侧向约束下柔性桩复合地基沉降特性

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201703202

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 侧向约束技术在地基处理工程中能有效地减小地基沉降。本文结合铁路工程与软土工程特性，采用模型试验与数值模拟的方法，研究了侧向约束（桩）对柔性桩（夯实水泥土桩）复合地基沉降的影响，分析了柔性桩和土体沉降变化随荷载水平的变化规律，探讨了侧向约束条件下土体模量、桩间距等因素对地基沉降的影响。研究结果表明：在柔性桩复合地基中设置侧向约束桩，当土体压缩模量较小时，采用2d（d为桩径）或3d桩距皆能较好地降低桩的沉降量；随着土体压缩模量的增大，桩距采用3d时减沉作用降低、2d时减沉效果增强、4d时减沉作用不明显；桩间土体沉降量在桩距为2d及3d时，减沉作用呈现先减小后增大的特点，4d时其沉降量减小比值为4%~5%。因此，合理设置侧向约束桩才能有效限制软土侧向挤出，以达到减少复合地基沉降的目的。

关键词: 侧向约束, 柔性桩复合地基, 沉降, 沉降比值

Abstract: Lateral restraint technique can effectively reduce the ground settlement during the treatment practice of soft soil foundation. Based on the characteristics of road engineering and engineering properties of soft soil, the effect of lateral restraint (pile) on the settlement of composite foundation reinforced by flexible pile (rammed soil-cement pile) was studied by means of model experiment and numerical simulation. Furthermore, the changing patterns of pile and soil settlement with the loading level were analyzed, and the influence of soil modulus and pile spacing on foundation settlement was discussed taking the lateral restraint condition into consideration. The results revealed that when lateral restraint piles were applied to the composite foundation reinforced by flexible pile, the pile spacing of 2d (d is pile diameter) and 3d both reduced the pile settlement effectively if soil compression modulus was low; as the soil compression modulus increased, the settlement reducing effects decreased when pile spacing was 3d, and it increased when pile spacing was 2d, while the settlement reducing effects can hardly be observed when pile spacing was 4d. However, as the piles spacing was 2d and 3d, the reducing effect to soil settlement decreased first and then increased; when pile spacing of 4d was applied, the reduced amount of the settlement was around 4%-5%. Therefore, a reasonable setting of lateral restraint pile was required for effectively restricting the lateral extrusion of soft soil, and consequently reducing the settlement of composite foundation.

Key words: lateral restraint, composite foundation reinforced by flexible pile, settlement, settlement ratio

中图分类号:

TU477

吴有平, 张可能, 刘杰, 何杰. 侧向约束下柔性桩复合地基沉降特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 818-825.

Wu Youping, Zhang Keneng, Liu Jie, He Jie. Settlement Characteristics of Composite Foundation Reinforced by Flexible Piles with Lateral Restraint[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2017, 47(3): 818-825.

参考文献

[1] 刘峰,范炳娟,张彤. 柔性桩处理高铁路基在沈丹客专中的应用分析[J]. 筑路机械与施工机械化, 2013, 30(11): 104-106. Liu Feng, Fan Bingjuan, Zhang Tong. Analysis on Subgrade Treatment of Shenyang-Dandong Passenger Dedicated Line with Flexible Piles [J]. Bridge and Tunnel Construction and Machinery, 2013, 30(11): 104-106.
[2] 曾长贤,程寅,吴大龙,等. 高速铁路上覆厚砂层下卧厚淤泥层地基不同处理方法的加固效果对比[J]. 中国铁道科学, 2014, 35(4): 1-8. Zeng Changxian, Cheng Yin, Wu Dalong, et al. Comparison of Different Foundation Treatment Effects on Thick Sand Overlying Thick Silt Foundation of High Speed Railway [J]. China Railway Science, 2014, 35(4): 1-8.
[3] 铁路客运网. 2015年铁路新开工项目[EB/OL]. (2015-04-10). http://www.zgtlky.com/bencandy.php? fid= 47&id=72741. Railway Passenger Network. New Railway Project in 2015[EB/OL]. (2015-04-10).http://www.zgtlky.com/bencandy.php?fid=47&id=72741.
[4] Tavenas F, Leroueil S. Effects of Stresses and Time on Yielding of Clays[J]. Jpn Soc of Soil Mech and Found Eng, 1977, 1:319-326.
[5] Handy R L. Does Lateral Stress Really Influence Sett-lement[J]. Geotechnical & Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(7): 623-626.
[6] 王志亮,李永池,殷宗泽.考虑土体侧胀性的路堤沉降计算探讨[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(10): 1772-1777. Wang Zhiliang, Li Yongchi, Yin Zongze. Discussion on Settlement Calculation of Embankment Considering Lateral Dilation Behavior of Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2005, 24(10): 1772-1777.
[7] 王峰,金武,王宏坤,等. 考虑侧向变形影响的客运专线路基沉降的修正[J]. 岩土工程学报,2010,32(增刊2): 245-248. Wang Feng, Jin Wu, Wang Hongkun, et al. Amendment of Subgrade Settlement of Passenger Dedicated Line Considering the Lateral Deformation Effects [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(Sup. 2): 245-248.
[8] 卢萌盟,谢康和,李传勋,等. 考虑桩土侧向变形的复合地基固结解[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(2): 181-187. Lu Mengmeng, Xie Kanghe, Li Chuanxun, et al. Analytical Solution for Consolidation of Composite Ground Considering Lateral Deformations of Column and Surrounding Soil [J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(2): 181-187.
[9] Loganathan N, Balasubramaniam A S, Bergado D T. Deformation Analysis of Embankments[J]. Geotechnical Engineering, 1993,119(8): 1185-1206.
[10] 韩君良,赵岩. 高路堤侧向位移沉降特性分析[J]. 武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版), 2012, 36(1): 165-167. Han Junliang, Zhao Yan. Analysis on the Settlement Characteristic of Lateral Displacement of the High Embankment[J]. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology (Transportation Science & Engineering), 2012, 36(1): 165-167.
[11] 刘杰,何杰,谭谨. 柔性桩复合地基中软土侧向挤出的影响因素[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(7): 2333-2338. Liu Jie, He Jie, Tan Jin. Influencing Factors of Lateral Extrusion on Soft Soil in Composite Foundation with Flexible Columns[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2014, 45(7): 2333-2338.
[12] 吴保全. 粉土中格栅结构复合地基的原理与技术方法研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2008. Wu Baoquan. Study on the Principles and Technical Methods for Grid Composite Foundation in Silt [D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2008.
[13] 柏松平,陈兴培,李勇林. 侧向限制法软土处理技术研究[J]. 公路,2005(7): 127-130. Bai Songping, Chen Xingpei, Li Yonglin. Study of Soft Soil Treatment Technology of Lateral Restraint [J]. Highway, 2005 (7): 127-130.
[14] 吴有平,刘杰,何杰. 水泥土桩应力测试方法与试验[J]. 湖南工业大学学报,2012,26(1): 23-26. Wu Youping, Liu Jie, He Jie. Experiment and Study on the Stress Testing of Cement-Soil Piles [J]. Journal of Hunan University of Technology, 2012, 26(1): 23-26.
[15] 王常明, 常高奇, 吴谦, 等. 静压管桩桩-土作用机制及其竖向承载力确定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 805-813. Wang Changming, Chang Gaoqi, Wu Qian, et al. Pile-Soil Interaction Mechanism and a Method to Determine Vertical Bearing Capacity of Prestressed Concrete Pipe Pile[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(3): 805-813.
[16] 朱小军,龚维明,赵学亮,等. 垫层土拱效应试验与计算方法[J]. 东南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,43(5): 957-961. Zhu Xiaojun, Gong Weiming, Zhao Xueliang, et al. Experiment and Calculation Methods of Soil Arching in Cushion[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 43(5): 957-961.
[17] 王立明. 有支点柔性支护结构主动区土压力和增强机理研究[D]. 上海:同济大学,2007. Wang Liming. The Research on Earth Pressure an Reinforced Mechanism in the Active Area behind Propped Flexible Retaining Walls[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2007.

相关文章 15

[1]	杨忠平, 赵凯, 高宇豪, 向宫固, 刘新荣. 基于模型试验的欠固结深厚土石混合回填区隧道施工力学响应[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1945-1957.
[2]	刘刚, 彭轶群, 徐昊, 裴江涛, 骆祖江. 基于统计学的地面沉降监测网优化设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1240-1255.
[3]	苑成旺, 张敏, 张少龙, 秦磊, 郭海洋, 墨海滢, 信旸. 长春地铁基坑支护结构变形与地表沉降特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 879-892.
[4]	刘波, 李诗浓, 李伟, 王文鹏, 鲁程鹏, 束龙仓. 基于栅格信息量法的区域地面沉降风险评价：以河北省沧州市为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 919-929.
[5]	刁国君, 何昕. 地铁明挖车站下穿越既有建筑物的局部暗扩挖施工关键技术 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 536-549.
[6]	张向涛, 张丽丽 , 胡杰, 张青林, 张涛, 郑文义, 魏成豪. 珠江口盆地深水区白云南洼-荔湾凹陷新生代构造-热演化模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1912-1926.
[7]	徐成华, 何政宇, 刘刚, 施威, 骆祖江. 南京江北新区地铁盾构开挖引发地面沉降三维数值模拟预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1316-1325.
[8]	韩红闪, 朱琳, 郭高轩, 李炳华, 卢灿. 新水情背景下北京平原朝阳—通州沉降区地面沉降特征及其影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1326-1338.
[9]	袁帅, 王君, 吴朝峰, 沈青松, 舒俊伟, 孙红月. 虹吸排水法处理软土地基的水位与沉降计算模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 208-218.
[10]	王伟, 王兴, 周勋, 韦生达. 砂卵石地层盾构区间地表沉降影响因素聚类分析#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 219-230.
[11]	刘希雯, 刘志宏, 高翔. 孙吴—嘉荫盆地沾河断陷构造变形及其对沉积作用的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 393-.
[12]	骆祖江, 成磊, 张兴旺, 于丹丹, 徐成华. 悬挂式止水帷幕深基坑降水方案模拟优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1946-1956.
[13]	孟世豪, 崔亚莉, 田芳, 罗勇, 石鸿蕾. 基于MODFLOW-SUB建立变渗透系数的地下水流-地面沉降模型[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 550-559.
[14]	彭恺然, 刘红帅, 平新雨, 程旷. CFD-DEM耦合模拟中拖曳力模型精度[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1400-1407.
[15]	秦胜伍, 张延庆, 张领帅, 苗强, 程秋实, 苏刚, 孙镜博. 基于Stacking模型融合的深基坑地面沉降预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1316-1323.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed