Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (10): 3228-3241.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240876

Previous Articles    

Experiment on performance of asphalt pavement grouting adhesive in seasonal frozen zone

Wei WANG1,2(),Rong-sen HE1,Zhi-guo CHEN2,Jia-le SHI1,Liang XU1(),Yan-nan SUN2   

  1. 1.School of Civil Engineering,Changchun Institute of Technology,Changchun 130012,China
    2.Jilin Provincial Transport Scientific Research Institute,Changchun 130012,China
  • Received:2024-08-06 Online:2025-10-01 Published:2026-02-03
  • Contact: Liang XU E-mail:16695496@qq.com;123333369@qq.com

Abstract:

This study builds on existing evaluation criteria by introducing additional indicators, including cone penetration ratio, compression elastic recovery rate, and low-temperature tensile strength, which are assessed through short-term and long-term aging tests. An evaluation model tailored to the performance of sealants in seasonally frozen asphalt pavements is developed using the entropy weight-TOPSIS method. The experimental results indicate the following: After short-term aging, the control standards for cone penetration ratio and compression elastic recovery rate are 90% and 30%, respectively, whereas after long-term aging, these standards decrease to 50% and 20%. The evaluation criteria for sealant viscosity are 1-3 Pa·s at 190 °C, with a grouting depth of 5 cm. The low-temperature tensile stress evaluation criteria for sealants after immersion are 0.06 MPa at -30 °C and 0.03 MPa at -20 °C, while the adhesion strength after freeze-thaw cycles is 0.03 MPa at -30 °C and 0.025 MPa at -20 °C. The entropy weight-TOPSIS method not only determines whether the sample meets qualification standards but also provides a comprehensive assessment of its quality across multiple indicators. These findings contribute to improving the application efficiency and durability evaluation of sealant materials, offering supplementary data for performance assessment and specification updates in cold regions.

Key words: seasonal freezing zone, asphalt pavement, grouting material, entropy weight TOPSIS, evaluating indicator

CLC Number: 

  • U414

Table 1

Basic parameters of heating type sealant"

样本编号样本A样本B样本C样本D样本E样本F样本G样本H
成分改性沥青
修补方式加热
适用温度/℃-30-30-30-30-20-20-20-20
锥入度/0.1 mm110.0~120.0115.0~120.0120.0~125.0115.0~125.085.0~95.075.0~85.090.0~95.080.0~90.0
软化点/℃86~9080~8885~9590~9587~9285~9092~9888~94
压缩弹性恢复率/%45~5040~4535~4045~5030~3530~4045~5035~40
流动性/mm1.5~2001~1.50000~0.5
适用规范JT/T740-2015

Fig.1

Basic experiment"

Fig.2

Testing process for depth of sealant filling"

Fig.3

Sample test of grouting adhesive"

Table 2

Performance of sample at -30 ℃"

样本JT/T 740要求
ABCD
锥入度/0.1 mm115.6138.9120.7135.290~150
软化点/℃84.487.882.580.7≥80
流动度/mm0.10.51.12.0≤5
弹性恢复率/%49.742.254.157.530~70
-30 ℃,150%,3次循环满足满足满足满足满足

Table 3

Performance of sample at -20 ℃"

样本JT/T 740要求
EFGH
锥入度/0.1 mm99.6102.288.084.270~110
软化点/℃87.681.892.386.2≥80
流动度/mm1.20.00.10.5≤5
弹性恢复率/%32.533.94735.430~70
-20 ℃,100%,3次循环满足满足满足满足满足

Fig.4

Aging process and comparative analysis of experimental sample cone penetration"

Fig.5

Comparison of softening point before and afteraging of test samples"

Fig.6

Comparison of compression elasticity recoveryrate of sealant before and after aging"

Table 4

Cone penetration ratio, softening point difference, and compression elastic recovery rate ratio of sealant test samples"

评价指数样本A样本B样本C样本D样本E样本F样本G样本H
短期老化后的锥入度比/%87.479.294.210010089.698.898.8
长期老化后的锥入度比/%69.754..152.046.746.155.685.174.9
老化后软化点差值/℃-3.1-6.41.5002.2-9.10
短期老化后的压缩弹性恢复率/%37.735.230.543.330.430.330.231.6
长期老化后的压缩弹性恢复率/%69.2093.910051.0190.599.746.076

Table 5

Liquidity of each sample before and after aging"

样本
ABCDEFGH
老化前流动度/mm0.10.51.11.11.2001.1
老化后流动度/mm000.500.9000

Table 6

Maximum tensile strength under low-temperature stretching"

样本A样本B样本C样本D样本E样本F样本G样本H
老化前第1次循环最大拉力/N8686621533759305163617560
老化前第3次循环最大拉力/N7285531006606292149540301
老化后第1次循环最大拉力/N559414305499297144574307
老化后第3次循环最大拉力/N447282295275284129350287

Fig.7

Low temperature tensile force displacement relationship curve of each sealant sample"

Fig.8

Adhesive and temperature curve of sealant sample"

Fig.9

Depth of injection for each sealant sample"

Table 7

Maximum tensile force of sealant afterimmersion in water"

样本
ABCDEFGH
第1次循环9105725901181564175853324
第2次循环860505487708303155802304
第3次循环853325305375285128720297

Fig.10

Relationship curve between tensile strength and displacement of sealant after immersion and stretching"

Table 8

Maximum tensile strength during freeze-thaw cycles"

样本
ABCDEFGH
第1次循环/N299282213167861193551309
第2次循环/N246157206151629190452239
第3次循环/N148145144148569128284221

Fig.11

Relationship curve between tensile force and displacement of each sealant under freeze-thaw cycles"

Fig.12

Damaged photo of sample H"

Table 9

Calculation results of indicator weights"

指标项信息熵值e信息效用值d权重/%
短期老化后的压缩弹性恢复率/%0.6010.39919.295
低温拉伸拉应力/N0.9160.0844.084
长期老化锥入度比/%0.7730.22710.986
冻融循环拉应力/N0.6030.39719.238
压缩弹性恢复率比/%0.8710.1296.223
短期老化锥入度比/%0.9130.0874.219
灌入深度/mm0.770.2311.131
长期老化后压缩弹性恢复率/%0.7750.22510.889
软化点差值/℃0.8830.1175.652
190 ℃黏度/(Pa·s)0.8290.1718.284

Table 10

Intermediate values"

指标项正理想解负理想解
短期老化后的压缩弹性恢复率/%10
低温拉伸拉应力/N10
长期老化锥入度比/%10
冻融循环拉应力/N10
压缩弹性恢复率之比/%10
短期老化锥入度比/%10
灌入深度/mm10
长期老化后的压缩弹性恢复率/%10
软化点差值/℃10
190 ℃黏度/(Pa·s)10
短期老化后的压缩弹性恢复率/%10
低温拉伸拉应力/N10
长期老化锥入度比/%10
冻融循环拉应力/N10

Table 11

Comparison of evaluation results"

样本正理想解距离(D+)负理想解距离(D-)综合得分指数排序原有评价排序
A0.671 152 250.477 917 180.415 916 603合格
B0.744 394 000.483 968 600.393 994 906合格
C0.751 896 150.517 854 540.407 839 545合格
D0.734 016 090.537 363 940.422 661 932合格
E0.514 680 200.634 990 570.493 595 811合格
F0.820 061 620.393 166 360.324 066 358合格
G0.750 362 860.529 487 340.413 710 404合格
H0.720 010 990.417 206 260.366 865 927合格
[1] 许正森, 雷相达, 管海燕. 多尺度局部特征增强Transformer道路裂缝检测模型[J]. 中国图象图形学报, 2023, 28(4): 1019-1028.
Xu Zheng-sen, Lei Xiang-da, Guan Hai-yan. Multi-scale local feature enhanced transformer network for pavement crack detection[J]. Journal of Image and Graphics, 2023, 28(4):1019-1028.
[2] 陈嘉锐, 崔得龙, 邱泽环, 等. 基于YOLOv5s模型的新型道路裂缝检测系统[J]. 现代电子技术, 2023, 46(13): 62-66.
Chen Jia-rui, Cui De-long, Qiu Ze-huan, et al. A new road crack detection system based on YOLOv5s model[J]. Modern Electronics Technique, 2023, 46(13): 62-66.
[3] 逄蕴泽. SBS/CNTs改性沥青灌缝胶的制备及性能研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学交通学院, 2023.
Pang Yun-ze. Investigation on the preparation and properties of SBS/CNTs modified asphalt sealant[D]. Changchun: College of Transportation, Jilin University, 2023.
[4] 李艳博. 适用于甘肃省典型气候环境的沥青路面灌缝胶研制与应用[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学土木工程学院, 2017.
Li Yan-bo. Preparation and application of asphalt pavement´s sealants and fillers for the typical climate of gansu province[D]. Lanzhou: School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, 2017.
[5] 覃金顺, 王振军, 孙宁, 等. 橡胶粉对沥青灌缝胶高温稳定性提升与机理[J]. 公路, 2023, 68(8): 332-340.
Qin Jin-shun, Wang Zhen-jun, Sun Ning, et al. Improvements and mechanism of crumb rubber on high temperature stability performance of asphalt sealant[J]. Highway, 2023, 68(8): 332-340.
[6] 1:2004.
Hot applied joint sealants [S].
[7] . 路面加热型密封胶 [S].
[8] Soliman H, Shalaby A, Kavanagh L. Performance evaluation of joint and crack sealants in cold climates using DSR and BBR tests[J]. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2008, 20(7): 470-477.
[9] Al-Qadi I L, Yang W, Fini E, et al. Towards performance-based selection guidelines for roadway crack sealants[C]∥International ISAP Symposium on Asphalt Pavements Environment, Zurich, Switzerland, 2008:161-172.
[10] 薛恒潇. 灌缝胶拉伸设备改进及低温性能评价研究[D].哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院, 2013.
Xue Heng-xiao. Research on crack sealant stretching tester improvement and performance evaluation in low temperature[D]. Harbin: School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014.
[11] 董岩岩. 基于弱边界层理论的灌缝胶失效机理研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院, 2017.
Dong Yan-yan. The failure mechanism of crack sealant based on the weak boundary layer theory[D]. Harbin: School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017.
[12] 刘忠骥. 灌缝胶失效判别方法及自愈性研究[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院, 2017.
Liu Zhong-ji. The failure evaluation and self-healing investigation of crack sealant[D]. Harbin: School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2017.
[13] Poulikakos L D, Falchetto A C, Wang D, et al. Impact of asphalt aging temperature on chemo-mechanics[J]. RSC Advances, 2019, 9(21): 11602-11613.
[14] Wang S Q, Jia Y S, Li Z R, et al. Evaluating the effect of aging on adhesion for hot-poured road sealants through a modified adhesion test[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 347: No. 128576.
[15] Masson J F, Collins P, Bundalo-Perc S, et al. Early thermodegradation of bituminous sealants resulting from improper installation: field study[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2007, 1991(1): 119-123.
[16] Masson J F, Woods J R, Collins P, et al. Accelerated aging of bituminous sealants: small kettle aging[J]. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 2008, 9(5): 365-371.
[17] Masson J F, Lacasse M A. Effect of hot-air lance on crack sealant adhesion[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 1999, 125(4): 357-363.
[18] . Standard test methods for sealants and fillers, hot-applied, for joints and cracks in asphalt pavements and portland cement concrete pavements [S].
[19] Wang S Q, Gao Y, Jia Y S, et al. Development of a modified bond test for hot applied crack sealants by using hot-cold cycles[J]. Road Materials and Pavement Design, 2023, 24(8): 1-21.
[20] Wang S Q, Li Y S, Wei Z Y, et al. Effects of periodically changing temperatures on the bond interface between crack sealant and repaired pavement[J]. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part B: Pavements, 2024, 150(1): No. 04024003.
[21] Al-Qadi I L, Masson J F, Yang S H, et al. Development of performance-based guidelines for selection of bituminous-based hot-poured pavement crack sealant:an executive summary repor[R]. Virginia:Virginia Transportation Research Council,2009.
[22] .Standard test method for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt binder [S].
[1] Wei LI,Ping LI,Hui WANG,Liu-bo ZHANG,Teng-fei NIAN,Qiang ZHANG,Ning LI. Application progress of self-healing microcapsules in the intelligent maintenance of asphalt pavement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(11): 3446-3462.
[2] Zheng-sen CAI,Yu WU,Xin-quan XU,Jian-wei FAN,Tao MA,Hong-rou ZENG. Pavement performance tracking and testing of porous asphalt pavement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(10): 2941-2951.
[3] Yan LI,Jiu-peng ZHANG,Zi-xuan CHEN,Guo-jing HUANG,Pei WANG. Evaluation of asphalt pavement performance based on PCA⁃PSO⁃SVM [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(6): 1729-1735.
[4] Han-chao LIAO,Mi-yuan SHAN. Risk identification method of foundation pit engineering of high⁃rise buildings based on fuzzy clustering maximum tree algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(12): 2892-2897.
[5] Xiao-he YU,Rong LUO,Zi-yao LIU,Ting-ting HUANG,Yu SHU. Numerical simulation of humidity field of typical cracks in asphalt pavement [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(10): 2343-2351.
[6] Yu MAO,Ping LI,Teng-fei NIAN,Mei LIN,Xi-ying WEI. Mechanical friction intensity behavior of asphalt pavement based on fractal theory [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2020, 50(2): 594-605.
[7] LI Yi,LIU Li-ping,SUN Li-jun. Prediction model on rutting equivalent temperature for asphalt pavement at different depth [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2018, 48(6): 1703-1711.
[8] MENG Fan-yu, PAN Xiao-dong. Optimization of functional asphalt pavement based on GA-ANN [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2013, 43(增刊1): 535-538.
[9] TAN Yi-qiu, ZHAO Li-dong, YUE Jun-sheng, LAN Tian-yun. Measure equipment for damage degree of icing asphalt pavement [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2012, 42(01): 57-62.
[10] ZHAO Yan-qing,TAN Yi-qiu,WANG Guo-zhong,WANG Zhi-chao. Effect of viscoelasticity on fatigue cracking of asphalt pavement [J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2010, 40(03): 683-0687.
[11] QIAO Ying-juan1,2,CHEN Jing-yun1,WANG Zhe-ren1,3,XU Guang-hui3 . Stress analysis of pavement structure considering Poisson ratio
effect of asphalt mixtures
[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2009, 39(01): 50-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!