吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (2): 363-374.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230158

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

松辽盆地西部斜坡带中南部大岗地区上白垩统油砂含油性特征

仝立华1,2,单玄龙3,张家强1,李锋1,石磊,李耀华1,徐银波1,刘衍彤4   

  1. 1.中国地质调查局油气资源调查中心,北京100083

    2.中国地质调查局非常规油气地质重点实验室,北京100083

    3.吉林大学地球科学学院,长春130061

    4.新疆新易通石油科技有限公司,新疆克拉玛依834000

  • 出版日期:2025-03-26 发布日期:2025-05-09
  • 基金资助:

    中国地质调查局项目(DD20189606, DD20160188, DD20230751


Oil-Bearing Characteristics of Upper Cretaceous Oil Sands in the Dagang Area, South-Central Part of Western Slope of Songliao Basin

Tong Lihua1,2,Shan Xuanlong3Zhang Jiaqiang1Li Feng1Shi Lei4 Li Yaohua1,Xu Yinbo1Liu Yantong4   

  1. 1. Oil & Gas Survey Center, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100083, China

    2. Key Laboratory of Unconventional Petroleum Geology, China Geological Survey, Beijing 100083, China

    3. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China

    4. Xinjiang Xinyitong Petroleum Technology Co.,Karamay 834000, Xinjiang, China

  • Online:2025-03-26 Published:2025-05-09
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Project of China Geological Survey (DD20189606, DD20160188, DD20230751

摘要:

松辽盆地西部斜坡带是中国重要的油砂成矿带,为了进一步厘清该区中南部白垩系油砂资源特征,开展了基础地质调查工作,并在吉林大岗地区布设了5口油砂调查井和1口水文观测井,通过岩心观察、地球物理测井解释、岩心样品含油率测试等方法开展地质综合研究。结果表明:该区白垩系姚家组油砂赋存深度为175208 m,岩性以粉砂岩和细砂岩为主,最大含油率为16.02%,平均含油率为8.23%。油砂层测井曲线具低自然伽马、高声波时差、中高电阻率和低密度的特征。自上而下对油砂地层划分了4个小层(S1S2S3S4)并开展含油特征分析,纵向上,油砂含油性表现为非均质性,且具有随深度增大含油率逐渐增高的特征,位于储层下部的S3S4小层平均含油率分别为10.80%11.40%,达到富矿品位。各小层有效厚度变化较大,最大单层有效厚度为3.10 m,最小单层有效厚度为1.20 m,下部的S3S4小层的平均有效厚度分别为2.90 m1.90 m,明显优于上部的S1S2小层。在油砂发育规模上:S3小层分布面积最大,有效厚度≥2 m的砂体面积约为270 m×160 m,厚度中心位于井区东南,自厚度中心向北西方向厚度有所减薄;S4小层分布面积次之,有效厚度≥2 m的砂体面积约250 m×120 m,厚度中心位于井区中部,平面上呈东南和西北方向分布面积大、中间略小的近哑铃状,自厚度中心向北东和南西方向厚度有所减薄。砂体沉积特征受区域浅水三角洲沉积演化过程控制,高品质油砂多赋存于分流河道的细砂岩中,特别是位于下部的S3S4小层具明显的多期叠置河道侧积砂体的沉积形态。总体而言,位于储层下部的S3S4小层表现为高含油率、有效厚度大、展布面积可观的油砂赋存特征,是该区高品质油砂的主力储层。


关键词: 油砂, 含油性特征, 松辽盆地, 西部斜坡带, 大岗地区, 上白垩统, 姚家组

Abstract:

The western slope of Songliao basin is an important oil sands metallogenic belt in China. In order to further clarify the characteristics of Cretaceous oil sands resources in the central and southern parts of the area, the basic geological survey work has been implemented with five oil sands investigation wells and one hydrological investigation well in the Dagang area of Jilin. Based on core observation, geophysical log interpretation, and oil content test of core samples, a comprehensive geological study was carried out. The results show that, the oil sands of the Cretaceous Yaojia Formation are located at a depth from 175 m to 208 m, and the lithology is mainly siltstone and fine sandstone. The oil content level of the core reaches oil immersion grade, with a maximum oil content of 16.02% and an average oil content of 8.23%. The oil sand formation logging curve is characterized by low natural gamma value, high acoustic velocity value, medium to high resistivity and low density. The oil sands formation is divided into four sub-layers (S1, S2, S3, S4) and oil content characteristics are analyzed. Vertically, the oil content is non-homogeneous and increases gradually with depth. The average oil content of S3 and S4 in the lower part of the reservoir is 10.80 % and 11.40 %, respectively, reaching the grade of rich ore. The effective thickness of each sub-layer varies widely in the vertical direction, with a maximum value of 3.10 m and a minimum value of 1.20 m. The average effective thickness of the lower S3 and S4 sub-layers is 2.90 m and 1.90 m respectively, which is obviously better than the upper S1 and S2 sub-layers. On the scale of oil-sand development, the distribution area of S3 sub-layer is the largest, and the area of sand body with effective thickness≥2 m is about 270 m×160 m, and the thickness center is located in the southeast of the well area, and the thickness is thinned from the thickness center to the northwest; The distribution area of S4 sub-layer is the second largest, and the area of sand body with effective thickness≥2 m is about 250 m×120 m, its thickness center is located in the middle of the well area. In terms of planar spreading, its distribution area is large in the southeast and northwest directions, and the distribution area in the middle zone is slightly smaller, with a nearly dumbbell shape, the thickness thins from the thickness center to the north-east and south-west directions. On sand deposition characteristics, controlled by the sedimentary evolution of the regional shallow water delta, high-quality oil sands are mostly deposited in the fine sandstone of the divergent river channel, especially the S3 and S4 sub-layers located in the lower part of the reservoir have obvious deposition patterns of multi-phase superimposed river lateral accumulation sand bodies. In general, the S3 and S4 sub-layers have high oil content, large effective thickness and considerable spreading area, and are the main reservoir of high-quality oil sands in the area.

Key words: oil sands, oil-bearing characteristics, Songliao basin, western slope, Dagang area, Upper Cretaceous, Yaojia Formation

中图分类号: 

  • P611
[1] 张熠, 刘萍, 周翔. 松辽盆地王府地区泉四段常规、非常规油气有序分布及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 46-56.
[2] 高波, 潘哲君, 刘连杰, 李玲玲, 洪淑新, 潘会芳, 张波. 松辽盆地徐家围子断陷沙河子组砂砾岩储层有效性综合评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 31-45.
[3] 李永刚.  长岭断陷查干花次凹火石岭组水下喷发火山岩相测井响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2061-2074.
[4] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[5] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443-1456.
[6] 丁恺, 赵福海, 高莲凤, 李丙喜, 付文钊, 高晨阳, 靳雪彬. 基于变分模态分解的营四段厚层砂砾岩地层细分层序[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1406-1418.
[7] 胡佳, 王丽丽, 王立贤, 韩昊天, 陶鹏, 唐华风.

基于岩浆汇聚区和上升通道特征的火山岩分布规律——以松辽盆地长岭断陷下白垩统营城组为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 429-446.

[8] 孟庆涛, 胡菲, 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉. 陆相坳陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因:以松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 20-37.
[9] 李研, 聂逢君, 王东旭, 贾立城, 卢胜军, 严兆彬, 罗敏, 刘晓辉. 松辽盆地北部砂岩型铀矿成矿潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1075-1089.
[10] 白雪峰, 刘家军, 陆加敏, 孙立东, 李军辉, 李笑梅, 狄嘉祥, 刘丽娟, 戴世立, 杨 亮. 松辽盆地北部中央古隆起带基岩风化壳气藏富集规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 343-.
[11] 孙月成, 周锡明, 刘洋, 陈树旺, 张健, 杨光, 鹿琪, 陈艺竹, 张海华, 苏飞, 卞雄飞, 公繁浩, 张德军, 孙雷, 李晓海. 松辽盆地深部上古生界物性特征与典型区勘探实践[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(6): 1747-1761.
[12] 张立亚, 徐 文, 沈艳杰. 松辽盆地南部深层致密砂岩气储层形成机制及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1707-1717.
[13] 任宪军.

松辽盆地长岭断陷盆缘陡坡带中性火山岩相模式及其对储层的控制作用 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(3): 816-828.

[14] 张辉, 王志章, 杨亮, 李忠诚, 邢济麟. 松南上白垩统青山口组一段不同赋存状态页岩油定量评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 315-327.
[15] 席海银, 范月野, 王广婷, 张杨. 松辽盆地北部构造演化对砂岩型铀矿床成矿的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 1030-1041.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[2] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[3] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[4] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[5] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[6] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[7] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[8] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[9] 王谦,吴志芳, 张汉泉,莫修文. 随机分形在刻划储层非均质特性中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 340 -0345 .
[10] 李雪平,唐辉明. 基于GIS的分组数据Logistic模型在斜坡稳定性评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 361 -0365 .