吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 54 ›› Issue (3): 721-734.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230319

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

盆地火山岩相研究进展:基性火山熔岩及水下喷发火山岩相新成果

单玄龙,邹玉洁,衣健,郝国丽,李昂,石云倩,陆俊杰,李嘉慧   

  1. 吉林大学地球科学学院,长春130061
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-18 出版日期:2024-05-26 发布日期:2024-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 衣健(1984—),男,讲师,博士,主要从事盆地火山岩、变质岩油气藏和火山地质等方面的研究,Email:yijian@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:单玄龙(1969—),男,教授,博士生导师,主要从事盆地火山岩、变质岩油气藏和火山地质等方面的研究,Email:shanxl@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41972313,41790453)

Progress of Basin Volcanic Facies:New Results of IntermediateMafic Volcanic Lava and Volcanic Facies of Subaqueous Eruption

Shan Xuanlong, Zou Yujie, Yi Jian, Hao Guoli,Li Ang, Shi Yunqian, Lu Junjie, Li Jiahui   

  1. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China

  • Received:2023-11-18 Online:2024-05-26 Published:2024-05-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972313,41790453) 

摘要: 火山岩相是火山物质喷发类型、搬运方式和就位环境与状态的总和,划分火山岩相是刻画盆地火山岩分布,寻找火山岩有利储层的基础,对盆地火山岩油气勘探具有重要作用。前人以火山岩的“岩性组构成因”为分类依据,建立了盆地火山岩“5相15亚相”分类方案,极大推动了我国盆地深层火山岩勘探进程。目前,我国大规模的盆地火山岩油气勘探已经走过了20余年的历程,随着勘探的深入对该岩相分类方案进行了不断地完善和丰富:针对基性火山熔岩,建立了基性溢流相,以及板状熔岩流、辫状熔岩流和玻质碎屑岩3种亚相及相模式;针对湖盆水下喷发,建立了水下爆发相,以及气携水下热碎屑流、水携火山高密度流和水下降落3种亚相及相模式,形成了“7相21亚相”的新的分类方案。基性溢流相中,辫状熔岩流亚相储层发育条件最好,玻质碎屑岩亚相次之,板状熔岩流亚相稍差;水下爆发相中,气携水下热碎屑流亚相控制有效储层的空间分布。基性溢流相的建立,克服了基性熔岩因单层厚度薄,钻井和地震亚相刻画困难等问题;水下爆发相的建立,实现了沉积盆地从陆上到水下不同喷发环境火山岩相的准确刻画。两种岩相的建立为进一步探索基性火山熔岩发育区和水下喷发火山碎屑岩发育区储层发育规律,寻找有利储层提供了基础。


关键词: 火山岩相, 基性溢流相, 水下爆发相, 火山岩储层, 盆地

Abstract:  Volcanic facies is the sum of volcanic material eruption type, transport mode, emplacement environment and state. The classification of volcanic facies is the basis for characterizing the distribution of volcanic rocks in a basin and searching for favorable volcanic reservoirs, which plays an important role in the exploration of volcanic oil and gas in a basin. Based on the “lithology, petrofabric and petrogenesis” of volcanic rocks, a classification scheme of “5 facies and 15 subfacies” of volcanic rocks in the basin was established, which greatly promoted the exploration process of deep volcanic rocks in China basins. At present, the largescale volcanic oil and gas exploration in basins in China has gone through a course of more than 20 years, and with the indepth exploration, the lithofacies classification scheme has been improved and enriched: For the intermediatemafic volcanic lava, the intermediatemafic effusive lava flow facies has been established, and three subfacies have been divided into braided lava flow unit, tabular lava flow unit and the lava dome. Aiming at subaqueous volcanic eruption in lacustrine basin, three subfacies and facies models of subaqueous volcanic eruption phase, gassupported hot pyroclastic flow subfacies, waterlaid density current subfacies and subaqueous fallout subfacies are established. A new classification scheme of “7 facies and 21 subfacies” was formed. In the intermediatemafic volcanic lava facies, the braided lava flow subfacies has the best development conditions, followed by the hyaloclastic rock subfacies and the tabular lava flow subfacies. Gassupported hot pyroclastic flow subfacies control the spatial distribution of effective reservoirs in the subaqueous volcanic eruption facies. The establishment of the intermediatemafic effusive lava flow facies overcomes the difficulty in characterizing the subfacies of the basic lava due to the thin monolayer thickness and the difficulty in drilling and seismic characterization. The establishment of subaqueous volcanic explosive facies has realized the accurate characterization of volcanic facies in different eruptive environments of sedimentary basins from land to subaqua. The establishment of the two lithofacies provides a basis for further exploration of the reservoir development law in the intermediatemafic effusive development area and the subaqueous volcanic eruption pyroclastic rock development area and searching for favorable reservoirs.

Key words:  , volcanic facies, intermediate basic effusive facies, subaqueous explosive facies, volcanic reservoir, basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 任杰, 郗爱华, 郑江, 武浩宇, 李亚, 成炼, 葛玉辉, 姜欢. 川西南峨眉山玄武岩中蚀变绿泥石的成分特征及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 877-889.
[2] 李勇霖, 倪智勇, 李晓光, 韩子敬, 张威, 安川. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区断控气藏差异[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 773-783.
[3] 何中波, 冀华丽, 胡宝群, 孙萧, 钟军, 杨喆, 陈虹. 准噶尔盆地北部晚白垩世至新近纪沉积介质环境演化特征及其对铀成矿的制约[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 800-810.
[4] 吴健, 张恒荣, 胡向阳, 刘土亮, 张恒. 北部湾盆地稠油储层流体识别问题探讨[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(3): 1054-1067.
[5] 胡佳, 王丽丽, 王立贤, 韩昊天, 陶鹏, 唐华风.

基于岩浆汇聚区和上升通道特征的火山岩分布规律——以松辽盆地长岭断陷下白垩统营城组为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 429-446.

[6] 孙晶, 蒋蕾茵, 侯文.

渤海湾盆地新生代玄武岩成因——地球化学和Sr-Nd-Hf-Pb同位素证据 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 531-545.

[7] 冯若琦, 刘正伟, 孟越, 蒋丽婷, 韩作为, 刘林玉.

烃源岩有机碳测井预测模型优选及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地安塞地区延长组长9为例 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 688--700.

[8] 王琦, 孙永河, 付晓飞, 张万福, 李熹微, 王有功, 彭贤锋.

冀中坳陷南部中—新生代构造转换及其油气地质意义 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 447-460.

[9] 宋林珂, 刘四兵, 曾青高, 周栋, 唐大海, 王锦西.

四川盆地川中—川西过渡带中侏罗统沙溪庙组致密砂岩相对优质储层成因机制 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(2): 371-388.

[10] 王倩倩, 袁四化, 王亚东, 李伟民, 刘永江, 郑世刚, 赵英利. 柴达木盆地西部地区新生代盆地性质[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 160-181.
[11] 余光展, 王健, 吴楠, 徐清海, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区延长组7段致密砂岩微观孔隙结构评价#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 83-95.
[12] 刘硕, 王飞, 于瑞, 高建星, 师昊, 朱玉双. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及其分形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 96-107.
[13] 孟庆涛, 胡菲, 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉. 陆相坳陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因:以松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 20-37.
[14] 唐华风, 边伟华, 王璞珺, 高有峰, 黄玉龙, 张艳, 户景松. 盆地火山岩相分类和模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1651-1671.
[15] 张增宝. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷深层侏罗系砂岩储层差异性成岩演化与烃类充注[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1672-1688.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[3] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[4] 孟治国,陈圣波,刘财,杜晓娟,吕航. 非均匀月壤介质的被动微波辐射传输模拟[J]. J4, 2008, 38(6): 1070 -1074 .
[5] 秦凯,王斌,郭广猛,杨杰. 使用NCEP数据分析新疆于田地震前异常增温[J]. J4, 2008, 38(6): 1075 -1080 .
[6] 张永祥,秦景华,王慧峰,邹 洪,彭庆君,刘敬涛,朱亚雷. 北京市朝阳区多目标水量优化配置模型[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 243 -248 .
[7] 许盛伟,王明常,白亚辉,张学明. 基于J2EE的分布式海量影像分发服务研究和实现[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 491 -496 .
[8] 庄文明,陈国能,林小明,彭卓伦,马浩明. 广东长坑金银矿床氧同位素组成特征及矿床成因讨论[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 521 -526 .
[9] 刘志宏,万传彪,任延广,李春柏,张 宏,柳行军. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊-贝尔凹陷的地质特征及油气成藏规律[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 527 -534 .
[10] 陶月赞,姚 梅. 地下水渗流力学的发展进程与动向[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 221 -230 .