Qinghai-Xizang plateau;moraine soil,freeze-thaw cycles,strength deterioration;microscopic mechanism;elastic modulus;shear strength ,"/> 冻融循环下青藏高原冰碛土强度劣化特性与微观机制

吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2026, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (2): 611-624.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20240149

• 地质工程与环境工程 • 上一篇    下一篇

冻融循环下青藏高原冰碛土强度劣化特性与微观机制

左志强1,李政男2,刘佳诺1,李明俐1,郑海君1   

  1. 1.地质灾害防治与地质环境保护全国重点实验室(成都理工大学),成都610059

    2.四川省地质调查研究院,成都610072

  • 出版日期:2026-03-26 发布日期:2026-04-15
  • 基金资助:

    地质灾害防治与地质环境保护全国重点实验室自由探索课题(SKLGP40100-20233006);国家自然科学基金项目(42107179)


Strength Deterioration Characteristics and Microscopic Mechanism of  Qinghai-Xizang Plateau Moraine Under Freeze-Thaw Cycle

Zuo Zhiqiang1,Li Zhengnan2,Liu Jianuo1,Li Mingli1,Zheng Haijun1   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (Chengdu University of Technology), Chengdu

    610059, China

    2. Sichuan Institute of Geological Survey, Chengdu 610072, China

  • Online:2026-03-26 Published:2026-04-15
  • Supported by:
    Supported by the Free Exploration Project of State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection (SKLGP40100-20233006) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42107179)

摘要: 为探究青藏高原冰碛土在冻融循环过程下的强度劣化规律与微观机制,采用室内试验与数值分析相结合的方法,通过开展标准三轴试验、扫描电镜实验及核磁共振实验,系统研究了不同初始条件(含水率、冻融循环次数)下冰碛土强度劣化特性和微观结构演变,并借助回归分析方法,建立了宏观强度参数与冻融作用之间的量化关系。结果表明:1)冻融循环后冰碛土的应力-应变关系曲线呈应变软化趋势,弹性模量与抗剪强度均随冻融次数增加而下降。在冻融循环前期(0~5次),弹性模量与抗剪强度的平均损伤率分别增至16.60%和10.33%,此时强度劣化最为明显;而在冻融循环后期(10~20次),强度特征参数呈小幅波动状态并趋于平稳。黏聚力与冻融循环次数呈负指数关系,而内摩擦角受其影响较小,仅表现为小幅波动。2)随冻融循环次数增加,冰碛土颗粒排列从密集、有序向松散、无序状态转变,孔隙结构发生明显变化。3)随冻融循环次数增加,细、微孔隙在水-冰相变过程产生冻胀力的作用下逐渐扩张并合并,形成大、中孔隙;冻融循环次数为20时,大、中孔隙占比上升至59.55%,细、微孔隙占比减少至40.45%,且孔隙结构调整在冻融后期(10~20次)已基本趋于稳定。基于此,本研究改进了适用于冰碛土在冻融循环下的莫尔库伦强度准则,并建立了抗剪强度、弹性模量与冻融循环次数的多参数耦合模型。

关键词: 青藏高原, 冰碛土, 冻融循环, 强度特性, 微观机制, 弹性模量, 抗剪强度

Abstract: In order to clarify the strength deterioration characteristics and microscopic mechanism of  Qinghai-Xizang Plateau moraines during freeze-thaw cycles, laboratory tests (standard triaxial, scanning electron microscopy and nuclear magnetic resonance tests) and numerical regression methods were used to study the moraines under different initial conditions (water content and freeze-thaw cycles). A quantitative relationship between macroscopic strength parameters and freeze-thaw action was established through regression analysis. The research results show that: 1) The stress-strain curve of the moraines after the freeze-thaw cycle exhibited a strain softening trend, with both elastic modulus and shear strength showing a downward trend, in the early freeze-thaw cycle (0-5 times) damage by about 16.60% and 10.33% respectively, strength degradation is most obvious, and later in the freeze-thaw cycle (10-20 times) a slight fluctuations and steady state. Freezing and thawing cycles and cohesion of negative exponent, internal friction angle with the increase of freeze-thaw cycles was fluctuated, extends the applicable under the ice moraine soil freezing and thawing cycle of Mohr coulomb strength criterion, and established the shear strength, elastic modulus and multi-parameter coupling mathematical model of freeze-thaw cycles. 2) SEM images showed that with the increase of freeze-thaw cycles, the arrangement of moraine particles changed from dense and ordered to loose and disordered.And the pore characteristic structure changes. 3) NMR results demonstrated evolution characteristics in the internal pore structure of moraines under the freeze-thaw cycle. With deepening freeze-thaw cycles, large, medium pore proportion increased to 59.55%(N=20) micro, small pore proportion reduced to 40.45%(N=20). The small and small pores gradually expanded and merged under the action of frost heave force generated during the water-ice phase transition. Large and medium pores were formed, and the characteristic evolution process of pore structure was basically completed in the late freeze-thaw period (10-20 times).

Key words: Qinghai-Xizang plateau;moraine soil')">

Qinghai-Xizang plateau;moraine soil, freeze-thaw cycles, strength deterioration;microscopic mechanism;elastic modulus;shear strength

中图分类号: 

  • TU43
[1] 王伯昕, 王天略, 王清, 陈慧娥. 冻土-结构界面剪切性能研究进展综述[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1923-1944.
[2] 王伯昕, 高银龙, 王清, 刘佳奇. 冻融循环对季冻土区粉质黏土-混凝土界面剪切性能的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1592-1603.
[3] 刘红帅, 张东涛. 基于正交-响应面法的砂土细观参数标定[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1280-1290.
[4] 苑晓青, 吴泽炬, 王清, 陈慧娥, 林森, 牛岑岑, 徐鑫. 冻融循环对钙剂改良土体分散性效果的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(6): 1812-1825.
[5] 赵越, 李磊, 闫晗, 肖万山, 苏艳军. 水化-冻融耦合作用下大理岩单轴蠕变力学特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2023, 53(4): 1195-1203.
[6] 吕建航, 杨忠年, 时伟, 李国玉, 凌贤长, 张莹莹. 冻融循环下加筋膨胀土边坡稳定性模型试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1587-1596.
[7] 张琦, 杨忠年, 时伟, 凌贤长, 涂志斌. 冻融循环下初始含水率对非饱和膨胀土剪切特性试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(5): 1544-1550.
[8] 徐新木, 张耀平, 付玉华, 雷大星, 邹雄刚. 冻融循环下含节理类岩石试样剪切破坏特性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2021, 51(2): 483-494.
[9] 张泽, 周泓, 秦琦, 邴慧, 武俊杰, 周攀峰. 冻融循环作用下黄土的孔隙特征试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 839-847.
[10] 张虎, 张建明, 苏凯, 刘世伟. 冻土旁压试验与单轴试验对比[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(5): 1479-1484.
[11] 宿晓萍,王清,王文华,孙昊月. 季节冻土区盐渍土环境下混凝土抗冻耐久性机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(4): 1244-1253.
[12] 张泽,马巍,齐吉琳. 冻融循环作用下土体结构演化规律及其工程性质改变机理[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(6): 1904-1914.
[13] 安玉科, 佴磊. 冻融循环作用下节理岩体锚固性能退化机理和模式[J]. J4, 2012, 42(2): 462-467.
[14] 邓继新, 韩德华. 应力松弛作用对未固结砂岩等效弹性性质的影响[J]. J4, 2011, 41(1): 283-291.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 程立人,张予杰,张以春. 西藏申扎地区奥陶纪鹦鹉螺化石[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 273 -0282 .
[2] 李 秉 成. 陕西富平全新世古气候的初步研究[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 291 -0295 .
[3] 和钟铧,杨德明,王天武,郑常青. 冈底斯带巴嘎区二云母花岗岩SHRIMP锆石U-Pb定年[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 302 -0307 .
[4] 陈 力,佴 磊,王秀范,李 金. 绥中某电力设备站场区地震危险性分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(05): 641 -645 .
[5] 纪宏金,孙丰月,陈满,胡大千,时艳香,潘向清. 胶东地区裸露含金构造的地球化学评价[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 308 -0312 .
[6] 初凤友,孙国胜,李晓敏,马维林,赵宏樵. 中太平洋海山富钴结壳生长习性及控制因素[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 320 -0325 .
[7] 李斌,孟自芳,李相博,卢红选,郑民. 泌阳凹陷下第三系构造特征与沉积体系[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 332 -0339 .
[8] 李涛, 吴胜军,蔡述明,薛怀平,YASUNORI Nakayama. 涨渡湖通江前后调蓄能力模拟分析[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 351 -0355 .
[9] 旷理雄,郭建华,梅廉夫,童小兰,杨丽. 从油气勘探的角度论博格达山的隆升[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 346 -0350 .
[10] 章光新,邓伟,何岩,RAMSIS Salama. 水文响应单元法在盐渍化风险评价中的应用[J]. J4, 2005, 35(03): 356 -0360 .