Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (1): 230-244.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20230255

Previous Articles    

Experiment on seismic behavior of fire-fired composite shear wall with double steel plates and infill concrete after reinforcement

Fang-fang WEI(),Li-ping LI,Qing-peng XU,You-zheng ZHAO,Jing-jing YANG   

  1. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering,Hohai University,Nanjing 210098,China
  • Received:2023-03-22 Online:2025-01-01 Published:2025-03-28

Abstract:

To study the seismic behavior of fire-fired composite shear wall with double steel plates and infill concrete after reinforcement, firstly, 1 piece of composite sheer wall of room temperature and 3 pieces of composite sheer wall of high temperature (two of the combined shear walls were reinforced after fire) were tested under quasi-static loading, and the failure form, hysteresis curve, skeleton curve, energy dissipation and stiffness degradation of the specimen were evaluated. Then, based on the test results, the finite element models were established by the finite element software ABAQUS. At last, the composite shear wall was parametrically analyzed. The results show that the failure mode of the specimens are all bending failure, the limit displacement angle is between 1/63 and 1/45, which meets the requirements of the angle of the frame-core tube structure, and the displacement ductility coefficient is between 2.18 and 3.1, indicating that the composite shear wall has good seismic performance. The finite element simulation results were reasonable and reliable. Parametric analysis shows that the ultimate lateral bearing capacity of the specimen decreases with the increase of the axial compression ratio, the degradation effect of axial pressure ratio on bearing capacity will be significantly amplified under the action of fire, and increasing the cross-sectional steel matching ratio can significantly improve the lateral stiffness and shear bearing capacity of the specimen. Since the steel plate on the fire side has the highest degree of strength degradation after a fire, the fire side must be reinforced.

Key words: structural engineering, composite shear wall with double steel plates and infill concrete, bonded steel reinforcement, quasi-static test, seismic performance

CLC Number: 

  • TU398

Table 1

Parameters of specimen"

试件编号

墙体尺寸

Ww×T×t/mm

端柱尺寸

Wc×Bc×tc/mm

试件高度H/mm试验轴压比n

轴压力

/kN

火灾时间/min

混凝土立方体

抗压强度fcu

加固方式
N4T0600×90×3120×100×3.510500.4949045.0 MPa/
N4T2600×90×3120×100×3.510500.49492039.2 MPa/
N4T4S600×90×3120×100×3.510500.49494039.2 MPa粘钢加固
N4T6S600×90×3120×100×3.510500.49496045.0 MPa粘钢加固

Fig.1

Geometric dimension and detailing of specimen"

Table 2

Concrete mix ratio"

C32.5

硅酸盐水泥

粉煤灰中砂

4~16 mm

粒径碎石

聚羧酸减水剂
1883799567910603.85

Table 3

Mechanical properties of steel"

材料类型

直径(厚度)

/mm

屈服强度

/MPa

极限强度

fst/MPa

钢筋10527.2637.3
20508.3625.1
栓钉6.0400.0500.0
钢板3.0238.1385.2
钢管3.5353.2466.9

Fig.2

Damage to fire surface"

Fig.3

Specimen reinforcement process"

Fig.4

Test set-up"

Fig.5

Mode of final failure"

Fig.6

Hysteretic curve and skeleton curve of each specimen"

Table 4

Main performance indexes of the specimens"

试件编号加载方向

屈服位移

Δy/mm

极限状态破坏状态

位移延性

Δu/Δy

Δmax/mmPmax/kNΔu/mmPu/kNθu/mm
N4T0+11.7223.28992.525.54843.61/472.18
-12.1123.71085.426.41922.61/452.18
N4T2+9.6815.68987.122.56839.01/512.33
-12.1918.891109.222.04942.81/481.81
N4T4S+9.6917.96909.820.66773.31/592.13
-10.4517.93957.020.97813.41/582.01
N4T6S+7.8313.21857.419.82728.81/472.53
-8.5913.6908.522.15772.21/452.58

Fig.7

Stiffness degradation curve"

Fig.8

Equivalent viscous damping coefficient- displacement curve"

Fig.9

CDP model of concrete"

Fig.10

Hybrid hardening models"

Fig.11

Contrast of final destruction model"

Fig.12

Comparison of skeleton curves"

Table 5

Post-fire model parameters"

研究参数取值固定参数取值

火灾时间

th /min

0, 30,60, 90,120, 150钢板屈服强度 fy /MPa345

轴压力Nn

/kN

0, 0.2,0.3,0.4,0.5连接件屈服强度 fy /MPa400
t(截面配钢率)/mm3 mm(6.9%), 4 mm(8.8%), 5 mm(11.0%)混凝土 fcu /MPa40

Fig.13

Load-displacement curve of finite element odel of specimens with different fire times"

Fig.14

Load-displacement curve of finite element model of specimens with different axial compression ratios"

Fig.15

Anti-side stiffness-displacement diagram of finite element model of specimens with different axial compression ratios"

Fig.16

Anti-side stiffness-displacement diagram of finite element model of specimens with different cross-section steel ratios"

Fig.17

Load-displacement curve diagram of finite element model of specimens with different cross-section steel matching ratios"

Fig.18

Effect of reinforcement position on bearing capacity recovery"

Fig.19

Effect of reinforced steel plate thickness on bearing capacity recovery coefficient k"

1 范重, 刘学林, 黄彦军. 超高层建筑剪力墙设计与研究的最新进展[J]. 建筑结构, 2011, 41(4):33-43.
Fan Zhong, Liu Xue-lin, Huang Yan-jun. The up to date development on design and research of shear wall in high-rise buildings[J]. Building Structure, 2011, 41(4):33-43.
2 姜封国,赵景鲁.受火后钢筋混凝土构件的可靠性[J].吉林大学学报:工学版,2013,43(6):1500-1503.
Jiang Feng-guo, Zhao Jing-lu. Reliability analysis of reinforced concrete member under fire load[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2013, 41(4): 33-43.
3 Eom T S, Park H G, Lee C H, et al. Behavior of double skin composite wall subjected to in-plane cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2009, 135(10): 1239-1249.
4 聂建国,卜凡民,樊健生.低剪跨比双钢板-混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2011, 32(11): 74-81.
Nie Jian-guo, Bu Fan-min, Fan Jian-sheng. Experimental research on seismic behavior of low shear-span ratio composite shear wall with double steel plates and infill concrete[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2011,32(11):74-81.
5 聂建国,卜凡民,樊健生.高轴压比、低剪跨比双钢板-混凝土组合剪力墙拟静力试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2013, 30(6): 60-66, 76.
Nie Jian-guo, Bu Fan-min, Fan Jian-sheng. Quasi-static test on low shear-span ratio composite shear wall with double steel plates and infill concrete under high axial compression ratio[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2013, 30(6): 60-66, 76.
6 卜凡民,聂建国,樊健生.高轴压比下中高剪跨比双钢板-混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2013, 34(4): 91-98.
Bu Fan-min, Nie Jian-guo, Fan Jian-sheng. Experimental study on seismic behavior of medium and high shear-span ratio composite shear wall with double steel plates and infill concrete under high axial compression ratio[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(4): 91-98.
7 Zhang X M, Qin Y, Chen Z H, et al. Experimental behavior of innovative T-shaped composite shear walls under in-plane cyclic loading[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2016,120(120): 143-159.
8 武晓东,童乐为.带方钢管混凝土端柱隔板连接双钢板-混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2019,40(12):41-50.
Wu Xiao-dong, Tong Le-wei. Experimental study on seismic behavior of steel-concrete-steel composite shear walls with CFST boundary columns and partitioning steel plates[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2019,40(12):41-50.
9 丁东升. 钢板-混凝土组合剪力墙耐火性能及火灾后抗震性能研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学土木与交通学院, 2015.
Ding Dong-sheng. Study on fire-resistance and post-fire seismic behavior of steel plate-concrete composite shear wall[D]. Guangzhou: School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, 2015.
10 沈鹏程. 常温下及高温后外包钢板混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能试验及有限元分析[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学土木与交通学院, 2017.
Shen Peng-cheng. Experimental studies and finite element analysis on seismic behaviors of concrete-filled steel plate at ambient temperature and after exposure to high temperature[D]. Guangzhou: School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, 2017.
11 肖飒. 玄武岩纤维布加固火灾后钢筋混凝土剪力墙抗震性能试验研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学土木与交通学院, 2016.
Xiao Sa. Experimental research on seismic performance of heat-damaged reinforced concrete shear walls strengthened with BFRP[D]. Zhengzhou: School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power,2016.
12 王雁楠. 受火钢筋混凝土剪力墙加固后的抗震性能研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学土木工程学院, 2015.
Wang Yan-nan. Study on the seismic behavior of the strengthened concrete shear wall after fire[D]. Nanjing: School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, 2015.
13 . 建筑抗震试验规程 [S].
14 . 普通混凝土配合比设计规程 [S].
15 . 普通混凝土拌合物性能试验方法标准 [S].
16 . 金属材料 拉伸试验 第1部分:室温试验方法 [S].
17 . 钢及钢产品 力学性能试验取样位置及试样制备 [S].
18 13G 311—1. 混凝土结构加固构造 [S].
19 . 组合结构设计规范 [S].
20 . 建筑抗震设计规范 [S].
21 Yan C W, Jia J Q, Zhang J. Seismic behavior of steel reinforced ultra high strength concrete column and reinforced concrete beam connection[J]. Transactions of Tianjin University,2010,16(4): 309-316.
22 Lie T T, Irwin R J. Fire resistance of rectangular steel columns filled with bar-reinforced concrete[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1995, 121(5): 797-805.
23 European Committee for Standardization. Design of composite steel and concrete structures part 1,2: general rules-structural fire design [S].
24 T/ . 火灾后工程结构鉴定标准[S].
25 Lu H, Zhao X L, Han L H. Testing of self-consolidating concrete-filled double skin tubular stub columns exposed to fire[J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010, 66(8, 9): 1069-1080.
26 Alfarah B, López-Almansa F, Oller S. New methodology for calculating damage variables evolution in plastic damage model for rc structures[J]. Engineering Structures, 2017, 132: 70-86.
27 Krätzig W B, Pölling R. An elasto-plastic damage model for reinforced concrete with minimum number of material parameters[J]. Computers and Structures,2004,82(15): 1201-1215.
28 徐贵良. 带内隔板矩形钢管混凝土巨柱轴压承载特性研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学土木工程学院,2018.
Xu Gui-liang. Research on ultimate bearing capability of super rectangular concrete-filled steel tubular columns with stiffening plate subjected to axial compression[D]. Nanjing: School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, 2018.
29 Gopalaratnam V S, Shah S P. Softening response of plain concrete in direct tension[J]. Journal Proceedings,1985,82(3): No.10338.
30 Bao Y B, Wierzbicki T. A comparative study on various ductile crack formation criteria[J]. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology,2004,126(3): 314-324.
31 林诚发. 设缝双钢板-混凝土组合剪力墙抗震性能研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学土木与交通学院, 2018.
Lin Cheng-fa. Research on seismic behavior of double steel composite shear wall with gaps[D]. Guangzhou: School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, 2018.
32 Ko H, Matthys S, Palmieri A, et al. Development of a simplified bond stress-slip model for bonded FRP-concrete interfaces[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 68: 142-157.
[1] Hao JIANG,Zheng-wen ZHAO. Experiment on shear performance of RC beams strengthened with basalt fiber grid cement-based composites [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2025, 55(1): 211-220.
[2] Jin-quan ZHAO,Long ZHOU,Yong-gang DING,Rong-ji ZHU. Experiment on anchoring performance of spiral stirrup-corrugated pipe grout splicing [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(9): 2484-2494.
[3] Wei-song YANG,An ZHANG,Wei-xiao XU,Hai-sheng LI,Ke DU. Seismic performance of stiffness enhanced metal coupling beam damper [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(9): 2469-2483.
[4] Qi-wu YAN,Zhong-liang ZOU. Hybrid algorithm for seismic energy-dissipated structures based on optimal placement of dampers [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(8): 2267-2274.
[5] Feng-guo JIANG,Yu-ming ZHOU,Li-li BAI,Shuang LIANG. Improved krill algorithm and its application in structural optimization [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(8): 2256-2266.
[6] Guang-tai ZHANG,Cheng-xiao ZHOU,Shi-tuo LIU. Restoring force model of fiber lithium slag concrete column in saline soil environment [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(7): 1944-1957.
[7] Yong-jun QIN,Qi CHEN,Chi ZHANG,Jian-hu WANG. Experiment on seismic performance of prefabricated beam-column joints with kinded rebar [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(6): 1677-1687.
[8] Hua-fei HE,Zhao-ping LI,Rui-an FU,Shao-lin MA,Ming-li HUANG. Experiment on seismic performance of prefabricated sidewall joints considering strata restraint effect [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(6): 1601-1611.
[9] Yan-song DIAO,Yi-jian REN,Yuan-qiang YANG,Ling-yun ZHAO,Xiu-li LIU,Yun LIU. Experimental on seismic performance of replaceable splicing steel beam-column joints with friction energy dissipation components [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(6): 1643-1656.
[10] Xue-ping FAN,Yue-fei LIU. Bridge extreme stress dynamic prediction based on improved Gaussian mixed particle filter new algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(4): 1038-1044.
[11] Yi-fan LIU,Zhi-wei MIAO,Chen SHEN,Xiang-dong GENG. Evaluation of mechanical properties of non-uniform corroded rebars based on Monte Carlo method [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(4): 1007-1015.
[12] Xue-ping FAN,Heng ZHOU,Yue-fei LIU. Time⁃variant reliability analysis of bridge members based on Gaussian Copula⁃Bayesian dynamic models [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(2): 485-493.
[13] Hai-xu YANG,Yue GUO,Hai-biao WANG,Yi HU. Bending performance of cold-formed thin-walled steel-glulam composite beams [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2024, 54(12): 3513-3525.
[14] Ming LEI,Si-yang YIN,De-ling WANG,Ji-cheng ZHANG,Shi-wei LU. Seismic performance simulation of high⁃rise concrete core tube based on static nappe analysis algorithm [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(9): 2573-2580.
[15] Xue-ping FAN,Heng ZHOU,Yue-fei LIU. Multi⁃process Bayesian dynamic combinatorial prediction of time⁃variant reliability for bridges [J]. Journal of Jilin University(Engineering and Technology Edition), 2023, 53(8): 2332-2338.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!