Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition ›› 2018, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (03): 585-591.doi: 10.13481/j.1671-587x.20180324

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparsion of soft and hard tissue profiles of adolescent patients with class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion between before and after treated with two different kinds of tooth extraction methods

MA Xiaoyuan, ZHANG Yi, JIANG Huan, YANG Junxing, HU Min   

  1. Department of Orthodontics, Stomatology Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2018-03-09 Online:2018-05-28 Published:2018-05-31

Abstract: Objective: To compare the changes of soft and hard tissue profiles of the adolescent patients with class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion between before and after treated with two different kinds of tooth extraction methods, and to provide the reference for clinical treatment. Methods: A total of 60 adolescent patients with class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion were included,and they were divided into 44/44 group(n=30) and 44/55 group(n=30) based on different kinds of tooth extraction methods. Four first premolars of the patients in 44/44 group were extracted and 2 maxillary first premolars and 2 mandibular second premolars of the patients in 44/55 group were extracted.The measurement indexes of pre-treatment(T1) and post-treatment(T2) and their difference values(T2-T1) of soft and hard tissues of the adolescent patients were detected by lateral cephalometric radiographs. Results: As for the hard tissue,compared with before treatment,the Overjet,SNA,ANB,U1-NA,distance of U1-NA,U1-SN,NA-PA,and A-NP of the adolescent patients in two groups after treatment were decreasd (P<0.01),and U1-L1 and Pog-NB were increased (P<0.05 or P<0.01); as for the soft tissue, compared with before treatment, the H angle, UL-SnPg', LL-SnPg', UL-ELine, LL-ELine, and Sn-HLine of the adolescent patients in two groups after treatment were decreased(P<0.05 or P<0.01); B'LL-FH was increased(P<0.01);there were no significant differences in the difference values(T2-T1) of measurement indexes in the soft and hard tissues of the adolescent patients in two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The changes of soft and hard tissue profiles of the adolescent patients after treated with two different kinds of tooth extraction methods are not significant.

Key words: class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion, extraction, soft and hard tissue profile

CLC Number: 

  • R783.5