高压氧治疗突发性耳聋效果评价的Meta分析

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20170217

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的：探讨高压氧治疗对突发性耳聋的疗效，为其治疗提供指导。方法：检索Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、MEDLINE、万方数据库和中国知网数据库自建库到2016年7月有关高压氧联合药物治疗突发性耳聋的文献。应用Cochrane协作网提供的RevMan5.3软件对纳入文献的数据进行处理。结果：共纳入39篇随机对照试验（RCTs）文献，共计4599例患者，其中高压氧联合药物治疗2418例（治疗组），单纯药物治疗2181例（对照组）。纳入36篇文献对治疗组和对照组之间临床疗效进行Meta分析，治疗组疗效优于对照组（RR：1.26，95%CI：1.22~1.30，P< 0.0001）。纳入6篇文献比较治疗组与对照组言语频率平均听阈（PTA）改善程度，治疗组PTA改善更明显（WMD：11.8，95%CI：4.77~18.83，P< 0.000 1）。纳入11篇文献分析引入高压氧治疗的早晚对临床疗效的影响，早期联合高压氧治疗优于晚期（RR：1.42，95%CI：1.31~1.53，P< 0.00001）。结论：高压氧联合药物治疗对于突发性耳聋疗效优于单纯药物治疗，并可明确改善PTA，且早期联合高压氧治疗疗效优于晚期治疗。

关键词: 临床疗效, 高压氧, Meta分析, 突发性耳聋

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of treatment of sudden deafness using hyperbaric oxygenation, and to provide guidance for its treatment. Methods: The studies about sudden deafness treated with hyperbaric oxygenation combined with drug were retrieved in Cochrane Library, PubMed, MEDLINE, Wanfang Database and CNKI up to July 2016. RavMan 5.3 provided by Cochrane was used for Meta-analysis. Results: Thirty-nine studies which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs)were included, a total of 4 599 cases,of which 2 418 cases received hyperbaric oxygenation therapy combined with drug treatment as treatment group and 2 181 cases received drug treatment alone as control group. A total of 36 studies about the comparison of clinical efficacy between treatment group and control group were included in the Meta-analysis, the result showed that treatment group had a significant clinical efficacy than control group(RR:1.26,95%CI:1.22-1.30,P< 0.0001). A total of 6 studies about the improvement of the pure tone average(PTA)in the two groups were included in the Meta-analysis, the PTA gain was significant better in hyperbaric oxygenation group(WMD:11.8,95%CI:4.77-18.83,P< 0.000 1).A total of 11 studies about the stage of using hyperbaric oxygenation therapy were included in the Meta-analysis, the result suggested that the early use of hyperbaric oxygenation therapy had better effect than the late use of hyperbaric oxygenation (RR:1.42,95%CI:1.31-1.53,P< 0.000 01). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygenation combined with drug therapy is better than drug therapy alone, the PTA gain is significantly improved and the introduction of hyperbaric oxygenation therapy at the earlier stage shows better results.

Key words: Meta-analysis, hyperbaric oxygenation, sudden deafness, clinical efficacy

中图分类号:

R764.437

马冉阳, 于红, 汪欣. 高压氧治疗突发性耳聋效果评价的Meta分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(02): 298-305.

MA Ranyang, YU Hong, WANG Xin. Evaluation on clinical efficacy of hyperbaric oxygenation in treatment of sudden deafness:A Meta-analysis[J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2017, 43(02): 298-305.

参考文献

[1] 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会. 突发性聋诊断和治疗指南(2015) [J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 50(6):443-447.
[2] Teranishi M, Katayama N, Uchida Y, et al. Thirty-year trends in sudden deafness from four nationwide epidemiological surveys in Japan [J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2007, 127(12):1259-1265.
[3] Cadoni G, Fetoni AR, Agostino S, et al. Autoimmunity in sudden sensorineural hearing loss:possible role of anti-endothelial cell autoantibodies [J]. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 2002(548):30-33.
[4] Quaranta N, Ramunni A. Endothelial progenitor cells in sudden sensorineural hearing loss [J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2011, 131(4):347-350.
[5] Pezzoli M, Magnano M, Maffi L, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as salvage treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss:a prospective controlled study [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2015, 272(7):1659-1666.
[6] Ohno K, Noguchi Y, Kawashima Y, et al. Secondary hyperbaric oxygen therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss in the subacute and chronic phases [J]. J Med Dent Sci, 2010, 57(2):127-132.
[7] Cekin E, Cincik H, Ulubil SA, et al. Effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy in management of sudden hearing loss [J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2009, 123(6):609-612.
[8] Topuz E, Yigit O, Cinar U, et al. Should hyperbaric oxygen be added to treatment in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss? [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2004, 261(7):393-396.
[9] Fattori B, Berrettini S, Casani A, et al. Sudden hypoacusis treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy:a controlled study [J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2001, 80(9):655-660.
[10] Schwab B, Flunkert C, Heermann R, et al. HBO in the therapy of cochlear dysfunctions:first results of a randomized study; proceedings of the EUBS Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Collected Manuscripts of XXIV Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Underwater and Baromedical Society[C]. Stockholm:EUBS. 1998:40-42.
[11] Pilgramm M, Lamm H, Schumann K. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in sudden deafness [J]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol, 1985, 64(7):351-354.
[12] Cavallazzi G, Pignataro L, Capaccio P. Italian experience in hyperbaric oxygen therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss; proceedings of the International Joint Meeting on Hyperbaric and Underwater Medicine[C].Bologna:Grafica Victoria,1996:647-649.
[13] 邢丹红. 59例突发性耳聋患者应用高压氧进行治疗的临床疗效研究 [J]. 中外医疗, 2015(17):35-36.
[14] 黎柱培, 蔡燕文, 张运如. 高压氧舱联合药物治疗突发性耳聋的疗效观察 [J]. 北方药学, 2015,12(11):52-53.
[15] 潘燕, 陈方方. 高压氧舱治疗突发性耳聋的疗效观察 [J]. 实用医技杂志, 2008, 15(16):2080-2081.
[16] 任存格. 高压氧辅助治疗突发性耳聋60例的疗效观察 [J]. 实用临床医学, 2011, 12(8):92-93.
[17] 胡华. 高压氧辅助治疗突发性耳聋的临床效果分析 [J]. 中国医药指南, 2012, 10(17):161-162.
[18] 陈悦. 高压氧结合药物综合治疗突发性耳聋45例疗效分析 [J]. 中国疗养医学, 2010, 19(3):257-258.
[19] 汪洋, 卢兵, 谢彗星. 高压氧联合地塞米松治疗突发性耳聋临床效果观察? [J]. 河北医学, 2015, 21(2):295-297.
[20] 姜成兴, 王萍. 高压氧联合葛根素治疗突发性耳聋疗效观察 [J]. 中国社区医师:医学专业, 2011, 13(12):101.
[21] 鲍兆麟. 高压氧联合药物与单独药物治疗突发性耳聋临床疗效的研究 [J]. 医药前沿, 2015, 5(16):65.
[22] 黄金樵, 胡伟群, 薛章委, 等. 高压氧联合药物与单独药物治疗突发性耳聋临床疗效分析 [J]. 海峡药学, 2015, 27(5):107-108.
[23] 陈开明, 周春群. 高压氧联合药物治疗突发性耳聋76例临床分析 [J]. 重庆医学, 2008, 37(9):907-908.
[24] 曾斌, 匡爱华. 高压氧联合药物治疗突发性耳聋104例疗效观察 [J]. 宁夏医科大学学报, 2010, 32(8):917-918.
[25] 吴武. 高压氧联合药物治疗突发性耳聋临床对比研究 [J]. 四川医学, 2013, 34(6):873-875.
[26] 孟新宇, 刘明秋. 高压氧联合银杏达莫静滴治疗突发性耳聋临床体会 [J]. 中国卫生产业, 2012(31):28-29.
[27] 郑晓秋, 陈代静, 向汉周, 等. 高压氧联合治疗突发性耳聋临床疗效分析 [J]. 中国当代医药, 2010, 17(30):19-20.
[28] 彭治龙. 高压氧与常规药物治疗突发性耳聋患者的效果比较 [J]. 中国医学创新, 2012, 9(17):22-23.
[29] 边宇. 高压氧与地塞米松联合用药治疗102 例突发性耳聋临床效果分析 [J]. 系统医学, 2016, 1(7):8-10.
[30] 陈泉东. 高压氧在突发性耳聋治疗中的疗效分析 [J]. 中国社区医师:医学专业, 2010, 12(12):93-93.
[31] 刘晓燕, 闫保星, 叶放蕾, 等. 高压氧治疗突发性耳聋96例临床分析 [J]. 中国实用医刊, 2013, 40(9):107-108.
[32] 贾敏, 袁琨. 高压氧治疗突发性耳聋的疗效观察 [J]. 中国康复, 2010, 25(3):210-211.
[33] 刘舟. 高压氧治疗突发性耳聋的临床效果观察 [J]. 医学信息, 2013, 26(5):191-192.
[34] 罗红灿, 高文达, 黄玉芳. 高压氧治疗突发性耳聋的临床效果研究 [J]. 中外医学研究, 2014, 12(28):108-109.
[35] 贾晓玲. 高压氧治疗突发性耳聋患者的疗效 [J]. 中国康复, 2013, 28(2):136-137.
[36] 刘红梅. 高压氧综合治疗突发性耳聋59例临床观察 [J]. 实用医技杂志, 2012, 19(1):52-53.
[37] 甄宗礼, 李长华, 孙万军, 等. 高压氧综合治疗突发性耳聋76例疗效观察 [J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2008, 29(11):1327-1328.
[38] 陈良, 王翠英, 唐圣芹, 等. 高压氧综合治疗突发性耳聋112例效果分析 [J]. 现代医药卫生, 2013, 29(1):53-53.
[39] 陈金中, 伍玉军, 李雯, 等. 高压氧综合治疗突发性耳聋不同时窗疗效分析 [J]. 中国医学创新, 2014(4):23-24.
[40] 聂采现, 邓长秀, 唐明灿, 等. 高压氧综合治疗突发性耳聋的疗效观察 [J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2007, 22(6):530-532.
[41] 张述宣, 刘友. 高压氧综合治疗突发性耳聋的疗效观察 [J]. 内蒙古医学杂志, 2009, 41(6):718-719.
[42] 栗娜, 史莉华. 高压氧综合治疗突发性耳聋的疗效观察 [J]. 广西医学, 2013, 5):658-659.
[43] 黄怀, 李宁, 古菁, 等. 高压氧综合治疗与药物治疗突发性耳聋的对比研究 [J]. 重庆医学, 2010, 39(8):937-938.
[44] Alimoglu Y, Inci E, Edizer DT, et al. Efficacy comparison of oral steroid, intratympanic steroid, hyperbaric oxygen and oral steroid + hyperbaric oxygen treatments in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss cases [J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 268(12):1735-1741.
[45] Murphylavoie H, Piper S, Moon RE, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss [J]. Undersea Hyperb Med, 2012, 39(3):765.
[46] 王秋莎, 田树昌, 孙爱华, 等. 高压氧治疗对感音性耳聋患者铁缺乏等因素的影响 [J]. 中华航海医学与高气压医学杂志, 2007, 14(1):26-28.