吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (5): 1494-1505.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230183

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

东海盆地西湖凹陷平湖斜坡始新统平湖组成岩相类型及对储层的控制

郭刚, 李鑫, 韩雅坤, 李峰, 陈莹, 李林致   

  1. 中海油研究总院有限责任公司,北京100028
  • 出版日期:2024-09-26 发布日期:2024-10-10
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42202157);中国博士后科学基金项目(2021M693543)

Diagenetic Facies Types and Their Control on Reservoirs of Eocene Pinghu Formation in Pinghu Slope, Xihu Sag, East China Sea Basin

Guo Gang, Li Xin, Han Yakun, Li Feng, Chen Ying, Li Linzhi   

  1. CNOOC Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100028,China
  • Online:2024-09-26 Published:2024-10-10
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42202157) and the  Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China (2021M693543)

摘要:

为了在深埋藏、强非均质性背景下寻找相对优质储层,本文以东海盆地西湖凹陷平湖组为例,基于直观微区观测、间接压汞表征及孔渗分析相结合的方法,在储层沉积学分析的基础上,先划分成岩相类型,进而明确不同成岩相的差异储集能力特征,评价成岩相储集能力。结果表明:平湖组沉积于河流和潮汐双向水动力条件的三角洲-潮坪体系,砂体多发育于水下分流河道、河口坝、潮道、砂坪和混合坪中,以细粒和极细粒为主,主要为长石岩屑砂岩和岩屑长石砂岩;基于成岩作用类型的强度差异将成岩相划分为3类,包括长石溶蚀相、富塑性压实相和钙质胶结相;同一成岩相类型孔渗特征和孔隙结构特征均一,而不同成岩相之间物性差异显著;以孔隙度、渗透率、最大连通孔喉半径为标准对3类成岩相进行量化参数分级评价,长石溶蚀相孔隙度>15%,渗透率>10.0×10-3 μm2,最大连通孔喉半径>5.0 μm,物性条件优于富塑性压实相和钙质胶结相,优选出长石溶蚀相为最有利的储层砂体类型。

关键词: 西湖凹陷, 平湖组, 深层, 非均质性, 成岩相, 压汞, 东海盆地

Abstract:

In order to find relatively high-quality reservoirs under the background of deep burial and strong heterogeneity, this paper takes Pinghu Formation in Xihu sag of East China Sea basin as an example. Based on the combination of intuitive micro-area observation, indirect mercury intrusion characterization and porosity/permeability test, the types of diagenetic facies are first divided based on reservoir sedimentology analysis, and then the differential reservoir capacity characteristics of different diagenetic facies are clarified, and the reservoir capacity of diagenetic facies is evaluated. The study shows that the Pinghu Formation is deposited in a deltaic-tidal transitional system with bi-directional hydrodynamic conditions of rivers and tides. The sand bodies are primarily developed in submerged divergent channels, estuarine dams, tidal channels, sand flats, and mixed flats, which are mainly fine-grained and very fine-grained. Lithologic characteristics are mainly feldspathic sandstones and lithic feldspathic sandstones. Three types of diagenetic phases are classified based on the difference in intensity of diagenetic types, including feldspathic dissolution facies, ductile-rich compaction facies, and calcareous cementation facies. The porosity-permeability and pore structure of the same diagenetic facies type are uniform, while the physical properties vary significantly among diagenetic facies. The three types of diagenetic facies are evaluated in terms of porosity, permeability and maximum connected pore throat radius. Among them, the porosity of feldspar dissolution facies is more than 15%, the permeability is more than 10.0×10-3μm2, the maximum connected pore throat radius is more than 5.0 μm, and the physical properties are better than ductile-rich compaction facies and calcareous cementation facies. Therefore, feldspathic dissolution facies is the most favorable reservoir sand body type.

Key words: Xihu sag, Pinghu Formation, deep-buried, heterogeneity, diagenetic facies, mercury pressure injection, East China Sea basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE122.2
[1] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443-1456.
[2] 刘硕, 王飞, 于瑞, 高建星, 师昊, 朱玉双. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及其分形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 96-107.
[3] 张文, 蓝升, 马文良, 王佳. 新疆油页岩升温过程中孔隙结构演化特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1689-1705.
[4] 张立亚, 徐 文, 沈艳杰. 松辽盆地南部深层致密砂岩气储层形成机制及成藏主控因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(5): 1707-1717.
[5] 胡艳飞, 孔庆莹 . 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部长8油层储层主控因素及分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(4): 1078-.
[6] 张丽华, 王敏, 单刚义, 潘保芝, 曹玥. 不同岩性火山岩孔隙度压力敏感性及其影响因素:以长岭断陷火山岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2022, 52(2): 382-389.
[7] 郭颖, 杨波, 韩自军, 李果营, 吴庆勋, 叶涛. 深层碎屑岩自生矿物成因机理及其对储层物性的影响——以渤海歧南断阶带侏罗系为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(4): 973-990.
[8] 魏博, 赵建斌, 魏彦巍, 李振林, 熊葵. 福山凹陷白莲流二段储层分类方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(6): 1639-1647.
[9] 谭思哲, 侯凯文, 覃军, 汤睿, 杨敏. 西湖凹陷平湖组不同煤系烃源岩热解生烃差异及其在油气勘探中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 968-978.
[10] 崔景伟, 朱如凯. 致密砂岩层内强钙质胶结物成因机制及其意义——以鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(4): 957-967.
[11] 于洋, 王祝文, 宁琴琴, 徐方慧. 松辽盆地大庆长垣四方台组可地浸砂岩铀成矿测井评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 929-940.
[12] 王付勇, 程辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组致密砂岩孔喉结构与油藏物性表征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(3): 721-731.
[13] 何玉平. 东海盆地西湖凹陷天台区始新世平湖组风暴岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2020, 50(2): 500-508.
[14] 李红进, 张道勇, 葛云锦, 王翊超, 徐刚. 甘泉—富县地区长7致密砂岩储层成岩相的定量识别及其对含油性的控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2019, 49(6): 1529-1539.
[15] 高崇龙, 纪友亮, 靳军, 王剑, 任影, 车世琦, 王茹, 桓芝俊. 准噶尔盆地莫索湾地区清水河组深层优质储层特征及其物性控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 990-1006.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!