图像引导放疗技术在直肠癌患者术前调强放疗中的应用

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20160635

吉林大学学报(医学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (06): 1226-1229.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587x.20160635

图像引导放疗技术在直肠癌患者术前调强放疗中的应用

许德权, 卓龙泉, 张永昶, 赵玲

吉林省肿瘤医院放疗一科, 吉林长春 130012

收稿日期:2016-09-12 出版日期:2016-11-28 发布日期:2016-12-02
通讯作者: 赵玲,副主任医师(Tel:0431-85879121,E-mail:18686696488@163.com) E-mail:18686696488@163.com
作者简介:许德权(1980-),男,黑龙江省牡丹江市人,医学硕士,主治医师,主要从事肿瘤放疗和化疗方面的研究。
基金资助:
吉林省卫生厅科研基金资助课题（20150204058YY）

Application of image-guided radiation therapy technology in patients with rectal cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy technology before operation

XU Dequan, ZHUO Longquan, ZHANG Yongchang, ZHAO Ling

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tumor Hospital, Jilin Province, Changchun 130012, China

Received:2016-09-12 Online:2016-11-28 Published:2016-12-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的：探讨图像引导放疗技术（IGRT）在直肠癌患者术前新辅助调强放疗（IMRT）中的应用，分析其对靶区勾画的指导意义。方法：67例临床分期为Ⅱ~Ⅲ期（T3-4N0M0或T1-4N1-2M0）的直肠癌患者行术前IMRT，放疗期间每周行1次IGRT，获得术前和术后的2组影像在三维空间的对比位置误差，计算系统误差（Σ）和随机误差（σ），按照Van Herk公式计算计划靶区扩边值（MPTV）。结果：389个CBCT扫描图像在x、y、z 3个轴位方向上的误差范围分别为（0.86~-1.13）、（1.94~-2.11）及（1.87~-1.81）cm。校正后y轴和z轴上的平移误差小于校正前（t=3.541，P=0.001；t=3.275，P=0.000）；校正后x轴和y轴上的旋转误差小于校正前（t=1.260，P=0.000；t=2.797，P=0.000。校正前，x、y、z 3个轴位方向上的MPTV分别为2.00、3.25和2.88 cm，校正后为0.73、1.74和1.50 cm，分别减少了1.27、1.51及1.38 cm。结论：IGRT可减少直肠癌患者术前IMRT的系统误差和摆位误差，是精确放疗的有效质量保证。

关键词: 调强放疗, 图像引导放疗技术, 直肠肿瘤

Abstract:

Objective: To explore the application of image-guided radiotherapy technology(IGRT) in intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) in the patients with rectal cancer before operation,and to analyze its guiding significance for target region.Methods: A total of 67 patients with rectal cancer(Ⅱ-Ⅲ stages,CT3-4N0M0 or CT1-4N1-2M0) were treated with IMRT before operation. IGRT was used for once a week during the radiotherapy and two sets of image contrast errors in the three-dimensional space were obtained.The systematic (Σ) and random (σ) setup errors were calculated.The MPTV was calculated according to the van Herk formula.Results: A total of 389 CBCT scans were analyzed. The error range in the directions of e x, y, z axis were (0.86--1.13), (1.94--2.11),and (1.87--1.81) cm, respectively. The translation errors of the corrected y axis and z axis were less than those before correction (t=3.541, P=0.001; t=3.275, P=0.000); the rotation errors of the corrected x axis and y axis were less than those before correction (t=1.260, P=0.000; t=2.797, P=0.000). Before correction, the MPTV in the directions of x, y, z axis were 2.00, 3.25, and 2.88 cm, respectively, which were 0.73, 1.74, and 1.50 cm after correction, reduced by 1.27, 1.51, and 1.38 cm, respectively.Conclusion: IGRT could effectivly guarantee the accuracy of IMRT of the patients with rectal cancer by reducing the systematic errors and position errors.

Key words: rectal neoplasms, intensity modulated radiation therapy, image-guided radiation therapy technology

中图分类号:

R735.37

许德权, 卓龙泉, 张永昶, 赵玲. 图像引导放疗技术在直肠癌患者术前调强放疗中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(06): 1226-1229.

XU Dequan, ZHUO Longquan, ZHANG Yongchang, ZHAO Ling. Application of image-guided radiation therapy technology in patients with rectal cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy technology before operation[J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2016, 42(06): 1226-1229.

参考文献

[1] Létourneau D, Wong JW, Oldham M, et al. Cone-beam-CT guided radiation therapy:technical implementation[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2005, 75(3):279-286.
[2] Boda-Heggemann J, Lohr F, Wenz F, et al. kV cone-beam CT-based IGRT:a clinical review[J]. StrahlentherOnkol, 2011, 187(5):284-291.
[3] Kilburn JM,Soike MH,Lucas JT,et al. Image guided radiation therapy may result in improved local control in locally advanced lung cancer patients[J].Pract Radiat Oncol,2016,6(3):73-80.
[4] Orisamolu A,Anderson N, Lin A. Setup uncertainty as determined by daily image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for head-and-neck cancer (HNC):evaluation of safety and implications on defining planning target volume (PTV)margins[J]. Internat J Radiat Oncol Biolog,2013,87(2Suppl):464-465.
[5] Chung MJ,LeeGJ,SuhYJ,et al.Setup error and effectiveness of weekly image-guided radiation therapy of tomo direct for early breast cancer.[J]. Cancer Res Treat,2015,47(7):774-780.
[6] Stroom JC, de Boer HC, Huizenga H, et al. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability[J]. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 1999, 43(4):905-919.
[7] Stroom JC, Heijmen BJ. Geometrical uncertainties, radiotherapy planning margins, and the ICRU-62 report[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2002, 64(1):75-83.
[8] van Herk M, Remeijer P, Lebesque JV. Inclusion of geometric uncertainties in treatment plan evaluation[J]. Int J RadiatOncolBiolPhys, 2002, 52(5):1407-1422.
[9] Gupta T, Chopra S, Kadam A, et al. Assessment of three-dimensional set-up errors in conventional head and neck radiotherapy using electronic portal imaging device[J]. Radiat Oncol, 2007, 2(6):1-8.
[10] Acevedo-Henao, Catalina M,Lopez Guerra,et al.Image-guided radiation therapy based on helical tomotherapy in prostate cancer:minimizing toxicity[J]. Oncol Res Treatment,2014,37(6):324-330.
[11] 戴建荣,胡逸民.图像引导放疗的实现方式[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志, 2006,15(2):132-135.
[12] 曲颂,朱小东,李龄.付国庆三种配准方式下腹部肿瘤IGRT摆位误差的比较[J].肿瘤防治研究, 2011,38(12):1434-1437.
[13] 陈娜,胡彩容,吴君心,等.腹盆部肿瘤在放疗分次内的摆位误差分析[J].中国肿瘤,2010,19(8):503-506.
[14] 徐宏宇,张军宁,王建平,等.盆腔肿瘤图像引导放疗计划靶区外放的研究[J].实用医学杂志,2014,30(17):2807-2808.
[15] 周明友,郑祖安.影像引导技术在腹盆腔调强放疗中的应用[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2013,11(4):366-368.
[16] Wu B,HeJ,FuJ,et al. Application of imaging-guided radiation therapy in pelvic tumor radiotherapy[J].Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi XieZaZhi,2015,39(4):299-301.

图像引导放疗技术在直肠癌患者术前调强放疗中的应用

Application of image-guided radiation therapy technology in patients with rectal cancer treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy technology before operation

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

赞

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	朱广伟, 郑炜, 黄永建, 华进, 杨树钢, 叶建新. 髓样分化因子88在结直肠癌患者癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2018, 44(05): 1047-1051.
[2]	王丹, 李怡飞, 历春, 董志恒, 董营, 盖晓东. 结直肠癌组织中B7-H1和B7-H4表达与Foxp3⁺调节性T细胞浸润的关联性[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2018, 44(03): 543-547.
[3]	焦洋, 杨冬野, 杨晶, 刘飞, 康喜荣, 张建生. Krüppel样转录因子12在结直肠癌患者肿瘤组织和血清中的表达及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(06): 1204-1208.
[4]	王溪, 韩今华, 李云峰, 杨艳明. 热疗联合¹²⁵I粒子治疗复发性直肠癌的近期疗效评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(05): 963-966.
[5]	杨冬阳, 赖晓嵘, 黎莹, 马立宇, 罗刚, 李子俊, 徐飞, 马冬. Ⅳ期结直肠癌轻微症状患者原发灶切除和KRAS基因突变对其预后的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(04): 805-811.
[6]	陈志华, 林素勇, 韩宏景, 苏小宝, 陈绍勤, 戴起宝. 慢病毒转染KISS1基因对人结直肠癌HCT116细胞增殖、侵袭和迁移能力的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2017, 43(03): 577-581.
[7]	鲁有望, 王昆华. 二代测序技术在结直肠癌基因组测序中应用的研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(06): 1263-1266.
[8]	钟华, 刘迪群. 结直肠癌组织中Ki-67和COX-2的表达及其临床意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(06): 1168-1172.
[9]	周解平, 王鹏, 钱立庭, 吴爱东. 宫颈癌术后静态调强放疗与单个和2个全弧容积调强弧形治疗的剂量学比较[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2016, 42(01): 120-124.
[10]	张龙, 朱燕, 王晓春, 张峻烽, 呼如芯, 李宇菲, 李春波. 硒蛋白P基因多态性与结直肠癌遗传易感性的关联性分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2015, 41(05): 980-985.
[11]	王铁军, 刘铜军, 张凯, 申震, 李凯, 李薇, 王新刚, 贾丹. 小窝蛋白3在人结直肠癌组织中的表达及斑蝥素对其表达的抑制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2015, 41(04): 794-797.
[12]	燕蒙蒙, 徐珊, 高岩, 刘扬, 贺梦子, 陈司霖, 李鹏武, 刘晓冬, 马淑梅. miR-18a对结直肠癌SW116细胞辐射敏感性的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2015, 41(02): 240-244.
[13]	黄晓东, 路倩, 沈楠, 王艳春. 五味子多糖对人结肠癌HT-29细胞体外增殖及侵袭能力的抑制作用[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2015, 41(02): 287-290.
[14]	陈志华，林素勇，陈绍勤，戴起宝，韩宏景. 结直肠癌组织中Kiss-1基因启动子甲基化对其表达 水平的影响及其临床意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2014, 40(05): 1074-1079.
[15]	黄雄，蔡传书. 非小细胞肺癌调强放疗后急性放射性肺炎发生与剂量体积直方图参数之间的关系 [J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2014, 40(04): 892-894.