Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (9): 2978-2984.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20250579

Previous Articles    

Agent⁃based behavioral simulation of parking reservation services driven by user satisfaction

Yun-xiang ZHANG(),Xian-min SONG(),Yu XIE,Tian-shu ZHAN   

  1. College of Transportation,Jilin University,Changchun 130022,China
  • Received:2025-06-29 Online:2025-09-01 Published:2025-11-14
  • Contact: Xian-min SONG E-mail:zayn2727@126.com;songxm@jlu.edu.cn

Abstract:

To identify the key mechanisms underlying behavioral transitions, a multi-path structural model was developed encompassing user expectations, perceived service quality, overall satisfaction, complaint behavior, and continued usage intention. Empirical data were used to estimate the relationships among these variables. Building on this foundation, an agent-based simulation model was constructed, dividing users into four behavioral states “non-adoption, initial contact, active use, and regular adoption”. The model simulates the evolution of user behavior throughout the service process. Simulation results indicate that the transition rate from “active use to regular adoption” is only 36.36%, while the downgrade risk for regular adopters reaches 53.81%, representing a structural bottleneck for platform operations. Under strategy intervention scenarios, improving service reliability increases the proportion of regular adopters from 28.7% to 32.4% and reduces their downgrade rate to 50.15%. In contrast, a complaint mitigation strategy mainly targets the negative feedback pathway; although it can temporarily increase the proportion of regular adopters to 31.5%, it fails to effectively curb subsequent attrition, with the downgrade rate rising to 55.73%. This suggests that its capacity to stabilize user behavior is limited and insufficient for sustaining long-term usage relationships. The findings provide strategic support for optimizing platform service processes and managing user structure.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, user behavioral evolution, satisfaction structural model, agent-based simulation, service reliability, complaint management

CLC Number: 

  • U491.1

Table1

Characteristics of influencing factors"

潜变量观测变量符号均值标准差

可靠性

(RE)

信息展示一致性RE14.090.65
及时帮助的有效性RE24.170.75
预约服务的可靠性RE34.120.75
对成功预约的信任程度RE44.160.69

感知价值

(PV)

服务性价比感知PV14.170.72
预约服务的便利性PV24.150.68
定价公平性感知PV34.130.70

响应性

(RS)

服务流程迅速性RS14.120.75
响应时长合理性RS24.160.77
问题咨询即时回应性RS34.070.72

保证性

(AS)

停车信息准确性AS14.140.74
技术支持可靠性AS24.140.76
车位可用性的保障AS34.160.76

同理心

(EM)

致力于体验提升EM14.190.74
个性化预约设计EM24.210.74
停车时间选择灵活性EM34.220.75

有形性

(TA)

预约流程简便性TA14.160.68
用户界面友好性TA24.220.73
视觉美观与操作流畅性TA34.250.72

用户期望

(EX)

服务持续升级的预期EX14.160.74
期望更快捷的预约流程EX24.140.72
期望提供更多停车选择EX34.090.75
期望更迅速的响应速度EX44.130.73

满意度

(SA)

总体服务满意度高SA14.110.68
对服务过程和结果感到满意SA24.130.73
对提供解决方案的愉悦感受SA34.100.65

投诉处理

(CT)

投诉反馈效率低CT13.411.14
投诉流程复杂CT23.401.24
投诉等待时间长CT33.231.20

忠诚度

(LO)

未来持续使用意愿LO14.140.68
向他人推荐服务倾向LO24.140.68
即使有其他选择仍偏好在线预约LO34.220.70
整体服务评价积极LO44.140.66

Fig.1

Satisfaction path coefficient"

Fig.2

Comparison chart of user status distribution"

Fig.3

Comparison chart of user behavior transfer rate"

[1] Parmar J, Das P, Dave S M. Study on demand and characteristics of parking system in urban areas: a review[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 2020, 7(1): 111-124.
[2] 李思奇, 安正阳, 孙迅, 等. 基于停车预约模式的差异化泊位定价优化[J]. 北京交通大学学报, 2023, 47(3): 79-86.
Li Si-qi, An Zheng-yang, Sun Xun.Differentiated parking pricing optimization based on parking reservation mode[J].Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2023, 47(3): 79-86.
[3] 关宏志, 张春晖, 韩艳. 考虑心理因素的旅游景区停车泊位预约选择行为研究[J]. 大连交通大学学报,2024, 45(3): 1-7.
Guan Hong-zhi, Zhang Chun-hui, Han Yan. Study on parking reservation choice behavior in tourist attractions considering psychological factors[J]. Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University, 2024, 45(3): 1-7.
[4] Wang A, Guan H, Guo J,et al. An empirical study on the segmentation of potential users of shared parking spaces considering individual heterogeneity[J]. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2022,336:No.130403.
[5] Kim D J, Hwang Y. A study of mobile internet user´s service quality perceptions from a user´s utilitarian and hedonic value tendency perspectives[J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2012, 14: 409-421.
[6] Niu Z, Hu X, Qi S, et al. Determinants to parking mode alternatives: a model integrating technology acceptance model and satisfaction-loyalty model[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 152: 216-234.
[7] Zhang C, Liu Y, Lu W, et al. Evaluating user satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: evidence from Chinese public transport service[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 120:149-164.
[8] Zainal S K, Ismail A. Assessment of factors affecting student's satisfaction and loyalty on the crossed parking system at residential colleges of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia[J]. Jurnal Kejuruteraan, 2019, 31(1): 123-129.
[9] Akai K, Aoki K, Ueda Y,et al. Redesigning parking facilities using a parking service satisfaction survey at Izumo local airport in Japan[J]. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2021, 11:No.100433.
[10] Tsami M, Adamos G, Nathanail E, et al. A decision tree approach for achieving high customer satisfaction at urban interchanges[J]. Transport and Telecommunication, 2018, 19: No.194.
[11] 熊志华, 董黛悦, 董春娇, 等. 考虑个人偏好的观赛人群组合决策选择行为[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版,2024, 54(4): 979-986.
Xiong Zhi-hua, Dong Dai-yue, Dong Chun-jiao, et al. Combined decision-making choice behavior of spectator groups considering individual preferences[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(4): 979-986.
[12] Channamallu S S, Kermanshachi S, Rosenberger J M, et al. Determinants of user satisfaction in smart parking applications[J].Transport Economics and Management, 2025,3: 214-221.
[13] Xie M H, Lin S Y, Wei S,et al. Online configuration of reservable parking spaces: an agent-based deep reinforcement learning approach[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review,2025, 194: No.103887.
[14] Doga I, Sakman E. Successful complaint handling on social media predicts increased repurchase intention: the roles of trust in company and propensity to trust[J].European Management Journal, 2024, 42(1): 11-22.
[1] Lin-hong WANG,Yu-yang LIU,Zi-yu LIU,Ying-jia LU,Yu-heng ZHANG,Gui-shu HUANG. Defect recognition of lightweight bridges based on YOLOv5 [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(9): 2958-2968.
[2] Jiang-bo YU,Jian-cheng WENG,Peng-fei LIN,Yu-xing SUN,Jiao-long CHAI. Passenger flow prediction model of external transportation hub based on hybrid Transformer [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(7): 2251-2259.
[3] Shu-shan CHAI,Zhi-qiang ZHOU,Hai-tao LI,Jiong-yang XU. Real-time road network traffic anomaly incident detection based on graph spatial-temporal pattern learning network [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(7): 2145-2161.
[4] Hong-zhuan ZHAO,Ze-jian WU,Xin ZHANG,Sheng-wen SHI,Wen-yong LI,Xin ZHAN,En-yong XU,Jia-ming WANG. Curve lattice model for connected commercial vehicles based on density dispersion and information transmission delay [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(6): 2015-2029.
[5] Yi-yong PAN,Jia-cong XU,Yi-wen YOU,Yong-jun QUAN. Multi-scale spatial heterogeneity analysis of influencing factors of ride-hailing travel demand [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(5): 1567-1575.
[6] He-shan ZHANG,Meng-wei FAN,Xin TAN,Zhan-ji ZHENG,Li-ming KOU,Jin XU. Dense small object vehicle detection in UAV aerial images using improved YOLOX [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1307-1318.
[7] Kai-ming LU,Yan-yan CHEN,Yao TONG,Jian ZHANG,Yong-xing LI,Ying LUO. Data-driven prediction of departure state for tail vehicles in queues at signalized intersections [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(4): 1275-1286.
[8] Jiao-rong WU,Xu-dong LIU. Analysis of influence of built environment of spatial units of different housing types on commuting mode choice [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 554-565.
[9] Fa-cheng CHEN,Guang-quan LU,Qing-feng LIN,Hao-dong ZHANG,She-qiang MA,De-zhi LIU,Hui-jun SONG. Review of drivers' takeover behavior in conditional automated driving [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 419-433.
[10] Yong-ming HE,Jia FENG,Kun WEI,Ya-nan WAN. Analysis on influencing factors of vehicle braking sideslip in curved section of superhighway [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(2): 591-602.
[11] Zhao-wei QU,Lin LI,Yong-heng CHEN,Chang-jian WU. Traffic characteristics and safety analysis of long interval U-turn intersections [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(8): 2206-2213.
[12] Guo-zhu CHENG,Lin SHENG,Hao-yu WANG,Tian-jun FENG. Safety evaluation method for pedestrians crossing street at signalized intersection considering secondary conflict of right-turn vehicles [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(7): 1903-1912.
[13] Yong-ming HE,Cong QUAN,Kun WEI,Jia FENG,Ya-nan WAN,Shi-sheng CHEN. Perceptual fusion method of vehicle road cooperation roadside unit in superhighway [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(7): 1923-1934.
[14] Ming-ye ZHANG,Min YANG,Yu LI,Shi-yu HUANG,Qing-yun LI. Optimal electric bus scheduling with multiple vehicle types considering coordinated recharging strategy [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(5): 1293-1301.
[15] Da-yi QU,Ke-kun ZHANG,Yuan GU,Tao WANG,Hui SONG,Shou-chen DAI. Analysis of lane⁃changing decision⁃making behavior and molecular dynamics modeling for autonomous vehicles [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(3): 700-710.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!