Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (4): 1016-1027.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20221081

Previous Articles    

Overall mechanical performance of jointless bridges with arch structure behind abutment

Qiu ZHAO1(),Peng CHEN1,Yu-wei ZHAO2,Ao YU1   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering,Fuzhou University,Fuzhou 350108,China
    2.School of Information Engineering,Wuhan University of Engineering Science,Wuhan 430200,China
  • Received:2022-08-24 Online:2024-04-01 Published:2024-05-17

Abstract:

Based on the trial design of the actual continuous prestressed concrete jointless bridge structure, the new type of integral jointless bridge with arch structure behind abutment was proposed. The three-dimensional beam-truss calculation model and the solid finite element model of the new structure was established. The effect of the interaction between the pile foundation and the soil around the pile was considered, and the half bridge organic glass model test was designed according to the principle of similarity ratio to verify the correctness of the simulation method. The verified numerical model was used to establish the full bridge beam-truss model and the full bridge solid model for the arch structure behind the abutment, and the effect of rise-span ratio and pile length on the overall mechanical performance was analyzed. The analysis results show that: The displacement and stress values of the model test are 8% and 21% different from those of the beam-truss model, and -3% and 5.3% different from those of the solid model. With the increase of rise-span ratio, the horizontal constraint on the arch foot decreases, the vertical displacement of the arch crown decreases relatively, the axial force on the main beam decreases gradually, and the bending moment variation range also decreases slightly, the horizontal force generated by the temperature is more transmitted to the arch structure behind the abutment. With the reduction of the pile length, the vertical displacement of the arch crown decreases, the shear force at the pile top decreases relatively, the axial force on the main beam decreases gradually, and the range of bending moment changes slightly decreases. Considering the actual foundation conditions, the jointless bridges with shorter pile length and larger rise-span ratio has better overall mechanical performance.

Key words: bridge engineering, integral jointless bridge, organic glass test, numerical simulation, arch structure, overall mechanical performance

CLC Number: 

  • U441

Fig.1

Diagram of jointless bridges with arch structure behind abutment"

Fig.2

Overall layout"

Fig.3

Three-dimensional frame simplified model"

Fig.4

Finite element model"

Fig.5

Half-bridge organic glass model test"

Fig.6

Loading layout"

Fig.7

Comparison of displacement results"

Fig.8

Comparison of stress results"

Fig.9

Influence of rise-span ratio on main beam deformation"

Fig.10

Influence of rise-span ratio on displacement forarch crown"

Fig.11

Influence of rise-span ratio on shear force atpile top"

Fig.12

Influence of rise-span ratio on horizontal reaction force for arch foot"

Fig.13

Influence of rise-span ratio on axial force forside span"

Fig.14

Influence of rise-span ratio on bending moment for side span"

Fig.15

Influence of pile length on main beam deformation"

Fig.16

Influence of pile length on displacement forarch crown"

Fig.17

Influence of pile length on shear force at pile top"

Fig.18

Influence of pile length on horizontal reactionforce for arch foot"

Fig.19

Influence of pile length on axial force for side span"

Fig.20

Influence of pile length on bending moment for side span"

1 Briseghella B, 薛俊青, 兰成, 等. 整体式桥台桥梁极限长度[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2014, 31(1):104-110.
Briseghella B, Xue Jun-qing, Lan Cheng,et al.Maximum length of integral abutment bridges[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2014, 31(1):104-110.
2 Xue J Q. Retro fit of existing bridges with concept of integral abutment bridge: static and dynamic parametric analyses[D]. Trento: University of Trento, 2013.
3 郭维强, Briseghella B, 薛俊青, 等. 无伸缩缝桥梁动力特性与抗震性能研究[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报,2021, 38(4): 89-100.
Guo Wei-qiang, Briseghella B, Xue Jun-qing,et al. Research on dynamic characteristics and seismic performance of jointless bridges[J]. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2021, 38(4): 89-100.
4 彭大文, 洪锦祥, 郭爱民, 等. 无伸缩缝桥梁的动力特性计算与试验研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2005(2): 72-76.
Peng Da-wen, Hong Jin-xiang, Guo Ai-min, et al. Dynamic analysis and field-test of jointless bridge[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2005(2): 72-76.
5 占雪芳, 邵旭东. 半整体式无缝桥中带预压缝的配筋接线路面温降效应[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(11): 74-78.
Zhan Xue-fang, Shao Xu-dong. Temperature effect of reinforced approach pavement of semi-integral abutment jointless bridge with pre-cutting cracks for temperature drops[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(11): 74-78.
6 陈宝春, 付毳, 庄一舟, 等. 中国无伸缩缝桥梁应用现状与发展对策[J]. 中外公路, 2018, 38(1): 87-95.
Chen Bao-chun, Fu Cui, Zhuang Yi-zhou, et al. The application status and development strategy of jointless bridges in China[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2018, 38(1): 87-95.
7 黄福云, 庄一舟, 付毳,等. 无伸缩缝梁桥抗震性能与设计计算方法研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动,2015, 35(5): 15-22.
Huang Fu-yun, Zhuang Yi-zhou, Fu Cui, et al. Review on the seismic performance and simplified design method of jointless bridge[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2015, 35(5): 15-22.
8 Ardalan S, Atorod A. Flexible Pile Head in Jointless Bridges: Experimental Investigation[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2015, 20(4): 9-20.
9 金晓勤, 邵旭东. 半整体式全无缝桥梁研究[J]. 土木工程学报, 2009, 42(9): 68-73.
Jin Xiao-qin, Shao Xu-dong. A study of fully jointless bridge-approach system with semi-integral abutment[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2009, 42(9): 68-73.
10 Tobia Z, Briseghella B, Lan C. Parametric and pushover analyses on integral abutment bridge[J]. Engineering Structures, 2011, 33(2): 502-515.
11 Gabriele F, Cihan C, Flavia D L, et al. Integral abutment bridges:Investigation of seismic soil-structure interaction effects by shaking table testing[J]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2021, 50(6): 1517-1538.
12 Brent M P, Adam S F, Lowell G, et al. Integral bridge abutment to approach slab connection[J]. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2013, 18(2): 179-181.
13 Olivier B, Einpaul J, Muttoni A. Experimental investigation of soil-structure interaction for the transition slabs of integral bridges[J]. Structural Concrete, 2015, 16(4): 470-479.
14 Xue J Q, Briseghella B, Lin J H,et al. Design and field tests of a deck-extension bridge with small box girder[J].Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2018, 5(6): 467-479.
15 洪锦祥. 整体式桥台桥梁的简化计算模型与受力性能研究[D]. 福州: 福州大学土木工程学院, 2006.
Hong Jin-xiang. Research on symolified calculating model and loaded behavior of integral abutment bridges[D]. Fuzhou: college of civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, 2006.
16 金永学, 徐栋, 郑明万, 等. 基于统一边界和梁格模型的整体式桥台桥梁分析[J]. 同济大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021, 49(1): 40-48.
Jin Yong-xue, Xu Dong, Zheng Ming-wan, et al. Analysis of an integral abutment bridge based on unified boundary condition and grillage model[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2021, 49(1):40-48.
17 黄福云, 张峰, 单玉麟, 等. 整体式桥台-桩基-土相互作用内力计算方法研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021,34(6): 69-79.
Huang Fu-yun, Zhang Feng, Shan Yu-lin, et al. Calculation method of internal force of integral abutment pile foundation-soil interaction[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(6): 69-79.
18 中华人民共和国行业标准. 公路桥涵设计通用规范 ()[S]. 北京: 人民交通出版社, 2015.
19 朱伟庆, 刘永健, 衡江峰, 等. 采用不同下部结构形式的整体式无缝桥受力特征[J]. 建筑科学与工程学报, 2017, 34(1): 49-57.
Zhu Wei-qing, Liu Yong-jian, Heng Jiang-feng, et al. Mechanical characteristics of integral abutment bridges with different substructures[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2017, 34(1): 49-57.
20 王先前, 郭晓燕, 严国齐. 整体式桥梁力学性能的关键参数分析[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2018, 15(9): 2276-2284.
Wang Xian-qian, Guo Xiao-yan, Yan Guo-qi. Parametric study on the mechanical properties of integral bridges[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2018, 15(9): 2276-2284.
[1] Hong ZHANG,Zhi-wei ZHU,Tian-yu HU,Yan-feng GONG,Jian-ting ZHOU. Bridge bolt defect identification method based on improved YOLOv5s [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(3): 749-760.
[2] Yi-gang WANG,Yu-peng WANG,Hao ZHANG,Si-an ZHAO. Identification and analysis of aerodynamic noise sources in the bogie area of high⁃speed trains [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 346-355.
[3] Zhi-qiang HAN,Gang XIE,Ya-juan ZHUO,Zuo-long LUO,Hua-teng LI. Vibration response of continuous girder bridge based on wheel⁃deck coherent excitation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 436-444.
[4] Guo-jun YANG,Ya-hui QI,Xiu-ming SHI. Review of bridge crack detection based on digital image technology [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 313-332.
[5] Wei-hua ZHANG,Jia-ming LIU,Li-peng XIE,Heng DING. Lane⁃changing model of autonomous vehicle in weaving area of expressway in intelligent and connected mixed environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 469-477.
[6] Guo-jin TAN,Ji OU,Yong-ming AI,Run-chao YANG. Bridge crack image segmentation method based on improved DeepLabv3+ model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 173-179.
[7] Guan-xu LONG,Xiu-shi ZHANG,Gong-feng XIN,Tao WANG,Gan YANG. Bridge weigh-in-motion combined with machine version [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 188-197.
[8] Xing WEI,Ya-jie GAO,Zhi-rui KANG,Yu-chen LIU,Jun-ming ZHAO,Lin XIAO. Numerical simulation of residual stress field of stud girth weld in low temperature environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 198-208.
[9] Zhi ZHENG,Pei YUAN,Xuan-hui JIN,Si-si WEI,Bo GENG. Experimental on composite flexible anti⁃collision fender of bridge pier [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2581-2590.
[10] Ran AN,You-zhi WANG. Shear properties of shear stud connectors under combined tension and shear loading [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2554-2562.
[11] Xin-dai ZUO,Jin-quan ZHANG,Shang-chuan ZHAO. Fatigue stiffness degradation and life prediction method of in⁃service concrete T⁃beams [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2563-2572.
[12] Chun-li WU,Shi-ming HUANG,Kui LI,Zheng-wei GU,Xiao-ming HUANG,Bing-tao ZHANG,Run-chao YANG. Analysis of pier action effect under flood based on numerical simulation and statistical analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1612-1620.
[13] Zheng-wei GU,Pan ZHANG,Dong-ye LYU,Chun-li WU,Zhong YANG,Guo-jin TAN,Xiao-ming HUANG. Earthquake⁃induced residual displacement analysis of simply supported beam bridge based on numerical simulation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1711-1718.
[14] Hui JIANG,Xin LI,Xiao-yu BAI. Review on development of bridge seismic structural systems: from ductility to resilience [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1550-1565.
[15] Guo-jin TAN,Qing-wen KONG,Xin HE,Pan ZHANG,Run-chao YANG,Yang-jun CHAO,Zhong YANG. Bridge scour depth identification based on dynamic characteristics and improved particle swarm optimization algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1592-1600.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!