吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 1998-2013.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240239

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

琼东南盆地宝岛凹陷南北断阶带古近系陵水组三段天然气差异富集机理

袁朱晔斐1, 田杨1, 熊小峰2, 叶琳1, 左高昆2, 吴楠1,朱晋杰3   

  1. 1.长江大学地球科学学院,武汉430100
     2.中海石油(中国)有限公司海南分公司,海口570312
    3.中国地质大学(武汉)资源学院,武汉430074
  • 出版日期:2024-11-26 发布日期:2024-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 田杨(1989—),男,讲师,主要从事非常规油气地质资源评价、油气成藏动力学和油气成藏机理方面的研究, E-mail: ty@yangtzeu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:袁朱晔斐(1999—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要从事油气成藏方面的研究, E-mail: 2022710399@yangtzeu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(42172179);湖北省教育厅科学研究计划资助项目(Q20221311)

Comparative Analysis of Gas Enrichment Differences in the Third Member of the Paleogene Lingshui Formation in the South-North Step-Fault Zone of Baodao Sag, Qiongdongnan Basin

Yuan Zhuyefei1, Tian Yang1, Xiong Xiaofeng2, Ye Lin1, Zuo Gaokun2, Wu Nan1,Zhu Jinjie3   

  1. 1. School of Geosciences, Yangtze University, Wuhan 430100, China
    2. CNOOC China Limited, Hainan Branch,  Haikou 570312, China
    3. School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan 430074, China
  • Online:2024-11-26 Published:2024-12-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42172179) and the Scientific Research Project Funded by the Education Department of Hubei Province (Q20221311)

摘要: 琼东南盆地宝岛凹陷沉积-构造演化复杂,存在多套生储盖组合。南北断阶带是宝岛凹陷现今主要油气富集区,古近系陵水组三段优质的三角洲砂体是其主要目的层。本文综合测井、地震、地球化学等资料,开展陵水组三段天然气富集静态要素对比研究,并结合盆地模拟技术,阐明天然气动态成藏的差异性,总结其主要控制因素。研究表明:北部断阶带甲烷体积分数偏低,非烃类气体体积分数高,以干气为主;南部断阶带天然气组分中烃类气体体积分数高,具有干气与湿气混合特征。北部断阶带为中孔、低渗储层,输导模式主要为T字型+Z字型混合输导;南部断阶带为中孔、低渗特低渗储层,输导模式以Z字型输导为主。北部断阶带BD21-1区块圈闭定型于三亚组末期,圈闭构造高点转为东西向,控凹断层活动,控圈断层持续变形,早期崖城组内生成的油气通过次级断层进入储层,后期控凹断层停止活动,通过控圈断层垂向运移至陵水组砂体。南部断阶带YL10-6区块北部圈闭定型于三亚组末期,后期受挤压应力影响,于F10-1断裂处形成小背斜圈闭,其早期与晚期输导体系类型均为Z字型。南北断阶带陵水组三段均经历了3期油气充注,天然气差异富集机理为各生烃次洼生烃潜力、油气初次运移富集程度和二次运移保存条件的差异。

关键词: 差异富集机理, 成藏期次, 天然气, 储层, 宝岛凹陷, 南北断阶带, 陵水组三段, 琼东南盆地

Abstract: The sedimentary-tectonic evolution of Baodao sag in the Qiongdongnan basin is complex, with many sets of source-reservoir-seal assemblages in Baodao sag, Qiongdongnan basin. The south-north step-fault zone is the main oil and gas enrichment area in Baodao sag, the high-quality deltaic sand bodies in the Third Member of the Lingshui Formation of Paleogene are the main target beds. Based on the data of logging, seismic and geochemical data, this paper makes a comparative study on the static factors of gas enrichment in the Third Member of Lingshui Formation, and expounds the difference of gas dynamic accumulation by combining with basin simulation technology, the main control factors were summarized. The results show that the methane content is low and the non-hydrocarbon gas content is high in the northern step-fault zone, and the dry gas is the main gas in the southern step-fault zone. In the northern part of the step-fault zone, the medium porosity and low permeability reservoirs are mainly transported by T-type and Z-type mixed reservoirs, while in the southern part of the step-fault zone, the medium porosity, low permeability and ultra-low permeability reservoirs are mainly transported by Z-type reservoirs. The trap of block BD21-1 in the northern fault step zone was formed at the end of the Sanya Formation, and the structural high point of the trap turned to the east-west direction, in the early stage, the oil and gas generated in Yacheng Formation entered the reservoir through secondary faults. The trap in the northern part of block YL10-6 in the southern fault step was characterized as a small anticline trap at the F10-1 fault zone, which was formed at the end of the Sanya Formation and was influenced by compressive stress at the late stage. The Third Member of Lingshui Formation in the south-north step-fault zone experienced three stages of oil and gas charging. The gas differential enrichment depends on the differences in hydrocarbon potential of sub-depression, enrichment degree during primary migration, and preservation situation of secondary migration.

Key words: differential enrichment mechanism, accumulation period, natural gas,  , reservoir, Baodao sag, the south-north step-fault zone, the Third Member of Lingshui Formation, Qiongdongnan basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE12
[1] 徐春强, 王晨杰, 王蔚. 渤中凹陷北部中生界火山岩储层发育特征及油气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1801-1814.
[2] 卞海越, 唐华风 , 吴斌, 石诺, 张津铭. 辽西兴城尖山白垩系义县组熔岩储层分布模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2114-2127.
[3] 张科, 窦松江, 高欢欢, 石石, 李涛, 汤戈, 杨冰.  频谱恢复和波形反演在大宁—吉县区块薄储层预测中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2142-2153.
[4] 高彦杰, 甘军, 胡潜伟, 江汝锋, 汪紫菱, 葛翔, 沈传波. 琼东南盆地深水西区梅山组储层成岩-孔隙协同演化机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2014-2028.
[5] 牛成民, 于海波, 单玄龙, 王冰洁, 郭景震, 邹玉洁, 庞赫, 衣健. 渤海海域锦州25-A构造区中生界火山岩有利储层成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1788-1880.
[6] 王庶丞, 唐华风, 邹明倬, 陆国超, 户景松. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷南部斜坡带中生界火山岩裂缝特征及分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1846-1859.
[7] 谢兵, 徐昉昊, 范彩伟, 满勇, 江凡, 徐国盛, 张喜淳, 李安然. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷灰岩潜山储层岩溶识别及发育模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2029-2046.
[8] 郝国丽, 蒋迪娅, 许风光, 张昊, 金艳, 刘洋. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷西南部火山岩相和火山机构特征及其分布控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1951-1967.
[9] 黄志, 叶涛, 肖述光, 李飞, 高文博, 戴建芳. 渤海湾盆地沙垒田西北斜坡带碳酸盐岩潜山储层形成与油气成藏[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1815-1828.
[10] 何元琴, 朱红涛, 丁琳, 陶文芳, 王维, 曾智伟. 珠一坳陷古近系火山物质分类、鉴定识别方法及其深层油气地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1860-1882.
[11] 马永坤, 徐乐意, 孙辉 , 汪晓萌, 李晓艳, 周凤娟. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷储层成岩特征及中深层储层勘探潜力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1940-1950.
[12] 张津铭, 唐华风 , 雷杭山, 卞海越, 贾万丽, 高有峰, 孙雨颀. 辽西地区中生界下白垩统义县组火山岩相模式及储层意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2089-2113.
[13] 于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
[14] 谢通, 陈威, 潘诗洋, 石万忠, 王亿, 张焱林, 段轲, 任志军. 鄂西地区二叠系大隆组含气页岩岩相类型及储层特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1154-1176.
[15] 刘宗宾, 李超, 路研, 王亚, 黄建廷. 基于孔隙结构表征的低渗透砂岩流体赋存特征及渗透率评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1124-1136.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!