吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 1592-1603.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230114

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

冻融循环对季冻土区粉质黏土-混凝土界面剪切性能的影响

王伯昕,高银龙,王清,刘佳奇   

  1. 吉林大学建设工程学院,长春130026
  • 出版日期:2024-09-26 发布日期:2024-10-12
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(42072296,42330708);吉林省自然科学基金项目(20220101164JC)


Effect of Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Shear Properties of Seasonal Frozen Soil Area Silty Clay-Concrete Interface

Wang Boxin,Gao Yinlong,Wang Qing,Liu Jiaqi   

  1. College of Construction Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130026, China
  • Online:2024-09-26 Published:2024-10-12
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42072296,42330708) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province (20220101164JC)

摘要:

为探究季冻土区粉质黏土-混凝土界面剪切性能,进行了不同冻融循环次数、土体含水率和法向应力的粉质黏土-混凝土二元体冻融循环试验和直剪试验,探讨了界面抗剪强度、抗剪强度参数和抗剪强度损伤度的变化规律。结果表明:直剪试验得到的应力-应变曲线均发生应变硬化现象,可分为弹性变形阶段(剪切位移为0~3 mm)和弹塑性变形阶段(剪切位移为4~15 mm);冻融循环对界面抗剪强度有劣化作用,即通过对土体造成损伤,导致界面内摩擦角和黏聚力下降,从而降低界面抗剪强度;随着冻融循环次数增加,界面抗剪强度损伤度增加,当冻融循环进行0、4次,抗剪强度损伤迅速,冻融循环进行12~20次,抗剪强度损伤较缓,最大界面抗剪强度损伤度为25%;土体含水率的增加对抗剪强度有削弱作用,随着土体含水率的增加,界面内摩擦角降低,但黏聚力先增加后减小,当土体含水率为20.7%时,黏聚力达到最大值;法向应力的增加对抗剪强度有增强作用。

关键词: 混凝土, 粉质黏土, 界面, 剪切性能, 冻融循环, 抗剪强度, 季冻土区

Abstract:

In order to explore the interfacial shear properties between silty clay and concrete in seasonal frozen soil area, the freeze-thaw cycles test and the interface direct shear test of silty clay-concrete binary with different freeze-thaw cycles, normal stress and moisture content of soil were completed, and the changes of interface shear strength, shear strength parameters and shear strength damage degree were discussed. Through direct shear tests, the variation rules on shear properties of the interface and strength parameters were investigated. The results showed that the strain-stress relation underwent strain hardening phenomenon, which can be divided into elastic deformation stage (0-3 mm) and elastoplastic deformation stage (4-15 mm). The freeze-thaw cycles deteriorated the interfacial shear strength, that is, by causing damage to the soil, the friction angle and cohesion of interface were reduced, thereby reducing the interfacial shear strength. With the increase of the number of freeze-thaw cycles, the damage degree of interfacial shear strength increased. However, when the freeze-thaw cycles were 0 and four times, the shear strength damage was rapid, and the damage was slow when the freeze-thaw cycles were 12-20 times, in which the maximum interfacial shear strength damage degree was 25%. With the increase of moisture content of soil, the increase of moisture content of soil weakened the shear strength, the friction angle of interface decreased, however the cohesion first rose and then reduced. When the soil moisture content was 20.7%, the cohesion reached the maximum. The rising of normal stress enhanced the shear strength.

Key words: concrete, silty clay, interface, shear properties, freeze-thaw cycles, shear strength, seasonal frozen soil area

中图分类号: 

  • TU445
[1] 苑晓青, 吴泽炬, 王清, 陈慧娥, 林森, 牛岑岑, 徐鑫. 冻融循环对钙剂改良土体分散性效果的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1812-1825.
[2] 赵越, 李磊, 闫晗, 肖万山, 苏艳军. 水化-冻融耦合作用下大理岩单轴蠕变力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1195-1203.
[3] 王清, 吕作俊, 姚萌, 董佳祺, 夏玮彤, 杨天亮, 牛岑岑. 崇明东滩吹填区黏性土层抗剪强度随时间变化特征及机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1163-1163.
[4] 鲁宝亮, 苏子旺, 赵志刚, 唐华风. 基于卫星重力异常的南海南部中生界反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 261-273.
[5] 王永洪, 银吉超, 张明义, 方翔, 桑松魁, 张广帅, 刘慧宁, 刘宪. 黏性土中静力沉桩过程桩土界面土压力模型试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(1): 196-206.
[6] 冉光炯, 杨翘楚, 王健.

特长隧道隧址区三维地质模型构建方案 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 930-940.

[7] 吕建航, 杨忠年, 时伟, 李国玉, 凌贤长, 张莹莹. 冻融循环下加筋膨胀土边坡稳定性模型试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1587-1596.
[8] 曹海莹, 郭毅磊, 杜量. 动、静载环境下界面土直剪试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1381-1390.
[9] 桑松魁, 王永洪, 张明义, 孔亮, 吴文兵, 陈志雄, 李兆龙, 张启军. 粉土与粉质黏土互层中静压桩桩土界面孔隙水压力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1551-1559.
[10] 张琦, 杨忠年, 时伟, 凌贤长, 涂志斌. 冻融循环下初始含水率对非饱和膨胀土剪切特性试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1544-1550.
[11] 陈剑平, 刘经, 王清, 韩岩, 王加奇, 李兴华. 含水率对分散性土抗剪强度特性影响的微观解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(3): 792-803.
[12] 徐新木, 张耀平, 付玉华, 雷大星, 邹雄刚. 冻融循环下含节理类岩石试样剪切破坏特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 483-494.
[13] 束龙仓, 王明昭, 张惠潼, 张含明, 张乃鹏, 孙影, 孙超, 袁鹏杰. 咸淡水界面位置确定的综合方法(TEcG)及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1706-1713.
[14] 洪勇, 周蓉, 郑孝玉. 不同排水条件下饱和砂土快速大剪切力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1416-1426.
[15] 范廷恩, 王海峰, 张晶玉, 汤婧, 高玉飞, 于斌. 基于中期旋回洪泛面的河流相地层等时划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(5): 1316-1329.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!