ADC和rADC值对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断效能

doi:10.13481/j.1671-587x.20160133

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic efficiency of the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC)and the relative apparent diffusion coefficient (rADC)in the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions in diffusion weighed imaging(DWI).Methods: One hundred twenty-three females with suspected breast lesions who underwent breast MRI examination and proved by pathology and surgery were included in this study. The axial DWI,sagittal T2WI and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)scan were performed. With reference to the location and size of lesions on the DCE image,the regions of interest (ROI)were placed in the lesions and their adjacent normal gland regions (more than 2 cm to the lesion). The ADC values of corresponding regions were recorded,and the standardized rADC values were calculated. The mean values of ADC and rADC between benign and malignant breast lesions were compared. The optimal threshold values of ADC and rADC in differentiation between benign and malignant lesions were defined based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve. Their diagnostic efficiency in breast lesions were assessed by comparing the area under curve(AUC). Results: Among the 134 lesions,the mean ADC values of 84 malignant lesions and 50 benign lesions were (1.04±0.26)×10^-3 and (1.60±0.40)×10^-3 mm²·s^-1,respectively. The mean ADC value of 134 ROI in the normal,glands was (1.89±0.31)×10^-3 mm²·s^-1. The ADC value of malignant lesions was significantly lower than those of benign lesion and normal gland tissues(P<0.01). The mean rADC values of malignant lesions and benign lesion were 0.59±0.18 and 0.83±0.30,respectively;the rADC value of malignant lesion was lower than that of benign lesion (P<0.01).When the ADC cutoff value of 1.22×10^-3 mm²·s^-1 was selected,its sensitivity and specificity were 86.0% and 84.50%,respectively;its AUC was 0.89. While the rADC cutoff value of 0.80 was selected,its sensitivity and specificity were 74.0% and 75.0%,respectively;its AUC was 0.80. The AUC of standardized rADC was lower than that of unstandardized ADC(P<0.05).Conclusion: Quantitative analysis of ADC and rADC values is an efficient method for differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.The standardized rADC value does not improve the diagnostic efficiency of ADC value.

Key words: breast lesion, diffusion weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, relative apparent diffusion coefficient, diagnostic efficiency

CLC Number:

R737.9

LU Wenli, OUYANG Zubin, LI Xinyou, SHI Jun, ZHANG Zhiwei. Diagnostic efficiency of ADC and rADC on benign and malignant breast lesions in diffusion weighted imaging[J].Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2016, 42(01): 159-163.

References

[1] 张峰,罗立民,鲍旭东,等. 中国妇女乳腺X线钼靶摄影普查成本效益分析[J]. 肿瘤,2012,32(6): 440-447.

[2] Li XR,Cheng LQ,Liu M,et al.DW-MRI ADC values can predict treatment response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy[J].Med Oncol,2012,29(2):425-431.

[3] Partridge SC,McDonald ES.Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the breast:protocol optimization,interpretation,and clinical applications[J].Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am,2013,21(3):601-624.

[4] 谢传淼,尹韶晗,李卉,等.扩散加权成像中表观弥散系数和相对表观弥散系数对乳腺恶性肿瘤的诊断价值[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2010,32(3):217-220.

[5] Hong Y,Shi Y,Liao W,et al.Relative ADC measurement for liver fibrosis diagnosis in chronic hepatitis B using spleen/renal cortex as the reference organs at 3 T[J].Clin Radiol,2014,69(6):581-588.

[6] 徐琳,汪登斌,王丽君,等.MR-DWI的ADC与rADC在乳腺疾病良恶性鉴别诊断中的比较[J].放射学实践,2014,29(10):1103-1107.

[7] 李宏伟,张延勇,李新,等.3.0T磁共振Vibrant序列联合高b值DWI在老年微小乳腺癌中的诊断价值[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(15):4144-4145.

[8] Nogueira L,Brandão S,Matos E,et al.Improving malignancy prediction in breast lesions with the combination of apparent diffusion coefficient and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetic descriptors[J].Clin Radiol,2015,70(9):1016-1025.

[9] Ei Khouli RH,Jacobs MA,Mezban SD,et al.Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging[J].Radiology,2010,256(1):64-73.

[10] Furman-Haran E,Feinberg MS,Badikhi D,et al.Standardization of radiological evaluation of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI:application in breast cancer diagnosis[J].Technol Cancer Res Treat,2014,13(5):445-454.

[11] Yabuuchi H,Matsuo Y,Kamitani T,et al.Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging:lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images[J].Eur J Radiol,2010,75(1):e126-e132.

[12] Zhang L,Tang M,Min Z,et al.Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer detection:a meta-analysis[J].Acta Radiol,2015,13(1):1-6.

[13] Chen X,Li WL,Zhang YL,et al.Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions[J].BMC Cancer,2010,10:693.

[14] Bogner W,Gruber S,Pinker K,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T:How does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis[J].Radiology,2009,253(2):341-351.

[15] 王海屹,王佳,叶慧义,等.自由呼吸扩散加权成像与屏气扩散加权成像在肾脏病变方面的对比研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2011,19(6):436-441.

[16] 黄小燕,杜红文,张毅力,等.磁共振扩散加权成像诊断乳腺病变的应用价值[J].实用放射学杂志,2008,24(4):526-533.

[17] 朱萍,王亚非,黄昊,等.MR扩散加权成像表观扩散系数在乳腺结节病变诊断中的应用价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2011,45(12):1117-1121.

[18] 蔡世峰,赵斌,王光彬,等.不同类型正常乳腺表观扩散系数值差异的研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2007,41(2):176-179.

Diagnostic efficiency of ADC and rADC on benign and malignant breast lesions in diffusion weighted imaging

PDF (PC)

Like

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 3

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	NIU Meng, DENG Dayong, LI Yunpengfei, LIU Shuo, DING Jun. Values of MRE in diagnosis of stages of hepatic fibrosis:A Meta-analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2017, 43(04): 787-793.
[2]	HOU Ruizhe, ZHAO Yingjia, LIU Yan, CHEN Qunbang, FU Hong, CHEN Jingyan, ZHAO Xingli. Application of diffusion tensor imaging FA value and ADC value in glioma grading:AMeta-analysis [J]. Journal of Jilin University Medicine Edition, 2017, 43(02): 311-316.
[3]	LIU Xiao-yun\|YUAN Ting-ting\|XI Yong-qiang\|TONG Dan. Application of ADC value in diagnosis of glioma grading before operation [J]. J4, 2011, 37(1): 154-158.