伪随机源时间域航空电磁响应系统辨识

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20200174

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在时间域航空电磁系统中，采用高频伪随机序列作为激励源是实现浅层高分辨地质探测的有效途径。为了提高大地脉冲响应的辨识精度，在基本相关辨识方法的基础上，本文提出了一种基于时间域循环相关计算的高精度辨识方法，通过消除旁瓣效应影响和在时间域下求解维纳-霍夫方程获取大地脉冲响应。数值模拟仿真结果表明，辨识大地响应相对误差均方根为2.2×10^-7，早期大地响应辨识误差小于10^-10。该高精度辨识方法具有较好的噪声压制能力，在观测时间较短时，单周期辨识提升的信噪比为8.7 dB，优于同等条件下线性叠加降噪方法提升的信噪比6.1 dB。

关键词: 航空电磁, 伪随机序列, m序列, 相关计算, 高精度辨识, 噪声压制

Abstract: In the time domain airborne electromagnetic system, using high-frequency pseudo-random binary sequence as excitation source is an effective way to realize shallow high-resolution geological exploration. In order to improve the identification accuracy, a high-precision identification method based on time-domain cyclic correlation calculation is proposed in this paper. The impulse response of the Earth is obtained by eliminating the side lobe effect and solving the Wiener-Hoff equation in the time domain. The numerical simulation results show that the root mean square value of the relative error in identifying the Earth response is 2.2×10^-7,while the identification error of the Early earth response is less than 10^-10, which proves that this identification method is accurate. Further analysis shows that this high-precision identification method has strong noise suppression ability in a short observation time. The signal-to-noise ratio improved by the single-period identification method is 8.7 dB, which is better than the 6.1 dB improved by the linear superposition noise reduction method under the same conditions.

Key words: airborne electromagnetic, pseudo-random binary sequence, m-sequence, correlation calculation, accurate identification, noise suppression

中图分类号:

P631

朱凯光, 景春阳, 范天姣, 杨洋, 彭聪. 伪随机源时间域航空电磁响应系统辨识[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(6): 1881-1889.

Zhu Kaiguang, Jing Chunyang, Fan Tianjiao, Yang Yang, Peng Cong. Identification of Time Domain Airborne Electromagnetic Response with Pseudo-Random Binary Sequence[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2021, 51(6): 1881-1889.

参考文献

[1] 殷长春,黄威,贲放. 时间域航空电磁系统瞬变全时响应正演模拟[J]. 地球物理学报,2013,56(9):3153-3162. Yin Changchun, Huang Wei, Ben Fang. The Full-Time Electromagnetic Modeling for Time-Domain Airborne Electromagnetic Systems[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(9):3153-3162.
[2] Wright D, Ziolkowski A, Hall G. Improving Signal-to-Noise Ratio Using Pseudo Random Binary Sequences in Multi Transient Electromagnetic (MTEM) Data[C]//68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Vienna:EAGE, 2006:P065.
[3] Ziolkowski A, Wright D. Comparison of PRBS and Square-Wave Transient CSEM Data over Peon Gas Discovery, Norway[J]. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2011, 30(1):583-588.
[4] Ziolkowski A, Hobbs B, Wright D. Multitransient Electromagnetic Demonstration Survey in France[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(4):F197-F209.
[5] 汤井田,罗维斌. 基于相关辨识的逆重复m序列伪随机电磁法[J]. 地球物理学报,2008,51(4):1226-1233. Tang Jingtian, Luo Weibin. Pseudo-Random Electromagnetic Exploration Based on Invert-Repeated m-Sequence Correlation Identification[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2008, 51(4):1226-1233.
[6] 罗维斌,李庆春,汤井田. 编码电磁测深[J]. 地球物理学报,2012,55(1):341-349. Luo Weibin, Li Qingchun, Tang Jingtian. Coded Source Electromagnetic Sounding Method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012, 55(1):341-349.
[7] 齐彦福,殷长春,王若,等. 多通道瞬变电磁m序列全时正演模拟与反演[J]. 地球物理学报,2015,58(7):2566-2577. Qi Yanfu, Yin Changchun, Wang Ruo, et al. Multi-Transient EM Full-Time Forward Modeling and Inversion of m-Sequences[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(7):2566-2577.
[8] 武欣,薛国强,底青云,等. 伪随机编码源电磁响应的精细辨识[J]. 地球物理学报,2015,58(8):2792-2802. Wu Xin, Xue Guoqiang, Di Qingyun, et al. Accurate Identification for the Electromagnetic Impulse Response of the Earth with Pseudo Random Coded Waveforms[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(8):2792-2802.
[9] 王若,王妙月,底青云,等. 伪随机编码源激发下的时间域电磁信号合成[J]. 地球物理学报,2016,59(12):4414-4423. Wang Ruo, Wang Miaoyue, Di Qingyun, et al. Signal Synthesis of Time-Domain Electromagnetic Response Excited by a Pseudo Random Binary Sequence Source[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59(12):4414-4423.
[10] 王显祥,底青云,王妙月,等. 基于m伪随机序列的电磁法抗噪能力分析[J]. 地球物理学报,2016,59(5):1861-1874. Wang Xianxiang, Di Qingyun, Wang Miaoyue, et al. A Study on the Noise Immunity of Electromagnetic Methods Based on m Pseudo-Random Sequence[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2016, 59(5):1861-1874.
[11] 欧阳涛,底青云,薛国强,等. 利用多通道瞬变电磁法识别深部矿体:以内蒙兴安盟铅锌银矿为例[J]. 地球物理学报,2019,62(5):1981-1990. Ouyang Tao, Di Qingyun, Xue Guoqiang, et al. Identifying Deep Ore Bodies Using the Multi-Channel Transient Electromagnetic Method (MTEM):An Example of a Lead-Zinc-Silver Mine in Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(5):1981-1990.
[12] 陈超健,蒋奇云,莫丹,等. 基于灰色判别准则和有理函数滤波的伪随机电磁数据去噪[J]. 地球物理学报,2019,62(10):3854-3865. Chen Chaojian, Jiang Qiyun, Mo Dan, et al. De-Noising Pseudo-Random Electromagnetic Data Using Gray Judgment Criterion and Rational Function Filtering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2019, 62(10):3854-3865.
[13] 牛之琏. 时间域电磁法原理[M]. 长沙:中南大学出版社,2007. Niu Zhilian. Principle of Time-Domain Electromagnetic Method[M]. Changsha:Central South University Publishing House, 2007.
[14] 淳少恒,陈儒军,耿明会. 伪随机m序列及其在电法勘探中的应用进展[J]. 地球物理学进展,2014,29(1):439-446. Chun Shaoheng, Chen Rujun, Geng Minghui. Review of the Pseudo-Random m Sequence and Its Electrical Prospecting of Exploration Geophysics[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(1):439-446.
[15] 李白男. 伪随机信号及相关辨识[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1987. Li Bainan. Pseudo-Random Signal and Correlation Identification[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 1987.
[16] 韩雪,殷长春,任秀艳,等. 时间域航空电磁系统探测深度研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2019,49(5):1448-1456. Han Xue, Yin Changchun, Ren Xiuyan, et al. Research on Exploration Depth of Time-Domain Airborne EM System[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2019, 49(5):1448-1456.
[17] 甄晓丹. 相关辨识的算法优化[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京),2018. Zhen Xiaodan. The Algorithm Optimization of Correlation Identification[D]. Beijing:China University of Geosciences (Beijing), 2018.
[18] 罗维斌,李梅,陈儒军. 相关辨识谱激电法及野外实验[J]. 地球物理学进展,2017,32(3):1393-1398. Luo Weibin, Li Mei, Chen Rujun. Induced Polarization Method Based on Circular Cross-Correlation Method and Field Experiment[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017, 32(3):1393-1398.
[19] Roinila T, Helin T, Vilkko M, et al. Circular Correlation Based Identification of Switching Power Converter with Uncertainty Analysis Using Fuzzy Density Approach[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2009, 17(6):1043-1058.
[20] 裴易峰,殷长春,刘云鹤,等. 时间域航空电磁磁场计算与应用[J]. 地球物理学进展,2014,29(5):2191-2196. Pei Yifeng, Yin Changchun, Liu Yunhe, et al. Calculation and Application of B-Field for Time-Domain Airborne EM[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(5):2191-2196.
[21] 张建国,武欣,齐有政,等. 时间域编码电磁勘探方法研究[J]. 雷达学报,2014,3(2):158-165. Zhang Jianguo, Wu Xin, Qi Youzheng, et al. Investigation on Time Domain Coded Electromagnetic Exploration Method[J]. Journal of Radars, 2014, 3(2):158-165.

相关文章 15

[1]	朱凯光, 王昊, 彭聪, 张琼, 范天姣, 景春阳. 基于BP神经网络的固定翼航空电磁线圈姿态校正[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(1): 252-260.
[2]	韩雪, 殷长春, 任秀艳, 刘云鹤, 张博, 蔡晶. 时间域航空电磁系统探测深度研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(5): 1448-1456.
[3]	曾昭发, 霍祉君, 李文奔, 李静, 赵雪宇, 何荣钦. 任意各向异性介质三维有限元航空电磁响应模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 433-444.
[4]	殷长春, 卢永超, 刘云鹤, 张博, 齐彦福, 蔡晶. 多重网格准线性近似技术在三维航空电磁正演模拟中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 252-260.
[5]	李世文, 殷长春, 翁爱华. 时间域航空电磁电阻率和磁导率全时反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1830-1836.
[6]	林君, 张扬, 张思远, 舒旭, 杜文元, 林婷婷. 强电磁干扰下磁共振地下水探测噪声压制方法研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1221-1230.
[7]	朱凯光, 李玥, 孟洋, 王凌群, 谢宾, 程宇奇. 最小噪声分离在航空电磁数据噪声压制中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 876-883.
[8]	刘霞, 黄阳, 黄敬, 段志伟. 基于经验模态分解(EMD)的小波熵阈值地震信号去噪[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 262-269.
[9]	殷长春, 邱长凯, 刘云鹤, 蔡晶. 时间域航空电磁数据加权横向约束反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(1): 254-261.
[10]	朱凯光, 李冰冰, 王凌群, 谢宾, 王琦, 程宇奇. 固定翼电磁数据双分量联合电导率深度成像[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1839-1845.
[11]	王卫平, 曾昭发, 李静, 吴成平. 频率域航空电磁法地形影响和校正方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(3): 941-951.
[12]	尹大伟，林君，朱凯光，王亚冉,李冰冰. 时间域航空电磁数据线圈运动噪声去除方法仿真研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(5): 1639-1645.
[13]	王德利, 党丹, 刘伟明, 张亚红. CFP技术层间多次波预测及Curvelet域相减方法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 907-914.
[14]	嵇艳鞠, 栾卉, 李肃义, 万玲, 王远, 许洋铖, 李丽, 林君. 全波形时间域航空电磁探测分辨率[J]. J4, 2011, 41(3): 885-891.
[15]	王忠仁, 高健, 耿亮. 基于非周期伪随机序列的可控震源信号调制技术[J]. J4, 2009, 39(6): 1146-1149.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed