吉林大学学报(医学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 51 ›› Issue (5): 1363-1369.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587X.20250524

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    

隐形矫治器前导治疗青少年骨性Ⅱ类错畸形伴深覆患者1例报告及文献复习

赵梦晗,史航,梁江怡,胡柯,冯馨平,王璐沄,齐慧川,史瑞新()   

  1. 吉林大学口腔医院正畸科,吉林 长春 130021
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-06 接受日期:2024-12-14 出版日期:2025-09-28 发布日期:2025-11-05
  • 通讯作者: 史瑞新 E-mail:shirx@jlu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:赵梦晗(1999-),女,吉林省长春市人,在读硕士研究生,主要从事口腔正畸学方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省科技厅科技发展计划项目(YDZJ202301ZYTS432)

Treatment of adolescent skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion patient accompanied with deep overbite by clear aligner through asymmetric anterior guidance: A case report and literature review

Menghan ZHAO,Hang SHI,Jiangyi LIANG,Ke HU,Xinping FENG,Luyun WANG,Huichuan QI,Ruixin SHI()   

  1. Department of Orthodontics,Stomatology Hospital,Jilin University,Changchun 130021,China
  • Received:2024-11-06 Accepted:2024-12-14 Online:2025-09-28 Published:2025-11-05
  • Contact: Ruixin SHI E-mail:shirx@jlu.edu.cn

摘要:

安氏Ⅱ类错畸形常出现下颌后缩和开唇露齿等,影响患者侧貌,甚至还可能引起上气道狭窄。安氏Ⅱ类错可分为牙性与骨性两类。针对处于生长发育高峰期的伴下颌后缩骨性Ⅱ类患者,临床常采用功能性矫治器进行下颌前导为首选治疗方案。目前国内外关于无托槽隐形矫治器应用于下颌前导治疗的临床应用仍缺乏报道。本文作者报道1例使用无托槽隐形矫治器进行下颌前导配合颌间Ⅱ类牵引以纠正骨性Ⅱ类错畸形伴深覆的青少年患者。治疗采用垂直向对前牙进行压低以改善深覆,水平向对上下颌进行扩弓以协调牙弓宽度,应用不对称前导技术改善中线。经过35个月矫治,患者凸面型和下颌后缩得到明显改善,上牙槽座点-鼻根点-下牙槽座点角(ANB)由6.8°减小至3.9°;覆、覆盖恢复正常;双侧尖牙及磨牙达到中性关系;颏唇沟深度(Si-LiPg')和颏唇沟厚度(Pm-Pm')较矫治前减小,颏唇沟变浅,面部软组织侧貌更为协调。下中切牙-下颌平面角(IMPA)由116.6°减小至110.7°,表明下颌前导过程中下前牙得到内收。综上,骨性Ⅱ类患者采用隐形矫治器进行下颌前导的矫治策略可以避免上下前牙过度代偿,并缩短正畸治疗周期。

关键词: 正畸治疗, 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错, 骨性Ⅱ类错, 下颌前导, 无托槽隐形矫治

Abstract:

Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion is often characterized by mandibular retraction and lip incompetence, which affects the patient’s lateral appearance and may even lead to upper airway stenosis. It can be classified into dental and skeletal types. For skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion patients with mandibular retraction during the peak growth period, mandibular anterior guidance with a functional orthodontic appliance is generally considered as the optimal clinical treatment approach. At present, there remains a paucity of clinical reports on the clinical application of bracket-free clear aligners in mandibular anterior guidance, both domestically and internationally. This article presented a case of an adolescent patient with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion accompanied with deep overbite treated with bracket-free clear aligner for mandibular anterior guidance in combination with intermaxillary class Ⅱ traction. During the treatment, vertical correction involved anterior intrusion of the anterior teeth to improve the deep overbite, while horizontal correction included maxillary and mandibular expansion to coordinate the width of the dental arches,and asymmetric anterior guidance was used to correct the midline deviation. After 35 months of treatment,the patient’s convex facial profile and mandibular retrusion were significantly improved. The subspinale-nasion-supramentale angle (ANB) was decreased from 6.8° to 3.9°, the overbite and overjet were normalized, and the bilateral canine and molar reached a neutral relationship. The mentolabial sulcus depth (Si-LiPg') and the soft tissue thickness of pogonion to pogonion (Pm-Pm') were decreased,resulting in a shallower mentolabial sulcus and a more harmonized lateral facial soft tissue profile. The mandibular incisor to mandibular plane angle (IMPA)was decreased from 116.6° to 110.7°, indicating retraction of the lower incisors during mandibular anterior guidance. In conclusion, the orthodontic strategy of mandibular advancement with clear aligners in skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion patients can avoid excessive overcompensation of the upper and lower anterior teeth and shorten the orthodontic treatment cycle.

Key words: Orthodontic treatment, Angle class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, Skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion, Mandibular advancement, Bracket-free clear aligner therapy

中图分类号: 

  • R783.5