下扬子地区中新生代构造变形单元及构造变形样式

doi:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.201506114

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

下扬子地区地处扬子板块东部,其构造变形特征研究具有重要意义。综合利用区域地质、地震、钻井和地球物理等多方面资料,对下扬子地区断裂、地层发育特征精细解释,建立了贯穿研究区的两条区域地质剖面,即宿迁绍兴大剖面和连云港苏州大剖面。研究表明:下扬子地区可划分为6个一级构造变形单元,依次为苏北胶南造山带、苏北冲断区、南北对冲带、苏南冲断区、浙北冲断区和江南造山带,并可进一步细分为14个二级构造变形单元,这些明确表现出本区中、新生代对冲构造变形特征;两条区域大剖面表现出了挤压、伸展、反转等3类典型构造变形样式,具体可分为5亚类、10小类。

关键词: 下扬子, 构造变形, 对冲构造, 区域大剖面, 断裂

Abstract:

Located in the eastern part of the Yangtze plate, the tectonic deformation of the Lower Yangtze is of geological significance. Based on the regional geological data, seismic data, well logging, and geophysical data, the stratigraphy and faults are finely interpreted, and two regional geological profiles are established throughout the study area, namely Suqian-Shaoxing profile and Lianyungang-Suzhou profile. The Lower Yangtze region is divided into 6 level one tectonic deformation units, followed by Subei-Jiaonan orogenic belt, Subei thrust area, north and south thrust belt, Sunan thrust area, Zhebei thrust area, and Jiangnan orogenic belt, and it can be further divided into 14 level two tectonic deformation units, which clearly represent the Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic deformation of the Lower Yangtze region. There are three typical tectonic deformation styles out of the two profiles, including compression, extension, inversion, which can be divided into 5 sub-classes and 10 small classes.

Key words: Lower Yangtze, tectonic deformation, hedge structure, regional geological section, fault

中图分类号:

吴林, 陈清华, 庞飞, 史鹏. 下扬子地区中新生代构造变形单元及构造变形样式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015, 45(6): 1722-1734.

Wu Lin, Chen Qinghua, Pang Fei, Shi Peng. Mesozoic-Cenozoic Tectonic Deformation Units and Styles in Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Journal of Jilin University(Earth Science Edition), 2015, 45(6): 1722-1734.

参考文献

[1] 程日辉, 白云风, 李艳博. 下扬子区三叠纪古地理演化[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2004, 34(3): 367-371. Cheng Rihui, Bai Yunfeng, Li Yanbo. Evolution of Paleogeography of Triassic of Lower Yangtze Area[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2004, 34(3): 367-371.

[2] 庄建建, 杨风丽, 赵文芳. 下扬子区印支早燕山期的构造特征及应力场模拟[J]. 高校地质学报, 2010, 16(4): 475-482. Zhuang Jianjian, Yang Fengli, Zhao Wenfang. Tectonic Characteristics and Numerical Stress Field Simulation in Indosinian-Early Yanshanian Stage, Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2010, 16(4): 475-482.

[3] 姚柏平, 陆红, 郭念发. 论下扬子地区多期构造格局叠加及其油气地质意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1999, 26(4): 10-13. Yao Baiping, Lu Hong, Guo Nianfa. The Multi-Stage Structure Frame of Lower Yangtze Basin Evolution and Its Significance in Petroleum Geology[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 1999, 26(4): 10-13.

[4] 肖文交, 周烑秀, 杨振宇, 等. 大别郯庐苏鲁造山带复合旋转拼贴作用[J]. 地球科学进展, 2000, 15(2): 147-153. Xiao Wenjiao, Zhou Yaoxiu, Yang Zhenyu, et al. Multiple Rotation and Amalgamation Rocesses of Dabie-Tanlu-Sulu Orogen[J]. Advances in Earth Sciences, 2000, 15(2): 147-153.

[5] 刘寅, 陈清华, 胡凯, 等. 渤海湾盆地与苏北南黄海盆地构造特征和成因对比[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2014, 38(1): 38-51. Liu Yin, Chen Qinghua, Hu Kai, et al. Comparison of the Bohai Bay Basin and Subei-South Yellow Sea Basin in the Structural Characteristics and Forming Mechanism[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2014, 38(1): 38-51.

[6] Zhu Rixiang, Yang Zhenyu, Wu Hanning, et al. Paleomagnetic Constraints on the Tectonic History of the Major Blocks of China During the Phanerozoic[J]. Science in China Series D:Earth Sciences, 1998, 41(2): 1-18.

[7] 李三忠, 李安龙, 范德江, 等. 安徽巢北地区的中生代构造变形及其大地构造背景[J]. 地质学报, 2009, 83(2): 208-217. Li Sanzhong, Li Anlong, Fan Dejiang, et al. Mesozoic Structure Deformation of the Chaobei Region, Anhui Province and Its Tectonic Setting[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2009, 83(2): 208-217.

[8] 李海滨, 贾东, 武龙, 等. 下扬子地区中新生代的挤压变形与伸展改造及其油气勘探意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2011, 27(3): 770-778. Li Haibin, Jia Dong, Wu Long, et al. The Mesozoic-Cenozoic Compressional Deformation, Extensional Modification and Their Significance for Hydrocarbon Exploration in Lower Yangtze Region.[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2011, 27(3): 770-778.

[9] 朱光, 徐嘉炜, 刘国生, 等. 下扬子地区沿江前陆盆地形成的构造控制[J]. 地质论评, 1998, 44(2): 120-129. Zhu Guang, Xu Jiawei, Liu Guosheng, et al. Tectonic Control on Development of the Foreland Basin Along the Yangtze River in the Lower Yangtze River Region[J]. Geological Review, 1998, 44(2): 120-129.

[10] 朱光, 徐嘉炜, 刘国生, 等. 下扬子地区前陆变形构造格局及其动力学机制[J]. 中国区域地质, 1999, 18(1): 74-80. Zhu Guang, Xu Jiawei, Liu Guosheng, et al. Tectonic Pattern and Dynamic Mechanism of the Foreland Deformation in the Lower Yangtze Region[J]. Regional Geology of China, 1999, 18(1): 74-80.

[11] 程日辉, 王璞珺, 刘万洙, 等. 下扬子区三叠纪层序地层样式对扬子板块与华北板块碰撞的响应[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2004, 28(2): 134-141. Cheng Rihui, Wang Pujun, Liu Wanzhu, et al. Response of Triassic Sequence Stratigraphy of Lower Yangtze to Collision Between Yangtze Plate and North China Plate[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2004, 28(2): 134-141.

[12] 周祖翼, 郭彤楼, 许长海, 等. 广西十万大山盆地中生代地层的裂变径迹研究及其地质意义[J]. 地质学报, 2005, 79(3): 395-401. Zhou Zuyi, Guo Tonglou, Xu Changhai, et al. Fission Track Analysis on Mesozoic Strata in the Shiwandashan Basin, Guangxi Province and Its Geological Significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2005, 79(3): 395-401.

[13] 陈刚, 史鹏, 陈清华, 等. 连云港苏州区域大剖面构造特征与变形机制[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2009, 31(4): 49-53. Chen Gang, Shi Peng, Chen Qinghua, et al. Structural Characteristics and Deformation Mechanisms of Lianyungang-Suzhou Section[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2009,31(4): 49-53.

[14] 朱光, 姜芹芹, 朴学峰, 等. 基底断层在断陷盆地断层系统发育中的作用:以苏北盆地南部高邮凹陷为例[J].地质学报, 2013,87(4): 441-452. Zhu Guang, Jiang Qinqin, Piao Xuefeng, et al. Role of Basement Faults in Faulting System Development of a Rift Basin: An Example from the Gaoyou Sag in Southern Subei Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2013, 87(4): 441-452.

[15] 练铭祥, 薛冰, 杨盛良. 苏北新生代盆地断陷和坳陷的形成机理[J]. 石油实验地质, 2001, 23(3): 256-260. Lian Mingxiang, Xue Bing, Yang Shengliang. Formation Mechanism of Depressions and Rifts in the Cenozoic Basin of North Jiangsu Province[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2001, 23(3): 256-260.

[16] 陈安定. 苏北箕状断陷形成的动力学机制[J]. 高校地质学报, 2001, 7(4): 408-418. Chen Anding. Dynamic Mechanism of Formation of Dustpan Subsidence, Northern Jiangsu[J]. Geological Journal of China Universities, 2001, 7(4): 408-418.

[17] 曾萍. G78区域大剖面综合解释与苏北盆地构造特征[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2007, 29(3): 82-86. Zeng Ping. Synthetic Interpretation of the G78 Profile and Tectonic Characteristics of Subei Basin[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2007, 29(3): 82-86.

[18] 王伟锋, 周维维, 周杰, 等. 金湖凹陷隐性断裂带形成机制及分布[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2014, 44(5): 1395-1405. Wang Weifeng, Zhou Weiwei, Zhou Jie, et al. Formation Mechanism and Distribution of Buried Fault Zone in the Jinhu Sag[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2014, 44(5): 1395-1405.

[19] 吴根耀, 马力, 陈焕疆, 等. 苏皖地块构造演化、苏鲁造山带形成及其耦合的盆地发育[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2003, 27(4): 337-353. Wu Genyao, Ma Li, Chen Huanjiang, et al. Tectonic Evolution of the Su-Wan Block, Creation of the Su-Lu Orogen and Orogenesis-Coupled Basin Developing[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2003, 27(4): 337-353.

[20] 林舸, 王岳军, 李自安. 盆地基本构造样式与天然气成藏[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 1999, 23(3): 197-204. Lin Ge, Wang Yuejun, Li Zian. The Structural Patterns and Gas Reserviors-Forming in Sedimentary Basins[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 1999, 23(3): 197-204.

[21] 何明喜, 杜建波, 古哲, 等. 下扬子北缘前陆盆地构造变形样式[J]. 石油实验地质, 2006, 28(4): 322-324. He Mingxi, Du Jianbo, Gu Zhe, et al. Tectonic Deformation of Foreland Basin in the Northern Part of Lower Yangtze Area[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2006, 28(4): 322-324.

相关文章 15

[1]	郑国磊, 徐新学, 李世斌, 袁航, 马为, 叶青. 天津市重力数据反演解释[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(4): 1221-1230.
[2]	马国庆, 孟庆发, 黄大年. 基于重力异常的松辽盆地构造特征识别[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 507-516.
[3]	朱晓颖, 杨海, 匡星涛, 彭巍巍, 张洪瑞. 新疆东昆仑-阿尔金地区航磁反映的断裂构造特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2018, 48(2): 461-473.
[4]	杨德相, 付广, 孙同文, 李熹微, 姜海燕, 刘滨莹. 油源断裂优势通道输导油气能力综合评价方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1678-1686.
[5]	展铭望, 付广, 仇翠莹, 杨在增. 一种新的断裂破坏泥岩盖层程度的综合研究方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(6): 1687-1694.
[6]	牛子铖, 柳广第, 国殿斌, 王朋, 张家舲, 赵其磊. 查干凹陷中央构造带不同断阶带原油成熟度特征差异及其成因分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1047-1059.
[7]	陈鹏, 单玄龙, 郝国丽, 赵容生, 周健. 长白山仙人桥温泉断裂岩溶复合型地热成因模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(4): 1236-1246.
[8]	王伟, 付广, 胡欣蕾. 断裂对盖层封气综合能力破坏程度的研究方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(3): 685-693.
[9]	张博为, 付广, 张居和, 胡明, 刘峻桥, 王浩然. 油源断裂转换带裂缝发育及其对油气控制作用——以冀中坳陷文安斜坡议论堡地区沙二段为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 370-381.
[10]	刘锦, 刘正宏, 赵辰, 彭游博, 王楚杰, 杨仲杰, 豆世勇. 辽宁清河断裂以北新太古代变质表壳岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(2): 497-510.
[11]	刘敬寿, 戴俊生, 徐珂, 张艺, 丁文龙. 构造裂缝产状演化规律表征方法及其应用[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2017, 47(1): 84-94.
[12]	宋洋, 谷洪彪, 李海君, 迟宝明. 断裂两盘井水位同震响应特征对比分析——以北京八宝山断裂带中段大灰厂两观测井为例[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1815-1822.
[13]	林承焰, 曹铮, 任丽华, 张昌盛, 范瑞峰, 王叶, 邢新亚, 马晓兰. 松辽盆地南部大情字井向斜区葡萄花油层石油富集规律及成藏模式[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1598-1610.
[14]	姜贵璞. 陆相断陷盆地油气空间互补分布成因及分布范围的确定方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(6): 1649-1659.
[15]	刘招君, 孙平昌, 柳蓉, 孟庆涛, 胡菲. 敦密断裂带盆地群油页岩特征及成矿差异分析[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2016, 46(4): 1090-1099.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

505

HTML			PDF

Just accepted	Online first	Issue	Just accepted	Online first	Issue
0	0	0	0	0	505

From	Others	local

Times	151	354
Rate	30%	70%

Abstract

357

Just accepted	Online first	Issue

0	0	357

From	Others	local

Times	319	38
Rate	89%	11%

Cited

Web of Science	Crossref	ScienceDirect	Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>


This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.

Shared

Discussed