吉林大学学报(医学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6): 1649-1654.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587X.20230633

• 方法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

新型冠状病毒快速检测标本前处理方法改良及其效果评价

万广财,李铤,孙唯秀,于秀艳()   

  1. 吉林省肿瘤医院检验科,吉林 长春 130012
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-28 出版日期:2023-11-28 发布日期:2023-12-22
  • 通讯作者: 于秀艳 E-mail:yuxiuyan1968@sohu.com
  • 作者简介:万广财(1989-),男,吉林省长春市人,主管技师,医学硕士,主要从事临床分子生物学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省科技厅卫生与健康技术创新项目(2018J025)

Modification and effect evaluation of pretreatment methods for rapid detection specimens of SARS-CoV-2

Guangcai WAN,Ting LI,Weixiu SUN,Xiuyan YU()   

  1. Department of Clinical Laboratory,Tumor Hospital,Jilin Province,Changchun 130012,China
  • Received:2023-01-28 Online:2023-11-28 Published:2023-12-22
  • Contact: Xiuyan YU E-mail:yuxiuyan1968@sohu.com

摘要:

目的 改良新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)标本前处理检验方法,并评价其效果。 方法 收集90例SARS-CoV-2阴性标本和30例SARS-CoV-2阳性标本,按检验方法分为传统组、改良1组和改良2组。传统组标本采用胍盐联合56 ℃、30 min水浴方式灭活、单管震荡、标本去编号和单手开盖方式检验;改良1组采用胍盐灭活、单管震荡、标本去编号和单手开盖方式检验;改良2组采用胍盐灭活,上下、左右和180度角的方式整批震荡,标本去编号及单手开盖方式检验。采用实时荧光定量PCR(RT-qPCR)法检测各组标本的循环阈值(Ct)和检出时间,Spearman相关分析法分析组间Ct值的相关性,Blank-Altman法进行一致性检验,记录各组标本SARS-CoV-2检出时间。 结果 改良1组Ct值与传统组Ct值具有强相关性(P<0.01),相关系数(r)=0.975 4(0.966 2—0.982 1);改良2组与传统组的Ct值具有强相关性(P<0.01),r=0.986 2(0.980 9—0.990 0)。改良1组与传统组检测SARS-CoV-2阴性标本的组间偏差为0.158 2(-0.613 7—0.930 1),检测SARS-CoV-2阳性标本的组间偏差为0.117 0(-0.403 1—0.637 1),改良1组与传统组呈良好的一致性;改良2组与传统组检测SARS-CoV-2阴性标本的组间偏差为0.015 7(-0.550 4—0.581 8),检测SARS-CoV-2阳性标本的组间偏差为0.022 7(-0.454 1—0.499 4),改良2组与传统组呈良好的一致性。改良1组90例SARS-CoV-2标本检出时间为15 min,改良2组90例SARS-CoV-2标本检出时间为10 min,传统组90例SARS-CoV-2标本检出时间为45 min。与传统组比较,改良1组检出时间可减少约67%,改良2组可减少约11%。 结论 改良的SARS-CoV-2标本检验方法与传统检验方法具有强相关性和良好一致性,可节约核酸检测时间,提高SARS-CoV-2核酸检测效率。

关键词: 新型冠状病毒, 核酸检验技术, 快速诊断, 平均循环阈值, 相关系数

Abstract:

Objective To improve the pre-processing laboratory test method for the severe acute respiratory syndome,coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) specimens, and to evaluate its effectiveness. Methods A total of 90 SARS-CoV-2 negative specimens and 30 SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens were collected. The specimens were divided into traditional group, modified 1 group, and modified 2 group, according to the test method. The specimens in traditional group were inactivated by using the guanidine salts and a 56 ℃, 30 minute water bath, followed by single tube oscillation, specimen de-identification, and single-handed lid opening for testing. The specimens in modified 1 group were inactivated by using the guanidine salts, followed by single tube oscillation, specimen de-identification, and single-handed lid opening for testing. The specimens in modified 2 group were inactivated by using the guanidine salts, followed by batch oscillation in vertical, horizontal, and 180-degree angle, specimen de-identification, and single-handed lid opening for testing. Real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) method was used to detect the cycle threshold (Ct) values and detection time of the specimens in various groups; Spearman correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation of Ct values between various groups; Blank-Altman method was used to perform the consistency test; the detection time of SARS-CoV-2 of the specimens in various groups was recorded. Results The Ct values of the specimens in modified 1 group were strongly correlated with those in traditional group (P<0.01), and the correlation coefficient(r)=0.975 4 (0.966 2-0.982 1). The Ct values of the specimens in modified 2 group were strongly correlated with those in traditional group (P<0.01), r=0.986 2 (0.980 9-0.990 0). The inter-group deviation of detecting SARS-CoV-2 negative specimens between modified 1 group and traditional group was 0.158 2(-0.613 7-0.930 1), and the inter-group deviation of detecting SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens was 0.117 0 (-0.403 1-0.637 1), indicating good consistency.The inter-group deviation between modified 2 group and traditional group for detecting SARS-CoV-2 negative specimens was 0.015 7(-0.550 4-0.581 8), and for detecting SARS-CoV-2 positive specimens was 0.022 7(-0.454 1-0.499 4), which indicated the good consistency. The detection time of 90 SARS-CoV-2 specimens in modified 1 group was 15 min, while the detection time of 90 SARS-CoV-2 specimens in modified 2 group was 10 min and the detection time of 90 SARS-CoV-2 specimens in traditional group was 45 min. Compared with traditional group, the detection time in modified 1 group was reduced by 67%and the detection time in modified 2 group was reduced by 11% . Conclusion The modified SARS-CoV-2 specimen testing method shows strong correlation and good consistency with the traditional testing method. It can save the detection time and improve the efficiency.

Key words: Novel coronavirus, Nucleic acid testing technique, Rapid diagnosis, Mean cycle threshold, Correlation coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • R446.6