Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 1188-1195.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20220728

Previous Articles    

Vehicle trajectory prediction model for multi-vehicle interaction scenario

Ling HUANG1,2(),Zuan CUI1,Feng YOU1,3(),Pei-xin HONG1,Hao-chuan ZHONG1,Yi-xuan ZENG1   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,China
    2.Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS,Southeast University,Nanjing 210096,China
    3.Pazhou Lab,Guangzhou 510330,China
  • Received:2022-06-10 Online:2024-05-01 Published:2024-06-11
  • Contact: Feng YOU E-mail:hling@scut.edu.cn;youfeng@scut.edu.cn

Abstract:

A DIP-LSTM model with dynamic interactive poling layer is proposed, which enables neighboring vehicles to share hidden states of LSTM network by pooling to get the characteristic of historical trajectory, and then realizes interactive modeling of time-space relationship between target vehicle and surrounding vehicles. NGSIM from USA and High-D from Germany are used to train and test the model, and the accuracy, robustness and transferability of the model are verified. The results show that compared with the traditional model prediction method, the DIP-LSTM network show advantages in prediction accuracy and long-time prediction considering multi-vehicle interactive information, and the model has good transferability and robustness, which significantly improves the practicability and universality of intelligent vehicle trajectory prediction model.

Key words: vehicle engineering, automatic driving, trajectory prediction, multi-vehicle interaction, long short-term memory

CLC Number: 

  • U495

Fig.1

Overall structure of model"

Fig.2

Schematic diagram of dynamic interaction pooling"

Fig.3

LSTM decoder"

Table 1

RMSE comparison of different LSTM models"

模型预测时域
1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s
LSTM0.681.763.214.826.87
S-LSTM0.631.432.634.126.18
SV-LSTM0.621.412.443.875.73
DIP-LSTM0.581.242.123.144.33

Fig.4

RMSE comparison of different LSTM model"

Fig.5

Performance comparison of different models in I-80 following and lane changing scenarios"

Table 2

Results of robustness of each model"

干扰模型预测时域/s
1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s
±10%噪声LSTM1.574.087.2511.1816.91
S-LSTM1.323.155.879.2414.23
SV-LSTM1.293.115.819.1314.07
DIP-LSTM1.152.865.438.1811.67
±20%噪声LSTM2.236.1711.0519.2728.24
S-LSTM2.015.469.5616.2423.34
SV-LSTM1.975.419.4715.8222.67
DIP-LSTM1.854.978.6114.1719.87
±30%噪声LSTM3.359.2516.4831.2841.25
S-LSTM3.088.3214.6426.3237.62
SV-LSTM3.028.2514.2125.8736.58
DIP-LSTM2.847.7313.1523.2131.18

Table 3

Results of transferability of each model"

数据集模型RMSE预测时域/s
1 s2 s3 s4 s5 s
NGSIM I-101LSTM0.862.314.948.3611.31
S-LSTM0.731.863.766.638.21
SV-LSTM0.711.783.526.297.78
DIP-LSTM0.641.652.875.246.62
High-DLSTM2.165.578.8615.0221.12
S-LSTM1.834.677.2411.5616.72
SV-LSTM1.784.557.0211.0216.14
DIP-LSTM1.423.256.429.6214.27
1 Lefevre S, Vasquez D, Laugier C. A survey on motion prediction and risk assessment for intelligent vehicles[J]. Robomech Journal, 2014, 1(1):No.101186.
2 Ammoun S, Nashashibi F. Real time trajectory prediction for collision risk estimation between vehicles[C]∥ IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computer Communication & Processing, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 2009: 417-422.
3 Broadhurst A, Baker S, Kanade T. Monte Carlo road safety reasoning[C]∥ 2005 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, Las Vegas, USA, 2005: 319-324.
4 Aoude G S, Desaraju V R, Stephens L H, et al. Driver behavior classification at intersections and validation on large naturalistic data set[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012, 13(2):724-736.
5 Xin L, Wang P, Chan C, et al. Intention-aware long horizon trajectory prediction of surrounding vehicles using dual LSTM networks[C]∥ International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, USA, 2018: 1441-1446.
6 季学武, 费聪, 何祥坤, 等. 基于LSTM网络的驾驶意图识别及车联轨迹预测[J]. 中国公路学报, 2019, 32(6): 34-42.
Ji Xue-wu, Fei Cong, He Xiang-kun, et al. Intention recognition and trajectory prediction for vehicles LSTM networks[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(6): 34-42.
7 Deo N, Trivedi M M. Multi-Modal trajectory prediction of surrounding vehicles with maneuver based LSTMs[C]∥ IEEE Conference on Intelligent Vehicles (IV), Changshu, China, 2018: 1179-1184.
8 Altché F, Fortelle A D L. An LSTM network for highway trajectory prediction[C]∥ International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Yokohama, Japan, 2017: 353-359.
9 Deo N, Trivedi M M. Convolutional social pooling for vehicle tajectory prediction[C]∥ International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Salt Lake, USA, 2018: 1549-1557.
10 Zhang H, Wang Y, Liu J, et al. A multi-modal states based vehicle descriptor and dilated convolutional social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction[C]∥ SAE Technical Papers, New York, USA, 2020:1-8.
11 Wang J Q, Huang H Y, Li K Q, et al. Towards the unified principles for level 5 autonomous vehicles[J/OL]. [2022-06-10].
12 Sajjad M, Omar Y, Jarrah A, et al. Deep learning-based vehicle behavior prediction for autonomous driving applications: a review[J]. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2020, 23(1): 33-47.
13 Alahi A, Goel K, Ramanathan V, et al. Social LSTM: human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces[C]∥ IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition(CVPR), New York, USA, 2016: 961-971.
14 Graves A. Generating sequences with recurrent neural networks[J]. arXiv Preprint, 2013, 8:No.13080850.
15 Federal Highway Administration. NGSIM-Next generation simulation [EB/OL]. [2022-06-10]. .
16 Robert K, Julian B, Lutz E, et al. The highD dataset: a drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on german highways for validation of highly automated driving systems [C]∥ International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, USA, 2018: 2118-2125.
17 Savitzky A, Golay M J. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures[J]. Analytical Chemistry, 1964, 36(8): 1627-1639.
18 黄玲, 郭亨聪, 张荣辉, 等. 人机混驾环境下基于LSTM的无人驾驶车辆换道行为模型[J]. 中国公路学报, 2020, 33(7): 156-165.
Huang Ling, Guo Heng-cong, Zhang Rong-hui, et al. LSTM-based lane-changing behavior model for unmanned vehicle under environment of heterogeneous human-driven and autonomous vehicles[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2020, 33(7): 156-165.
19 Huber P J. Robust statistics[M]. New York: John Wiley & Son, 2004.
[1] Hong-yan GUO,Lian-bing WANG,Xu ZHAO,Qi-kun DAI. Joint estimation of vehicle mass and road slope considering lateral motion [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(5): 1175-1187.
[2] Shao-hua WANG,Qi-rui ZHANG,De-hua SHI,Chun-fang YIN,Chun LI. Analysis of nonlinear vibration response characteristics of hybrid transmission system with dual-planetary gear sets [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(4): 890-901.
[3] Xue-jing DU,Ning WANG,Jie ZHANG,Yu-long PEI. Control strategy of lateral stability of semi-trailer train in dangerous section of cold area [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(4): 996-1006.
[4] Zhen-hai GAO,Rong-gui CAI,Tian-jun SUN,Tong YU,Hao-yuan ZHAO,Hao BAN. Data⁃filtering method for driving behavior based on vehicle shared autonomy [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(3): 589-599.
[5] Xian-yi XIE,Yu-han WANG,Li-sheng JIN,Xin ZHAO,Bai-cang GUO,Ya-ping LIAO,Bin ZHOU,Ke-qiang LI. Intelligent vehicle trajectory tracking control based on adjusting step size of control horizon [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(3): 620-630.
[6] Xiao-lin DENG,Fu-mo YANG,Shan-gan QIN. Comparative analysis on crashworthiness of a novel bamboo⁃like hexagonal gradient hierarchical multicellular tube [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 333-345.
[7] Yi-gang WANG,Yu-peng WANG,Hao ZHANG,Si-an ZHAO. Identification and analysis of aerodynamic noise sources in the bogie area of high⁃speed trains [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 346-355.
[8] Jian-jun NIE,Jun-kai HOU,Xiao-lin XIE,Hong-zhen YAN. Design and obstacle surmounting performance analysis of a novel mobile chassis for inspection robot [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 356-364.
[9] Tie WANG,Xu-dong LI,Cheng TIAN,Hong-wei ZHAO. Building biaxial fatigue damage model of wheel rims based on multi-axial loads projection theory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 99-104.
[10] Xu-dong LI,Xin-yu WANG,Cheng TIAN,Xin-feng ZHANG,Zhi-hui NIU,Zhi-qiang ZHAO. Compiling vehicle durability load spectrum based on customer usage correlation [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(1): 66-75.
[11] Zhao-wei CHEN,Qian-hua PU. Suppression characteristics of vehicle⁃bridge coupling vibration of long⁃span cable⁃stayed bridge with resilient wheels [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2519-2532.
[12] Ping-yi LIU,Xiao-ting LI,Ruo-lin GAO,Hai-tao LI,Wen-jun WEI,Ya WANG. Design and experiment of tilt-driving mechanism for the vehicle [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(8): 2185-2192.
[13] Xue-jin HUANG,Jin-xing ZHONG,Jing-yu LU,Ji ZHAO,Wei XIAO,Xin-mei YUAN. Electric vehicle charging load forecasting method based on user portrait [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(8): 2193-2200.
[14] Shu-pei ZHANG,Ming-yue XIA,Wei ZHANG,Zhao CHEN,Yi-xiang CHEN. Impact dynamic modeling and simulation for ball joint with clearance considering nonlinear stiffness [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(8): 2227-2235.
[15] Hui CHEN,Ya-jun SHAO. Measurement method of pavement surface spectrum with multi⁃sensor coupling based on inertial benchmark [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(8): 2254-2262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!