吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (1): 315-323.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20180998

• 通信与控制工程 • 上一篇    

基于次用户优先级的频谱共享动态博弈算法

李翠然(),于永生,谢健骊   

  1. 兰州交通大学 电子与信息工程学院,兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-29 出版日期:2020-01-01 发布日期:2020-02-06
  • 作者简介:李翠然(1975-),女,教授,博士.研究方向:认知无线网络,无线传感器网络,协同通信技术.E-mail: licr@mail.lzjtu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(61661026);兰州交通大学“百名青年优秀人才培养计划”基金项目(152022)

Dynamic game algorithm for spectrum sharing based on priority of secondary users

Cui-ran LI(),Yong-sheng YU,Jian-li XIE   

  1. School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
  • Received:2018-09-29 Online:2020-01-01 Published:2020-02-06

摘要:

针对包含多个主用户的主服务和包含多个次用户的次服务在频谱市场中的频谱共享问题,提出了一种认知频谱共享动态博弈算法。引入优先级机制,优先满足次服务中关键任务用户和高实时性业务用户的频谱需求;考虑主服务的收益和次服务的满意度,得到满足稀缺资源分配属性的频谱价格;利用非合作博弈建模次用户间的竞争过程,保证次用户的效用最大化。对静态博弈、动态博弈、动态博弈稳定性的仿真分析证明了该算法在频谱共享中的合理性和有效性。

关键词: 通信技术, 认知无线电, 频谱共享, 非合作博弈, 优先级

Abstract:

A dynamic game algorithm for cognitive spectrum sharing is proposed, to solve the spectrum sharing problem in the spectrum market, in which there exist multiple primary users and secondary users that belong to primary service and secondary service respectively. The Priority strategy is introduced to meet the spectrum requirements of mission-critical users and high real-time service users of secondary service. The spectrum price satisfying allocation attribute of scarce resources is obtained by considering the revenue of primary service and the satisfaction of secondary service. The non-cooperative game is used to model the competition process between secondary users to maximize the utilities of secondary users. The simulation results of static game, dynamic game and dynamic game stability show that the algorithm is reasonable and effective in spectrum sharing.

Key words: communication technology, cognitive radio, spectrum sharing, non-cooperative game, priority

中图分类号: 

  • TN929.5

图1

系统模型"

表1

Saaty标度"

aiji:j重要程度aiji:j重要程度
1同等重要7强烈重要
3稍微重要9极端重要
5明显重要

图2

迭代流程图"

图3

最优频谱请求带宽和纳什均衡点"

图4

不同主用户数目下主服务租让的总频谱带宽"

图5

参数τ的不同取值对应的主服务收益"

图6

动态博弈的稳定区域和不稳定区域"

图7

动态博弈收敛到纳什均衡的过程"

图8

次用户优先级对频谱请求带宽的影响"

1 Wang T, Li G, Ding J, et al. 5G spectrum: is china ready?[J]. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2015, 53(7): 58-65.
2 Yang C, Li J, Guizani M, et al. Advanced spectrum sharing in 5G cognitive heterogeneous networks[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications,2016,23(2): 94-101.
3 Zhang L, Xiao M, Wu G, et al. A survey of advanced techniques for spectrum sharing in 5G networks[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2017, 24(5): 44-51.
4 Sohul M M, Yao M, Abdallah A S, et al. Quality of service assurance-based auction for spectrum sharing systems[J]. Analog Integrated Circuits & Signal Processing, 2017, 91(2): 203-216.
5 Gao L, Duan L, Huang J. Two-sided matching based cooperative spectrum sharing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2017, 16(2): 538-551.
6 Niyato D, Hossain E. Competitive spectrum sharing in cognitive radio networks: a dynamic game approach[J]. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, 2008, 7(7): 2651-2660.
7 黄丽亚, 刘臣, 王锁萍. 改进的认知无线电频谱共享博弈模型[J]. 通信学报, 2010, 31(2): 136-140.
Huang Li-ya, Liu Chen, Wang Suo-ping. Improved spectrum sharing model in cognitive radios based on game theory[J]. Journal on Communications, 2010, 31(2): 136-140.
8 韩松, 李鑫滨, 马锴,等. 改进的认知无线电系统中频谱共享博弈算法[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2017, 37(7):758-764.
Han Song, Li Xin-bin, Ma Kai, et al. Improved game-theoretic algorithm for spectrum sharing in cognitive radio[J]. Transactions of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017, 37(7): 758-764.
9 谢健骊. 认知的铁路移动通信网络分簇频谱感知与共享研究[D]. 兰州:兰州交通大学电子与信息工程学院, 2014.Xie Jian-li. Research on clustering spectrum sensing and sharing for cognitive railway mobile communication network[D]. Lanzhou:School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2014.
10 Ahmad I, Wan C, Chang K. LTE-Railway user priority-based cooperative resource allocation schemes for coexisting public safety and railway networks[J]. IEEE Access, 2017, 5: 7985-8000.
11 李翠然, 钟章队, 谢健骊. 认知的铁路应急自组织网络研究[J]. 铁道学报, 2013, 35(1): 60-65.
Li Cui-ran, Zhong Zhang-dui, Xie Jian-li. Research on railway emergency Ad Hoc network based on cognitive radio[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 2013, 35(1): 60-65.
12 Zhong Z D, Ai B, Zhu G, et al. Dedicated Mobile Communications for High-speed Railway[M]. Berlin: Springer, 2018.
13 Niyato D, Hossain E. Spectrum trading in cognitive radio networks: a market equilibrium based approach[J]. IEEE Wireless Communications, 2008, 15(6): 71-80.
14 Lin P, Jia J, Zhang Q, et al. Dynamic spectrum sharing with multiple primary and secondary users[J]. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2011, 60(4): 1756-1765.
15 Agiza H N, Bischi G I, Kopel M. Multistability in a dynamic Cournot game with three oligopolists[J]. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 1999, 51(1/2): 63-90.
[1] 刘毅,肖玲玲,王改静,张武军. 基于联合优化的D2D资源分配算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2020, 50(1): 306-314.
[2] 李文军,华强,谭立东,孙悦. DV⁃HOP和接收信号强度指示结合的改进算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1689-1695.
[3] 王洪雁,房云飞,朱圣棋,裴炳南. 非均匀噪声条件下考虑互耦效应的DOA估计方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(5): 1706-1714.
[4] 刘勇,邓方顺,刘小林,闵思婕,王鹏. 基于双混沌振子的最小频移键控信号频率估计方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(4): 1357-1362.
[5] 王宏志,姜方达,周明月. 基于遗传粒子群优化算法的认知无线电系统功率分配[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2019, 49(4): 1363-1368.
[6] 周彦果,张海林,陈瑞瑞,周韬. 协作网络中采用双层博弈的资源分配方案[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(6): 1879-1886.
[7] 孙晓颖, 扈泽正, 杨锦鹏. 基于分层贝叶斯网络的车辆发动机系统电磁脉冲敏感度评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1254-1264.
[8] 董颖, 崔梦瑶, 吴昊, 王雨后. 基于能量预测的分簇可充电无线传感器网络充电调度[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1265-1273.
[9] 丁宁, 常玉春, 赵健博, 王超, 杨小天. 基于USB 3.0的高速CMOS图像传感器数据采集系统[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1298-1304.
[10] 牟宗磊, 宋萍, 翟亚宇, 陈晓笑. 分布式测试系统同步触发脉冲传输时延的高精度测量方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(4): 1274-1281.
[11] 陈瑞瑞, 张海林. 三维毫米波通信系统的性能分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 605-609.
[12] 关济实, 石要武, 邱建文, 单泽彪, 史红伟. α稳定分布特征指数估计算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 618-624.
[13] 张超逸, 李金海, 阎跃鹏. 双门限唐检测改进算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(2): 610-617.
[14] 孙晓颖, 王震, 杨锦鹏, 扈泽正, 陈建. 基于贝叶斯网络的电子节气门电磁敏感度评估[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 281-289.
[15] 王金鹏, 曹帆, 贺晓阳, 邹念育. 基于多址干扰和蜂窝间互扰分布的多载波系统联合接收方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(1): 301-305.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!