吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 1-14.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160265

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

层序格架中富有机质页岩发育模式及差异分布:以上扬子下寒武统为例

刘忠宝1,2,3, 杜伟3, 高波3, 胡宗全3, 张钰莹4, 吴靖3, 冯动军3   

  1. 1. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石化页岩油气勘探开发重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    4. 中国石油大学(华东)非常规油气与新能源研究院, 山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-02 出版日期:2018-01-26 发布日期:2018-01-26
  • 作者简介:刘忠宝(1978),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事非常规油气地质、层序地层及碳酸盐岩沉积储层研究,E-mail:liuzb.syky@sinopec.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项(2016ZX05060,2016ZX05061);中国石油化工股份有限公司科技部项目(P15114)

Sedimentary Model and Distribution of Organic-Rich Shale in the Sequence Stratigraphic Framework: A Case Study of Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze Region

Liu Zhongbao1,2,3, Du Wei3, Gao Bo3, Hu Zongquan3, Zhang Yuying4, Wu Jing3, Fen Dongjun3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Shale Oil/Gas Exploration and Production, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. Research Institute of Unconventional Oil & Gas Renewable Energy, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-09-02 Online:2018-01-26 Published:2018-01-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project(2016ZX05060,2016ZX05061) and SINOPEC Ministry of Science and Technology (P15114)

摘要: 以岩石地层分区多、名称复杂多变的上扬子下寒武统为例,并以高分辨率层序地层学理论为指导,通过露头、岩心、钻(测)井及岩矿测试等资料综合研究,识别出6个层序划分依据、5种沉积旋回叠加组合样式,认为页岩层系中层序界面厘定困难,不同级次沉积旋回的识别是层序划分的关键。以此为依据,结合研究区构造、岩相、有机碳含量等研究,建立了等时层序地层格架及其富有机质页岩的沉积发育模式,并以层序为单元,开展了富有机质页岩分布的精细编图。富有机质页岩主要发育于不同级次的海侵-海退作用早期,不同地区时空分布特征差异明显:四川盆地内部富有机质页岩主要分布在资阳长宁一线近南北向带状展布的区域,其受基底断裂早寒武世多幕堑垒式活动控制,纵向上发育4套富有机质页岩段;四川盆地之外鄂西—渝东、黔北、黔东南及宜昌等地区主要受早寒武世早期上升洋流作用控制,以下部层序发育大套富有机质页岩段为特征。今后应考虑不同地区富有机质页岩的时空分布特点,进行页岩气勘探与开发部署。

关键词: 页岩, 层序地层, 筇竹寺组, 牛蹄塘组, 下寒武统, 上扬子地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Taking the lithostratigraphy complicated Lower Cambrian in the Upper Yangtze region as an example, guided by the theory of high resolution sequence stratigraphy, based on the outcrop, rock core, thin section and drill data, we identified 6 standards to divide sequence stratigraphy and 5 sedimentary cycles of combination style. The interface of shale sequence stratigraphy is difficult to identify, and the recognition of different grades of depositional cycle is the key factor. Based on the above, combined with the study of tectonics, lithofacies and organic carbon content, we established isochronous sequence stratigraphic framework and sedimentary model of rich organic shales, and carried out fine mapping of organic shale distribution based on the sequence units. The organic-rich shales are developed mainly in the early different grade of transgressive-regressive periods. The distribution of organic-rich shales in the different areas is varied. The organic-rich shales distribute mainly in Ziyang-Changning area in the Sichuan basin. There are four sets of organic-rich shales controlled by the poly-tectonic basement rift. A large set of organic-rich shales are developed in the western Hubei- eastern Chongqing, north- southeastern Guizhou and Yichang areas controlled by Early Cambrian upward flow of ocean currents. The distribution characteristics of organic-rich shales should be taken into consideration for shale gas exploration and exploitation.

Key words: shale, sequence stratigraphy, Qiongzhusi Formation, Niutitang Formation, Lower Cambrian, Upper Yangtze region, Sichuan basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 谭聪,于炳松,阮壮,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组高分辨率层序地层划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(2):336-347. Tan Cong, Yu Bingsong, Ruan Zhuang, et al. High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy Division of Yanchang Formation in Southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2016,46(2): 336-347.
[2] 杜治利,田亚,刘洪军,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长9段页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(2):358-367. Du Zhili, Tian Ya, Liu Hongjun, et al. Shale Gas Resource Potential Evaluation of Chang 9 Member, Fm. Yanchang in South Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 358-367.
[3] 刘忠宝,高波,张钰莹,等. 上扬子地区下寒武统页岩沉积相类型及分布特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1):21-31. Liu Zhongbao, Gao Bo, Zhang Yuying, et al. Types and Distribution of the Shale Sedimentary Facies of the Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze Area, South China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 21-31.
[4] 刘忠宝,高波,冯动军,等. 上扬子地区下寒武统黑色页岩矿物组成特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气工业,2017,37(4): 21-26. Liu Zhongbao, Gao Bo, Feng Dongjun, et al.Mineral Composition of the Lower Cambrian Black Shale in the Upper Yangtze Region and Its Significance in Oil and Gas Exploration[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(4): 21-26.
[5] Nikki T H, Nicholas B H, Cheryl A M, et al. A Sequence-Stratigraphic Framework for the Upper Devonian Woodford Shale, Permian Basin, West Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2014,98(1): 23-47.
[6] Brett C E, Baird G C, Bartholomew A J, et al. Sequence Stratigraphy and a Revised Sea Level Curve for the Middle Devonian of Eastern North America[J]. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoe-cology, 2011, 304:21-53.
[7] Abouelresh M O, Slatt R M. Lithofacies and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Barnett Shale in East-Central Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(1):1-22.
[8] Halgedahl S L, Jarrard R D, Brett C E, et al. Geophysical and Geological Signatures of Relative Sea Level Change in the Upper Wheeler Formantion, Drum Mountains, West-Central Utah: A Perspective into Exceptional Preservation of Fossils[J]. Palaeogeofraphy, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2009, 277: 34-56.
[9] 吴靖,姜在兴,吴明昊. 细粒岩层序地层学研究方法综述[J]. 地质科技情报,2015,34(5):16-20. Wu Jing, Jiang Zaixing, Wu Minghao. Summary of Research Methods About the Sequence Stratigraphy of the Fine-Grained Rocks[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(5):16-20.
[10] 董大忠,程克明,王玉满,等. 中国上扬子区下古生界页岩气形成条件及特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2010,31(3):288-299,308. Dong Dazhong, Cheng Keming, Wang Yuman,et al. Forming Conditions and Characteristics of Shale Gas in the Lower Paleozoic of the Upper Yangtze Region, China[J]. Oil & Gas geology, 2010, 31(3):288-299, 308.
[11] 聂海宽,唐玄,边瑞康. 页岩气成藏控制因素及我国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(4): 484-491. Nie Haikuan, Tang Xuan, Bian Ruikang. Controlling Factors for Shale Gas Accumulation and Prediction of Potential Development Area in Shale Gas Reservoir of South China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 484-491.
[12] 胡琳,朱炎铭,陈尚斌,等. 中上扬子地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气资源潜力分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2012,37(11):1871-1877. Hu Lin, Zhu Yanming, Chen Shangbin, et al. Resource Potential Analysis of Shale Gas in Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Middle & Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(11): 1871-1877.
[13] 孙玮,刘树根,冉波,等. 四川盆地及周缘地区牛蹄塘组页岩气概况及前景评价[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2012,39(2):170-175. Sun Wei, Liu Shugen, Ran Bo, et al. General Situation and Prospect Evaluation of the Shale Gas in Niutitang Formation of Sichuan Basin and Its Surrounding Areas[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2012,39(2):170-175.
[14] 梅冥相,张海,孟晓庆,等. 上扬子区下寒武统的层序地层划分和层序地层格架的建立[J]. 中国地质,2006,33(6):1292-1304. Mei Mingxiang, Zhang Hai, Meng Xiaoqing, et al. Sequence Stratigraphic Division and Framework of the Lower Cambrian in the Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(6):1292-1304.
[15] 邓鸿斌,满玲,陈文,等. 多重地层划分理论及其在四川盆地寒武系底界划分中的应用[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2013,36(1):1-4. Deng Hongbin, Man Ling, Chen Wen, et al. Multiple-Stratigraphic Division Theory and Its Application to Dividing Cambrian Bottom Boundary of Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2013, 36(1):1-4.
[16] 刘满仓,杨威,李其荣,等. 四川盆地蜀南地区寒武系地层划分及对比研究[J]. 天然气地球科学,2008,19(1):100-106. Liu Mancang, Yang Wei, Li Qirong, et al. Characteristics and Stratigraphic Classif Ication and Correlation of Cambrian on South Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2008, 19(1):100-106.
[17] 汪新伟,沃玉进,周雁,等. 上扬子地区褶皱-冲断带的运动学特征[J]. 地学前缘,2010,17(3):200-212. Wang Xinwei, Wo Yujin, Zhou Yan, et al. The Kinematics of the Fold-Thrust Zones in the Western Yangtze Area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(3):200-212
[18] 李伟,余华琪,邓鸿斌. 四川盆地中南部寒武系地层划分对比与沉积演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):681-690. Li Wei, Yu Huaqi, Deng Hongbin. Stratigraphic Division and Correlation and Sedimentary Characteristics of the Cambrian in Central-Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):681-690.
[19] 梅冥相,张丛,张海,等. 上扬子区下寒武统的层序地层格架及其形成的古地理背景[J]. 现代地质,2006,20(2):195-208. Mei Mingxiang, Zhang Cong, Zhang Hai, et al. Sequence Stratigraphic Frameworks and Their Forming Backgrounds of Paleogeography for the Lower Cambrian of the Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Geoscience, 2006, 20(2): 195-208.
[20] 梅冥相,马永生,张海,等. 上扬子区寒武系的层序地层格架:寒武纪生物多样性事件形成背景的思考[J]. 地层学杂志,2007,31(1):68-78. Mei Mingxiang, Ma Yongsheng, Zhang Hai, et al. Sequence-Stratigraphic Frameworks for the Cambrian of the Upper Yangtze Region: Ponder on the Sequence Stratigraphic Back Ground of the Cambrian Biological Diversity Events[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy,2007,31(1): 68-78.
[21] 王传尚,李旭兵,李志宏,等. 中上扬子区寒武纪层序地层划分与对比[J]. 地层学杂志,2012,36(4):773-783. Wang Chuanshang, Li Xubing, Li Zhihong, et al. Cambrian Sequence-Stratigraphy in the Middle and Upper Yangtze Platform[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2012,36(4): 773-783.
[22] 张俊鹏,樊太亮,张金川,等. 露头层序地层学在上扬子地区页岩气初期勘探中的应用: 以下寒武统牛蹄塘组为例[J]. 现代地质,2013,27(4):978-985. Zhang Junpeng, Fan Tailiang, Zhang Jinchuan, et al. Application of Outcrop Sequence Stratigraphy on the Initial Exploration of Shale Gas in Upper Yangtze Region: Taking Niutitang Formation in Lower Cambrian as an Example[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(4):978-985.
[23] 黄福喜,陈洪德,侯明才,等. 中上扬子克拉通加里东期(寒武-志留纪)沉积层序充填过程与演化模式[J].岩石学报,2011,27(8)2299-2317. Huang Fuxi, Chen Hongde, Hou Mingcai, et al. Filling Process and Evolutionary Model of Sedimentary Sequence of Middle-Upper Yangtze Craton in Caledonian (Cambrian-Silurian)[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27( 8):2299-2317.
[24] 汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):305-312. Wang Zecheng, Jiang Hua, Wang Tongshan, et al. Paleo-Geomorphology Formed During Tongwan Tectonization in Sichuan Basin and Its Significance for Hydrocarbon Accumulation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):305-312.
[25] 罗超. 上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩特征研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2014. Luo Chao. Geological Characteristics of Gas Shale in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation of the Upper Yangtze Platform[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
[26] Algeo T J, Schwark L, Hower J C. High-Resolution Geochemistry and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Hushpuckney Shale (Swope Formation, Eastern Kansas): Implications For Clima to Environmental Dynamics of the Late Pennsylvanian Midcontinent Seaway[J]. Chemical Geology,2004,206(3/4):259-288.
[27] 徐政语,蒋恕,熊绍云,等. 扬子陆块下古生界页岩发育特征与沉积模式[J]. 沉积学报,2015,33(1):21-35. Xu Zhengyu, Jiang Shu, Xiong Shaoyun, et al. Characteristics and Depositional Model of the Lower Paleozoic Organic Rich Shale in the Yangtze Continental Block[J]. Acta Sedimentologiga Siniga, 2015, 33(1):21-35.
[28] 李忠权,赖芳,李应,等. 四川盆地震旦系威远-安岳拉张侵蚀槽特征及形成演化[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):26-33. Li Zhongquan, Lai Fang, Li Ying, et al. Formation and Evolution of Weiyuan-Anyue Extension-Erosion Groove in Sinian System, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1):26-33.
[29] 李伟,刘静江,邓胜徽,等. 四川盆地及邻区震旦纪末-寒武纪早期构造运动性质与作用[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(5):546-556. Li Wei, Liu Jingjiang, Deng Shenghui, et al. The Nature and Role of Late Sinian-Early Cambrian Tectonic Movement in Sichuan Basin and Its Adjacent Areas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(5):546-556.
[30] 魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等. 四川盆地震旦纪一早寒武世克拉通内裂陷地质特征[J]. 天然气工业,2015,35(1):24-35. Wei Guoqi, Yang Wei, Du Jinhu, et al. Geological Characteristics of the Sinian-Early Cambrian Intracratonic Rift, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(1): 24-35.
[1] 赵谦平, 张丽霞, 尹锦涛, 俞雨溪, 姜呈馥, 王晖, 高潮. 含粉砂质层页岩储层孔隙结构和物性特征:以张家滩陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1018-1029.
[2] 日比娅, 孙友宏, 韩婧, 郭明义. 3种无机盐催化热解油页岩[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1043-1049.
[3] 邓馨卉, 刘财, 郭智奇, 刘喜武, 刘宇巍. 济阳坳陷罗家地区各向异性页岩储层全波场地震响应模拟及分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1231-1243.
[4] 张冰, 郭智奇, 徐聪, 刘财, 刘喜武, 刘宇巍. 基于岩石物理模型的页岩储层裂缝属性及各向异性参数反演[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1244-1252.
[5] 冯小龙, 敖卫华, 唐玄. 陆相页岩气储层孔隙发育特征及其主控因素分析:以鄂尔多斯盆地长7段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 678-692.
[6] 刘丽红, 杜小弟, 徐守礼, 文华国. 四川盆地中南部寒武系白云岩特征及形成机制[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 775-784.
[7] 孙思敏, 季汉成, 刘晓, 赵忠新, 陈亮. 断陷盆地边界断层分段的层序地层响应特征——以南堡凹陷西南庄断层上盘陡坡带东营组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 382-392.
[8] 徐宏杰, 胡宝林, 郑建斌, 刘会虎, 张文永, 郑凯歌. 淮南煤田煤系页岩气储集空间特征及其岩相控制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 418-430.
[9] 马中良, 郑伦举, 赵中熙. 不同边界条件对油页岩原位转化开采的影响及启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 431-441.
[10] 逄硕, 刘财, 郭智奇, 刘喜武, 霍志周, 刘宇巍. 基于岩石物理模型的页岩孔隙结构反演及横波速度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 606-615.
[11] 张建坤, 杨国涛, 吴吉忠, 吴鑫, 王方鲁. 黄骅坳陷北部马头营凸起馆陶组砂体成因及展布特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 48-60.
[12] 白永强, 刘美, 杨春梅, 姜振学. 基于AFM表征的页岩孔隙特征及其与解析气量关系[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(5): 1332-1341.
[13] 王冠民, 熊周海, 张婕. 岩性差异对泥页岩可压裂性的影响分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1080-1089.
[14] 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 敦密断裂带盆地群油页岩特征及成矿差异分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1099.
[15] 杜佰伟, 谢尚克, 董宇, 彭清华, 郑博. 伦坡拉盆地渐新统丁青湖组油页岩特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(3): 671-680.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!