吉林大学学报(地球科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 1-14.doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20160265

• 地质与资源 •    下一篇

层序格架中富有机质页岩发育模式及差异分布:以上扬子下寒武统为例

刘忠宝1,2,3, 杜伟3, 高波3, 胡宗全3, 张钰莹4, 吴靖3, 冯动军3   

  1. 1. 页岩油气富集机理与有效开发国家重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    2. 中国石化页岩油气勘探开发重点实验室, 北京 100083;
    3. 中国石化石油勘探开发研究院, 北京 100083;
    4. 中国石油大学(华东)非常规油气与新能源研究院, 山东 青岛 266580
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-02 出版日期:2018-01-26 发布日期:2018-01-26
  • 作者简介:刘忠宝(1978),男,高级工程师,博士,主要从事非常规油气地质、层序地层及碳酸盐岩沉积储层研究,E-mail:liuzb.syky@sinopec.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重大科技专项(2016ZX05060,2016ZX05061);中国石油化工股份有限公司科技部项目(P15114)

Sedimentary Model and Distribution of Organic-Rich Shale in the Sequence Stratigraphic Framework: A Case Study of Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze Region

Liu Zhongbao1,2,3, Du Wei3, Gao Bo3, Hu Zongquan3, Zhang Yuying4, Wu Jing3, Fen Dongjun3   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Shale Oil and Gas Enrichment Mechanisms and Effective Development, Beijing 100083, China;
    2. Key Laboratory of Shale Oil/Gas Exploration and Production, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China;
    3. Petroleum Exploration and Production Research Institute, SINOPEC, Beijing 100083, China;
    4. Research Institute of Unconventional Oil & Gas Renewable Energy, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, Shandong, China
  • Received:2017-09-02 Online:2018-01-26 Published:2018-01-26
  • Supported by:
    Supported by National Science and Technology Major Project(2016ZX05060,2016ZX05061) and SINOPEC Ministry of Science and Technology (P15114)

摘要: 以岩石地层分区多、名称复杂多变的上扬子下寒武统为例,并以高分辨率层序地层学理论为指导,通过露头、岩心、钻(测)井及岩矿测试等资料综合研究,识别出6个层序划分依据、5种沉积旋回叠加组合样式,认为页岩层系中层序界面厘定困难,不同级次沉积旋回的识别是层序划分的关键。以此为依据,结合研究区构造、岩相、有机碳含量等研究,建立了等时层序地层格架及其富有机质页岩的沉积发育模式,并以层序为单元,开展了富有机质页岩分布的精细编图。富有机质页岩主要发育于不同级次的海侵-海退作用早期,不同地区时空分布特征差异明显:四川盆地内部富有机质页岩主要分布在资阳长宁一线近南北向带状展布的区域,其受基底断裂早寒武世多幕堑垒式活动控制,纵向上发育4套富有机质页岩段;四川盆地之外鄂西—渝东、黔北、黔东南及宜昌等地区主要受早寒武世早期上升洋流作用控制,以下部层序发育大套富有机质页岩段为特征。今后应考虑不同地区富有机质页岩的时空分布特点,进行页岩气勘探与开发部署。

关键词: 页岩, 层序地层, 筇竹寺组, 牛蹄塘组, 下寒武统, 上扬子地区, 四川盆地

Abstract: Taking the lithostratigraphy complicated Lower Cambrian in the Upper Yangtze region as an example, guided by the theory of high resolution sequence stratigraphy, based on the outcrop, rock core, thin section and drill data, we identified 6 standards to divide sequence stratigraphy and 5 sedimentary cycles of combination style. The interface of shale sequence stratigraphy is difficult to identify, and the recognition of different grades of depositional cycle is the key factor. Based on the above, combined with the study of tectonics, lithofacies and organic carbon content, we established isochronous sequence stratigraphic framework and sedimentary model of rich organic shales, and carried out fine mapping of organic shale distribution based on the sequence units. The organic-rich shales are developed mainly in the early different grade of transgressive-regressive periods. The distribution of organic-rich shales in the different areas is varied. The organic-rich shales distribute mainly in Ziyang-Changning area in the Sichuan basin. There are four sets of organic-rich shales controlled by the poly-tectonic basement rift. A large set of organic-rich shales are developed in the western Hubei- eastern Chongqing, north- southeastern Guizhou and Yichang areas controlled by Early Cambrian upward flow of ocean currents. The distribution characteristics of organic-rich shales should be taken into consideration for shale gas exploration and exploitation.

Key words: shale, sequence stratigraphy, Qiongzhusi Formation, Niutitang Formation, Lower Cambrian, Upper Yangtze region, Sichuan basin

中图分类号: 

  • TE121.3
[1] 谭聪,于炳松,阮壮,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组高分辨率层序地层划分[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(2):336-347. Tan Cong, Yu Bingsong, Ruan Zhuang, et al. High-Resolution Sequence Stratigraphy Division of Yanchang Formation in Southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition),2016,46(2): 336-347.
[2] 杜治利,田亚,刘洪军,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长9段页岩气资源潜力评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2016,46(2):358-367. Du Zhili, Tian Ya, Liu Hongjun, et al. Shale Gas Resource Potential Evaluation of Chang 9 Member, Fm. Yanchang in South Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 358-367.
[3] 刘忠宝,高波,张钰莹,等. 上扬子地区下寒武统页岩沉积相类型及分布特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1):21-31. Liu Zhongbao, Gao Bo, Zhang Yuying, et al. Types and Distribution of the Shale Sedimentary Facies of the Lower Cambrian in Upper Yangtze Area, South China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 21-31.
[4] 刘忠宝,高波,冯动军,等. 上扬子地区下寒武统黑色页岩矿物组成特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气工业,2017,37(4): 21-26. Liu Zhongbao, Gao Bo, Feng Dongjun, et al.Mineral Composition of the Lower Cambrian Black Shale in the Upper Yangtze Region and Its Significance in Oil and Gas Exploration[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(4): 21-26.
[5] Nikki T H, Nicholas B H, Cheryl A M, et al. A Sequence-Stratigraphic Framework for the Upper Devonian Woodford Shale, Permian Basin, West Texas[J].AAPG Bulletin,2014,98(1): 23-47.
[6] Brett C E, Baird G C, Bartholomew A J, et al. Sequence Stratigraphy and a Revised Sea Level Curve for the Middle Devonian of Eastern North America[J]. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoe-cology, 2011, 304:21-53.
[7] Abouelresh M O, Slatt R M. Lithofacies and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Barnett Shale in East-Central Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(1):1-22.
[8] Halgedahl S L, Jarrard R D, Brett C E, et al. Geophysical and Geological Signatures of Relative Sea Level Change in the Upper Wheeler Formantion, Drum Mountains, West-Central Utah: A Perspective into Exceptional Preservation of Fossils[J]. Palaeogeofraphy, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2009, 277: 34-56.
[9] 吴靖,姜在兴,吴明昊. 细粒岩层序地层学研究方法综述[J]. 地质科技情报,2015,34(5):16-20. Wu Jing, Jiang Zaixing, Wu Minghao. Summary of Research Methods About the Sequence Stratigraphy of the Fine-Grained Rocks[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015, 34(5):16-20.
[10] 董大忠,程克明,王玉满,等. 中国上扬子区下古生界页岩气形成条件及特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2010,31(3):288-299,308. Dong Dazhong, Cheng Keming, Wang Yuman,et al. Forming Conditions and Characteristics of Shale Gas in the Lower Paleozoic of the Upper Yangtze Region, China[J]. Oil & Gas geology, 2010, 31(3):288-299, 308.
[11] 聂海宽,唐玄,边瑞康. 页岩气成藏控制因素及我国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(4): 484-491. Nie Haikuan, Tang Xuan, Bian Ruikang. Controlling Factors for Shale Gas Accumulation and Prediction of Potential Development Area in Shale Gas Reservoir of South China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(4): 484-491.
[12] 胡琳,朱炎铭,陈尚斌,等. 中上扬子地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩气资源潜力分析[J]. 煤炭学报,2012,37(11):1871-1877. Hu Lin, Zhu Yanming, Chen Shangbin, et al. Resource Potential Analysis of Shale Gas in Lower Cambrian Qiongzhusi Formation in Middle & Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2012, 37(11): 1871-1877.
[13] 孙玮,刘树根,冉波,等. 四川盆地及周缘地区牛蹄塘组页岩气概况及前景评价[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2012,39(2):170-175. Sun Wei, Liu Shugen, Ran Bo, et al. General Situation and Prospect Evaluation of the Shale Gas in Niutitang Formation of Sichuan Basin and Its Surrounding Areas[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2012,39(2):170-175.
[14] 梅冥相,张海,孟晓庆,等. 上扬子区下寒武统的层序地层划分和层序地层格架的建立[J]. 中国地质,2006,33(6):1292-1304. Mei Mingxiang, Zhang Hai, Meng Xiaoqing, et al. Sequence Stratigraphic Division and Framework of the Lower Cambrian in the Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(6):1292-1304.
[15] 邓鸿斌,满玲,陈文,等. 多重地层划分理论及其在四川盆地寒武系底界划分中的应用[J]. 天然气勘探与开发,2013,36(1):1-4. Deng Hongbin, Man Ling, Chen Wen, et al. Multiple-Stratigraphic Division Theory and Its Application to Dividing Cambrian Bottom Boundary of Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2013, 36(1):1-4.
[16] 刘满仓,杨威,李其荣,等. 四川盆地蜀南地区寒武系地层划分及对比研究[J]. 天然气地球科学,2008,19(1):100-106. Liu Mancang, Yang Wei, Li Qirong, et al. Characteristics and Stratigraphic Classif Ication and Correlation of Cambrian on South Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2008, 19(1):100-106.
[17] 汪新伟,沃玉进,周雁,等. 上扬子地区褶皱-冲断带的运动学特征[J]. 地学前缘,2010,17(3):200-212. Wang Xinwei, Wo Yujin, Zhou Yan, et al. The Kinematics of the Fold-Thrust Zones in the Western Yangtze Area[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(3):200-212
[18] 李伟,余华琪,邓鸿斌. 四川盆地中南部寒武系地层划分对比与沉积演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(6):681-690. Li Wei, Yu Huaqi, Deng Hongbin. Stratigraphic Division and Correlation and Sedimentary Characteristics of the Cambrian in Central-Southern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(6):681-690.
[19] 梅冥相,张丛,张海,等. 上扬子区下寒武统的层序地层格架及其形成的古地理背景[J]. 现代地质,2006,20(2):195-208. Mei Mingxiang, Zhang Cong, Zhang Hai, et al. Sequence Stratigraphic Frameworks and Their Forming Backgrounds of Paleogeography for the Lower Cambrian of the Upper Yangtze Region[J]. Geoscience, 2006, 20(2): 195-208.
[20] 梅冥相,马永生,张海,等. 上扬子区寒武系的层序地层格架:寒武纪生物多样性事件形成背景的思考[J]. 地层学杂志,2007,31(1):68-78. Mei Mingxiang, Ma Yongsheng, Zhang Hai, et al. Sequence-Stratigraphic Frameworks for the Cambrian of the Upper Yangtze Region: Ponder on the Sequence Stratigraphic Back Ground of the Cambrian Biological Diversity Events[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy,2007,31(1): 68-78.
[21] 王传尚,李旭兵,李志宏,等. 中上扬子区寒武纪层序地层划分与对比[J]. 地层学杂志,2012,36(4):773-783. Wang Chuanshang, Li Xubing, Li Zhihong, et al. Cambrian Sequence-Stratigraphy in the Middle and Upper Yangtze Platform[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2012,36(4): 773-783.
[22] 张俊鹏,樊太亮,张金川,等. 露头层序地层学在上扬子地区页岩气初期勘探中的应用: 以下寒武统牛蹄塘组为例[J]. 现代地质,2013,27(4):978-985. Zhang Junpeng, Fan Tailiang, Zhang Jinchuan, et al. Application of Outcrop Sequence Stratigraphy on the Initial Exploration of Shale Gas in Upper Yangtze Region: Taking Niutitang Formation in Lower Cambrian as an Example[J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(4):978-985.
[23] 黄福喜,陈洪德,侯明才,等. 中上扬子克拉通加里东期(寒武-志留纪)沉积层序充填过程与演化模式[J].岩石学报,2011,27(8)2299-2317. Huang Fuxi, Chen Hongde, Hou Mingcai, et al. Filling Process and Evolutionary Model of Sedimentary Sequence of Middle-Upper Yangtze Craton in Caledonian (Cambrian-Silurian)[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27( 8):2299-2317.
[24] 汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等.四川盆地桐湾期古地貌特征及成藏意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2014,41(3):305-312. Wang Zecheng, Jiang Hua, Wang Tongshan, et al. Paleo-Geomorphology Formed During Tongwan Tectonization in Sichuan Basin and Its Significance for Hydrocarbon Accumulation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2014, 41(3):305-312.
[25] 罗超. 上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩特征研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学,2014. Luo Chao. Geological Characteristics of Gas Shale in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation of the Upper Yangtze Platform[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
[26] Algeo T J, Schwark L, Hower J C. High-Resolution Geochemistry and Sequence Stratigraphy of the Hushpuckney Shale (Swope Formation, Eastern Kansas): Implications For Clima to Environmental Dynamics of the Late Pennsylvanian Midcontinent Seaway[J]. Chemical Geology,2004,206(3/4):259-288.
[27] 徐政语,蒋恕,熊绍云,等. 扬子陆块下古生界页岩发育特征与沉积模式[J]. 沉积学报,2015,33(1):21-35. Xu Zhengyu, Jiang Shu, Xiong Shaoyun, et al. Characteristics and Depositional Model of the Lower Paleozoic Organic Rich Shale in the Yangtze Continental Block[J]. Acta Sedimentologiga Siniga, 2015, 33(1):21-35.
[28] 李忠权,赖芳,李应,等. 四川盆地震旦系威远-安岳拉张侵蚀槽特征及形成演化[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2015,42(1):26-33. Li Zhongquan, Lai Fang, Li Ying, et al. Formation and Evolution of Weiyuan-Anyue Extension-Erosion Groove in Sinian System, Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(1):26-33.
[29] 李伟,刘静江,邓胜徽,等. 四川盆地及邻区震旦纪末-寒武纪早期构造运动性质与作用[J]. 石油学报,2015,36(5):546-556. Li Wei, Liu Jingjiang, Deng Shenghui, et al. The Nature and Role of Late Sinian-Early Cambrian Tectonic Movement in Sichuan Basin and Its Adjacent Areas[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(5):546-556.
[30] 魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等. 四川盆地震旦纪一早寒武世克拉通内裂陷地质特征[J]. 天然气工业,2015,35(1):24-35. Wei Guoqi, Yang Wei, Du Jinhu, et al. Geological Characteristics of the Sinian-Early Cambrian Intracratonic Rift, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(1): 24-35.
[1] 李冠, 何文祥, 文志刚, 胡勇, 高小洋, 肖娜. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长71-2亚段不同源储组合的页岩油富集机理及富集模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 768-787.
[2] 陈泽熙, 徐志明, 李斌, 钟笠, 彭军, 张昆, 魏祥峰, 郝景宇. 基质型页岩甜点特征及评价方法:以四川盆地涪陵地区中侏罗统凉高山组陆相页岩为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 788-803.
[3] 夏英杰, 陈华斌, 陈健, 姚明宇, 杨海. 不同施工参数下深层页岩水力压裂数值模拟[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 924-936.
[4] 张恩威, 孟庆涛, 唐佰强, 胡菲, 党微.  基于机器学习的TOC测井预测方法:以松辽盆地南部青山口组一段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(3): 1062-1075.
[5] 王健, 张媛瑗, 吴楠, 徐清海, 崔子岳, 刘显凤, 付清萌. 鄂尔多斯盆地志靖—安塞地区长7段夹层型页岩油储层特征及分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2026, 56(2): 453-468.
[6] 吴小奇, 刘全有, 王萍, 黎华继, 朱东亚, 李朋朋. 沉积盆地天然气藏中氦气贫化机理及资源潜力:以四川盆地新场气田为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(6): 1837-1850.
[7] 肖正录, 李勇, 路俊刚, 秦春雨, 刘章昊, 周翔, 蒋奇君, 周易鑫. 四川盆地侏罗系大安寨段页岩油富集条件及有利勘探目标[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1039-1050.
[8] 杨立红, 刘莹, 罗弋卜, 曾皓, 苏建政, 李迎超. 油页岩原位开采中高温腐蚀下的选材[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1091-1102.
[9] 张可佳, 廖明月, 刘涛, 赵玉武, 刘宗堡, 田枫, 张岩, 贺友志.

基于改进BlendMask的页岩扫描电镜图像矿物鉴定方法 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(4): 1387-1400.

[10] 陈欢庆, 龚亮, 孙磊, 韩洁. 辽河盆地西部凹陷于楼油层高分辨率层序地层学[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(3): 731-744.
[11] 程瑶, 陆丹丹, 赵龙飞.

微波加热油页岩储层的热响应 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 387-400.

[12] 屈海洲, 陈润, 徐伟 , 张云峰, 张亚 , 何溥为, 唐松, 李文皓.

白云石胶结物特征及其对深层白云岩孔隙的作用 [J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(2): 401-416.

[13] 殷文. 低勘探程度地区层序地层分析及沉积规律——以五墩凹陷侏罗系为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2025, 55(1): 70-83.
[14] 王安, 胡明毅, 高家俊, 杨亮, 邢济麟. 松南长岭凹陷青山口组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(6): 2075-2088.
[15] 蔡潇, 夏威, 马晓东, 臧素华, 丁安徐, 刘玉霞, 花彩霞, 朱一川, 李辉. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷古近系阜宁组页岩油储集空间特征及其影响因素[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1482-1493.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴远坤, 刘成林, 于春勇. 松辽盆地双城断陷深层原油成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(5): 1443 -1456 .
[2] 马荣,石建省,刘继朝. 人工内分泌网络模型在水文地质参数研究中的应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3): 914 -921 .
[3] 李宁, 王成文. 东北及邻区晚古生代地层接触关系与佳-蒙地块的形成和演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(5): 1331 -1340 .
[4] 胡大千,初凤友,姚 杰. 中太平洋YJA海山富钴结壳矿物组成与元素地球化学[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 32 -0037 .
[5] 姜 雪, 程日辉,于民凤. 裂谷地层的气候和构造控制:Zscape模型分析与在松辽盆地北安断陷的应用[J]. J4, 2006, 36(01): 54 -0059 .
[6] 李春柏,张新涛,刘 立,任延广,孟 鹏. 布达特群热流体活动及其对火山碎屑岩的改造作用--以海拉尔盆地贝尔凹陷为例[J]. J4, 2006, 36(02): 221 -0226 .
[7] 孟宪纲,薄万举,刘志广,刘勇,畅柳,李朝柱,王子平. 芦山7.0级地震与巴颜喀拉块体中东段的活动性[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2014, 44(5): 1705 -1711 .
[8] 陈欢庆, 梁淑贤, 舒治睿, 邓晓娟, 彭寿昌. 冲积扇砾岩储层构型特征及其对储层开发的控制作用——以准噶尔盆地西北缘某区克下组冲积扇储层为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(1): 13 -24 .
[9] 贾大成,邢立新, 潘 军, M. J. van Bergen, H. van Roermund. 伊通上地幔剪切带捕虏体中富铝尖晶石的地球化学特征[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 497 -502 .
[10] 谢忠雷,杨佰玲,包国章,董德明. 茶园土壤不同形态镍的含量及其影响因素[J]. J4, 2006, 36(04): 599 -604 .