充气位置及压力对边坡截排水效果的影响

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201602203

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 536-542.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201602203

充气位置及压力对边坡截排水效果的影响

钱文见¹, 尚岳全¹, 杜丽丽², 朱森俊¹

1. 浙江大学建筑工程学院, 杭州 310058;
2. 浙江长征职业技术学院建工系, 杭州 310023

收稿日期:2015-06-29 发布日期:2016-03-26
通讯作者: 杜丽丽(1983-),讲师,博士,主要从事边坡治理方面的研究及教学工作,E-mail:lilidu19820116@126.com E-mail:lilidu19820116@126.com
作者简介:钱文见(1991-),研究生,主要从事岩土工程灾害防治技术研究,E-mail:qwjqlm@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(41372277);"十二·五"国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAK10B06)

Influences of Inflatable Location and Pressure on Draining of Slopes

Qian Wenjian¹, Shang Yuequan¹, Du Lili², Zhu Senjun¹

1. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China;
2. Department of Architectural Engineering, Zhejiang Changzheng Vocational & Technical College, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China

Received:2015-06-29 Published:2016-03-26
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41372277)and the National Science & Technology Pillar Program During the Twelfth Five-Year Plan Period(2012BAK10B06)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

充气截排水主要依据非饱和渗流理论,通过向坡体后缘压入气体驱除部分地下水,形成非饱和帷幕带,降低土体的渗透性,截排斜坡后缘地下水的入渗,降低潜在滑坡体内地下水位。多孔介质的多相渗流问题相当复杂,模拟技术往往是有效的研究方法。笔者以试验得到的地下水位及渗流量为基础进行数值反演分析,得到土质参数,构建数值计算模型,研究不同充气位置对边坡潜在滑坡区地下水位的影响。结果表明:在坡体后缘压入气体能够降低潜在滑坡区的地下水位线;在坡体后缘充气时,充气点放置在距离潜在滑坡区较近的位置时,截排水效果更好;充气点充气压力越大,潜在滑坡区的地下水位线下降得越多;选择充气点深度时,宜选择较深的充气深度,这样能够选择较大的充气压力。

关键词: 滑坡, 地下水, 充气截排水, 模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract:

The method of intercepting water with compressed air for a landslide is mainly based on the unsaturated seepage theory, through filling the trailing edge of slope with compressed air to expel some groundwater, to form the unsaturated curtain belt, to intercept the groundwater seepage from the trailing edge of slope, and then to lower the groundwater level in a potential landslide. The multiphase seepage is quite complex, so the simulation technology is often the effective research method. Based on the groundwater level and the seepage quantity in the landslide model test, it's easy to get the soil parameter through numerical inversion analysis. To study the effects of groundwater level in potential landslide caused by different inflatable positions through constructing the numerical model, the authors get the conclusions as follows:the groundwater level of potential landslide area can be lowered by filling and inflating the trailing edge of slope with compressed air; a better inflatable position should be closed to the potential landslide area. The greater the pressure of the inflatable point is, the more the groundwater level of the potential landslide area drops. When choosing the depth of the inflatable point, we should select a deeper one, so that a larger air pressure can be used.

Key words: landslide, groundwater, the method of intercepting groundwater with compressed air, model test, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

P642.22

钱文见, 尚岳全, 杜丽丽, 朱森俊. 充气位置及压力对边坡截排水效果的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(2): 536-542.

Qian Wenjian, Shang Yuequan, Du Lili, Zhu Senjun. Influences of Inflatable Location and Pressure on Draining of Slopes[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 536-542.

参考文献

[1] 钟荫乾. 滑坡与降雨关系及其预报[J]. 中国地质灾害与防治学报, 1998,9(4):82-87. Zhong Yinqian.Landslide Related to Rainfall and Its Forecasting[J]. The Chinese Journal of Geological Hazard and Control,1998,9(4):82-87.

[2] 孙永帅, 贾苍琴, 王贵和. 降雨对边坡稳定性影响研究综述[J]. 施工技术, 2012,41(17):63-66. Sun Yongshuai,Jia Cangqin,Wang Guihe.Overview of Research on Stability of Slope During Rainfall[J]. Construction Technology,2012,41(17):63-66.

[3] 沈珠江. 非饱和土简化固结理论及其应用[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2003(4):1-6. Shen Zhujiang. Simplified Consolidation Theory for Unsaturated Soils and Its Application[J]. Hydro-Science and Engineering,2003(4):1-6.

[4] 弗雷德隆德, 拉哈尔佐. 非饱和土力学[M]. 陈仲颐译. 北京:中国建筑工业出版社, 1997:126-130. Fredlund D G,Rahardjo H.Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils[M]. Translated by Chen Zhongyi. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press,1997:126-130.

[5] 薛定谔A E. 多孔介质中的渗流物理[M]. 王鸿勋, 张朝琛, 译. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1982:284-332. Schrödiager A E.Physics of Flow Through Porous Media[M]. Translated by Wang Hongxun,Zhang Chaochen. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1982:284-332.

[6] 许迪, Mermoud A. 从土壤持水数据估算导水率方法的比较分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2001,15(增刊1):125-129. Xu Di,Mermoud A. Comparison of Models for Predicting Hydraulic Conductivity Functions from Soil Retention Data[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001,15(Sup.1):125-129.

[7] 叶为民, 钱丽鑫, 白云, 等. 由土-水特征曲线预测上海非饱和软土渗透系数[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2005,27(11):27-30. Ye Weimin,Qian Lixin,Bai Yun,et al.Predicting Coefficient of Permeability from Soil-Water Characteristic Curve for Shanghai Soft Soil[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2005,27(11):27-30.

[8] 王丽娟. 含水层储气库建库机理的数值模拟研究[D]. 北京:中国石油勘探开发研究院, 2005. Wang Lijuan. The Numerical Simulation of the Mechanism for Underground Gas Storage Building[D]. Beijing:Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005.

[9] 展长虹, 焦文玲, 廉乐明, 等. 利用含水层建造地下储气库[J]. 天然气工业, 2001,21(4):88-91. Zhan Changhong,Jiao Wenling,Lian Leming,et al. The Construction of Underground Gas Storage in Aquifers[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2001,21(4):88-91.

[10] 张英. 地下水曝气(AS)处理有机物的研究[D]. 天津:天津大学, 2004. Zhang Ying.Study on Organic Chemicals Removal Using Air Sparging[D].Tianjin:Tianjin University,2004.

[11] 郭如美, 刘汉湖. 垃圾填埋场渗滤液对地下水污染的修复技术[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2006,22(5):432-435. Guo Rumei,Liu Hanhu.Groundwater Pollution for Landfill Leach-Ate and the Control Strategy[J]. Resource Development and Market, 2006,22(5):432-435.

[12] 刘辉, 李仲奎, 廖宜, 等. 压气新奥法隧道施工中的渗流分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2006,25(3):584-589. Liu Hui,Li Zhongkui,Liao Yi,et al. Seepage Analysis in New Austria Tunneling Compressed Air in Urban Underground Engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2006,25(3):584-589.

[13] 李仲奎, 高翔, 杜若超. 压气新奥法隧洞施工技术及其在城市地下工程中的应用[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 1995,14(1):75-84. Li Zhongkui,Gao Xiang,Du Ruochao. Application of the Natm Under Compressed Air in Urban Underground Engineering, 1995,14(1):75-84.

[14] 杜丽丽, 孙红月, 尚岳全, 等. 充气截排水滑坡治理数值模拟研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014(增刊1):2628-2634. Du Lili,Sun Hongyue,Shang Yuequan,et al. Simulation of Numerical Control of Pneumatic Cut-off Method for Landslide[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engeering,2014(Sup.1):2628-2634.

[15] 杜丽丽, 孙红月, 尚岳全. 松散堆积土边坡充气排水方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013,43(3):877-882. Du Lili,Sun Hongyue,Shang Yuequan. Air-Filled Drainage Method in Loose Accumulation Soil Slope[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2013,43(3):877-882.

[16] 王初生. 气体在饱和黏性土中渗透行为的模拟试验及其工程应用[D]. 上海:同济大学, 2006. Wang Chusheng. The Research on the Permeating Behavior of Gas Flow in Saturated Clay and Its Applying[D].Shang Hai:Tongji University,2006.

[17] 张丙印, 朱京义, 王昆泰. 非饱和土水气两相渗流有限元数值模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2002,24(6):701-705. Zhang Bingyin,Zhu Jingyi,Wang Kuntai.Finite Element Modeling of Two-Phase Seepage in Unsaturated Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engeering,2002,24(6):701-705.

[18] Van Genuchten M T. A Closed-Form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980,44(5):892-898.

[19] Bear J. 多孔介质流体动力学[M].李竟生,陈崇希,译.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1983:522-568. Bear J.Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media[M].Translated by Li Jingsheng,Chen Chongxi. Beijing:China Architecture and Building Press,1983:522-568.

相关文章 15

[1]	赵金童, 牛瑞卿, 姚琦, 武雪玲. 雷达数据辅助下的滑坡易发性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1182-1191.
[2]	殷长春, 杨志龙, 刘云鹤, 张博, 齐彦福, 曹晓月, 邱长凯, 蔡晶. 基于环形扫面测量的三维直流电阻率法任意各向异性模型响应特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(3): 872-880.
[3]	谭福林, 胡新丽, 张玉明, 何春灿, 章涵. 考虑渐进破坏过程的滑坡推力计算方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 193-202.
[4]	董军, 徐暖, 刘同喆, 管锐, 邓俊巍. 乳化植物油强化土著微生物修复中高浓度Cr(Ⅵ)污染地下水[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 234-240.
[5]	付建康, 罗刚, 胡卸文. 滑坡堰塞坝越顶溢流破坏的物理模型实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(1): 203-212.
[6]	阮大为, 李顺达, 毕亚强, 刘兴宇, 陈旭虎, 王兴源, 王可勇. 内蒙古阿尔哈达铅锌矿床构造控矿规律及深部成矿预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1705-1716.
[7]	黄星, 路莹, 刘肖, 段晓飞, 朱利民. 地下水位抬升对人工回灌中悬浮物堵塞的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1810-1818.
[8]	李鹏, 苏生瑞, 马驰, 黄璜, 徐继维. 堆积层-基岩接触面滑坡的形成机理——以祖师庙滑坡为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1471-1479.
[9]	王孔伟, 常德龙, 李春波, 胡安龙, 魏东. 再论“滑坡群”——以三峡库区为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1491-1501.
[10]	谭家华, 雷宏武. 基于GMS的三维TOUGH2模型及模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1229-1235.
[11]	秦胜伍, 马中骏, 刘绪, 李广杰, 彭帅英, 陈骏骏, 翟健健. 基于简化Newmark模型的长白山天池火山诱发崩塌滑坡危险性评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 826-838.
[12]	尹崧宇, 赵大军, 周宇, 赵博. 超声波振动下非均匀岩石损伤过程数值模拟与试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 526-533.
[13]	董维红, 孟莹, 王雨山, 武显仓, 吕颖, 赵辉. 三江平原富锦地区浅层地下水水化学特征及其形成作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 542-553.
[14]	徐则民, 梅雪峰, 王礼荣, 张有为, 曾强, 郭丽丽. 滑坡预警中的降水时空变异性——以云南头寨沟为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 154-162.
[15]	安玉科, 吴玮江, 张文, 姚青青, 宋建, 张宏宏. 抗滑桩裂纹控制荷载结构设计法及工程应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 171-178.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

377

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	0	0	0	377

From	Others	local

Times	51	326
Rate	14%	86%

Abstract

481

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	481

From	Others	local

Times	451	30
Rate	94%	6%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

Discussed

充气位置及压力对边坡截排水效果的影响

Influences of Inflatable Location and Pressure on Draining of Slopes

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0