吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (6): 2089-2113.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240210

• 地质与资源 • 上一篇    下一篇

辽西地区中生界下白垩统义县组火山岩相模式及储层意义

张津铭1,唐华风 1,雷杭山2,卞海越1,贾万丽2,高有峰1,孙雨颀1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学地球科学学院,长春130061
    2. 中海油研究总院有限责任公司,北京100028
  • 出版日期:2024-11-26 发布日期:2024-12-24
  • 通讯作者: 唐华风(1979),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事火山地层和火山岩储层综合方面的研究,E-mail:tanghfhc@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张津铭(2000),男,硕士研究生,主要从事火山岩相和火山岩储层方面的研究,E-mail:zjm22@mails.jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省重点研发项目(20230203107SF);国家自然科学基金重大项目(41790453)

Volcanic Facies Model and Reservoir Significance of Mesozoic Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation in Western Liaoning

Zhang Jinming1, Tang Huafeng 1, Lei Hangshan2, Bian Haiyue1, Jia Wanli2, #br# Gao Youfeng1, Sun Yuqi1#br#   

  1. 1. College of Earth Sciences,Jilin University,Changchun 130061,China
    2. CNOOC Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100028,China
  • Online:2024-11-26 Published:2024-12-24
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Key Research and Development Project of Jilin Province (20230203107SF) and the Major Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (41790453)

摘要: 岩相模式是火山岩油气藏研究的重要基础,对储层的预测和油气层评价有重要的指导意义。渤海海域中生界火山岩取得了重大突破,随着勘探工作的深入,其他区域的火山岩相模式在本区已不再适用。为了建立渤海海域下白垩统义县组火山岩相模式,为该区火山岩油气藏勘探开发提供依据,本文基于辽宁西部露头地质调查,利用岩矿鉴定、主微量元素分析、粒度分析和面孔率(或面缝率)分析方法,进行岩性、岩相和储层物性的综合研究。结果表明,辽西义县组火山岩就位环境存在陆上和水下两种。根据5相15亚相44微相分类方案,识别出3相5亚相9微相:爆发相,热基浪亚相,包括火山口-近火山口微相、近源微相和远源微相,热碎屑流亚相,包括火山口-近火山口微相;喷溢相,水上熔岩流亚相,包括简单熔岩流微相和复合熔岩流微相,水上喷发水下就位熔岩流亚相,包括复合熔岩流微相和原地碎屑堆积微相;侵出相,水上熔岩穹丘亚相,包括内核微相。储层面孔率(或面缝率)由高到低依次为爆发相、喷溢相和侵出相。热碎屑流亚相火山口-近火山口微相的储层物性优于热基浪亚相火山口-近火山口微相,且前者总面孔率(或面缝率)较大,水上喷发水下就位熔岩流亚相的储层物性优于水上熔岩流亚相。水上喷发水下就位熔岩流亚相原地碎屑堆积微相在所识别出的9种微相里储层最好。爆发相和喷溢相的亚相纵横比中等储层更好。


关键词: 火山岩相, 储层, 面孔率, 义县组, 下白垩统, 辽西

Abstract:  Lithofacies model is an important basis for the study of volcanic oil and gas reservoirs and  has important guiding significance for reservoir prediction and oil and gas reservoir evaluation. A major breakthrough has been made in Mesozoic volcanic rocks in Bohai Sea. With the deepening of exploration work, the inapplicability of volcanic facies models in other regions has become prominent in this area. In order to establish the volcanic facies model of Lower Cretaceous Yixian Formation in Bohai Sea, it provides a basis for the exploration and development of volcanic oil and gas in this area. There are abundant outcrop data in western Liaoning. Based on outcrop geological survey, the lithology, lithofacies and reservoir physical properties are comprehensively studied by means of rock and mineral identification, major and trace element analysis, particle size analysis and surface porosity analysis. The results are as follows, there are two kinds of volcanic emplacement environments in the Yixian Formation of western Liaoning Province: onshore and underwater. According to the classification scheme of five facies 15 subfacies 44 microfacies, three facies five subfacies nine microfacies are identified in this study, which are volcanic pyroclastic flow subfacies crater-near crater microfacies, base surge subfacies crater-near crater microfacies, near source microfacies and far source microfacies;Effusive facies subaerial lava flow subfacies simple lava flow microfaciesand composite lava flow microfacies, effusive facies subaqueous lava flow subfacies composite lava flow microfacies and autochthonous debris accumulation microfacies; Extrusive facies lava dome above water subfacies core microfacies. From high to low, the reservoir surface porosity is explosive facies, effusive facies and extrusive facies. The physical properties of the volcanic crater-near-volcanic microfacies of the pyroclastic flow subfaciesare better than those of the volcanic crater-near-volcanic microfacies of the base surgesubfacies, and the total surface porosity is larger. Effusive facies subaqueous lava flow subfacies autochthonous debris accumulation microfacies in nine identified microfacies have the best reservoir. The subfacies aspect ratio of effusive facies and extrusive facies is better than that of small reservoirs.


Key words: volcanic facies, reservoir, surface porosity, Yixian Formation, Lower Cretaceous, western Liaoning

中图分类号: 

  • P586
[1] 徐春强, 王晨杰, 王蔚. 渤中凹陷北部中生界火山岩储层发育特征及油气成藏条件[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1801-1814.
[2] 卞海越, 唐华风 , 吴斌, 石诺, 张津铭. 辽西兴城尖山白垩系义县组熔岩储层分布模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2114-2127.
[3] 张科, 窦松江, 高欢欢, 石石, 李涛, 汤戈, 杨冰.  频谱恢复和波形反演在大宁—吉县区块薄储层预测中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2142-2153.
[4] 袁朱晔斐, 田杨, 熊小峰, 叶琳, 左高昆, 吴楠, 朱晋杰. 琼东南盆地宝岛凹陷南北断阶带古近系陵水组三段天然气差异富集机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1998-2013.
[5] 高彦杰, 甘军, 胡潜伟, 江汝锋, 汪紫菱, 葛翔, 沈传波. 琼东南盆地深水西区梅山组储层成岩-孔隙协同演化机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2014-2028.
[6] 牛成民, 于海波, 单玄龙, 王冰洁, 郭景震, 邹玉洁, 庞赫, 衣健. 渤海海域锦州25-A构造区中生界火山岩有利储层成因[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1788-1880.
[7] 李永刚.  长岭断陷查干花次凹火石岭组水下喷发火山岩相测井响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2061-2074.
[8] 王庶丞, 唐华风, 邹明倬, 陆国超, 户景松. 渤海湾盆地莱州湾凹陷南部斜坡带中生界火山岩裂缝特征及分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1846-1859.
[9] 谢兵, 徐昉昊, 范彩伟, 满勇, 江凡, 徐国盛, 张喜淳, 李安然. 北部湾盆地涠西南凹陷灰岩潜山储层岩溶识别及发育模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2029-2046.
[10] 刘翔宇, 单玄龙, 衣健, 苏思远, 李嘉慧, 庞赫, 邹玉洁. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷义县组火山喷发旋回及其分布规律[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1829-1845.
[11] 郝国丽, 蒋迪娅, 许风光, 张昊, 金艳, 刘洋. 珠江口盆地恩平凹陷西南部火山岩相和火山机构特征及其分布控制因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1951-1967.
[12] 黄志, 叶涛, 肖述光, 李飞, 高文博, 戴建芳. 渤海湾盆地沙垒田西北斜坡带碳酸盐岩潜山储层形成与油气成藏[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1815-1828.
[13] 何元琴, 朱红涛, 丁琳, 陶文芳, 王维, 曾智伟. 珠一坳陷古近系火山物质分类、鉴定识别方法及其深层油气地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1860-1882.
[14] 马永坤, 徐乐意, 孙辉 , 汪晓萌, 李晓艳, 周凤娟. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷储层成岩特征及中深层储层勘探潜力[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 1940-1950.
[15] 于正军, 张军华, 周昊, 任瑞军, 陈永芮, 杨玉龙. 准噶尔盆地东南缘页岩油储层脆性预测与评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1711-1723.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!