LIU. Influencing factors and structural optimization of main cable saddle bearing capacity of suspension bridge [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(6): 2068-2078.
[2] Fei ZHANG,Yu-ming ZHU,Shang-chuan YANG,Shu-mao WANG. Emission mitigation analysis of geosynthetic⁃reinforced walls [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2021, 51(2): 631-637.
[3] Wen-bin TAO,Jun-ling HOU,Tie-lin CHEN,Bin TANG. Mechanical analysis of full⁃length anchorage with high pretension post⁃tensioning method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 631-640.
[4] Deng-hui GAO,Yi-chuan XING,Min-xia GUO,Ai-jun ZHANG,Xian-tao WANG,Bao-hong MA. Modified hyperbola model of interface between unsaturated remolded loess and concrete [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(1): 156-164.
[5] GU Hai-dong,LUO Chun-hong. Experiment on soil arching effect of pit supporting structure with scattered row piles and soil nail wall [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1712-1724.
[6] ZHANG Kuo, TAN Qing-chang, WANG Shun, WANG Cong-hui, WANG Chun-yan. Effect of surface roughness amplitude on point contact mixed lubrication condition [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(02): 377-381.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!