吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1651-1671.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20230256

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

盆地火山岩相分类和模式

唐华风,边伟华,王璞珺,高有峰,黄玉龙,张艳,户景松   

  1. 吉林大学地球科学学院,长春130061
  • 出版日期:2023-11-26 发布日期:2023-12-11
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省重点研发计划项目(20230203107SF);国家自然科学基金项目(41790453)

 Classification and Model of Volcanic Facies in the Basin

Tang Huafeng, Bian Weihua, Wang Pujun, Gao Youfeng, Huang Yulong, Zhang Yan, Hu Jingsong   

  1. College of Earth Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun 130061, China
  • Online:2023-11-26 Published:2023-12-11
  • Supported by:
    the Key Research and Development Program of Jilin Province (20230203107SF) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41790453)

摘要: 盆地火山岩相模式是储层分布规律和识别的重要基础,目前遇到了地层单位不一致、钻井揭示不系统和盆地间存在差异大的问题。基于此,需要建立一套系统的基本地层单位的相模式。本文总结了相、岩相、火山岩相的相关定义,梳理了针对地质填图、矿产普查、现代火山和盆地火山岩研究的火山岩相分类方案的特点。本文认为利用出露好的现代火山研究成果指导盆地火山岩相研究是首选的研究方式。针地火山地层堆积单元,突出岩石组构和几何外形要素,厘定了5相15亚相44微相的火山岩相划分方案。相和亚相分别是爆发相的热碎屑流、(热)基浪、火山碎屑裙和火山碎屑筒亚相,喷溢相的水上熔岩流、水下熔岩流和水上喷发水下就位熔岩流亚相,侵出相的水上熔岩穹丘、水下熔岩穹丘和早期水下晚期水上熔岩穹丘亚相,火山-沉积相的火山泥石流和崩塌堆积亚相,次火山岩相的岩脉、岩盖和岩盆/岩席亚相,进一步指出了各微相的特征岩石结构构造。不同化学成分的熔岩可以形成相同的亚相或微相,如流纹岩和玄武岩均可以形成喷溢相水上熔岩流亚相复合熔岩流微相,流纹岩、英安岩、安山岩和玄武岩均可形成侵出相水上熔岩穹丘亚相。从储层来看,复合熔岩流微相好于水上熔岩穹丘亚相的各类微相,所以本文的分类方案可以建立起亚相或微相与储层的细划对应性关系。相关认识可用于盆地火山岩相对比和储层预测。

关键词: 火山岩, 火山岩相, 相模式, 地层单元, 火山地层学, 盆地

Abstract:  Volcanic facies model in the basin is an important basis for reservoir distribution and identification. There are still some problems including stratigraphic unit inconsistency, unsystematic drilling, and large differences between basins. It is necessary to establish a system of facies models of basic stratigraphic units. This paper summarizes the definitions of facies, lithofacies and volcanic facies. Volcanic facies are divided into three classification schemes, which are for geological mapping and mineral survey in field, modern volcanoes and volcanic rocks in basin. It is considered that it is preferancial to apply the modern volcanic research results to guide the study of volcanic facies in the basin. The deposited units of volcanostratigraphy highlight the elements of rock fabric and geometric shape, and the volcanic facies division scheme of 5 facies, 15 subfacies and 44 microfacies is summarized. The eruptive facies is divided into pyroclastic flow, base surge, volcaniclastic apron, and volcaniclastic diatreme subfacies. The effusive facies is divided into subaerial lava flow, subaqueous lava flow, and subaerial eruption-subaqueous emplacement lava flow subfacies. The extrusive facies is divided into subaerial lava dome, underwater lava dome, and early subaqueous-late subaerial lava dome subfacies. The volcano-sedimentary facies is divided into lahar and debris avalanche subfacies. The subvolcanic facies is divided into dikes, laccolith and sill/lopolith subfacies. The characteristics of the fabric and structure of each microfacies are pointed out. Lava with different chemical compositions can form the same subfacies or microfacies. For example, rhyolite and basalt can both form the braided lava flow subfacies of the subaerial lava flow, while rhyolite, dacite, andesite, and basalt can all form the subaerial lava dome. With respect to the reservoir potential, the braided lava flow microfacies is better than the various microfacies of the subaerial lava dome. Therefore, the classification scheme in this paper can establish a detailed correlation between the subfacies/microfacies and the reservoir, and can be suitable for reservoir prediction and volcanic facies comparison in the basin.

Key words: volcanic rocks, volcanic facies, facies model, stratigraphic unit, volcanostratigraphy, basin

中图分类号: 

  • P618.13
[1] 孟庆涛, 胡菲, 刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉. 陆相坳陷湖盆细粒沉积岩岩相类型及成因:以松辽盆地晚白垩世青山口组为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 20-37.
[2] 刘硕, 王飞, 于瑞, 高建星, 师昊, 朱玉双. 致密砂岩储层微观孔喉结构及其分形特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 96-107.
[3] 余光展, 王健, 吴楠, 徐清海, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区延长组7段致密砂岩微观孔隙结构评价#br#[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 83-95.
[4] 王倩倩, 袁四化, 王亚东, 李伟民, 刘永江, 郑世刚, 赵英利. 柴达木盆地西部地区新生代盆地性质[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(1): 160-181.
[5] 张增宝. 准噶尔盆地阜康凹陷深层侏罗系砂岩储层差异性成岩演化与烃类充注[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1672-1688.
[6] 单玄龙, 邢健, 苏思远, 李昂, 赵振铎, 杨钦, 李雪松, 井翠, 张家浩, 孙越.

川南长宁地区下古生界五峰组—龙马溪组一段页岩岩相与含气性特征 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1323-1337.

[7] 赵全升, 孔智涵, 胡舒娅, 张建伟.

柴达木盆地马海盐湖地下卤水地球物理探测及应用 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(5): 1560-1572.

[8] 付丽. 大杨树盆地南部坳陷九峰山组烃源岩地球化学特征及油气来源[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1001-1015.
[9] 张晓晴, 康玉国, 孙斌, 孙钦平, 杨青. 勃利盆地七台河断陷煤层气富集特征及有利区优选[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1033-1047.
[10] 吴琼玲, 彭光荣, 肖张波, 雷永昌, 沈梦蓉, 邱欣卫, 李敏. 岩浆底辟改造型洼陷复杂结构特征及演化规律:以珠江口盆地陆丰22洼为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1048-1065.
[11] 李研, 聂逢君, 王东旭, 贾立城, 卢胜军, 严兆彬, 罗敏, 刘晓辉. 松辽盆地北部砂岩型铀矿成矿潜力分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1075-1089.
[12] 牟芮霆, 裴福萍, 时玉芹, 魏敬洋. 吉林省伊通地区早二叠世火山岩成因:锆石U-Pb年代学和岩石地球化学证据[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1117-1131.
[13] 闫佰忠, 李瑶, 秦光雄, 于开宁, 吴云霞, 王亚楠. 基于遥感技术的贵德盆地多元信息干热岩靶区预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1288-1300.
[14] 李忠城, 李丹丹. 山西沁水寿阳ST区块煤储层三维精细地质建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 635-.
[15] 吴燕清, 王常东, 余弘龙, 周 舰, 林天发, 于 兵, 董小宇. 内蒙古五十家子—新城子地区火山岩型铀矿地质特征及找矿方向[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(2): 418-.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王福刚,廖资生. 应用 D、18O同位素峰值位移法求解大气降水入渗补给量[J]. J4, 2007, 37(2): 284 -287 .
[2] 时艳香,郝立波,陆继龙,纪宏金. 因子分类法在黑龙江塔河地区地质填图中的应用[J]. J4, 2008, 38(5): 899 -0903 .
[3] 徐波,孙卫. 姬塬油田长4+5砂岩储层孔隙类型与成岩作用[J]. J4, 2008, 38(6): 953 -0958 .
[4] 杨晓平,李仰春,柳 震, 汪 岩,王洪杰. 黑龙江东部鸡西盆地构造层序划分与盆地动力学演化[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 616 -621 .
[5] 王立军,刘国才,黄继国,李跃迁,丛颖,沈照理,赵晓波. 接触氧化技术在公园景观水体功能恢复中的运用试验研究[J]. J4, 2006, 36(03): 458 -461 .
[6] 初凤友,胡大千,姚杰. 中太平洋YJB海山富钴结核矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2007, 37(1): 8 -0014 .
[7] 张世广, 柳成志, 卢双舫, 张雁, 吴高平, 刘秋宏. 高分辨率层序地层学在河、湖、三角洲复合沉积体系的应用--以朝阳沟油田扶余油层开发区块为例[J]. J4, 2009, 39(3): 361 -368 .
[8] 曾庆栋, 刘建明. 西拉沐伦钼矿带半拉山斑岩钼矿床花岗斑岩锆石SHRIMP U-Pb测年及其地质意义[J]. J4, 2010, 40(4): 828 -834 .
[9] 冯智慧, 刘财, 冯晅, 王典, 张先武. 基于高阶累积量一维切片的地震信号初至自动拾取方法[J]. J4, 2011, 41(2): 559 -564 .
[10] 陈永良, 李学斌, 林楠. 遥感图像像素级异常识别的一种方法[J]. J4, 2012, 42(3): 881 -886 .