吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2023, Vol. 53 ›› Issue (6): 1621-1637.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20221428

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

多损伤钢-混组合梁桥力学性能有限元分析方法

卜建清1(),郭至博2,张吉仁3,荀敬川4,黄晓明5   

  1. 1.石家庄铁道大学 交通运输学院，石家庄 050043
    2.石家庄铁道大学 土木工程学院，石家庄 050043
    3.湖南大学 土木工程学院，长沙 410082
    4.中建路桥集团有限公司，石家庄 050043
    5.东南大学 交通运输学院，南京 210096
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-11 出版日期:2023-06-01 发布日期:2023-07-23
  • 作者简介:卜建清（1968-），男，教授，博士.研究方向：桥梁结构力学行为分析.E-mail：bujq2004@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFB2600600);河北省重点研发计划项目(19275405D);2023年河北省硕士在读研究生创新能力培养项目(CXZZSS2023078)

Finite element analysis method for mechanical properties of steel⁃concrete composite beam bridges with multiple damages

Jian-qing BU1(),Zhi-bo GUO2,Ji-ren ZHANG3,Jing-chuan XUN4,Xiao-ming HUANG5   

  1. 1.School of Traffic and Transportation，Shijiazhuang Tiedao University，Shijiazhuang 050043，China
    2.School of Civil Engineering，Shijiazhuang Tiedao University，Shijiazhuang 050043，China
    3.School of Civil Engineering，Hunan University，Changsha 410082，China
    4.CSCEC Road and Bridge Group Co. ，Ltd. ，Shijiazhuang 050043，China
    5.School of Traffic and Transportation，Southeast University，Nanjing 210096，China
  • Received:2022-11-11 Online:2023-06-01 Published:2023-07-23

RICH HTML

 2   

PDF (PC)

72

摘要：

为了研究钢-混组合梁桥多损伤状态有限元分析方法，探明不同损伤类型和程度对钢-混组合梁桥力学性能的影响规律，首先，研究了钢-混组合梁桥多损伤组合有限元模拟方法及损伤等级量化评定方法；然后，基于车-桥耦合振动分析了不同车速和不同损伤等级下钢-混组合梁桥跨中动力响应和车体加速度响应；最后，研究了不同损伤等级下钢-混组合梁桥关键截面挠度、板梁间相对滑移与应力的变化规律。结果表明：多损伤组合模拟方法能够有效表征钢-混组合梁桥的多构件损伤交织状态，可实现钢-混组合梁桥多损伤状态的定量描述；随着损伤等级的增加，跨中竖向振动位移和加速度响应峰值增大，车体的竖向、侧倾和俯仰振动加速度也表现出相同的变化规律，与无损伤状态相比，其峰值的最大增幅分别为2.16倍、92.5倍、205倍、565倍和235倍；关键截面的挠度、滑移亦随之增大，钢梁下缘应力变化不明显，混凝土板上缘应力显著增大。

关键词: 桥梁与隧道工程, 钢-混组合梁桥, 多损伤表征, 损伤等级评定, 车-桥耦合

Abstract:

In order to propose the finite element analysis method of steel-concrete composite beam bridges with multiple damages， and find out the influence law of different damage types and degrees on the mechanical properties of steel-concrete composite beam bridge， firstly， the finite element simulation method of multi-damage combination of steel-concrete composite beam bridge and the quantitative assessment method of damage grade were studied. Then， based on the vehicle-bridge coupling vibration， the dynamic response of the steel-concrete composite beam bridge midspan and the acceleration response of the vehicle body under different vehicle speeds and different damage grades were analyzed； At last， the key section deflection， relative slip between slabs and beams and stress variation of steel-concrete composite beam bridge under different damage grades were studied. The results show that the multi-damage combination simulation method can effectively characterize the multi-component damage intertwined state of steel-concrete composite beam bridges and achieve the quantitative description of the multi-damage state of steel-concrete composite beam bridges. With the increase of the damage grade， the mid-span vertical vibration displacement and acceleration response peaks increased， and the vertical， lateral and pitch vibration acceleration of the vehicle body also showed the same change pattern， compared with the undamaged state， the maximum increase of its peak value is 2.16 times， 92.5 times， 205 times， 565 times and 235 times respectively. The deflection and slip of the key section also increased， and the stress at the lower edge of the steel beam did not change significantly， while the stress at the upper edge of the concrete slab increased significantly.

Key words: bridge and tunnel engineering, steel-concrete composite beam bridges, multi-damage characterization, damage grade assessment, vehicle-bridge coupling

中图分类号: 

  • U447

图1

混凝土裂缝模型"

图2

单元几何"

表1

桥面破损等级"

桥面等级桥面平度系数
下限几何平均上限
A81632
B3264128
C128256512
D51210242048
E204840968192

表2

钢-混组合梁桥损伤评定标准"

BCI≥9081~9071~8061~70<60
损伤等级ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤ

表3

桥梁结构损伤指标权重值"

一级指标

一级

权重

二级指标模拟方法二级权重
桥面系0.2桥面破损修改桥面平整度1
上部结构0.4混凝土板裂缝刚度折减0.2
横隔板损伤刚度折减0.2
剪力钉断裂删除单元0.2
钢板梁微裂缝刚度折减0.2
支座损伤删除单元0.2
下部结构0.4下部结构混凝土剥落删除单元1

表4

桥梁结构损伤指标扣分标准"

损伤指标扣分值
1011~2021~3434~50>50
桥面破损等级ABCDE
混凝土板刚度退化/%<1010~2021~3031~40>40
横隔板刚度退化/%<1010~2021~3031~40>40
剪力钉断裂比例/%<1010~2021~3031~40>40
钢板梁刚度退化/%<1010~2021~3031~40>40
支座损伤比例/%<2021~4041~6061~80>80
下部结构混凝土剥落/m3<0.030.03~0.060.061~0.090.091~0.12>0.12

图3

有限元模型"

表5

钢-混组合梁桥多损伤工况"

参数工况1工况2工况3工况4工况5工况6
BCI1009084756454
损伤等级无损伤ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤ
桥面破损等级-ABCDE
混凝土刚度退化/%-1015202530
横隔板刚度退化/%-1015202530
剪力钉断裂数/个-120180240300360
钢板梁刚度退化/%-510152025
支座脱空-AA、BA、B、CA、B、C、DA、B、C、D
1号桥台破损体积/m3-0.030.050.070.090.11

表6

空间二轴车辆模型参数"

参 数数值
总质量/t27.71
车体质量M1/t24.81
俯仰转动惯量Izx1/（kg·m2）172 160
侧翻转动惯量Izy1/（kg·m2）31 496
1轴悬挂质量m1/t0.73
上（下）部弹簧刚度Ku1(Kl1)/（kN·m-1）727.81（1 972.90）
上（下）部阻尼系数Cu1(Cl1)/（kN·s·m-1）2.19（0）
几何间距L1（L2）/m4.56（1.69）
几何间距b/m1.10

图4

二轴车模型"

图5

车桥耦合程序验证"

图6

不同车速下各损伤等级跨中竖向振动位移响应"

图7

不同车速下各损伤等级跨中竖向振动位移峰值"

表7

跨中竖向振动位移峰值及其最大增幅 (mm)"

损伤等级车速/（km·h-1）Amax/%
20406080
Amax/%185196201216
无损伤2.832.882.922.954.2
I4.924.965.045.052.6
II5.345.525.475.584.5
III6.076.256.506.639.2
IV7.177.237.648.0312
V8.218.528.789.3113.4

图8

不同车速下各损伤等级跨中竖向振动加速度响应"

图9

不同车速下各损伤等级跨中竖向振动加速度峰值"

表8

跨中竖向振动加速度峰值及其最大增幅 (m/s2)"

损伤等级车速/（km·h-1）Amax/%
20406080
Amax/%9250682942794060
无损伤0.020.070.140.167
I0.140.691.201.711121
II0.171.032.412.781535
III0.361.462.823.85969
IV0.873.685.996.90693
V1.874.856.137.52302

图10

不同车速下各损伤等级车体振动加速度"

图11

车体振动加速度峰值"

表9

跨中竖向振动加速度峰值及其最大增幅 (rad/s2)"

损伤等级车速/（km·h-1）Amax/%
20406080
无损伤Ya0.020.060.100.15650
Xa0.0060.0130.0180.024300
Za0.0080.020.0460.076850
ⅠYa0.300.380.420.5273
Xa0.121.652.433.272 625
Za0.120.140.320.37208
ⅡYa0.500.750.840.9182
Xa0.781.522.642.99283
Za0.230.310.580.84265
ⅢYa1.021.471.801.8379
Xa1.643.554.735.19216
Za0.600.611.061.36127
ⅣYa1.182.803.004.00121
Xa3.045.936.148.81190
Za1.051.192.742.94180
ⅤYa4.124.856.256.8157
Xa3.187.368.3511.22278
Za1.892.354.616.67253
Amax/%Ya20 5007 9836 4504 200
Xa49 40056 51546 28946 650
Za23 52511 6509 9228 676

图12

各灾损等级桥梁挠度变化曲线"

表10

钢-混组合界面绝对滑移值 (mm)"

桥梁位置无损伤ⅠⅡⅢⅣⅤ
0C1.001.701.902.903.504.10
S0.911.001.101.231.301.49
L/8C0.961.001.102.102.803.50
S0.900.920.980.991.101.30
L/4C0.710.740.790.850.981.08
S0.680.700.720.770.880.95
L/2C0.430.570.590.610.690.70
S0.420.540.560.580.640.65

图13

钢-混组合界面相对滑移值"

图14

跨中截面抗弯强度"

1 卫星, 肖林, 温宗意, 等. 钢混组合结构桥梁2020年度研究进展[J]. 土木与环境工程学报, 2021, 43(): 107-119.
Wei Xing, Xiao Lin, Wen Zong-yi, et al. State-of-the art review of steel-concrete composite bridges in 2020[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2021, 43(Sup.1): 107-119.
2 张吉仁, 卜建清, 曹文龙, 等. 栓钉式钢-混凝土组合梁疲劳刚度退化研究[J]. 铁道标准设计, 2022, 66(5): 77-82.
Zhang Ji-ren, Bu Jian-qing, Cao Wen-long, et al. Study on the fatigue stiffness degradation of studded steel-concrete composite beams[J]. Railway Standard Design, 2022, 66(5): 77-82.
3 王勇, 王功臣, 王本淼, 等. 火灾后混凝土连续板剩余承载力试验研究及理论分析[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39(2): 96-109.
Wang Yong, Wang Gong-chen, Wang Ben-miao, et al. Experimental study and theoretical analysis on the residual capacities of fire-damaged concrete continuous slabs[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(2): 96-109.
4 陈俊, 张白, 杨鸥, 等. 微锈蚀钢筋混凝土高温后粘结锚固性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(10): 92-100.
Chen Jun, Zhang Bai, Yang Ou, et al. Bond Performance between slightly corroded steel bars and concrete after exposed to high temperatures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(10): 92-100.
5 王卫永, 李国强. 钢-混凝土组合梁抗火性能研究综述[J]. 建筑钢结构进展, 2014, 16(5): 1-8, 28.
Wang Wei-yong, Li Guo-qiang. A state-of the-art review on fire resistance of steel-concrete comp osite beams[J]. Progress in Steel Building Structures, 2014, 16(5): 1-8, 28.
6 张岗, 宋超杰, 李徐阳, 等. 碳氢火灾下钢-混组合梁破坏试验研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(6): 135-146.
Zhang Gang, Song Chao-jie, Li Xu-yang, et al. Experimental study on failure of steel-concrete composite bridge girders under hydrocarbon fire exposure conditions[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(6): 135-146.
7 武芳文, 冯彦鹏, 王广倩, 等. 高温后钢-混组合梁抗剪性能试验研究[J]. 工程力学, 2022, 39: 1-14.
Wu Fang-wen, Feng Yan-peng, Wang Guang-qian, et al. Experimental study on shear performance of steel-concrete composite beams after experiencing high temperatures[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39: 1-14.
8 鞠晓臣, 赵欣欣, 刘晓光, 等. 火灾作用下剪力钉抗拔性能研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2018, 48(2): 55-60.
Ju Xiao-chen, Zhao Xin-xin, Liu Xiao-guang, et al. Study of pullout performance of shear stud under fire[J]. Bridge Construction, 2018, 48(2): 55-60.
9 姚伟发, 黄侨, 张娟秀. 钢-混组合梁的火灾试验及剩余承载力[J]. 东南大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 46(2): 347-352.
Yao Wei-fa, Huang Qiao, Zhang Juan-xiu. Fire experiment and residual strength of steel-concrete composite girders[J]. Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 46(2): 347-352.
10 张岗, 宗如欢, 施颖, 等. 钢-混组合简支箱梁耐火性能研究[J]. 桥梁建设, 2017, 47(3): 41-46.
Zhang Gang, Zong Ru-huan, Shi Ying, et al. Study of fire resistance performance of simply-supported steel and concrete composite box girder[J]. Bridge Construction, 2017, 47(3): 41-46.
11 周焕廷, 郑志远, 郝聪龙, 等. 预应力连续钢-混组合梁抗火性能[J]. 长安大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 38(6): 40-48.
Zhou Huan-ting, Zheng Zhi-yuan, Hao Cong-long, et al. Fire resistance of prestressed continuous steel-concrete composite beams[J]. Journal of Chang'an University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 38(6): 40-48.
12 赵硕硕. 剪力钉锈蚀对钢-混凝土组合梁负弯矩区力学性能的影响研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学土木工程学院, 2021.
Zhao Shuo-shuo. Effect of stud corrosion onmechanical properties of steel-concrete composite beams innegative bending moment region[D]. Chengdu: School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2021.
13 许波, 刘永健, 朱伟庆, 等. 焊钉锈蚀后钢-混组合梁抗弯承载力简化计算方法[J]. 交通运输工程学报, 2019, 19(2): 25-35.
Xu Bo, Liu Yong-jian, Zhu Wei-qing, et al. Simplified method of calculating flexural capacity of steel-concrete composite beam after stud corrosion[J]. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 2019, 19(2): 25-35.
14 王威, 刘杰. 锈蚀损伤对钢-混组合梁抗弯性能的影响研究[J]. 中外公路, 2020, 40(): 180-184.
Wang Wei, Liu Jie. Study on the effect of corrosion damage on the flexural behavior of steel-concrete composite beams[J]. Journal of China & Foreign Highway, 2020, 40(Sup.2): 180-184.
15 陈冠. 多部件非均匀锈蚀对钢混组合梁承载力退化的影响研究[J]. 公路工程, 2022, 47(3): 35-42, 130.
Chen Guan. Study on the effect of multi-component non-uniform corrosion onbearing capacity degradation of steel-concrete composite beams[J]. Highway Engineering, 2022, 47(3): 35-42, 130.
16 Lin J P, Wang G, Xu R. Variational principles and explicit finite-element formulations for the dynamic analysis of partial-interaction composite beams[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2020, 146(6): No.04020055.
17 Lin J P, Wang G, Bao G, et al. Stiffness matrix for the analysis and design of partial-interaction composite beams[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2017, 156: 761-772.
18 范晨, 王莹, 李兆霞. 以疲劳评估为目标的大跨钢箱梁桥车桥耦合动力分析方法[J]. 振动与冲击, 2020, 39(6): 236-242.
Fan Chen, Wang Ying, Li Zhao-xia. Vehicle-bridge coupling dynamic analysis method for the fatigue assessment of a long-span steel box-girder bridge[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2020, 39(6): 236-242.
19 樊学平, 杨光红, 尚志鹏, 等. 考虑适用性的大跨桥梁主梁动态可靠性融合预测[J]. 吉林大学学报:工学版, 2022, 52(1): 144-153.
Fan Xue-ping, Yang Guang-hong, Shang Zhi-peng, et al. Dynamic reliability fusion prediction of long-span bridge girder considering structural serviceability[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2022, 52(1): 144-153.
20 王莹, 李兆霞, 缪海萍. 考虑环境变温作用的大跨桥梁疲劳损伤分析[J]. 湖南大学学报:自然科学版, 2018, 45(1): 26-36.
Wang Ying, Li Zhao-xia, Miao Hai-ping. Analysis on fatigue damage of long-span bridges considering effect of environment varying-temperature[J]. Journal of Hunan University(Natural Sciences), 2018, 45(1): 26-36.
21 Sun B, Xu Y L, Zhu Q, et al. Auto-adaptive multiblock cycle jump algorithm for fatigue damage simulation of long-span steel bridges[J]. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2019, 42(3): No. 12960.
22 黄海新, 李振龙, 方乐焱. 既有桥梁损伤状态模拟方式和判断标准的探究[J]. 河北工业大学学报, 2018, 47(2): 60-66.
Huang Hai-xin, Li Zhen-long, Fang Le-yan. Research on the simulation methods and criteria of damage state of existing bridges[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Technology, 2018, 47(2): 60-66.
23 李敏峰, 吴娇媚, 陈长华. 某连续刚构桥主桥考虑损伤影响的有限元模拟[J]. 河北建筑工程学院学报, 2020, 38(4): 46-50.
Li Min-feng, Wu Jiao-mei, Chen Chang-hua. Finite element simulation of main bridge of a continuous rigid frame bridge considering damage effect[J]. Journal of Hebei Institute of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2020, 38(4): 46-50.
24 周林仁, 欧进萍. 钢筋混凝土结构裂缝损伤状态模型建模方法与分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2012, 52(3): 399-405.
Zhou Lin-ren, Jin-ping Ou. Modeling method and analysis of crack damage state model of reinforced concrete structure[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2012, 52(3): 399-405.
25 王文洁, 吕中荣, 刘济科. 含呼吸裂缝的桥梁振动响应与时频特性分析[J]. 振动与冲击, 2013, 32(11): 12-16.
Wang Wen-jie, Zhong-rong Lü, Liu Ji-ke. Dynamic response and time-frequency feature analysis for a bridge with breathing cracks[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2013, 32(11): 12-16.
26 Law S S, Zhu X Q. Dynamic behavior of damaged concrete bridge structures under moving vehicular loads[J]. Engineering Structures, 2004, 26(9): 1279-1293.
27 Kim S H, Mha H S, Lee S W. Effects of bearing damage upon seismic behaviors of a multi-span girder bridge[J]. Engineering Structures, 2006, 28(7): 1071-1080.
28 刘佳锋. 车载下既有损伤公路混凝土简支梁桥动力响应分析[D]. 哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学交通科学与工程学院, 2014.
Liu Jia-feng. Dynamic response analysis of highway concrete simply supported beambridges with damage under moving vehicles[D]. Harbin: School of Transportation Science and Transportation, Harbin Institute of Technology, 2014.
29 黄辉. 基于车桥耦合振动的既有损伤高速铁路混凝土简支梁桥动力响应研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学土木工程学院, 2019.
Huang Hui. Dynamic response analysis of high-speed railway concrete simplysupported girder bridge withdamage under vehicle-bridge coupled vibrations[D]. Chengdu: School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2019.
30 Abdel Wahab M M, De Roeck G, Peeters B. Parameterization of damage in reinforced concrete structures using model updating[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999, 228(4): 717-730.
31 Adams R D, Cawley P, Pye C J, et al. A vibration technique for non-destructively assessing the integrity of structures[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1978, 20(2): 93-100.
32 Ostachowicz W M, Krawczuk M. Analysis of the effect of cracks on the natural frequencies of a cantilever beam[J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1991, 150(2): 191-201.
33 唐站站. 钢桥弹塑性地震反应计算方法及钢材地震损伤指标研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学建筑工程学院, 2016.
Tang Zhan-zhan. Research on seismic response evaluation method of steel bridges and seismic damage index of steel material[D]. Hangzhou: College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, 2016.
34 Miki C, Sasaki E. Fracture in steel bridge piers due to earthquakes[J]. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2005, 5(2): 133-140.
35 王新敏, 李义强, 许宏伟. ANSYS结构分析单元与应用[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2011: 15-20.
36 尹江南. 装配式钢筋混凝土空心板桥支座与铰缝损伤的数值仿真分析[D]. 天津:天津大学建筑工程学院, 2009.
Yin Jiang-nan. Numerical simulation analysis on damage of bearing and hinge joint of prefabricated reinforced concrete hollow slab bridge[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University School of Civil Engineering, 2009.
37 陈少峰, 刘骁, 彭周. 局部铰缝开裂的装配式空心板梁有限元分析[J]. 公路, 2013(10): 128-131.
Chen Shao-feng, Liu Xiao, Peng Zhou. Finite element analysis of assembled hollow slab beam with local hinge crack[J]. Highway, 2013(10): 128-131.
38 杜修力, 韩强, 李忠献, 等. 5.12汶川地震中山区公路桥梁震害及启示[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2008, 34(12): 1270-1279.
Du Xiu-li, Han Qiang, Li Zhong-xian, et al. 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake damage to highway and bridge in zhongshan district and its enlightenment[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2008, 34(12): 1270-1279.
39 . 公路桥梁板式橡胶支座 [S].
40 郑明军, 谢基龙. 压缩状态下橡胶件大变形有限元分析[J]. 北方交通大学学报, 2001, 25(1): 76-79.
Zheng Ming-jun, Xie Ji-long. Finite element analysis of large deformation of compressed rubber component[J]. Journal of Northern Jiaotong University, 2001, 25(1): 76-79.
41 王桂萱, 葛政青, 秦建敏. 基于ANSYS模拟桥梁支座的弹簧单元刚度系数率定与振动台试验验证[J]. 公路, 2020, 65(2): 74-78.
Wang Gui-xuan, Ge Zheng-qing, Qin Jian-min. Calibration of spring element stiffness coefficient of bridge bearing based on ANSYS simulation and verification of shaking table test[J]. Highway, 2020, 65(2): 74-78.
42 . 车辆振动输入路面平度表示方法 [S].
43 庞志强. 车载作用下分离式钢-混凝土组合曲线连续箱梁力学行为研究[D]. 石家庄:石家庄铁道大学土木工程学院, 2022.
Pang Zhi-qiang. Study on the mechanical behavior of separatedsteel-concrete composite curved continuous box girder under vehicle load[D].Shijiazhuang: School of Civil Engineering, Shijiazhuang Railway University, 2022.
44 张劲泉. 公路混凝土梁式桥结构损伤评定[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社, 2014: 18-26.
45 周绪红, 刘永健. 钢桥[M]. 北京:人民交通出版社股份有限公司, 2020: 115-117.
46 Shen H, Chen X, Lu K, et al. A new vehicle-bridge coupling analysis method based on model polycondensation[J]. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 2021, 25(1): 245-255.
47 Wang L, Jiang P, Hui Z, et al. Vehicle-bridge coupled vibrations in different types of cable stayed bridges[J]. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 81-92.
48 邓露, 何维, 王芳. 不同截面类型简支梁桥动力冲击系数研究[J]. 振动与冲击, 2015, 34(14): 70-75.
Deng Lu, He Wei, Wang Fang. Dynamic impact factors for simply supported bridges with different cross-section types[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2015, 34(14): 70-75.
49 张洁. 公路车辆与桥梁耦合振动分析研究[D]. 成都:西南交通大学土木工程学院, 2007.
Zhang Jie. Studies on coupling vibrationof highway vehicle-bridge system[D]. Chengdu: School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007.
50 李喜梅, 王新, 母渤海, 等. 车辆荷载作用下双工字钢-混组合连续梁桥振动控制研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2022, 35(7): 173-183.
Li Xi-mei, Wang Xin, Mu Bo-hai, et al. Research on vibration control of twin-i steel-concretecomposite continuous girder bridge under vehicle load[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2022, 35(7): 173-183.
51 . 公路桥涵设计通用规范 [S].
[1] 韩智强,谢刚,周勇军,刘世忠,晋民杰. 曲线桥梁车桥耦合振动数值分析方法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(2): 515-522.
[2] 杨国俊,田骐玮,吕明航,杜永峰,唐光武,韩宗健,伏一多. 大跨度悬索桥隧道式锚碇力学特性研究综述[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(6): 1245-1263.
[3] 袁周致远,吉伯海,夏俊元,孙童. 钢箱梁横隔板-纵肋疲劳裂纹气动冲击维修试验[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(12): 2883-2891.
[4] 李春良,林志豪,赵珞珞. 铰缝及板损伤后对空心板桥横向受力的影响[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2021, 51(2): 611-619.
[5] 谭国金,刘寒冰,程永春,王龙林,刘斌. 基于车-桥耦合振动的简支梁桥冲击效应[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2011, 41(01): 62-0067.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》编辑部
地址：长春市人民大街5988号　电话：+86-431-85095297　传真：+86-431-85094074　E-mail: xbgxb@jlu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发