Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 50 ›› Issue (2): 543-548.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb20181087

Previous Articles    

Influence of built environment on commuting mode choice considering spatial heterogeneity

Chao-ying YIN(),Chun-fu SHAO(),Xiao-quan WANG,Zhi-hua XIONG   

  1. Key Laboratory of Transport Industry of Big Data Application Technologies for Comprehensive Transport, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2018-11-20 Online:2020-03-01 Published:2020-03-08
  • Contact: Chun-fu SHAO E-mail:15114226@bjtu.edu.cn;cfshao@bjtu.edu.cn

Abstract:

In order to explore the influences of built environment characteristics on commuting mode choice, a multilevel binary logistic model considering spatial heterogeneity is establsihed, and Changchun is chosen as the empirical case in this study. The influences of the variables at individual level and traffic analysis zone level are considered simultaneously in the model. The model parameters are calibrated using HLM software. The result shows that the spatial heterogeneity of commuting mode choice significantly exists. At the individual level, gender, age, education, hukou, household income, household car ownership and commuting distance have significant influences on commuting mode choice. At the traffic analysis zone level, residents living in areas with higher land use mix, transit station and intersection density have a lower probability of commuting by car. Additionally, residents living farther from Central Business District (CBD) tend to have a higher probability of driving to work.

Key words: engineering of communications and transportation system, built environment, commuting mode choice, spatial heterogeneity, multilevel logistic model

CLC Number: 

  • U491

Table 1

Descriptive statistics for individual social-demographics and built environment factors"

类 别变 量变量描述均值标准差
个体层性别1=男;0=女0.5800.493
年龄连续变量37.12010.155
教育水平1=大学及以上;0=大学以下0.3500.478
户口类型1=本地户口;0=非本地户口0.9400.230
家庭收入

收入1:1=小于等于2万元;0=其他

收入2:1=大于10万元;0=其他

0.030

0.130

0.177

0.340

家庭小汽车拥有连续变量0.2600.475
通勤距离连续变量5.62510.266
通勤方式1=小汽车出行;0=其他出行方式0.1600.367
交通小区层土地利用混合度交通小区11类兴趣点的混合程度0.5890.066
公共交通站点密度公共交通站点数量/交通小区面积10.5475.242
到CBD距离交通小区质心到CBD的距离5.0592.446
道路交叉口密度道路交叉口数量/交通小区面积29.42427.220

Fig.1

Study region and traffic analysis zone"

Fig.2

Hierarchical structure of individual and traffic analysis zone"

Table 2

Calibration results of model parameters"

类 别变量名称单层模型多层模型
系数P系数P
个体层性别1.9360.0001.2480.000
年龄0.1020.0610.1770.000
教育水平0.8590.0001.2290.000
户口类型0.1180.6120.2960.031
家庭规模0.0580.2670.0470.231
家庭收入1-0.0130.087-0.1110.074
家庭收入20.0540.0890.1320.082
家庭小汽车拥有6.4870.0001.4430.000
通勤距离0.0150.0030.0080.000
交通小区层土地利用混合度-1.2650.069-2.1250.056
公共交通站点密度-0.0150.060-0.0250.071
到CBD距离0.0140.1710.3120.066
道路交叉口密度-0.0010.096-2.0050.034
AIC值3 189.6083 014.336
1 秦焕美, 高建强, 和士辉, 等. 基于奖罚措施的小汽车通勤者出行行为研究[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18( 1): 115- 120.
Qin Huan-mei, Gao Jian-qiang, He Shi-hui, et al. Car commuters’ travel behavior based on rewarding and punishments strategies[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18( 1): 115- 120.
2 Wang X Q, Shao C F, Yin C Y, et al. Application of bayesian multilevel models using small and medium size city in China: the case of Changchun[EB/OL]. ( 2018-02-11).[ 2018-11-20]. .
3 尹超英, 邵春福, 王晓全. 考虑停车可用性的建成环境对小汽车通勤出行的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报: 工学版, 2019, 49( 3): 714- 719.
Yin Chao⁃ying, Shao Chun⁃fu, Wang Xiao⁃quan. Influence of urban built environment on car commuting considering parking availability[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49( 3): 714- 719.
4 孙斌栋, 但波. 上海城市建成环境对居民通勤方式选择的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70( 10): 1664- 1674.
Sun Bin-dong, Dan Bo. Impact of urban built environment on residential choice of commuting mode in Shanghai[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70( 10): 1664- 1674.
5 塔娜, 柴彦威, 关美宝. 建成环境对北京市郊区居民工作日汽车出行的影响[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70( 10): 1675- 1685.
Ta Na, Chai Yan-wei, Guan Mei-bao. The relationship between the built environment and car travel distance on weekdays in Beijing[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70( 10): 1675- 1685.
6 Li S X, Zhao P J. Exploring car ownership and car use in neighborhoods near metro stations in Beijing: Does the neighborhood built environment matter?[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 56: 1- 17.
7 Shen Q, Chen P, Pan H X. Factors affecting car ownership and mode choice in rail transit-supported suburbs of a large Chinese city[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016, 94: 31- 44.
8 Xiao Z P, Liu Q, Wang J. How do the effects of local built environment on household vehicle kilometers traveled vary across urban structural zones?[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2018, 12( 9): 637- 647.
9 Reid E, Robert C. Travel and the built environment[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association, 2010, 76( 3): 265- 294.
10 Cao X S, Yang W Y. Examining the effects of the built environment and residential self-selection on commuting trips and the related CO 2 emissions: an empirical study in Guangzhou, China [J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017, 52: 480- 494.
11 尹超英, 邵春福, 王聘玺, 等. 基于多层模型的城市建成环境对通勤行为的影响[J]. 交通运输系统工程与信息, 2018, 18( 2): 122- 127.
Yin Chao-ying, Shao Chun-fu, Wang Pin-xi, et al. Impacts of built environment on commuting behavior based on a multilevel modeling approach[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2018, 18( 2): 122- 127.
12 Zhao P J. The Impact of the built environment on individual workers’ commuting behavior in Beijing[J]. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 2013, 7( 5): 389- 415.
13 Hedeker D. A mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression model[J]. Statistics in Medicine, 2003, 22( 9): 1433- 1446.
14 Ding C, Wang Y P, Tang T Q, et al. Joint analysis of the spatial impacts of built environment on car ownership and travel mode choice[J]. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2016, 60: 28- 40.
[1] Hong-fei JIA,Xin-ru DING,Li-li YANG. Bi-level programming model for optimization design of tidal lane [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 535-542.
[2] Yi-ming BIE,Kai JIANG,Ru-ru TANG,Lin-hong WANG,Xin-yu XIONG. Time of interval partition for traffic control at isolated intersection considering impacts of plan transition [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1844-1851.
[3] Yuan-li GU, Yuan ZHANG, Xiao-ping RUI, Wen-qi LU, Meng LI, Shuo WANG. Short⁃term traffic flow prediction based on LSSVMoptimized by immune algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1852-1857.
[4] Guo-zhu CHENG, Si-he FENG, Tian-jun FENG. Setting condition of on⁃street parking space occupied vehicle lane [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(6): 1858-1864.
[5] Hai-bo LONG,Jia-qi YANG,Xue-yu ZHAO. Optimizing vehicles allocation of multimodal coordinated freight transport based on transshipment delay risks [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(5): 1492-1499.
[6] Quan LIANG,Jian-cheng WENG,Wei ZHOU,Jian RONG. Stability identification of public transport commute passengers based on association rules [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(5): 1484-1491.
[7] Wen⁃jing WU,Run⁃chao CHEN,Hong⁃fei JIA,Qing⁃yu LUO,Di SUN. Collaborative control method of vehicles in U⁃turn zone under environment of cooperative vehicle infrastructure system [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(4): 1100-1106.
[8] Zhao⁃wei QU,Zhao⁃tian PAN,Yong⁃heng CHEN,Peng⁃fei TAO,Di SUN. Car⁃following model with improving safety distance based on optimal velocity model [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(4): 1092-1099.
[9] Lei CHEN,Jiang⁃feng WANG,Yuan⁃li GU,Xue⁃dong YAN. Multi⁃source traffic data fusion algorithm based onmind evolutionary algorithm optimization [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(3): 705-713.
[10] Qiang TU,Lin CHENG,Fen LIN,Chao SUN. Finding shortest path considering traveler′s risk attitude [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(3): 720-726.
[11] Ning⁃bo CAO,Li⁃ying ZHAO,Zhao⁃wei QU,Yong⁃heng CHEN,Qiao⁃wen BAI,Xiao⁃lei DENG. Social force model considering bi⁃direction pedestrian slipstreaming behavior [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(3): 688-694.
[12] Chao⁃ying YIN,Chun⁃fu SHAO,Xiao⁃quan WANG. Influence of urban built environment on car commuting considering parking availability [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(3): 714-719.
[13] Qiao⁃wen BAI,Zhao⁃wei QU,Yong⁃heng CHEN,Shuai XIONG,Chu⁃qing TAO. Modeling on trajectories of through vehicles with an unprotected left⁃turn phase under non⁃strict priority [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2019, 49(3): 673-679.
[14] CHEN Yong-heng,LIU Fang-hong,CAO Ning-bo. Analysis of conflict factors between pedestrians and channelized right turn vehicles at signalized intersections [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1669-1676.
[15] LIU Zhao-hui, WANG Chao, LYU Wen-hong, GUAN Xin. Identification of data characteristics of vehicle running status parameters by nonlinear dynamic analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(5): 1405-1410.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!