钢板增强胶合木梁的抗弯性能

doi:10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201702017

吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 468-477.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb201702017

钢板增强胶合木梁的抗弯性能

杨昕卉^{1, 2}, 薛伟¹, 郭楠¹

1.东北林业大学工程技术学院,哈尔滨 150040;
2.牡丹江师范学院,黑龙江牡丹江 157011

收稿日期:2016-01-04 出版日期:2017-03-20 发布日期:2017-03-20
通讯作者: 薛伟(1962-),男,教授,博士生导师.研究方向:森工装备.E-mail:nefuxw1962@163.com
作者简介:杨昕卉(1972-),女,教授,博士研究生.研究方向:现代木结构.E-mail:yangxinhuimsy@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(51208083); 国家林业局林业项目科学技术研究项目(2014-04).

Bending performance of glued-lumber beam reinforced with steel plate

YANG Xin-hui^{1, 2}, XUE Wei¹, GUO Nan¹

1.College of Engineering and Technology, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China;
2.Mudanjiang Normal University,Mudanjiang 157011,China

Received:2016-01-04 Online:2017-03-20 Published:2017-03-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了改善普通胶合木梁的受力性能,提出了在其底部粘贴钢板或增设螺钉的增强方式,从而形成钢板增强胶合木梁。进行了21根梁的抗弯试验,分析了钢板厚度、是否设置螺钉对梁破坏形态、承载力和变形能力的影响,并与普通胶合木梁进行对比。结果表明:粘贴2、3和4 mm厚钢板增强后,梁承载力分别提高了73.3%、90.0%和71.0%,随着钢板厚度的增加,承载力先增大后减小;粘贴同厚度钢板并设置螺钉后,梁承载力分别提高了76.4%、96.9%和148.6%,随着钢板厚度的增加,承载力增大,螺钉的增强效果在钢板较厚时表现明显。钢板增强后,梁的极限变形比普通胶合木梁提高了6.2%~61.1%,钢板厚度和是否设置螺钉对梁变形能力的影响与其对承载力的影响类似。在验证了钢板增强胶合木梁基本符合平截面假定后,提出了此类构件的受弯承载力计算公式,并与试验结果进行对比,结果表明,理论值与试验值的平均误差不大于10%。

关键词: 结构工程, 钢板增强胶合木梁, 抗弯性能, 破坏形态, 承载力计算

Abstract: To improve the mechanical property of common glued-lumber beam, an reinforcing method is proposed, that steel plate is fixed on the bottom of beam by pasting or screwing. Bending test of 21 beams were conducted to analyze the influences of steel plate thickness, with or without the screwing on beam failure mode, bearing capacity and deformation capacity in comparison with common clued-lumber beam. The bearing capacities are respectively increased by 73.3%, 90.0% and 71.0% by pasting steel plates with thickness of 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm, indicating that as the thickness of the steel plate increases the bearing capacity increases first then decreases. When both pasting and screwing are used with the above values of thickness, the bearing capacities are increased by 76.4%, 96.9% and 148.6% respectively, indicating that bearing capacity increases with the thickness of the steel plate, and the reinforcing effect of thicker steel plate is obvious. With steel plate reinforcement, the ultimate deformation is increased by 6.2% to 61.1% than that of common glued-lumber beam, and the influences of the steel plate thickness and screwing are similar to that of bearing capacity. After verification of the glued-lumber beam reinforced with steel plate conformed on the plain section, the bending capacity calculation formula of similar constructional member is proposed. The average error between the theoretical value and testing value is less than 10%.

Key words: materials synthesis and processing technology, steel plate reinforced glued-lumber beam, bending performance, test research, failure mode, bearing capacity calculation

中图分类号:

TU366.3

杨昕卉, 薛伟, 郭楠. 钢板增强胶合木梁的抗弯性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 468-477.

YANG Xin-hui, XUE Wei, GUO Nan. Bending performance of glued-lumber beam reinforced with steel plate[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(2): 468-477.

参考文献

[1] 赵越,杨春梅,齐英杰,等. 新中国成立后木结构建筑的发展概况[J]. 林业机械与木工设备,2012,40(5):10-12.
Zhao Yue,Yang Chun-mei,Qi Ying-jie,et al. Development of wood architecture since the founding of new China[J]. Forestry Machinery and Woodworking Equipment, 2012,40(5):10-12.
[2] 侯桂深. 现代木结构房屋的先进性及发展趋势分析[J]. 产业与科技论坛,2012,11(23):113-114.
Hou Gui-shen. Advancement and development trend of wooden structure building[J]. Industrial and Science Tribune,2012,11(23):113-114.
[3] 蔡汉忠,甄小翠. 湘西传统木建筑构造探析[J]. 森林工程,2012,28(6):94-95.
Cai Han-zhong, Zhen Xiao-cui. An analysis of the xiangxi traditional wood building construction[J]. Forest Engineering,2012,28(6):94-95.
[4] Issa C A, Kmeid Z. Advanced wood engineering: glulam beams[J]. Original Research Article Construction and Building Materials,2005,19(2):99-106.
[5] Ribeiro A S, de Jesus A M P, Lima A M, et al. Study of strengthening solutions for glued-laminated wood beams of maritime pine wood[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2009,23(8):2738-2745.
[6] 刘伟庆,杨会峰. 工程木梁的受弯性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报,2008,29(1):90-95.
Liu Wei-qing, Yang Hui-feng. Experimental study on flexural behavior of engineered wood beams[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2008,29(1):90-95.
[7] Ferrier E, Labossière P, Neale K. Mechanical behavior of an innovative hybrid beam made of glulam and ultrahigh-performance concrete reinforced with FRP or steel[J]. Journal of Composites for Construction,2010,14(2):217-228.
[8] Manalo A C, Aravinthan T, Karunasena W. Flexural behaviour of glue-laminated fibre composite sandwich beams[J]. Composite Structures,2010,92(11):2703-2711.
[9] Khorsandnia N, Valipour H R, Foster S, et al. A force-based frame finite element formulation for analysis of two-and three-layered composite beams with material non-linearity[J]. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics,2014,62:12-22.
[10] Yahyaei-Moayyed M, Taheri F. Creep response of glued-laminated beam reinforced with pre-stressed sub-laminated composite[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2011,25(5):2495-2506.
[11] 王全凤,李飞,陈浩军,等. GFRP加固木梁抗弯性能的试验研究与理论分析[J]. 建筑结构学报,2010,40(5):50-52,107.
Wang Quan-feng, Li Fei, Chen Hao-jun,et al. Experimental study on bending behavior of timber beams reinforced with GFRP sheets[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2010,40(5):50-52,107.
[12] Huang Dong-sheng, Zhou Ai-ping, Bian Yu-ling. Experimental and analytical study on the nonlinear bending of parallel strand bamboo beams[J]. Construction and Building Materials,2013,44:585-592.
[13] Manalo A C, Aravinthan T, Karunasena W. Flexural behaviour of glue-laminated fibre composite sandwich beams[J]. Composite Structures,2010,92(11):2703-2711.
[14] Toratti T, Schnabl S, Turk G. Reliability analysis of a glulam beam[J]. Original Research Article Structural Safety,2007,29(4):279-293.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

钢板增强胶合木梁的抗弯性能

Bending performance of glued-lumber beam reinforced with steel plate

PDF (PC)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	戴岩, 聂少锋, 周天华. 带环梁的方钢管约束钢骨混凝土柱-钢梁节点滞回性能有限元分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2018, 48(5): 1426-1435.
[2]	郭楠, 张平阳, 左煜, 左宏亮. 竹板增强胶合木梁受弯性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2017, 47(3): 778-788.
[3]	王少杰, 徐赵东, 李舒, 王凯洋，Dyke Shirley J. 基于应变监测的连续梁支承差异沉降识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1096.
[4]	苏迎社, 杨媛媛. 高温对建筑混凝土材料抗震抗压的作用及原理[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(5): 1436-1442.
[5]	宿晓萍，王清. 复合盐浸-冻融-干湿多因素作用下的混凝土腐蚀破坏[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2015, 45(1): 112-120.
[6]	姜浩, 郭学东. 基于地震激励的混凝土桥梁模态参数识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊2): 185-188.
[7]	刘寒冰, 郑继光, 邹品德. 叠合式钢筋混凝土圆截面短柱偏心受压承载力计算[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(增刊2): 159-163.
[8]	刘寒冰,刘天明,张云龙. 钢-混凝土组合连续梁抗弯性能[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(06): 1486-1491.