›› 2012, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (04): 845-850.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于区间层次分析法的数控机床可靠性预计

郝庆波1,2, 杨兆军1, 陈传海1, 陈菲1, 李国发1   

  1. 1. 吉林大学 机械科学与工程学院, 长春 130022;
    2. 空军航空大学 力学教研室, 长春 130022
  • 收稿日期:2011-10-19 出版日期:2012-07-01 发布日期:2012-07-01
  • 通讯作者: 杨兆军(1956-),男,教授,博士生导师.研究方向:数控装备可靠性技术.E-mail:yzj@jlu.edu.cn E-mail:yzj@jlu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技重大专项项目(2010ZX04014-011,2011ZX04014-011); 吉林大学研究生创新研究计划项目(20111057).

Reliability prediction for NC machine tool based on interval AHP

HAO Qing-bo1,2, YANG Zhao-jun1, CHEN Chuan-hai1, CHEN Fei1, LI Guo-fa1   

  1. 1. College of Mechanical Science and Engineering, Jilin University, Changchun 130022, China;
    2. Department of Mechanics, Aviation University of Air Force, Changchun 130022, China
  • Received:2011-10-19 Online:2012-07-01 Published:2012-07-01

摘要: 针对将传统相似比较法用于数控机床可靠性预计时,评价对象和相似产品之间可靠性水平的差异程度很难准确评定的问题,提出了一种引入区间层次分析的数控机床可靠性预计方法。首先分析了整机和子系统的可靠性关系,建立了整机的可靠性预计模型。在子系统可靠性预计过程中,充分利用了相似产品的可靠性数据。全面分析了评价对象和相似产品之间的差异,建立了可靠性修正因子评估模型。使用区间层次分析法求出了可靠性修正因子,实现了确定性信息和模糊信息的互补。结合实例进行了数控机床的可靠性预计,验证了该方法的可行性。

关键词: 机床, 可靠性预计, 相似比较法, 区间层次分析法

Abstract: In view of the problem that it is difficult to determine the difference degree of reliability levels between the evaluation object and similar products when using similar comparison method to predict the reliability level of NC machine tools, a reliability prediction method introducing interval analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was presented. The relationship between the whole machine and its subsystems was analyzed, and a reliability prediction model was built for the whole machine. The reliability data of similar products were used in the course of reliability prediction for subsystems. The differences between the evaluation object and the similar products were comprehensively analyzed and an evaluation model for reliability correction factor was built. The reliability correction factor was obtained by using the interval AHP, realizing the mutual complement of certain and fuzzy informations. The application of this method was illustrated with an example, verifying the feasibility of the method.

Key words: machine tool, reliability prediction, similar comparison method, interval analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

中图分类号: 

  • TG659
[1] Blischke W R, Murthy D N P. Reliability:Modeling, Prediction, and Optimization[M]. New York:Wiley, 2000:517-519.
[2] Isis Didier Lins, Márcio das Chagas Moura, Enrico Zio, et al. A particle swarm-optimized support vector machine for reliability prediction[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2012,28(2):141-158.
[3] MIL-HDBK-217F, Notice 2. Military handbook:reliability prediction of electronic equipment[S]. Washington DC:Department of Defense, 1995.
[4] Lee Seung-woo, Lee Hwa-ki. Reliability prediction system based on the failure rate model for electronic components[J]. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2008, 22(5):957-964.
[5] NSWC-06. Handbook of reliability prediction procedures for mechanical equipment[S]. Maryland:Naval Surface Warfare Center, Department of Defense, 2006.
[6] 张增照. 以可靠性为中心的质量设计、分析和控制[M]. 北京:电子工业出版社, 2010:51-67.
[7] Jin Yan, Huang Zhao-feng. Reliability prediction methods:a survey and selection for mechanical design-for-reliability//Proceedings of ASME 2009 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, California, 2009:759-771.
[8] 陈云霞, 谢汶姝, 曾声奎. 功能分析与失效物理结合的可靠性预计方法[J]. 航空学报, 2008, 29(5):1133-1138. Chen Yun-xia, Xie Wen-shu, Zeng Sheng-kui. Functional analysis and physics of failure associated reliability prediction[J]. Acta Aeronautica Et Astronautica Sinica, 2008, 29(5):1133-1138.
[9] 徐玖平, 吴巍. 多属性决策的理论与方法[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社, 2006:285-287.
[10] Lee Gwo-luh, Lin Horng-jyh, Yu Tse-wei, et al. Optimal allocation for improving system reliability using AHP//The 30th International Conference on Software Engineering, Leipzig, Germany, 2008:159-163.
[11] 杨兆军, 郝庆波, 陈菲, 等. 基于区间分析的数控机床可靠性模糊综合分配方法[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2011, 37(3):321-329. Yang Zhao-jun,Hao Qing-bo,Chen Fei,et al. A comprehensive fuzzy reliability allocation method of NC machine tools based on interval analysis[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2011, 37(3):321-329.
[12] 郭齐胜, 董志明,李亮, 等. 系统建模与仿真[M]. 北京:国防工业出版社, 2007:243-245.
[13] 高羡明, 洪军, 刘瑞萍, 等. 多准则数控机床模块谱系聚类的划分方法研究[J]. 西安交通大学学报, 2011, 45(5):131-136. Gao Xian-ming, Hong Jun, Liu Rui-ping, et al. Numerical control machine tool module partition with multi-criteria pedigree clustering method[J]. Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 2011, 45(5):131-136.
[14] Moore R, Lodwick W. Interval analysis and fuzzy set theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 135(1):5-9.
[1] 郑玉彬, 杨斌, 王晓峰, 申桂香, 赵宪卓, 秦猛猛. 基于威布尔分布的电主轴加速寿命试验时间设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(3): 767-772.
[2] 申桂香, 曾文彬, 张英芝, 吴茂坤, 郑玉彬. 最小故障率下数控组合机床平均维修时间确定[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(5): 1519-1526.
[3] 曲兴田, 赵永兵, 刘海忠, 王昕, 杨旭, 陈行德. 串并混联机床几何误差建模与实验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 137-144.
[4] 张英芝, 刘津彤, 申桂香, 戚晓艳, 龙哲. 基于故障相关性分析的数控机床系统可靠性建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(1): 169-173.
[5] 孟书, 申桂香, 张英芝, 龙哲, 曾文彬. 基于时间相关的数控机床系统组件更换时间[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(6): 1946-1952.
[6] 李洪洲, 杨兆军, 许彬彬, 王彦鹍, 贾玉辉, 侯超. 数控机床可靠性评估试验周期设计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(5): 1520-1527.
[7] 王健健, 冯平法, 张建富, 吴志军, 张国斌, 闫培龙. 卡盘定心精度建模及其保持特性与修复方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(2): 487-493.
[8] 杨兆军, 杨川贵, 陈菲, 郝庆波, 郑志同, 王松. 基于PSO算法和SVR模型的加工中心可靠性模型参数估计[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(3): 829-836.
[9] 王晓燕,申桂香,张英芝,孙曙光,戚晓艳,荣峰. 基于故障链的复杂系统故障相关系数建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(2): 442-447.
[10] 赵帼娟, 张雷, 卢磊, 韩飞飞, 赵继. 四轴抛光平台综合误差建模及分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(6): 1676-1683.
[11] 王继利, 杨兆军, 李国发, 朱晓翠. EM算法的多重威布尔可靠性建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(4): 1010-1015.
[12] 杨兆军,王继利,李国发,张新戈. 冲压机床可靠性增长的模糊层次分析预测方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(3): 686-691.
[13] 杨兆军, 杨川贵, 陈菲, 王东亮, 马帅, 刘博. 基于最小二乘算法和SVDUKF算法的电液伺服加载优化[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(2): 392-397.
[14] 陈传海, 杨兆军, 陈菲, 郝庆波, 许彬彬, 阚英男. 基于Bootstrap-Bayes的加工中心主轴可靠性建模[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(01): 95-100.
[15] 申桂香, 孟书, 张英芝, 戚小艳, 栾兰, 宋琪. 平均秩次法在子系统可靠性建模中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2014, 44(01): 101-105.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!