吉林大学学报(工学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 55 ›› Issue (12): 3852-3861.doi: 10.13229/j.cnki.jdxbgxb.20240361

• 交通运输工程·土木工程 • 上一篇    

单全球导航卫星系统信号下基于自监督双向长短时记忆网络的车辆速度估计方法

田婧(),马社强(),赵丹,陈发城   

  1. 中国人民公安大学 交通管理学院,北京 100038
  • 收稿日期:2024-04-07 出版日期:2025-12-01 发布日期:2026-02-03
  • 通讯作者: 马社强 E-mail:jingt202310@163.com;masheqiang@163.com
  • 作者简介:田婧(1995-),女,讲师,博士.研究方向:智能交通态势感知,交通大数据处理.E-mail:jingt202310@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划重点专项项目(2023YFC3009700);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2024JKF02ZK13)

Vehicle travel speed estimation based on selfsupervised long shortterm memory network under single global navigation satellite system signal

Jing TIAN(),She-qiang MA(),Dan ZHAO,Fa-cheng CHEN   

  1. School of Transportation Management,People's Public Security University of China,Beijing 100038,China
  • Received:2024-04-07 Online:2025-12-01 Published:2026-02-03
  • Contact: She-qiang MA E-mail:jingt202310@163.com;masheqiang@163.com

摘要:

单全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)环境下车辆速度检测存在显著噪声干扰,且数据采样的稀疏性会加剧速度计算的不稳定性。为此,将单GNSS下车辆速度估计构建为基于时空相关性的速度期望优化问题,并提出一种自监督双向长短时记忆(LSTM)算法求解。首先,该算法构建稀疏数据时空特征提取LSTM网络,引入时间门和空间门控函数来分析稀疏、不等间距的车辆检测数据中速度时空关联的变化,提取速度时空特征嵌入向量;其次,噪声双向抑制的车辆速度估计LSTM网络分别从前向、后向来分析车辆速度变化趋势,准确实现噪声清除与速度估计;最后,以GPS信号为例对算法的车辆速度估计性能进行了实验验证,结果表明:提出的算法在采样间隔为1~10 min的稀疏数据下,去除速度数据中的噪声平均值为26.73 dB PSNR,与LWR、EnKF、Noise2Void算法相比平均高28.93%,估计速度的准确度平均高2.02%。

关键词: 交通管理工程, 车辆速度, 自监督学习, 双向LSTM, 单GNSS信号

Abstract:

The vehicle speed detection in the single Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) environment is subject to significant noise interference, and the sparsity of data sampling will further exacerbate the instability of speed calculation. To address this issue, the vehicle speed estimation under the single GNSS scenario is formulated as a speed expectation optimization problem based on spatiotemporal correlation, and a self-supervised bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) algorithm is proposed for its solution. Firstly, a sparse data spatiotemporal feature extraction LSTM is constructed by this algorithm, where time gate and spatial gate functions are introduced to analyze the changes in speed spatiotemporal correlations in sparse and unequal-interval vehicle detection data, and embedded vectors for speed spatiotemporal features are extracted. Secondly, the trend of vehicle speed changes is analyzed from both forward and backward directions by the noise bidirectional suppression LSTM network for vehicle speed estimation, enabling the accurate achievement of noise elimination and speed estimation. Finally, experimental verification of the vehicle speed estimation performance of the proposed algorithm was conducted using GPS signals as an example. The results show that an average noise reduction of 26.73 dB PSNR was achieved by the proposed algorithm in sparse speed data with sampling intervals ranging from 1 minute to 10 minutes, which is 28.93% higher than that achieved by the LWR, EnKF, and Noise2Void algorithms on average. Additionally, the speed estimation accuracy of the proposed algorithm is 2.02% higher on average.

Key words: traffic management engineering, vehicle speed, self-supervised learning, bidirectional long short-term memory network, single global navigation satellite system signal

中图分类号: 

  • U149.41

图 1

面向车辆速度估计的自监督双向LSTM算法总体结构"

图 2

稀疏数据时空特征提取LSTM网络"

图 3

噪声双向抑制的车辆速度估计LSTM网络"

图4

SSB-LSTM对不同采样间隔车辆速度数据的估计误差"

表1

不同噪声干扰下SSB-LSTM的车辆速度估计误差指标"

噪声水平/(km2·h-2高斯噪声泊松噪声尖峰噪声
PSNR/dBSSIMPSNR/dBSSIMPSNR/dBSSIM
520.980.5822.090.3118.130.41
1023.200.2422.650.2820.300.47
1520.440.4122.670.2818.370.37
2021.660.3623.280.2517.280.37

图5

速度估计中算法去除的噪声与实际噪声间的绝对误差箱线图"

图6

不同算法在真实车辆速度数据集上的估计误差对比"

图7

不同算法在合成高斯噪声数据上的速度估计误差对比"

图8

不同算法在合成泊松噪声数据上的速度估计误差对比"

图9

不同算法在合成尖峰噪声数据上的速度估计误差对比"

[1] 闵海根, 方煜坤, 吴霞, 等. 弱GNSS信号下基于EMD和LSTM的车辆位置预测方法研究[J]. 中国公路学报, 2021, 34(7): 128-139.
Min Hai-gen, Fang Yu-kun, Wu Xia, et al. Position prediction based on empirical mode decomposition and long short-term memory under global navigation satellite system outages[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2021, 34(7): 128-139.
[2] Shen C, Zhang Y, Tang J, et al. Dual-optimization for a MEMS-INS/GPS system during GPS outages based on the cubature Kalman filter and neural networks[J]. Mechnical Systems and Signal Processing, 2019, 133:No. 106222.
[3] Yao Y Q, Xu X S, Zhu C C, et al. A hybrid fusion algorithm for GPS/INS integration during GPS outages[J]. Measurement, 2017, 103: 42-51.
[4] Lehtinen J, Munkberg J, Hasselgren J, et al. Noise2Noise: learning image restoration without clean data[C]∥International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden, 2018: 2965-2974.
[5] Moran N, Dan S, Yu Z, et al. Noisier2Noise: learning to denoise from unpaired noisy data[C]∥IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Seattle, USA,2020: 12061-12069.
[6] Krull A, Buchholz T O, Jug F. Noise2Void-Learning denoising from single noisy images[C]∥IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, USA, 2019: 2124-2132.
[7] 刘雪梅, 程彭圣男, 李海瑞, 等.基于字词向量的BiLSTM-CRF水利工程巡检文本实体识别模型[J]. 华北水利水电大学学报: 自然科学版, 2023(3): 9-17.
Liu Xue-mei, Sheng-nan Chengpeng, Li Hai-rui, et al. Research on text entity recognition for water project inspection based on word-character vector BiLSTM-CRF[J]. Journal of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, 2023(3): 9-17.
[8] 崔丽霞, 许利显. 基于Bi LSTM-CTC的语音识别系统研究[J].自动化与仪器仪表, 2023 (10): 90-94.
Cui Li-xia, Xu Li-xian. Research on speech recognition system based on BiLSTM-CTC[J]. Automation & Instrumentation, 2023 (10):90-94.
[9] 苏兆品, 张羚, 张国富, 等. 基于多特征融合和BiLSTM的语音隐写检测算法[J]. 电子学报, 2023, 51(5): 1300-1309.
Su Zhao-pin, Zhang Ling, Zhang Guo-fu, et al. A speech steganalysis algorithm based on multi-feature fusion and BiLSTM[J]. Acta Electronica Sinica, 2023, 51(5): 1300-1309.
[10] 付翔, 肖帅, 徐超. 轮毂电动机驱动车辆并联式复合制动策略[J]. 江苏大学学报: 自然科学版, 2025, 46(1): 9-17.
Fu Xiang, Xiao Shuai, Xu Chao. Parallel compound braking strategy of vehicle driven by wheel motor[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University(Natural Science Edition), 2025, 46(1): 9-17.
[11] Guo S, Yan Z F, Zhang K, et al. Toward convolutional blind denoising of real photographs[C]∥IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, USA, 2019: 1712-1722.
[12] He K M, Chen X L, Xie S N, et al. Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners[C]∥IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans,USA,2022: 15979-15988.
[13] Cui Z Y, Ke R M, Pu Z Y, et al. Stacked bidirectional and unidirectional LSTM recurrent neural network for forecasting network-wide traffic state with missing values[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2020, 118(9): No.102674.
[14] Lv Y S, Duan Y J, Kang W W, et al. Traffic flow prediction with big data: a deep learning approach[J]. IEEE Transactions Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2015, 16(2): 865-873.
[15] Do L N N, Vu H L, Vo B Q, et al. An effective spatial-temporal attention based neural network for traffic flow prediction[J]. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 2019(108): 12-28.
[16] 贾现广, 冯超琴, 苏治文, 等.城市交通网格集群的Bi-LSTM的流量预测[J]. 重庆大学学报, 2023, 46(9): 130-141.
Jia Xian-guang, Feng Chao-qin, Su Zhi-wen, et al. Forecasting for urban traffic grid clusters based on Bi-LSTM[J]. Jounal of Chongqing University, 2023, 46(9):130-141.
[17] Graves A, Jaitly N, Mohamed A R. Hybrid speech recognition with deep bidirectional lstm[C]∥IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, Olomouc, Czech Republic, 2013: 273-278.
[1] 田婧,马社强,宋现敏,赵丹,陈发城. 稀疏数据下的交通状态估计自适应卷积网络[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2025, 55(8): 2579-2587.
[2] 曹洁,苏广,张红,李鹏辉. CapsNet融合D-BiLSTM的区域复杂路网交通速度预测[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2024, 54(9): 2531-2539.
[3] 白琳,刘林军,李轩昂,吴沙,刘汝庆. 基于自监督学习的单目图像深度估计算法[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2023, 53(4): 1139-1145.
[4] 赵宏伟,张健荣,朱隽平,李海. 基于对比自监督学习的图像分类框架[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(8): 1850-1856.
[5] 周大可,张超,杨欣. 基于多尺度特征融合及双重注意力机制的自监督三维人脸重建[J]. 吉林大学学报(工学版), 2022, 52(10): 2428-2437.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!